Russia's air defenses: issues and problems

Discussion in 'Europe and Russia' started by Singh, Jun 20, 2009.

  1. Singh

    Singh Phat Cat Administrator

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2009
    Messages:
    20,305
    Likes Received:
    8,268
    Location:
    011
    MOSCOW. (RIA Novosti military commentator Ilya Kramnik) - Early this week, some media circulated a statement by General of the Army Anatoly Kornukov, the former commander-in-chief of the Russian Air Force. The general claims that the Moscow air defense system has failed to live up to its mission. Moreover, he says, Russian air defense forces lack capabilities to intercept tactical missiles, which pose one of the main threats to developed nations.

    As any statement of this kind, it contains a grain of truth, but not a full picture. To begin with, the present Moscow anti-ballistic missile system (A-135) was set up in the 1970s and 1999s to protect the Soviet capital against a large-scale nuclear strike.

    It was to be equipped with two types of anti-missile missiles. The first, the 51T6 (NATO reporting name Gorgon), was meant for long-range (exoatmospheric) interception of missiles at altitudes of 80 km to 100 km and a distance of over 600 km. The second, the 53T6 (Western reporting name Gazelle), was intended for close-range (endoatmospheric) interception at altitudes of 50 km and a distance of 350 km.

    The A-135 system was completed in the main by the mid-1980s. Successful tests confirmed the ability of anti-missiles to intercept ballistic targets, including such sophisticated ones as multiple individually targetable warheads. The A-135 firing systems, provided with a total of 100 anti-missile missiles, went on combat duty in 1995, following shakedown trials and workup.

    All missiles need target designation. So radars and satellites of the early warning system formed a key part of the Space Missile Defense Force, established in 1967. In the twenty years that followed, the Soviet Union deployed a network of radars able to detect ballistic missiles coming in from any direction. Early warning satellites were to pinpoint missile launches and send the information to command centers and ground detection facilities. Currently, radar information is collected by the Space Missile Defense Force command post and the Don-2N radar, which serves to guide intercepting missiles onto targets.

    Despite its capabilities, the Moscow air defense system is unable to deal with a large-scale nuclear strike. In fact, no country in the world - not even the United States - has such a system. The ultimate the Moscow system can do is to repulse a blow from second-tier nuclear powers - France, Britain, China and the "latest comers," such as India or Pakistan - or to intercept one-off and provocative launches. A bigger mission - to fight back a multiple strike from the U.S. - would fall short of missiles especially now that 51T6 endoatmospheric anti-missiles have been removed from operational status after they outlived their predicted life span.

    The remaining 53T6 missiles, according to specialists, have enough power to destroy lone ballistic missiles, all the way up from tactical to strategic. This gives hope that Moscow will be defended in a conflict with some second-tier country having a small number of such missiles.

    Still, trimmed as it is, the system makes Moscow the world's most protected city.

    On the other hand, Moscow and its environs are not the only target sought by Russia's potential opponents. To intercept missiles in other areas, outside the A-135 umbrella, S-300 and latest S-400 mobile surface-to-air missile systems can be used.

    In the S-300 family, there is a special S-300V series, designed to engage short- and medium-range ballistic missiles. In addition, S-300P systems, optimized to deal with aerodynamic targets, can also be used to intercept ballistic missiles, but with less effect.

    The S-400 system, which began to be deployed in 2007, combines the advantages of both families, while the long-range 40N6E missile, some sources claim, is capable of bringing down warheads of intercontinental ballistic missiles, if necessary.

    Currently, Russia's combined Air and Air Defense Forces have two battalions of S-400 surface-to-air systems, very much superior to the promising U.S. THAAD system, which is expected to be deployed this year. The rates of S-400 deployment are expected to quicken in the next few years. By 2015, the Air Defense Force must get 23 S-400 battalions, while in the longer term all existing air defense regiments, equipped with S-300 systems, will be refitted to S-400s.

    It should be remembered, however, that the best defense is to destroy hostile missiles before they are employed. Therefore, the defense of Moscow and all of Russia should be seen in the context of the armed forces in general, their combat readiness and proficiency, above all those armed services that can engage the opponent at long range and with high precision - the Strategic Missile Force, the Air Force and the Navy.

    The opinions expressed in this article are the author's and do not necessarily represent those of RIA Novosti.

    Russia's air defenses: issues and problems | Top Russian news and analysis online | 'RIA Novosti' newswire
     
  2.  
  3. rock45

    rock45 Founding Member/ RIP our friend

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2009
    Messages:
    152
    Likes Received:
    1
    .
    I thought one S-400 Battalion was in testing and how does one know its so superior to the THAAD system? I don't see Russia's level of techogy being so much better then the US in this area based on what the S-300 family? Were all suppose to belive the ranges and capabilities of there sale press releases on such a weapon? How much really produced and produced is the key word high tech weapons or equipment Russia has really made and deployed in the last ten years to believe such claims? From a country that had to send 30 year old cold war bombers as recon platform because they couldn't see a lousy 50 miles inside Georgia. And a country that must import UAV's and most likely copy them from Israel in 2009, sorry I don't buy into this at all without more proof.

    .
    Based on what on all the other programs and projects that have been finished on time and fielded already?


    Since the S-300 upgrade program is already late on production and sales for a number of clients I'm sure the S-400 will come in as plan and solve all of Russia's air defense needs.

    On a side note I wonder how many Russian S-300 systems are really operational? I'm sure replacement equipment, etc and personnel training is just flowing to these Russian SAM regiments.

    Any effective SAM system the outer layers still need air power for protection even the mighty Bear could be taken down if enough assets were applied. I know this wouldn't happen and nukes would come into play before Russia allowed chucks of their terroitory to be taken but in theory its doable. According to Russia's own press a whopping 12 new Flankers made it to their air force last year, I'm sure the Su-27M1 or M2 upgrade. Russia better be watching China next to them or one day the Chinese well be eyeing a certain pipeline in Alaska from across the Bering sea.
     
  4. LETHALFORCE

    LETHALFORCE Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2009
    Messages:
    20,364
    Likes Received:
    6,337
    If S-400 is comparable to THAAD why are Russians willing to sell it to Turkey a NATO nation and risk having the Americans get their hands on it?
     
  5. rock45

    rock45 Founding Member/ RIP our friend

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2009
    Messages:
    152
    Likes Received:
    1
    They still need other sources of funding to even produce such weapons or systems and NATO has better clients $$$$. Turkey has huge pipelines cutting through their country there worth billions of future and steady dollars and its a path that goes around Russia's own. There trying to draw Turkey to the dark side (a little star wars thrown in), it's more about long term oil and natural gas routes then trapped Russian fleets even.


     
  6. Zmey Smirnoff

    Zmey Smirnoff Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2009
    Messages:
    104
    Likes Received:
    0
    Because S-400 isnt the LAST S-XXX in existence. And to fund S-500 you need to sell S-400.

    Besides, it will be a downgraded model w/o longest range missiles.
     

Share This Page