offtopic,JayATL said:n fact lead the world is shininga light
what do you mean your are not advocating it . you said " Oh what a load of crap. Moral compass doesn't get you anywhere.". And economic and military power by itself makes you a china and look at the world's opinion of china. Look at its friends, IRAN, North Korea, Pakistan- pissing off 99% of its neighbors. Look how the world treats china besides trade... a recent article cited Japanese industries about moving its trade as a majority from china to India in the next 3 years because of china's military threats and attitude towards free developed nations.Strawman. I did not 'advocate' anything.
Actually, soft power backed by hard military+economic might and ability to convince the world that your viewpoint is the right one, sounds awfully close to the 'USA model'.
btw "Detaining inocent people" ? Guantánamo rings any bells?
Ummm yeah after they/you invaded the country and 'bombed it with democracy'. Pretty convenient eh?
I think I'm gonna puke right now
Again you're just cherry picking. I said power backed up by an ability to convince the world that your viewpoint is right. China's propaganda machinery sucks, it's good for it's citizens but no one outside China takes it seriously.JayATL said:And economic and military power by itself makes you a china and look at the world's opinion of china. Look at its friends, IRAN, North Korea, Pakistan- pissing off 99% of its neighbors. Look how the world treats china besides trade...look at what ta recent article cited Japanese industries about moving its trade as a majority from china to India because of china's military threat
Again you're just cherry picking. I said power backed up by an ability to convince the world that your viewpoint is right. China's propaganda machinery sucks, it's good for it's citizens but no one outside China takes it seriously.JayATL said:And economic and military power by itself makes you a china and look at the world's opinion of china. Look at its friends, IRAN, North Korea, Pakistan- pissing off 99% of its neighbors. Look how the world treats china besides trade...look at what ta recent article cited Japanese industries about moving its trade as a majority from china to India because of china's military threat
where is India when it's neighbor's citizenry in Myanmar and Tibet are being slaughtered or on the past LTTE issue? On one hand you talk about US interference and then on the other hand you ask for it to interfere. Yes , they supported Pakistan , just like USSR did India. It was a different geo political , cold war era. you could not have a more pro India stance than from the US right now.Again you're just cherry picking. I said power backed up by an ability to convince the world that your viewpoint is right. China's propaganda machinery sucks, it's good for it's citizens but no one outside China takes it seriously.
Iraq invasion already happened, no point rejecting it. It's not gonna bring those lives back
Read my previous post on American support when Pakistan was involved in the Bangladeshi genocide.
The documents were declassified later, wow America is so open and democratic right? It even declassified those docs !! Power to the people !!
But does that change the fact that in 1971 Americans overtly and covertly supported Pakistan ?!
Hehe do you think I go on the roads and burn US flags? I'm a realist, now USA and our interests align I support them...for the time being. However the USA is certainly not a 'shining beacon of light', it's good/bad as any other country (albeit with a good propaganda dept). I'm not emotional at all.JayATL said:If I / all were to follow your logic- then WHY DON"T you advocate an anti UK stance for India? They did more than send a ship, they screwed us, slaughtered us,robbed and plundered us to oblivion. This anti US bias is based on an emotional response, doing the very cherry picking you protest- to brand that country.
You're contradicting yourselfJayATL said:here is India when it's neighbor's citizenry in Myanmar and Tibet are being slaughtered or on the past LTTE issue? On one hand you talk about US interference and then on the other hand you ask for it to interfere.
Uh uh...You were going bonkers over the 'moral compass' etc. I am on the side of realpolitik NOT morality.Yes , they supported Pakistan , just like USSR did India. It was a different geo political , cold war era. you could not have a more pro India stance than from the US right now.
Hehe do you think I go on the roads and burn US flags? I'm a realist, now USA and our interests align I support them...for the time being. However the USA is certainly not a 'shining beacon of light', it's good/bad as any other country (albeit with a good propaganda dept). I'm not emotional at all.JayATL said:If I / all were to follow your logic- then WHY DON"T you advocate an anti UK stance for India? They did more than send a ship, they screwed us, slaughtered us,robbed and plundered us to oblivion. This anti US bias is based on an emotional response, doing the very cherry picking you protest- to brand that country.
You're contradicting yourselfJayATL said:here is India when it's neighbor's citizenry in Myanmar and Tibet are being slaughtered or on the past LTTE issue? On one hand you talk about US interference and then on the other hand you ask for it to interfere.
Uh uh...You were going bonkers over the 'moral compass' etc. I am on the side of realpolitik NOT morality.Yes , they supported Pakistan , just like USSR did India. It was a different geo political , cold war era. you could not have a more pro India stance than from the US right now.
dude , I was talking about the fact that since India wants to be in a leadership role and given its mandate now in the UNSC- taking on terrorism as that very mandate ( go read my original post) it is imperative that actions such as what was cited in the article here, continues to be the attitude of the GOI. You came in and called what I termed as the good showing of moral compass and authority of India as Crap, in relationship to being a leader in the world stage. Then you went on to cherry pick items of US disdain to challenge the moral compass of the US ( essentially calling it morally corrupt based on a few incidents or missteps vs its history, democratic principles and its people etc)Hehe do you think I go on the roads and burn US flags? I'm a realist, now USA and our interests align I support them...for the time being. However the USA is certainly not a 'shining beacon of light', it's good/bad as any other country (albeit with a good propaganda dept). I'm not emotional at all.
You're contradicting yourself
For the last time: my argument is self interest trumps all (Tibet is part of China btw), morality means squat. Well call keep telling the Myanmar junta about the benefits of democracy (which we did for quite a while) and watch them slowly slip away to China or....(you know the answer)
Remember your argument was about morality
Uh uh...You were going bonkers over the 'moral compass' etc. I am on the side of realpolitik NOT morality.
Killing Bangladeshis by the thousands= amoral, Supporting Pakistan=Geopolitics and self interest
Why is US pro India now? Because of great Indian morals and soft spiritual power? NO
1. It wants access to Indian markets
2. It wants to counter China
No shit Sherlock ( and I mean that in a lighthearted manner)- that showing a moral compass as shown by GOI on this incident is what I called as advocating for its self interest! you cant sit on a " anti terrorism board/mandate and ignore your own home grown terrorist" .For the last time: my argument is self interest trumps all
You hit a six, bhai. I am wondering myself as to whether we can trust this Con Party anymore or not before it leaves entire India nowhere around the world in terms of dignity and credibility. As such it took US 30 years to realize Pakistani hand in terrorist attacks in India and now we have a mud slinging game that is going on to gain political votebank as usual by the Con party.What is the credibility of the govt and its investigation agencies consideringhr variety of people who have been accused of perpetrating various acts of terror in this country.The central govt first blamed Pakistani terror outfit LET and their co Islamic terrorists based in indian and B'desh,the HuJi,this was declared so by the govt on the floor of the parliament,so much so even the United nations report quotes the govt on the same,and now we have the govt agencies coming up with a whole new set of candidates.If the samjhauta was carried out by Hindu groups,why did they blame LeT or HuJi,on what basis and evidence.
In the wake of this new allegation,what is going to be left govt credibility over its accusation that Pakistani terrorists carried out the Mumbai attacks,who is going to believe them and why,why would Pakistan carry forward a trial,who entire premise is base don evidence provided by the Indian govt,which thanks to the central govts flip flops will now come under a cloud of suspicion.
Has Ajmal Kasab confessed to his role in the Mumbai attack yet,or we are going to see some swami or sadhvi 'confessing' for the same.
Col Purohit is an idiot.The reason why Col Purohit ......
Yeah of course....we can see that now very well..LOL. Do you know what is common between humans and sheep? When both flock together, both act like mindless idiots no matter how intelligible/intelligent a single one of them might be. That is India's voters for you: large number, confused and undecided. This especially is because the educated and disliking class does not vote, leaving the illiterate and semi-literate people vulnerable to politicians' electoral seduction. And then since the class of aware people in voting is less, naturally the greater devil wins./\/\/\ The power @ centre lies in the power grabbed at the grass-root level i.e Assembly elections. This is regional politics for you. There are a lot of Indian who don't like Congress, but vote for them. It's the TINA factor that counts afterall.
Blaming the Congress is no solution. We have to understand why Congress wins, even when BJP plays the Nationalistic card every time. As simple as it is, majority of Indians are not fools.