Discussion in 'Subcontinent & Central Asia' started by Armand2REP, Mar 9, 2013.
Should India Rebuild Adam's (Rama) Bridge?
Adam's Bridge - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
We would require high-end technical assistance to do such a project. Which can only be provided by France.
Help India please France, please. Oh dear god France. Adam's bridge needs uuuuuuuuuuu.
What does France have to do with it? It is for India-Lanka transport.
Oh dear god, Armand2REP is saying France won't help.
Actually France has experience building such transport
Channel Tunnel - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
We won't need to go under the sea. We can actually build a long bridge or viaduct. India has the capability, and the money. The question is its commercial feasibility.
For what . i mean purpose of such bridge ????
^^Purpose is the realization of the wet dreams of Hindu religious fanatics.
Ok it should be built with a gate for ship crossing but how much traffic and tourists it will attract?
Plus put your own money............
no it should not. We have so much trouble with India even without road access.
it should not be built as it will effect the most precious coral reef in & around that area. It will change the whole ecosystem.
ONLY the ancient bridge which is also known as Ram Setu has
religious and sentimental value for Hindus
And right now there is a plan to clear it and make the
Sethusamudram shipping canal project
NOBODY has asked for a new bridge
If a new bridge is made what purpose will it serve
Indian tourists visiting SL will not use it ; the sea will be permanently blocked
Sir, you're a state in the union, so no choice, soon France will help inshallah.
Sethusamudram canal project should be cancelled as it is the only visible proof about Ramayana. Destroying this will not only hurt Majority Hindus but also whole ecosystem in & around the area. Coral reefs are very important in the ecosystem of the sea.
Also it is a very shallow area as the depth ranges from 3feet to 30feet & only very small to medium( low) range of ships & boat can traverse. It is very expensive to maintain the canal because it involves silt & this silt needs to cleared every once in 2 months for ship movement. This is not at all a viable option economically as well as ecologically.
Only gain for the current government would be to hurt the majorities Hindus & showcase themselves as secular. Pachauri committee reportâ€Ž also recommends the same but this government wants to go ahead.
So India can have mass transport to annex the island.
how long is the "bridge" pls save my time browsing wiki
Sent from my 5910 using Tapatalk 2
As far as I can tell by reading about it, the bridge was never an actual engineered bridge.
Yeah then we will give it to France ie give Sri Lanka to France ; as a payment for RAFALE
Separate names with a comma.