Resolution for Independent Balochistan: US Congressman

KS

Bye bye DFI
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Messages
8,005
Likes
5,758
WASHINGTON: A week after he chaired a Congressional committee's hearing on Balochistan, US Congressman Dana Rohrabacher introduced tabled a resolution in the US Congress, asking for the Baloch be given their right of self-determination and to their own sovereign country.

The House Concurrent Resolution in the US House of Representatives has been co-sponsored by Representatives Louie Gohmert and Steve King. It highlights the history of Balochistan, and says that revolts in 1958, 1973 and 2005 "indicate continued popular discontent against rule by Islamabad, and the plunder of its vast natural wealth while Baluchistan remains the poorest province in Pakistan."

The text says that there is also an insurgency underway in Sistan-Balochistan, which is being repressed by Iran.

Rohrabacher's resolution says that it is the US policy to "oppose aggression and the violation of human rights inherent in the subjugation of national groups as currently being shown in Iran and Pakistan against the aspirations of the Baloch people."
.
According to the resolution, the people of Balochistan that are "currently divided between Pakistan, Iran, and Afghanistan, have the right to self-determination and to their own sovereign country and they should be afforded the opportunity to choose their own status among the community of nations, living in peace and harmony, without external coercion."

In a statement from his office, Rohrabacher, who is also the Chair of the House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, said, "The Baluchi, like other nations of people, have an innate right to self-determination. The political and ethnic discrimination they suffer is tragic and made more so because America is financing and selling arms to their oppressors in Islamabad."

The press release further added that Balochistan is "rich in natural resources but has been subjugated and exploited by Punjabi and Pashtun elites in Islamabad, leaving Baluchistan the country's poorest province."


Rohrabacher had earlier this week introduced a bill calling for a medal be awarded to Dr Shakil Afridi for revealing the location of Osama bin Laden, directly aiding in the SEAL team operation to kill the former al Qaeda leader.

---Express Tribune
 

Param

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2010
Messages
2,810
Likes
653
F$$k them!

I hope they lose in Iran or elsewhere.

Where were these F***tards when people were being butchered in SL.
 
Last edited:

pmaitra

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Messages
33,262
Likes
19,594
It is good news, and finally!

I would year to see such ideas gaining momentum. It is time Pakistan felt the heat, and what can be a better option to dismember Pakistan without having to have boots on the ground? The Baloch would be more than happy to help.
 

Mad Indian

Proud Bigot
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Messages
12,835
Likes
7,762
Country flag
F$$k them!

I hope they lose in Iran or elsewhere.

Where were these F***tards when people were being butchered in SL.
Where were our own politicians mate????? In fact INDIA was the country that provided diplomatic clout for the SL govt....
 

KS

Bye bye DFI
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Messages
8,005
Likes
5,758
Where were these F***tards when people were being butchered in SL.
Why would they care when even India, which had an integral connection and interest in the Lankan issue, could not care less and actually aided and abetted in that genocide ?

Lets be clear about one thing. The US is raising all these noises about Balochistan because a part of the lawmakers believe that taking the fight to Pakistan is the way to win the war in Afghanistan. They even believe the transit issue to Afghanistan can be solved through an independent Balochistan which will be an American lackey. The noises are not for humanitarian reasons.
 
Last edited:

Mad Indian

Proud Bigot
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Messages
12,835
Likes
7,762
Country flag
Why would they care when even India, which had an integral connection and interest in the Lankan issue, could not care less ?

The US is raising all these noises about Balochistan because a part of the lawmakers believe that taking the fight to Pakistan is the way to win the war in Afghanistan. They even believe the transit issue to Afghanistan can be solved through an independent Balochistan which will be an American lackey. The noises are not for humanitarian reasons.
Agreed but its on our own interests as well ... so atleast this time we should not cry foul against the Yankees.... Not under some misplaced sense of righteousness
 

Param

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2010
Messages
2,810
Likes
653
Why would they care when even India, which had an integral connection and interest in the Lankan issue, could not care less and actually aided and abetted in that genocide ?

Lets be clear about one thing. The US is raising all these noises about Balochistan because a part of the lawmakers believe that taking the fight to Pakistan is the way to win the war in Afghanistan. They even believe the transit issue to Afghanistan can be solved through an independent Balochistan which will be an American lackey. The noises are not for humanitarian reasons.
You know that I know that. That's why I was angry at those lying Hypocrites.
 

Mad Indian

Proud Bigot
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Messages
12,835
Likes
7,762
Country flag
:balle::balle:
You know that I know that. That's why I was angry at those lying Hypocrites.
why are you angry at some one who is willing to shed his precious blood to bleed our enemy....???? I think we should back them here... No more Aman Ki tamasha.....
 

The Messiah

Bow Before Me!
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2010
Messages
10,809
Likes
4,619
You know that I know that. That's why I was angry at those lying Hypocrites.
lol

western policy has always been about there own interests rather than "freedom and democracy". any avg student of world history after ww2 knows this.
 

Param

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2010
Messages
2,810
Likes
653
lol

western policy has always been about there own interests rather than "freedom and democracy". any avg student of world history after ww2 knows this.
Why only post WW2?

An average student would also have studied about western Hypocrisy in the Spanish civil war, Sino-Japanese war etc
 

The Messiah

Bow Before Me!
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2010
Messages
10,809
Likes
4,619
Why only post WW2?

An average student would also have studied about western Hypocrisy in the Spanish civil war, Sino-Japanese war etc
because it is recent ?

even westeners know they pillaged before ww2 but now most seem to think they are the bearers of freedom and democracy.
 

W.G.Ewald

Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2
Professional
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
14,139
Likes
8,594
The opinion of one (1) US congressman is not worth much. When bills are introduced out of committee for a vote is the time to pay attention.
 

Param

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2010
Messages
2,810
Likes
653
because it is recent ?

even westeners know they pillaged before ww2 but now most seem to think they are the bearers of freedom and democracy.
The Sino-Japanese war as well as Spanish civil war happened barely 2 to 3 years before out break or WW2.
Its in 10th std history books.
 

The Messiah

Bow Before Me!
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2010
Messages
10,809
Likes
4,619
The Sino-Japanese war as well as Spanish civil war happened barely 2 to 3 years before out break or WW2.
Its in 10th std history books.
that all well and good. the basic point is that there is a feeling that after ww2 among the westeners that they learned there lesson and corrected there ways.

before ww2 "democracy" wasn't used to justify regime changes.

its like the preacher outside a whore house! before the ww2 the preacher was just a person visiting the whore house but afterwards he became the preacher of "freedom and democracy" but still visits the whore house so that makes him a hypocrite. for eg. west cites freedom and democracy to syria yet turns a blind eye to bahrain when both countries are run by dictators.
 

Param

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2010
Messages
2,810
Likes
653
that all well and good. the basic point is that there is a feeling that after ww2 they learned there lesson and corrected themselves.

before ww2 "democracy" wasn't used to justify regime changes.

its like the preachor outside a whore house! before the ww2 the preachor was just a person visiting the whore house but afterwards he became the preacher of "freedom and democracy" but still visits the whore house so that makes him a hypocrite. for eg. west cites freedom and democracy to syria yet turns a blind eye to bahrain when both countries are run by dictators.
1.Western military intervention in Russia post the October revolution in 1917.
2.The west's support to Hitler & Gen Franco combine to fight against the socialists of Spain.
 

The Messiah

Bow Before Me!
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2010
Messages
10,809
Likes
4,619
1.Western military intervention in Russia post the October revolution in 1917.
2.The west's support to Hitler & Gen Franco combine to fight against the socialists of Spain.
you do realize that we are arguing the same point ?
 

Mad Indian

Proud Bigot
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Messages
12,835
Likes
7,762
Country flag
that all well and good. the basic point is that there is a feeling that after ww2 among the westeners that they learned there lesson and corrected there ways.

before ww2 "democracy" wasn't used to justify regime changes.

its like the preacher outside a whore house! before the ww2 the preacher was just a person visiting the whore house but afterwards he became the preacher of "freedom and democracy" but still visits the whore house so that makes him a hypocrite. for eg. west cites freedom and democracy to syria yet turns a blind eye to bahrain when both countries are run by dictators.
Why only post WW2?

An average student would also have studied about western Hypocrisy in the Spanish civil war, Sino-Japanese war etc
because it is recent ?

even westeners know they pillaged before ww2 but now most seem to think they are the bearers of freedom and democracy.
The Sino-Japanese war as well as Spanish civil war happened barely 2 to 3 years before out break or WW2.
Its in 10th std history books.
If it serves our Interest, we should back them that is all(Be like the americans, strongest allies of both Saudi Arabia and Israel :confused::confused::confused:)..... we are not short of Hypocrisy ourself....

IPKF and Non Interventionism..... what was that....???
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,880
Likes
48,585
Country flag
With a possible war against Iran,US will not destabilize pakistan.
 
Last edited:

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top