Sikh Harassed in Pakistan - Social Experiment

[Brij Ray]

Sau chuhey khake billi haj ko chali...

Allow us to bring the muzzie population in India down to less than 1%. Then we will also make such videos....."Muzzie harrased in India a social experiment".

 

[raheel besharam]

pakis do have soft corner for sikhs because of khalistan separatism and they deliberately do such acts to lure sikhs.

Nowdays u when u go to wagha border u see a pakistani token sardar in rangers dress, a token sardar is also planning to come in pakistani cricket team (he will see same fate as danish kaneria).

 

[vinuzap]

they even don't know sardar bana singh was the chief architect of siachin victory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bana_Singh

http://www.hindustantimes.com/india...-bana-singh/story-XqpPeQt2GRJNKcmL3TjDKK.html


this is what called revenge naming battlefield from quaid-e-azam to bana


http://www.thesundayindian.com/en/story/from-quaid-to-bana/7/47831/

It was at the icy heights of Siachen in 1987 that a young JAK LI soldier, Bana Singh, achieved what till then was considered unimaginable. He was part of the 8 JAK LI’s Special Operations Group (SOG) completing its glacier tenure.

To launch an assault in oxygen-depleted rarefied air is considered near suicidal but the Quaid post – situated at an altitude of 21,153 feet - was strategically important to observe nearly 80 km of territory around it. It gave Pakistanis, its then occupants, an edge of not just preventing supplies to other Indian posts but also of interdicting any movement with precise firing.

Its capture, therefore, became important for the Indian Army. Naib Subedar Bana Singh, hand-picked for this challenging assignment, led the last attack along with riflemen Chunni Lal, Laxman Das, Om Raj and Kashmir Chand. A force of 62 people participated to the final operation; two officers, three JCO’s and 57 jawans.

Remembers Bana Singh, "we were losing friends every day, some of them just a few days after their induction into the force. Our Commanding Officer and all of us were determined to throw the Pakistanis out, whatever the price.’’Two decades after his inspired heroism in those chilling heights, Subedar Major (Honorary Captain) Bana Singh, Param Vir Chakra (PVC), has sent his son to defend the frontiers in Kashmir.

Born in 1949 in Kadyal district of Jammu, Bana Singh was awarded the Param Vir Chakra, the highest wartime gallantry medal in India, for conspicuous bravery and leadership under most adverse conditions.

“Operation Rajiv” as this operation was named, resulted in various awards: one Maha Vir Chakra (for Subedar Sansar Singh), seven Vir Chakras and one Sena Medal, besides the PVC. Bana Singh later declined an offer of Rs 25 lakh, 25 acres of land and a pension of Rs 15, 000 a month if he decided to settle in Punjab. Singh’s belief: as a proud soldier of Jammu and Kashmir, he could not leave the state, no matter how strong the allurement.

The other hero of the party that took Quaid was late Naib Subedar Chuni Lal, winner of Ashok Chakra, Vir Chakra and the Sena Medal.

Chuni Lal was born in Doda’s Bhadarwah tehsil in 1968. He joined JAK LI in 1984. Within three years of his service he earned a Sena Medal for his death-defying act in capturing Bana Post alongside the legendary Bana.
Not the one to sit on his laurels, in 1999 while serving with his unit in the Poonch Sector during ‘Operation Rakshak’ he and his unit were instrumental in beating back an attempted intrusion by the Pakistan Army and for this act of gallantry he was awarded the Vir Chakra.

Chuni Lal died in a fierce firefight with militants in Kupwara district on June 25, 2007. ``He was short but his courage exemplary,'' remembers Bana of his comrade. In true tradition, Bana's son Rajinder Singh and Chuni's son Manveer Singh too have joined JAK LI. Perfectly understandable.

 

[vinuzap]

https://www.dawn.com//1188236news

(4300 pakistani hindu and sikh got indian citizenship in 2015 according to pakistan only )

Pakistani Minorities Want to become Indian Citizens; Minister Reveals Figures in Parliament


2016, as per information available on this ministry’s IVFRT (Immigration, Visa and Foreigners Registration and Tracking) online module, more than 12,800 applications for Long Term Visa and more than 1,200 applications for grant of citizenship to Pakistan minorities have been received across the country, including Chhattisgarh,” the Minister told the Rajya Sabh

“The Ministry of Home Affairs has sensitised the States/UT administrations to expedite the processing of LTV applications from Pakistan nationals and upload all applications for grant of LTV online only on IVFRT module for speedy processing,” Rijiju said in a written reply.

“As regards grant of Indian Citizenship to Pakistani minority migrants, the Ministry of Home Affairs has delegated the powers to grant Indian Citizenship to District Magistrate of 16 districts of seven States,” he added.

May be Min Rajnath Singh was correct in saying that Pakistan should hold a referendum to find out how many people in Pakistan would prefer to be Indians instead of asking for one in Kashmir.

 

[vinuzap]

http://english.alarabiya.net/en/News/2017/02/08/1-200-Pakistanis-apply-for-Indian-citizenship.html




1,200 Pakistanis apply for Indian citizenship

The flags of India (L) and Pakistan (R)
By AlArabiya.netWednesday, 8 February 2017
Text size A A A
More than 1,000 Pakistani people applied for Indian citizenship in 2016 according to India’s Minister of State for Home Affairs, Kiren Rijiju.

“More than 12,800 applications for long term visa and more than 1,200 applications for grant of citizenship to Pakistani minorities have been received across the country,” the minister said on Wednesday.

Under the Indian Passport and Foreigners Act, Hindus and Sikhs from Bangladesh and Pakistan who have entered India on the basis of religious persecution on or before December 31 were allowed to stay in the country.

According to Rijiju, a number of Pakistani Hindus and Sikhs who entered India on pilgrimage visas have not returned to Pakistan on the grounds of religious persecution.

The minister added that all citizenship applications have been delegated to the district magistrates at the seven states were the applications were made.

 

[F-14B]

That is why i love my Country <3 .....

I thought you are going out because we are typical dirty hindu

 

[Hemu Vikram Aditya]

That is why i love my Country <3 .....

You love a country which persécutés all minorities yet in BHARAT you want us to treat them
same
Ohhh the Irony

 

[vinuzap]

in pakistan daily 1984 happens, @jihadi indian is much more diverse with much more population and even has more muslims than pakistan and sardar manmohan was previous prime minister

do you know what your passport says about ahmadiyas

you know who was sayed ahmad bugati the baloch

biggest genocide was of bengalis committed by pakistan army

jinnah's daughter was evenlabelled raw agent

zulfiqar was hanged , you know who is founder of lahore in terms of construction?

http://shiapost.com/2016/07/04/shia-genocideover-1200-shias-killed-in-3-years-in-paksitan-report/
Shia Genocide: Over 1200 Shias killed in 3 years in Pakistan:

Report
July 4, 2016 Comments Offon Shia Genocide: Over 1200 Shias killed in 3 years in Pakistan: Report


It is difficult to believe but true that Pakistan, a country created for Muslims, for Sunnis and Shias alike, has today become a nightmare for millions of Shias living there. A well-known writer and a member of the famous political family in Pakistan, Fatima Bhutto, said the country had become a “country of ghosts“ for minorities, especially for Shias.

In a May 2016, a report came forth from the Jinnah Institute run by an equally well known writer and political leader, Sherry Rehman.

The institute pointed out that Shia muslims in the country have been victims of rising levels of violence in the recent past. The report puts the number of Shias killed in various violent acts to be over 1900 between 2012 and 2015.

To quote the report: “There has been an upsurge in attacks against Shia Muslims in Peshawar, Rawalpindi and southern Punjab…The Shia Muslims have been …. besieged for a very long time as violence has grown in some parts of Pakistan, particularly in Quetta, Karachi and north of the country…

Pakistan is home to 40 million Shias, the second largest concentration after Iran. Most of them have been living in their traditional home even before the Partition. But they have been facing systematic discrimination and repression a few years after the creation of Pakistan.

But now Pakistan is become a scene of war and violence with militant groups actively operating here.

The institutes’ report suggests that Shias, among other minorities, have been the victims of gravest religious violence in Pakistan in the last three years. In this period, there have been at least 23 targeted attacks on religious places of Shias and over 200 targeted killings of Shias in the country. These killings and attacks have been most in Punjab and Sindh but have also been reported from other provinces.

In Balochistan, anti-Shia messaging in public space has been on the rise. In Khyber Pakthunkhwa, violence is driving Shias out of the province to safer areas. The most serious attack on Shias took place in May 2015 in Karachi when assailants sprayed bullets on a bus packed with Shias and other minorities.

In the past a faction was subjugated in the same fashion, Ahmadis, the first ones to be targeted. Merely six years after Pakistan was created, Sunnis under state patronage began first intimidating and then openly attacking Ahmadis and their religious places. The violence unleashed by the Sunnis, supported by the state political and military leadership, culminated in widespread riots and arson in Lahore. The Ahmadis since then have been officially marginalised, prohibited from visiting mosques, offering prayers in public and discriminated in all possible spheres of life.

The targeting of Ahmadis was a long-term project of the state to divide any other faction but Sunni, later to, then destroy their faith. The process got a decisive boost when military dictator Zia-ul Haq took reins of power and began converting Pakistan into a fundamentalist Sunni state, a U-turn from what the country’s founding fathers had conceived. Zia’s fundamentalist plan however misfired when Shias and other minorities strongly protested and came out into the streets.

Nonetheless, Ahmedis were declared Non-Muslims with a segregation in their ID cards and Passport. This is what the state desires of all other factions in Pakistan, a Takfiri State.
Shias were taught a lesson for challenging Zia’s authority, as he sponsored a rabidly anti-Shia Sunni group called Anjuman Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan which later on spawned an armed extremist group known as Lashkar-e-Jhangvi (LeJ). This armed group, with a stated agenda of targeting Shias, became the recruitmentagency for terrorist groups like al Qaeda, the Taliban, LeT, JeM and various other extremist groups based in Pakistan and Afghanistan.

Zia-created anti-Shias indulged in targeted killings of Shia professionals with immunity in all major cities across Pakistan. The Sunni group became so powerful that its leaders were courted by the political leaders of all parties and the military and police were wary of their close relationship with terrorist groups which also targeted Pakistan’s military and security personnels at times.

 

[Hemu Vikram Aditya]

1984 . plz quote any such incident happen here .

https://www.dawn.com/news/1130271
http://www.dailyo.in/politics/pakis...s-conversion-karachi-sindh/story/1/11153.html

 

[Villager]

1984 . plz quote any such incident happen here .

Let's talk on topic. Tell me about your history. How long has it been since you converted? It's unlikely that you converted in 7th century.

So when did the first conversion in your family took place? When and who was the first member to be assaulted in your family after which you converted? Do you keep a record of your family history?

 

[Hemu Vikram Aditya]

Dailyo.in . not an indian source

It has references unlike paki websites which bring out facts from their ass

Dont know exactly but thank god my forefathers are sane enough that they stop worshipping flying monkey etc

But INsane enough to worship a pedophile

 

[vinuzap]

insulting flying money and need blasphemous law to support allah because he is weak

Pakistan's blasphemy laws carry a potential death sentence for anyone who insults Islam. Critics say they have been used to persecute minority faiths and unfairly target minorities.

When do the laws date from?
The offences relating to religion were first codified by India's British rulers in 1860, and were expanded in 1927. Pakistan inherited these laws when it came into existence after the partition of India in 1947.

Between 1980 and 1986, a number of clauses were added to the laws by the military government of General Zia-ul Haq. He wanted to "Islamicise" them and also legally to separate the Ahmadi community, declared non-Muslim in 1973, from the main body of Pakistan's overwhelmingly Muslim population.

What do the laws say?
The law enacted by the British made it a crime to disturb a religious assembly, trespass on burial grounds, insult religious beliefs and intentionally destroy or defile a place or an object of worship. The maximum punishment under these laws ranges from one year to 10 years in jail, with or without a fine.

During the 1980s the blasphemy laws were created and expanded in several instalments. In 1980, making derogatory remarks against Islamic personages was made an offence, carrying a maximum punishment of three years in jail.

In 1982, another clause prescribed life imprisonment for "wilful" desecration of the Koran, the Muslim holy book. In 1986, a separate clause was inserted to punish blasphemy against the Prophet Muhammad and the penalty recommended was "death, or imprisonment for life", in that order.

Who is affected by the laws?
Image captionChristians Shama (L) and Shehzad (R) were accused of desecrating the Koran and killed by a mob
The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) - a voluntary organisation - has been documenting blasphemy cases for decades. It says that Muslims constitute the majority of those booked under these laws, closely followed by the Ahmadi community.

Data provided by National Commission for Justice and Peace (NCJP) shows a total of 633 Muslims, 494 Ahmedis, 187 Christians and 21 Hindus have been accused under various clauses of the blasphemy law since 1987.

The vast majority of these cases were lodged for desecration of the Koran - far fewer for blasphemy against the Prophet Muhammad.

Critics say the fact that minorities figure so prominently in the cases shows how the laws are unfairly applied. Often the laws are used to settle personal scores and have little or nothing to do with religion.

Correspondents say the mere accusation of blasphemy is enough to make someone a target for hardliners, as is defending those accused of blasphemy or calling for the laws to be reformed.

Do most Pakistanis support the laws?
A large majority of Pakistani people support the idea that blasphemers should be punished, but there is little understanding of what the religious scripture says as opposed to how the modern-day law is codified.

Many believe the law, as codified by the military regime of General Zia-ul Haq back in the 1980s, is in fact straight out of the Koran and therefore is not man-made.

When Punjab Governor Salman Taseer - a prominent critic of the law - was assassinated by his bodyguard in 2011, Pakistan was divided, with some hailing his killer as a hero.

Why do the authorities not amend them?
Image captionSalman Taseer, the Punjab governor who tried to reform the laws, was assassinated in 2011
Amending the blasphemy laws has been on the agenda of nearly all the popular secular parties. But none of them has made much progress - principally because of the sensitivities over the issue, but also because no major party wants to antagonise the religious parties.

A month after Salman Taseer was killed, Religious Minorities Minister Shahbaz Bhatti, a Christian who spoke out against the laws, was shot dead in Islamabad, underlining the threat faced by critics of the law.

In 2010, a member of the ruling Pakistan People's Party (PPP), Sherry Rehman, introduced a private bill to amend the blasphemy law. Her bill sought to change procedures of religious offences so that they would be reported to a higher police official and the cases heard directly by the higher courts.

The bill was passed on to a parliamentary committee for vetting. It was withdrawn in February 2011 under pressure from religious forces as well as some opposition political groups.

Related Topics

 

[Bornubus]

Dont know exactly but thank god my forefathers are sane enough that they stop worshipping flying monkey etc

So how did Muhammad split the moon and what is Djinn, flying Horses like Baraq ?

 

[asingh10]

Not as much as Ass kissing and boot shining as your kind displayed when you converted to Islam. Some for favours others in just fear.




And Musalman too sided with the British and duly rewarded for their Ass kissing.

Most colonial anthro accounts heap praises on Muslims (particularly Punjabi Muslims) as useful idiots for the Raj. Also, many accounts of Muslim leaders and thinkers from Sir Syed Ahmed to Muslim eaguers praising the British Raj. Documented it here :-

http://defenceforumindia.com/forum/...kistan-partition-of-india.74768/#post-1116597


Secret Affairs: Britain's Collusion with Radical Islam by Mark Curtis details it out at length in his book how Brits fathered Pakistan because of the region's geostratergic importance to counter USSR.

The British were trying to secure the interests of the Empire against Stalin after their departure from India.

"‘The Indus Valley, western Punjab and Baluchistan [the northwest] are vital to any strategic plans for the defence of [the] all-important Muslim belt …[and] the oil supplies of the Middle East … If the British Commonwealth and the United States of America are to be in a position to defend their vital interests in the Middle East, then the best and most stable area from which to conduct this defence is from Pakistan territory. Pakistan [is] the keystone of the strategic arch of the wide and vulnerable waters of the Indian Ocean’."

- A British Memorandum dated May 19, 1948

If Jinnah is regarded as the father of Pakistan, Churchill must qualify as its uncle... - Tunzelmann

Off course you will resist English culture, education etc because you are backward Musalman following the most primitive medieval Arab religion that's why your kind still lack scientific temper and treated badly in western countries. For a civilized men It's an insult to take a Muslim as his friend. You don't want to tell me te the reasons lol


Hindus on the other hand were always adaptive and open to the wisdon and Knowledge of the world. That's why Hindus were always employed by the Ruling class be it Central Asians or British. Hindus were Governor, administrator, Artist but was the worth of Musalman from present day Pak ?


Even scholars from your so called "Islamic Age" lived here for years gaining the Indian knowledge. Abu Mashir Al Balkhi was lived in Banaras for 10 years to study.

Muslims are at the bottom of the barrel pretty much every where. They keep spinning up conspiracy theories like "hindus or jews are holding us back" to comfort themselves.

Case in point is UK where Pakistanis and Bangladeshis have the lowest income levels and highest share in poverty levels :-

" In 2015, Pakistani and Bangladeshi communities were the most likely to be in ‘persistent poverty’, followed by Black African and Black Caribbean communities."

http://www.irr.org.uk/research/statistics/poverty/


Indians (Hindus and Sikhs) oth are considered model minorities everywhere with highest education and income levels, has nothing to do with "ass licking". It's just being cultured and having a better work ethic. Pakistanis for all their pretensions of piety and religiosity indulge in anti-social activities like terrorism, creating shariah zones, drug dealing and grooming when abroad.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...sh-Indians-a-remarkable-story-of-success.html

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/09/30/5-facts-about-indian-americans/

 

[Villager]

Dont know exactly but thank god my forefathers are sane enough that they stop worshipping flying monkey etc

Are you trying to be insulting? Is there anything that Islam taught you to do rightly except being retard?

Okay okay, not to be rude. Let's get back on topic again. It's unfortunate that you don't remember anything exactly but your answer is giving the impression that you have a little idea of when, please share. Even if you don't remember the first account of assault, you can share the second or third assault/conversions. Or maybe you can ask your family members, they might remember. After all, it's your family history, you ought to find, learn and know all that is there to know. So start again.

 

[asingh10]

And all this noise about Sikhs supporting Brits in 1857, Punjabi Muslims being the good coolies they were for the raj played a pivotal role in suppressing the revolt as well. Atleast the Sikhs fought 3 Anglo-Sikh wars prior to 1857 and contributed later on to the freedom movement in a big way. Just see the Sikh numbers in Bose's Indian national army, the same army that Muslims betrayed and sided with Brits btw citing religious reasons (Turks had joined the WW2 in favor of allies).

 

[Bornubus]

And all this noise about Sikhs supporting Brits in 1857, Punjabi Muslims being the good coolies they were for the raj played a pivotal role in suppressing the revolt as well. Atleast the Sikhs fought 3 Anglo-Sikh wars prior to 1857 and contributed later on to the freedom movement in a big way. Just see the Sikh numbers in Bose's Indian national army, the same army that Muslims betrayed and sided with Brits btw citing religious reasons (Turks had joined the WW2 in favor of allies).

And that's why no one trust these Musalman especially Punjabi Musalman. These same low life who are showing their fake love for sikhs were begging the Afghans and foreign Islamic rulers to liberate them from Kafir Sikhs.


And many of these consider sayyed Ahmad Barelvi as a martyr who decapitated head was impaled on a spear by an ordinary Sikh soldier.

 

[aakash_2410]

If this is true then, why didn't Muslims of north western British India whole heartedly reject '2 nation theory' and why were Sikhs and Hindus murdered en masse after the independence?

If there Muslims didn't have a problem living with Hindus and Sikhs then what was the need of Pakistan in the first place.

 

[south block]

@Bornubus lol that was brutal......