Rajnath Singh SLAMS Pakistan in Pakistan for Terrorism: Top 10 quotes

rock127

Maulana Rockullah
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2009
Messages
10,569
Likes
25,230
Country flag
Rajnath Singh slams Pakistan in Pakistan: Top 10 quotes



Home minister Rajnath Singh used the opportunity of his visit to Pakistan to slam it, while on its soil, for its support to terror, and for its inaction against UN-designated terrorists like 26/11 mastermind Hafiz Saeed. In his address on Thursday to the Home Ministers Conference of SAARC countries in Islamabad, Rajnath said that no terrorism should be glorified. His remarks came against the backdrop of Pakistan PM Nawaz Sharif recently paying tribute to Burhan Wani, a Hizbul terrorist, who was killed in an encounter in Jammu & Kashmir on July 8. Sharif had called him a martyr. Here are Rajnath Singh's top 10 quotes.

1. Don't glorify terrorists
One country’s terrorist cannot be a martyr or freedom fighter for anyone. I also speak for the entire humanity - not just for India or other Saarc members - in urging that in no circumstances should terrorists be eulogised as martyrs.

2.Terrorists are terrorists
There are no good terrorists or bad terrorists. Terrorists are terrorists.

3. Act against wanted terrorists
The will and mandate of international community against proscribed and wanted terrorists and their organisations must be respected and implemented.

4. Isolate those who support terror
Those who provide support, encouragement, sanctuary, safe haven or any assistance to terrorism or terrorists must be isolated.

5. Strongest possible steps needed against terror
Strongest possible steps needed not only against terrorists but also individuals, organisations or nations that support them.

6. Justice for victims of 26/11, Pathankot terror attacks
Immediate and effective action will ensure justice for victims of terrorist attacks such as in Mumbai and Pathankot terror attacks case.

7. Act against state actors
No type of terror or support to it justified. Action required against those who support global terror, including state actors.

8. Terrorism biggest challenge to peace in SAARC region
Mere condemnation of terrorism and terrorists is not enough. Terrorism poses the biggest challenge to peace in the Saarc region.

9. Look into possible avenues of cyber-crime and its link with terror
In our effort to tackle terrorism, we should look into all possible avenues of cyber-crime, its linkages with the terrorist world, and how these could be dealt with. Attention and efforts need to be devoted to ensure that social media and other modern technology is not misused for misleading especially the youth or promoting terrorism in any way.

10. Common fight against terrorism
In our common fight against terrorism, implementation of the Saarc Regional Convention on Suppression of Terrorism and its Additional Protocol becomes crucial. This also includes ensuring effective measures so that those committing terrorist acts do not escape prosecution and punishment, and are extradited or prosecuted.

========================================================================================
Maulana Rockullah's Expert comment: : WELL DONE Rajnath!!! Poor Pakis STOOPED low, even lower than normal Diplomatic rituals by doing MEDIA BLACK OUT when Rajnath was giving speech.No media was allowed to give TV footage of his speech which proves how Pakis are shit scared of India. Poor Pakis were left so nervous and insecure and had their panties in a twist. :lol:

@Abhijat @A chauhan @Alien @alphacentury @Ancient Indian @anupamsurey @Bharat Ek Khoj @blueblood @brational @Bangalorean @Blackwater @Bornubus @bose @cobra commando @DingDong @DFI_COAS @ersakthivel @fooLIam @gpawar @guru-dutt @hit&run @HariPrasad-1 @Indx TechStyle @jackprince @Kharavela @Illusive @I_PLAY_BAD @LETHALFORCE @Lions Of Punjab @maomao @Mad Indian @OneGrimPilgrim @Peter @pmaitra @porky_kicker @Razor @raja696 @Rowdy @Sakal Gharelu Ustad @saty @sydsnyper @Srinivas_K @Screambowl @sorcerer @Simple_Guy @Sylex21 @wickedone @tarunraju @TrueSpirit2 @thethinker @vayuu1 @VIP @Vishwarupa @VIP @Varahamihira @roma @Navnit Kundu

Our esteemed Terrorist Paki Panel: @Neo @Raja.pakistani @Zarvan @musalman @Zulfiqar Khan

You shameless idiots can just stoop low and do blackouts but you were BITCHSLAPPED on face by Indian Home Minister on your own dirty soil.Your so called "country" is run by bunch of Eunuch Terrorists and Army.
 

sukhish

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2009
Messages
1,321
Likes
312
Rajnath actually did more than Kadi Ninda there :lol: Very Good :D
So what exactly is end result ? they listened to him, did you also hear what nisar said ? Iam not sure what exactly is the end result ? can you further explain. or because he went there and it satisfied bunch of people that's it .
 

Berkut

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2012
Messages
511
Likes
1,510
Country flag
So what exactly is end result ? they listened to him, did you also hear what nisar said ? Iam not sure what exactly is the end result ? can you further explain. or because he went there and it satisfied bunch of people that's it .
If you analyse the psychology of the avg paki abdul . Honour and Dignity are two words they use very often. We will eat grass but we have "gairat" etc.
Speech by Rajnath hits at this.
There are no immediately visible results in any psy Ops. N if you are really a keen observer you will straight away infer some of the intended results from ensuing pak talk shows
 

sukhish

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2009
Messages
1,321
Likes
312
If you analyse the psychology of the avg paki abdul . Honour and Dignity are two words they use very often. We will eat grass but we have "gairat" etc.
Speech by Rajnath hits at this.
There are no immediately visible results in any psy Ops. N if you are really a keen observer you will straight away infer some of the intended results from ensuing pak talk shows
how exactly does it hit their gairat ? he went , he spoke and he came back. so nobody has mentioned them before that they should not treat terrorists as mayters?, and then nisar hits him right back saying indian military is also indulging in the same thing. so how does it hit their gairat again ? or are we suppose to praise him no matter what, just because he belongs to the nationalistic party ?
 
Last edited:

sukhish

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2009
Messages
1,321
Likes
312
how exactly does it hit their gairat ? he went , he spoke and he came back. so nobody has mentioned them before that they should not treat terrorists as mayters?, and then nisar hits him right back saying indian military is also indulging in the same thing. so how does it hit their gairat again ?
@sukhish In that case, please do yourself something.:D

well being self delusion is one thing and reality is completely another. I would rather like to be more real then be full of emotions. I can't do nothing, But I do expect something concrete from GOI, getting impressed by articles or lectures is not my habit.
 

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
Mod
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,277
Likes
56,182
Country flag
well being self delusion is one thing and reality is completely another.
Let me tell you reality.
You are an NRI sitting in USA. You have no idea what we're doing in India.

We didn't give you any right to decide what our government should do.
I would rather like to be more real then be full of emotions. I can't do nothing, But I do expect something concrete from GOI, getting impressed by articles or lectures is not my habit.
As told before,
Come up with a solution yourself before of pointing out fingers at others. You know, we aren't impressed because of article, we're impressed because neighbor was pi$$ed off that they even stopped media.


As far as things which impress you (Italian petdog congis or any other party) are concerned, neither we care, nor it matters because we (Indian Citizens) gonna choose, not you who study in high ranked Government Universities but then flew to west.



So, your opinion doesn't matter. First, come back to India.:D
 

bose

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2010
Messages
4,921
Likes
5,961
Country flag
Pakistan blackout made Rajnath's point more pertinent ... what a loser !!

A visiting minister boycotting dinner / lunch invitation from his Pakistani counterpart in Pakistan is another slap on their face...
 

bose

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2010
Messages
4,921
Likes
5,961
Country flag
well being self delusion is one thing and reality is completely another. I would rather like to be more real then be full of emotions. I can't do nothing, But I do expect something concrete from GOI, getting impressed by articles or lectures is not my habit.
what concrete steps you expect from GOI... please enlighten us...
 

Rahul Singh

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2009
Messages
3,652
Likes
5,790
Country flag
He did covered good points. Though i wanted him to say India will not hold back if provoked by anyone by any means.
 

tarunraju

Sanathan Pepe
Mod
Joined
Sep 18, 2009
Messages
9,080
Likes
40,077
Country flag
This speech caused so much butthurt that ISI blocked his speech from live telecast.
 

Berkut

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2012
Messages
511
Likes
1,510
Country flag
how exactly does it hit their gairat ? he went , he spoke and he came back. so nobody has mentioned them before that they should not treat terrorists as mayters?, and then nisar hits him right back saying indian military is also indulging in the same thing. so how does it hit their gairat again ? or are we suppose to praise him no matter what, just because he belongs to the nationalistic party ?
Ok, to make you understand, let's take a cricket eke based exampled
Every Indian treats Sachin Tendulkar as a deity, at par with the gods.
Now if an American or any other nationality was to come for a sports related conference in India and was to say "people should stop treating right hand opening batsmen as god, all they brought about is misery"
It is hitting right where it hurts.

Now you say "he went, he spoke , he came back" unfortunately, even this much has been missing as a response for the belligerence of the neighbour . Atleast he spoke.

You say nisar hits back with words of his own. That is an expected reaction. You would have said his words were useless if there was no reaction from the Abdul's. The Abdul's even thinking of blanking out the speech shows how hard the "short dark hindu baniya" hit the "tall fair meat eating martial quom"
 

Rahul Singh

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2009
Messages
3,652
Likes
5,790
Country flag
ISLAMABAD: Indian Home Minister Rajnath Singh on Thursday left the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (Saarc) Interior Ministers’ meeting halfway through after losing a war of words with his Pakistani counterpart Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan.

The Indian minister indirectly accused Pakistan of sponsoring terrorism. But when Interior Minister Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan responded — after relinquishing his position as the chairman of the meeting — Mr Singh found it difficult to digest.

Chaudhry Nisar called for respecting the fundamental rights of people and stressed that legitimate freedom struggles should not be suppressed in the name of the fight against terrorism. He called upon the countries from the region to differentiate between terrorism and freedom movements, sanctified by the UN Security Council, and observed that violence against freedom fighters in a disputed territory under Indian occupation was state-sponsored.

He highlighted how Pakistan itself was one of the biggest victims of terrorism. “Instead of engaging in a blame-game and taking swipes at each other, we should take time out to reflect and sit together to try and work out the problems and reservations that we might harbour towards each other,” he remarked.

Nisar takes offence at remarks against Pakistan
It was not Pakistan that closed its doors to talks, he said. “Pakistan is ready to engage in any dialogue process based on mutual respect and dignity with no strings attached. It is for those who have put conditions and sub-conditions for initiating dialogue to reconsider and realign their position.”

He said that unlike India’s claims, terrorist activities were not restricted to India, Afghanistan or Bangladesh. Scores of terrorist attacks had taken place in Pakistan and were equally condemnable, if not more so, he observed, specifically mentioning the attacks on Army Public School in Peshawar, the Bacha Khan University in Charsadda and the Gulshan-i-Iqbal Park in Lahore. Such incidents, he said, could not be ignored and the perpetrators of these attacks must be apprehended and brought to justice.

The interior minister’s remarks came at a time when tensions are running high between the two nuclear-armed neighbours over fresh unrest and killings by security forces in India-held Kashmir. His remarks rendered Mr Singh speechless and he chose not to respond.

The strains in relations were evident when Chaudhry Nisar and Mr Singh came across each other for the first time. The interior minister was receiving the guests at the entrance to the conference’s venue when the Indian minister arrived; the two did not even shake hands properly.

Addressing the meeting, the Indian minister called for tough action against terrorism and countries supporting it. “Terrorists should not be glorified as ‘martyrs’. There is no good or bad terrorism. Terrorism is terrorism,” he maintained.

Both men skipped the luncheon arranged for ministers and participants of the Saarc meeting. Speaking at a press conference later, Chaudhry Nisar said he had received a message from the Indian minister asking whether he (Nisar) would be coming to the lunch. The interior minister said he excused himself as he had to attend an important meeting at Prime Minister House.

Rajnath Singh, however, did not stick around longer and left the venue without attending the final session of the conference.

Chaudhry Nisar observed that equating the movement for Kashmir’s liberation with terrorism was ‘dishonesty with history’. He felt that Saarc countries could not be hostage to a certain country’s agenda.

“If somebody refers to some specific dates and incidents, [we have] the right to come up with our own assessment of blatant foreign intervention and the influx of terrorism in Pakistan from across the border.”

Meanwhile, Saarc ministers condemned terrorism in all its forms and manifestations, calling for collective efforts to fight this menace and emphasised that terrorists should not escape prosecution.

The meeting highlighted the need for identifying practical solutions to challenges such as cybercrime and transnational organised crime, to ensure safety and security for socioeconomic growth and provide a secure future for the youth, women and children.

The meeting called for strengthening Saarc regional conventions on suppression of terrorism and the additional protocol on mutual assistance in criminal matters and on drugs and psychotropic substances.

Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, who was the chief guest at the inaugural session of the conference, said that at the national level, remarkable gains had been made against terrorists through Operation Zarb-i-Azb and the National Action Plan.

Published in Dawn, August 5th, 2016



Longer we concentrate on safeguarding ourselves passively, the longer we will bleed. We have made enough mistakes already. Going to UN in 47, giving up hard fought tools of bargain in 65 and in 71. Even in 99 we should have captured some portion of PoK as punishment. Enough of Nehruvian mistakes. Lets change ourselves now

Now it is time to debunk the strategy of "A stable Pakistan means a safer India". It's time we apply their strategy of "Will make you bleed through thousand cuts" on them. Start with Balochistan, pour money into it and let them understand the real meaning of this phrase. It is enough already.

.
 

Rahul Singh

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2009
Messages
3,652
Likes
5,790
Country flag
how exactly does it hit their gairat ? he went , he spoke and he came back. so nobody has mentioned them before that they should not treat terrorists as mayters?, and then nisar hits him right back saying indian military is also indulging in the same thing. so how does it hit their gairat again ? or are we suppose to praise him no matter what, just because he belongs to the nationalistic party ?
I don't think he is incapable of a proper rebuttal. But converting that meeting into a debate of 'Newshour' kind would be have been a dent on India's image and exactly what Pakistan would have liked. They want us and rest of the world to talk more and more on Kashmir. Shorter (but straighter) we keep, sweeter it will be for us, bitter for them ofcourse.
 

VIP

Ultra Nationalist
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2012
Messages
5,405
Likes
5,530
Country flag
So what exactly is end result ? they listened to him, did you also hear what nisar said ? Iam not sure what exactly is the end result ? can you further explain. or because he went there and it satisfied bunch of people that's it .
We haven't called Pakistan a terrorist sponsor country in Pakistan in SAARC meeting before. Pakistan blocked GOI's HM's speech which make his point more concrete. Whole world is watching and before they were not ready to call Pakistan what actually it is but now most of them are listening to India's point and openly calling these porkis terrorist sponsors. Diplomatically, it's a major setback for Pakistan and it's feeling isolated in world forums. India's hand is going upper and upper. The repercussions won't be good for Pakis, after all their deeds are no good and they'll pay for such lowlife activities.
 

OneGrimPilgrim

Senior Member
Joined
May 18, 2015
Messages
5,243
Likes
6,810
Country flag
what concrete steps you expect from GOI... please enlighten us...
there're no expectations, because if and when steps are taken or alt avenues discussed, the same orchestra starts playing the symphony of "we should be patient, give peace a chance & not be played by emotions & act hyper-'nationalistically' even if slapped not 4 but 40 times."
havent you observed the same gadha-chaal almost everytime since years now?! when an attack occurs - "you should answer why lapse in the security! resign..blah blah"; when non-conventional means are discussed - "nahin saahab, DIALOGUE chalte rahna chahiye; 'track 2' process should not be abandoned."

BTW the porki media prohibited from broadcasting HM's speech is in itself ample evidence of his speech being a strike on porki 'gairat' & their attempt to save whatever's bachi-khuchi, by not relaying their chaddi-utaaroing by HM among porki public.
while a certain 'allah ka banda' porki latrine-licker from a non-nationalistic but dynastic party seemingly did a khambha-ukhaad feat by begging porks to uproot dahshatgard baniya moodi from power, thats why his earnest request was broadcast by the porky media/govt. for the consumption of porks & pork-humnasheen in India & elsewhere.
 

Akask kumar

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2016
Messages
583
Likes
666
they blocked the TV telecast not only beacause they are scared of india but also scared from their own terrorist group and people .. On seeing Rajnath singh speaking and lashing out pakistan in pakistan .. terrorists wud hav gone mad and might have started blowing pakistan itself..
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top