pmaitra
Senior Member
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2009
- Messages
- 33,262
- Likes
- 19,594
Firstly, I provided two scenarios, transportation of mineral ore and ore concentrate. Either way, Aussie ore is cheaper. Pick any one you like.My math is alrite but your assumption in doing the math is not. Transportation cost is not based on the concentration of the ore and the distance. But your point only proves that because Aussies are the ones to go with because of better quality of theory ore.
Secondly, I can't agree with you that transportation cost is not based on distance because, as usual, you have not backed it up with any figures. That is where your math went wrong.
My point does not say that we should go with Aussie ore for better quality. I said that transportation costs with Aussie ore will be cheaper because:
- In case of mineral ore, due to (1) better quality and (2) shorter distance (the point you keep ignoring each time)
- In case of ore concentrate, due to (1) shorter distance (again, the point you keep ignoring each time)