Russia's new aircraft carrier programme

Discussion in 'Europe and Russia' started by icecoolben, Nov 10, 2009.

?

What path would russia take to realise their ambitions of carrier capable navy?

Poll closed Aug 6, 2012.
  1. nuclear propelled carrier at st.petersberg shipyard

    62.3%
  2. <60,000 tons conventional ships at sevmash

    15.1%
  3. Reviving soviet's oriel project and working with ukraine

    1.9%
  4. Joining india's project 71 vikrant class carriers of 40 k ton disp

    20.8%
  1. icecoolben

    icecoolben Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2009
    Messages:
    472
    Likes Received:
    4
    With india and china poised for a leap in carrier aviation in the coming decades the russians would not want to fall behind. Though that rheotic has upped recently, nothing concrete has come out so far. Lets pool the forum's knowledge regarding the programme, it would be ideal to start a thread on this one,

    this is the chronology of russia's predecessor the soviet union's carrier programme
    A Brief Look at Russian Aircraft Carrier Development

    an initiative to build carriers
    Baird Maritime | Russia places aircraft carrier newbuild programme at forefront

    the imperative for a new carrier building programme New Nuclear Powered Aircraft Carrier

    the russian capacity and options/means to accomplish this end of building&operating fixed wing aircraft for forward deployment groups and the accompanying flotia and submarines Russia set to build new aircraft carrier | Top Russian news and analysis online | 'RIA Novosti' newswire
     
    indian_sukhoi likes this.
  2.  
  3. icecoolben

    icecoolben Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2009
    Messages:
    472
    Likes Received:
    4
    Members who see russian carrier programme as strategically unadviseable are also welcomed to post their views
     
  4. icecoolben

    icecoolben Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2009
    Messages:
    472
    Likes Received:
    4
  5. bengalraider

    bengalraider DFI Technocrat Stars and Ambassadors

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2009
    Messages:
    3,624
    Likes Received:
    2,027
    Location:
    in a fast food joint next to the imperial shipyard
    Russia stands a lot to gain from joining the Indian carrier project , for one future Indian carriers have been designed to operate much the same aircraft as the RN can hope to get , also the Indian carrier project has already been initiated joining this would let the Russians learn a lot about building a new carrier something they have not done for the last 20 odd yrs.
     
  6. icecoolben

    icecoolben Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2009
    Messages:
    472
    Likes Received:
    4
    the russian navy already operate the admiral kuznetzov a 65,000 ton disp carrier. Will they be willing to downgrade the capacity of power projection a larger carrier is capable of given the no of fixed wing aircraft able to operate from a carrier increases phenominally with its tonage. Eg- vikrant class can operate 30 mig-29-k. But the kitty hawk class double its displacement at 80,000 (max) could hold 90 hornets even 30 years ago. Would the russian navy compromise and scale down its power projection capability.
     
  7. bengalraider

    bengalraider DFI Technocrat Stars and Ambassadors

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2009
    Messages:
    3,624
    Likes Received:
    2,027
    Location:
    in a fast food joint next to the imperial shipyard
    My point was not about operating a carrier the Russians have been doing that with a fair amount of success for along time now what i was referring to was that the
    Admiral Flota Sovetskovo Soyuza Kuznetsov, was constructed at Nikolayev South Shipyard in Nikolayev, Ukrainian SSR,i.e the Russians have not built a carrier in Russian yards ever . all the carriers in the erstwhile soviet fleet were built at black sea port notably at Nikolayev in present day Ukraine, this was because the seas around this port did not get frozen in the winter something that has plagued and frustrated Russian naval ambitions forever. The Russians have only repaired existing aircraft carriers in their ports with mixed success(the admiral gorshkov being a case in point), a joint construction program with India would reduce costs and provide the Russians with a ready made design reducing development time.
    as far as the carrier being too small the future Indian carriers have been slated to have displacement of 60,000 tonnes+ i.e they will not be that small.
     
  8. amitkriit

    amitkriit Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2009
    Messages:
    2,465
    Likes Received:
    1,923
    Location:
    La La Land
    Indian can offer nothing substantial to Russia when it comes to expertise in defence platforms, including "Building A/Cs". Option 4 sounds corny to me.
     
  9. icecoolben

    icecoolben Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2009
    Messages:
    472
    Likes Received:
    4
    Even i'm with u. Given russian capabilities why would they join an indian led programme. But why u refer all russian media reports, think tank articles, journals on defence, you would find that the final choice they talk of as their strategy of building carrier aviation has always been getting expertise on the carrier being built by india in which russian experts have been closely cooperating, so the poll would not be comprehensive even void if that option had
    not been included.

    As another member has posted, former soviets had their carriers built in ukraine which had warm water ports that could be operated all round the year compared to st.petersberg and sevmash. But given india's own immediate needs of three carriers to counter chinese naval build up. I wonder if our cochin shipyard could be used. May be the laying of hull could be done in india and subsequent important works of basic ship building done here and the other electronic equipment integrated in Russian yards. Given russia's immediate needs another shipyard like vizagapatinam could be upgraded with russian assistance to build large ships of larger than 50k tonnage to build the hulls then after the project is completes one of the yards can be converted and upgraded to build oil tankers or other similar ships thats have displacements exceeding that of even the largest supercarriers.
     
  10. icecoolben

    icecoolben Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2009
    Messages:
    472
    Likes Received:
    4
    Will russian ultra-nationalism give way to pragmatism on defence purchases

    i agree with u, russia's most capable shipyard floped big time on goskov. But given russian nationalism of getting everything in-house and the overwhelming monetary outflow it would create by building in india, will russian politicians and public allow this, given this would be a chance to build such an infrastructure within russia itself. Many attemps with ukraine on building transports, ships have broken and political will completely evaporated after the color revolution and russia has turned even more in-ward. Though the decision to buy a french ship is a welcome broader thought, it has not gone through yet. In there lights, do u think russia would be willing to invest to build its ships in india.
     
  11. icecoolben

    icecoolben Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2009
    Messages:
    472
    Likes Received:
    4
    Vladimir-invited

    I would like to invite mr.vlad to share his knowledge on the topic, Since it wor in his initiative i stated this exclusively dedicated thread.

    we would be honoured, if all our russian friends in the forum contributed on the topic, as u would have exclusive local knowledge on the topic.
     
  12. bengalraider

    bengalraider DFI Technocrat Stars and Ambassadors

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2009
    Messages:
    3,624
    Likes Received:
    2,027
    Location:
    in a fast food joint next to the imperial shipyard
    Any governmental expense whether it is running a hospital or building a ship has political strings attached to it.The Russian government shall have to go through considerable amounts of opposition both from opposition parties and from members of the governing party in order to be able to build in India .I do not think Russia shall build any carrier or any other warship in India, any cooperation shall probably be limited to an exchange of knowledge and training to Russian ship building engineers, maybe the CSL could provide some consultancy to the Russians as well.
     
  13. icecoolben

    icecoolben Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2009
    Messages:
    472
    Likes Received:
    4
    The russians are saying in all media reports, politician interviews etc that they are already involved in the project and providing us expertise. Talking of us providing expertise, i don't get it.
     
  14. Vladimir79

    Vladimir79 Defence Professionals Defence Professionals

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2009
    Messages:
    1,404
    Likes Received:
    65
    I think the answer is pretty clear. We are buying licensed production of Mistral to get upgraded shipyards and access to latest marine engineering techniques and technology. We already know how to build a 1143.5 type carrier so successful points of design will be utilised, but will be infused with modifed French tech and new nuklear reactors. The real hard part will be building catapults, EM rails look like the best option.
     
  15. icecoolben

    icecoolben Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2009
    Messages:
    472
    Likes Received:
    4
    what about its propulsion, there are conflicting reports about it?
    Well how about few photographs of russian shipyards, atleast the one with goskov stationed
     
  16. sandeepdg

    sandeepdg Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2009
    Messages:
    2,333
    Likes Received:
    216
    Location:
    Gurgaon/Noida
    I don't understand what makes anyone think that the Russians would seek Indian help in building aircraft carriers ? They have a far advanced knowledge of ship building than we do, i think. Though nuclear powered carriers are new to them and they might have consult for external help to get on with that issue, but they are most capable of building conventional large carriers. About having ports capable of operating all round the year, now that's the main problem that has to be sorted out, although Ukraine will remain an option.
     
  17. icecoolben

    icecoolben Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2009
    Messages:
    472
    Likes Received:
    4
    the french were thinking of borrowing the british design. But that doesn't mean their capabilitiy is any less to the british. Rather than going through the process of tendering and selecting designs which are a time consuming and financial burden. Borrowing a design from india and impoving it to their own requirement would be a better choice than designing and building a carrier from scratch.
     
  18. AJSINGH

    AJSINGH Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2009
    Messages:
    1,237
    Likes Received:
    74
    Location:
    hyderabad
    i think India should invest in russian AC desgin ,we will later get help from russsians ,i am sure russians dont lack the technology but maybe some more finance can help them from india side
     
  19. Armand2REP

    Armand2REP CHINI EXPERT Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,397
    Likes Received:
    2,313
    The design that won the RN's CVF tender was made by Thales Group. Thales and BAE are in partnership building their carriers. That is why our PA2 is going to be of a similar design since we already developed it and have all the knowledge of the success and pitfalls of the British programme.

    As far as aiding Indian carrier design, Italy is already the lead contractor for that based on the Cavour experience of which IAC will be similar. If India wants to upscale to larger carriers, a partnership with Thales would be possible. Thales' experience with carrier design is about 30 years ahead of the Russians. I thought it was laughable when Sevmash said they had "lost" the blue prints for Gorshkov. I wouldn't turn to them for anything.
     
  20. notinlove

    notinlove Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2009
    Messages:
    466
    Likes Received:
    20
    Location:
    All i can do is be me, whoever that is.
    well ...
    when russia decides to build a new carrier it won't face much difficulty
    but bear in mind they wont do it right now because they are smart enough.
    1. about shipyards
    they have st petersburg which has already built 24000 ton kirov class and has the capability to build large civil vessels so it can do the job .(but i don't think they will do it there) because they are building a new 100,000 tonne capacity dry dock at sevmash which would be ideal for building the carrier
    2. Propulsion.
    They have nuclear propulsion in their kirov class cruisers and have built a fair amount of nuclear subs too . also their diesel propulsion system are good so propulsion shouldn't be that much of a challenge.
    3. they have built and designed large ships since ages. also getting designs from a foreign country is not that big a problem.

    now the two areas that they lack in are
    advanced building techniques and CATOBAR carriers . frankly i don't have any idea if they can do CATOBAR or not but i still remain optimistic that they can do it or get somebody to help them on it if they can't.
    now Advanced building techniques is their biggest Achilles Heel and that is why they are planning to buy 5 mistral class ships. they have said that they want to build 4 ships in their own shipyards. first they'll get expertise in building and then they will go around making their own carrier.
    according to me they will start building their new carrier only after they have completed a couple of mistral class ships but the design and configuration phase could start earlier.
     
  21. Armand2REP

    Armand2REP CHINI EXPERT Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,397
    Likes Received:
    2,313
    If Russia decides to build a new carrier they will face much difficulty, I will explain responding to your points.

    It took them 12 years just to complete their flagship. 90% of it was completed by 1991 and took another 7 years to finish the rest. St. Pete yards have zero experience building aviation cruisers. Those were built in No. 444 yard in Ukraine. Most of the designers, such as those on the Ulyanovsk, were Ukrainian and not likely to help again.

    Baltiysk Zavod already has a 100,000t drydock but they build one at Sevmash who has zero experience building large ships. It is a mismatch of skills that need to be fused.

    They would be better off going nuclear. They have far less problems with that than the conventional boilers. Kuznetsov's propulsion design was a disaster from day one as well as the Kyivs.

    "They" used to include Ukraine, now it doesn't. The largest ships they make are ice breakers but that was years ago. The cargo tonnage are far less. Their shipyards have become 3-5 times more costly to build than competitors with 95% of tonnage being built abroad. Shipyards are in bankruptcy and have lost most of their talent. It will be hard to overcome when designing a state of the art carrier, much less building one. The reason they are after Mistral is to get our shipbuilding technology which doesn't bode well for their homegrown industry.

    If they are willing to spend the money on CATOBAR they can get it.

    Very true, but Mistral is a far cry from a 60,000 tonne CVN. The time to take to absorb the technologies will be great and then to apply them on a bigger scale even longer.

    Agree with that, but this project is going to take far longer than projected dates. They plan to start construction in 2012 but they aren't even close to having the equipment or facilties for such a venture. When they absorb the Mistral production it will be almost 2014 until they get modern equipment and training. Translating that to Russian CVN construction will take several more years. I wouldn't even dream about seeing a Russian carrier before 2025.
     

Share This Page