Dumbest idea a Congress butthead ever had. Apart from changing the name on every file, edifice and politico-legal code in the country, renaming serves to soothe patriotic passions with historical reappraisal, rather than concrete development. It is a fruitless endeavor, economically and practically, of typically dystopian post-colonial proportions, is an appendage of all the truly flavorless political rendering that goes on in these countries and is indicative of a people that dwell in the past rather than focus on the present. It is, moreover, a mendacious, deceitful way of trying to come to terms with the past, amid the irony of being unable to change the present and a dissolute sense of powerlessness over the future, serving to satisfy only the interests of Machiavellian politicians rather than the development needs of society itself; indeed detracting and distracting, and more nefariously, substituting with tranquil contentment over "historical conciliation" the satisfaction that comes from truly achieving concrete achievements.
'India' is a name, that is easy to pronounce among the Anglo-Saxon world, whose English language enjoys global consuetuedal ascendancy. Moreover, it is a familiar name, etched in the minds of people, culturalists, historians and anthropologists, and associated intimately with all that is both, good and bad in the subcontinent and more recently, increasingly with the good. It bears history, culture and praxis, sharing an unequivocally established relationship with the mighty Indus river, that princes and traders from time immemorial associated with a land of a culture of which the greater part we know has endured. Changing it to a name that is uniquely colloquial, will not only serve to undermine that established association, it will also serve to diminish the value of an international brand, by replacing it with one that is indefinitely colloquial.