Shyama Mukherjee, Nehru and Sheikh Abdullah on Autonomy for J&K

Discussion in 'Politics & Society' started by ejazr, Aug 9, 2010.

  1. ejazr

    ejazr Stars and Ambassadors Stars and Ambassadors

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    4,518
    Likes Received:
    1,378
    Location:
    Hyderabad and Sydney
    Leaf from the past
    Nehru-Abdullah-Mukherjee Formula on Kashmir


    HISTORY BY BALRAJ PURI
    Smaller Default Larger

    As Kashmir is on boil today,various solutions are being offered. The latest is being that of senior Bharatiya Janata Party(BJP) leader L.K. Advani who on July 6 said “if Nehru could have accepted the views of Shyama Prasad Mukherjee, the founder of the Bharatiya Jana Sangh then the crown of Himalayas may not have been disturbed.” Advani added that the thought and foresight of Mukherjee were very important but due to Nehru's 'wrong policies,' the condition in the Kashmir valley was very precarious today.

    Advani presumes that Mukherjee was against the autonomy and was for full merger of the state into the Indian union, and if it would have been accepted then the subsequent troubles in Kashmir valley would have been avoided. On the contrary, J&K chief minister, Omar Abdullah traces the current problems of Kashmir valley to the failure of the federal government to restore the full autonomy of the state. Now it will be worthwhile to understand what Mukherjee actually stood for. Though he did enter the state to support the demand of the Praja Parishad, Jammu affiliate of the Jana Sangh, for ek pradhan, ek nishan and ek vidhan (one president, one flag and one constitution), finally he came to the contrary conclusion.

    Shyama Prasad’s prolonged triangular correspondence with Nehru and Sheikh Abdullah on the status of the State, which was published at that time by the party, is the most authentic evidence of his stand on the issue. In his letter dated January 9, 1953 to both of them, for instance, he wrote: “We would readily agree to treat the valley with Sheikh Abdullah as the head in any special manner and for such time as he would like but Jammu and Ladakh must be fully integrated with India.” While Nehru rejected the idea straightway warning against its repercussions in Kashmir and its international implications, Abdullah sent a detailed reply in which he, inter alia, said. “You are perhaps not unaware of the attempts that are being made by Pakistan and other interested quarters to force a decision for disrupting the unity of the State. Once the ranks of the State people are divided, any solution can be foisted on them.”

    Finally, the prolonged correspondence is concluded with Dr. Mukerjee’s letter to Pandit Nehru on February 17, 1953, in which he suggested.

    1. “Both parties reiterate that the unity of the State will be maintained and that the principle of autonomy will apply to the province of Jammu and also to Ladakh and Kashmir Valley.

    2. Implementation of Delhi agreement—which granted special status to the State—will be made at the next session of Jammu and Kashmir Constituent Assembly.”

    Nehru replied that proposal for autonomy to the three provinces had been agreed by him and Abdullah in July 1952. If Mukerjee had realised his mistake, he should withdraw the agitation unconditionally. Mukerjee was unwilling to do it as it amounted to surrender. The deadlock prolonged over some way which could provide, what may be called, a face saving to the Jana Sangh.

    However, after sudden death of Mukerjee, Nehru made an appeal to the people of Jammu to withdraw their agitation as their demand for regional autonomy had been conceded. The State government endorsed the appeal on July 2, when Praja Parishad leaders were released who went to Delhi where they met Nehru on July 3. Thus the Praja Parishad agitation was withdrawn on the assurance of regional autonomy and immediate implementation of the Delhi Agreement.

    Meanwhile the State government had sent a 45 page draft on regional autonomy to Durga Dass Verma, the underground dictator of the Parishad agitation. He returned it with approval after consulting the constitutional experts that were available to him.

    If the final agreement on autonomy of the State within India and regional autonomy to the three regions within the State, had been implemented, there might not have been any Kashmir problem by now. At any rate the perpetual tension between the regions, which in Jammu often takes a communal form while in Kashmir it assumes anti-India form, might have ended.

    But there are number of ifs and buts. One factor which prevented its implementation was that Praja Parishad and Jana Sangh backed out of it. According to Balraj Madhok, who later on became the president of the Jana Sangh, the party withdrew its commitment to the State autonomy and regional autonomy under the directive from Nagpur (the RSS headquarters).The party continued a ceaseless campaign against regional autonomy and Article 370.

    BJP, the principal opposition of the country, is against any change in the status quo of the state. It does have an importance in the context of easing the situation in the troubled state, while the views of Omar Abdullah as chief minister and the leader of the National Conference, the prominent mainstream party of the Kashmir valley, can also not be ignored. Let the two parties along with the Congress led UPA revisit Nehru, Sheikh Abdullah and Mukherjee’s agreement in 1953. This may help in seeking a possible solution to the Kashmir issue. Or at least a step forward towards that.

    (Balraj Puri is Director, Institute of Jammu and Kashmir affairs, Karan Nagar Jammu. He can be reached at www.humanrightsjournal.com)
     
  2.  
  3. JBH22

    JBH22 Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2010
    Messages:
    3,620
    Likes Received:
    2,390
    yeah let's grant them autonomy this would please and give enemy propaganda more venom to spew that they are right in their struggle.UPA thank you after 1 partition you people are slowly but surely setting the ground for further partition.thanks waitress

    BJP to Oppose any Bid for Grant of Autonomy to J&K
    http://news.outlookindia.com/item.aspx?689881
     
  4. SHASH2K2

    SHASH2K2 New Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2010
    Messages:
    5,711
    Likes Received:
    723
    Location:
    Bihar, BanGalore , India
    This Entire mess in Kashmir is one more failure of Congress or Jawaharlal Nehru. As mentioned in article Shyama prasad Mukherjee was against this special status for J&K . He also protected it asn was jailed later . Rumors are that he was killed/ or died under mysterious circumstances. I think he sensed his death thats why he sent back Atal Bihari Bajpeyee . When he started his march for J&K to protect ABB was also with him but was sent back . May be shyama prasad mukerjee felt that he may loose his life in this.
     
  5. ajtr

    ajtr Veteran Member Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    12,038
    Likes Received:
    715
    Even if GOI is thinking of autonomy then let it divide the state first Why should patriotic indians of Jammu and Laddak suffer by clubbing them with Valley people.Make these two reasons separate fron Valley and convert valley into security state by covering it from all side by army on its borders.Let valley stew in its own juice like pakistan.
     
  6. ajtr

    ajtr Veteran Member Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    12,038
    Likes Received:
    715
    GOI must not give even single paisa to valley.better spend that money in jammu and laddak.
     
  7. SHASH2K2

    SHASH2K2 New Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2010
    Messages:
    5,711
    Likes Received:
    723
    Location:
    Bihar, BanGalore , India
    I donot understand why this Autonomy issue surfaced once again. I feel for those poor soilders who lost life for a cause called Kashmir . They will all feel betrayed. This Entire Kashmir and its special status is a gift by congress and they just They just want to increase our pain by giving us another Gift ie autonomy of Kashmir.
    Good Job MMS and Madam Sonia.
     
  8. SHASH2K2

    SHASH2K2 New Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2010
    Messages:
    5,711
    Likes Received:
    723
    Location:
    Bihar, BanGalore , India
    Shyama Prasad was arrested on entering Kashmir in May 11, 1953. Thereafter, he was jailed in a dilapidated house. Shyama Prasad had suffered from dry pleurisy and coronary troubles, and was taken to hospital one and a half months after his arrest due to complications arising from the same. He was administered penicillin despite having informed the doctor-in-charge of his allergy to penicillin, and he died on May 23, 1953.

    His death in custody raised wide suspicion across the country and demands for independent enquiry were raised, including earnest requests from his mother, Jogmaya Devi, to Jawaharlal Nehru. Nehru declared that he had enquired from a number of persons who were privy to the facts and, according to him, there was no mystery behind Mookerjee's death. Jogmaya Devi did not accept Nehru's reply and requested the setting up of an impartial enquiry. Nehru however ignored the letter and no enquiry commission was set up. Mookerjee's death therefore remains a matter of some controversy.[3]


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syama_Prasad_Mookerjee
     
  9. ejazr

    ejazr Stars and Ambassadors Stars and Ambassadors

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    4,518
    Likes Received:
    1,378
    Location:
    Hyderabad and Sydney
    The point being addressed here is not wether autonomy is given or not but the fact that Mukherjee also eventually supported the autonomy proposal in principle. The correspondence he had with Nehru and the discussions with Abdullah are cited.

    Hence:

    Finally, the prolonged correspondence is concluded with Dr. Mukerjee’s letter to Pandit Nehru on February 17, 1953, in which he suggested.

    1. “Both parties reiterate that the unity of the State will be maintained and that the principle of autonomy will apply to the province of Jammu and also to Ladakh and Kashmir Valley.

    2. Implementation of Delhi agreement—which granted special status to the State—will be made at the next session of Jammu and Kashmir Constituent Assembly.”
     

Share This Page