Raja Raja Cholan, The Great South Indian Tamil King

Shaitan

Zandu Balm all day
Mod
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Messages
4,654
Likes
8,364
Country flag
Wonder what the Indian history would have been if he had turned North rather than South East.

Nah they did.. Chola inscriptions also said they went to Sindhu(Indus river) under Rajendra Chola..

With both the Western and Eastern Chalukya fronts subdued, Rajendra's armies undertook an extraordinary expedition. C. 1019 CE Rajendra's forces continued to march through Kalinga to the river Ganges. The Emperor himself advanced up to the river Godavari to protect the rear of the expeditionary force. The Chola army eventually reach the Pala kingdom of Bengal where they met Mahipala and defeated him.

According to the Tiruvalangadu Plates, the campaign lasted less than two years in which many kingdoms of the north felt the might of the Chola army. The inscriptions further claim that Rajendra defeated '"¦the armies of Ranasura and entered the land of Dharmapala and subdued him and thereby he reached the Ganges and caused the water river to be brought by the conquered kings' back to the Chola country. The new conquests opened up new roots for the Cholas to head for distant lands like Burma by land (through what are now modern Orissa, West Bengal, Assam and Bangladesh). Many inscriptions of chola do refer to the chola control over provinces of north like mathura(vadamadurai), kanyakubja(kannaikucchi or kannauj) and sindhu(sind). This is possible because of chola domination of both the seas on east and west.

It is true that Rajendra's army defeated the kings of Sakkarakottam and Dhandabhukti and Mahipala. These territories were initially added to the kingdom, while later they had the status of tribute paying subordinates and trade partners with the Chola Kingdom, an arrangement that lasted till the times of Kulothunga-III and to a limited extent, of Raja Raja-III too. It was undoubtedly an exhibition of the power and might of the Chola empire to the northern kingdoms. But the benevolent leadership of the Cholas treated them in a benevolent manner and did not permanently annexe them to the Chola dominions, while at the same time acting firmly to nip in the bud any ill-treatment of people from Tamil country.
 

Sabir

DFI TEAM
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2009
Messages
2,116
Likes
793
Wonder what the Indian history would have been if he had turned North rather than South East.
Not only Rajendra Chola, even the Rashtrakuta kings had the opportunity too. They defeated the Gurjara-Pratiharas and the Palas but turned back to South after their victory. Otherwise there would have been no 'Pala era' in Aryavarta.
 

Sabir

DFI TEAM
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2009
Messages
2,116
Likes
793
It is not always the size of the army but the organization and strategy to use them becomes important. As an example the Mongols used to terrorize every kingdoms because of their swiftness of their attack. Though much less in number these horsemen were capable to cover large distance in very small time. They used to be up on the enemy before he could organize his army. One historian mentioned Mongol attack during Ala-ud-din Khilji like this ..." they reach Delhi like shadow..." and forced the mighty Khilji to take shelter in Siri fort. Al-ud-din had a standing army of 4,50,000 (yess, standing army) at center while those Mongols were only l8,000 approximately.
 

Vinod2070

मध्यस्थ
Ambassador
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Messages
2,557
Likes
115
Mongols were in a league of their own. There have been few warrirors like them in history.

They were exceedingly brave and disciplined but also exceedingly cunning. For them winning a war with cunning and deceit was more honorable than winning a straight war. The brutality was part of the strategy to not have to fight more than needed.
 

Phenom

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2010
Messages
878
Likes
406
One of the best thing about Cholas is their aggressive nature. They were not like normal Indian kingdoms that were content with staying within their own borders. Chola aggressively expanded the border and consolidated any gains made after battle. They maintained large standing army and where often able to defeat multiple kingdoms allied against them. Another thing I like about the Cholas, is their focus on the navy, probably the only Indian kingdom to have given so much importance to the navy. They were even capable of launching an sea borne attack on srivijaya kingdoms.

Overall Cholas are one of those kingdoms that deserve far more focus from Indian history books than what they are currently given.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top