Putin Predicted Washington Would Employ Assassination Tactic

Discussion in 'Europe and Russia' started by sorcerer, Mar 7, 2015.

  1. sorcerer

    sorcerer Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2013
    Messages:
    6,203
    Likes Received:
    5,119
    Location:
    India
    Putin Predicted Washington Would Employ Assassination Tactic against Russia

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69Qwju5nJ-w

    The Saker provides a one minute video with translation of Putin explaining two years ago the Russian government’s concern that an overseas entity would use a false flag assassination within Russia in order to create an “involuntary martyr” that the Western media would use to demonize Russia.

    According to this report by The Saker, the Washington-financed Russian opposition has not, as Washington hoped it would, joined the Western anti-Putin media campaign. Possibly the Washington-financed Russian NGOs have wised up from observing events in Ukraine. In place of “more democracy,” Ukraine got a Washington stooge government that split the country and is squandering Ukraine’s last cent on a losing war.

    The most likely explanation of Nemtsov’s murder is that the CIA decided, as Nemtsov was completely marginalized as an opposition politician with 5% as against Putin’s 85%, that Nemtsov was worth more dead than alive. But the ploy, if that is what it is, has not worked inside Russia.

    Part of the circumstantial evidence that Nemtsov’s murder was a CIA tactic to destabilize Russia is the orchestrated US media. The New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, NPR, and the rest of the presstitutes were ready on cue with reports insinuating that Putin was responsible. Stephen Lendman has done a good job tracking the US media’s unquestioning adherence to Washington’s propaganda line.

    On February 28, NPR’s report of Nemtsov’s murder consisted of a sound bite from a dissident Russian in exile who implied that Nemtsov was actually a rival to Putin with the population split between the two and that Putin eliminated his rival. No counterview to this abject nonsense was offered. At one time NPR was an alternative voice. Today NPR belongs to the Republican Party and the corporations whose advertising revenues are larger than listener donations. NPR’s donors are supporting propaganda.

    If the Russian investigation discovers CIA involvement, the Russian government will keep it quiet. The audacity of Washington murdering a washed-up Russian politician in order to blame the Russian government bespeaks of war. Putin, unlike Washington, does not want war. If the culprit(s) is not found, it will look like a coverup. So someone has to be blamed. The Russian police have already suggested that possibly the key to the murder is the attractive young woman with Nemtsov when he was shot down. Nemtsov might have been trespassing on the property of a dangerous man, possibly a member of the Russian mafia.

    Like everything else that happens, Americans will be given by the presstitutes an explanation that coincides with the interests of Washington. All who rely on the US media will never know why Nemtsov was murdered, or anything else for that matter.

    Putin Predicted Washington Would Employ Assassination Tactic against Russia | Foreign Policy Journal

    @pmaitra, @jouni, @roma, @ladder , @apple, @Free Karma and all others
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 10, 2015
  2.  
  3. SREEKAR

    SREEKAR Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2015
    Messages:
    1,072
    Likes Received:
    587
    Location:
    visakhapatnam
    What is the reaction of Mr.Obama?
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 10, 2015
    Prometheus likes this.
  4. Razor

    Razor CIDs from Tamilnadu Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2011
    Messages:
    5,365
    Likes Received:
    4,511
    Location:
    ഭരതം (Bharatham)
    Mr. Obama need not worry about this.

    Why?

    Because this news item will not get any coverage in the US (controlled) media, and the US public will not know about it.

    And even if the news receives coverage among the amrikis, the US govt. has got experts who know how to turn around opinions using the media.

    As a general rule in the Western media (which is almost entirely controlled), news about Russia is never positive; it is usually something like "dictator" putin did that or this, or something like how russians are suffering, lying, hating, cold so on and so forth. Actual news from Russia, which might help amerikan/western public form a more complete picture of russia and russians is not acceptable in US media companies and therefore will not be aired in US main stream media.
     
  5. SREEKAR

    SREEKAR Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2015
    Messages:
    1,072
    Likes Received:
    587
    Location:
    visakhapatnam
    American media is censored???
     
  6. pmaitra

    pmaitra Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    31,663
    Likes Received:
    17,162
    Location:
    EST, USA
    Of course it is. They will deliberately repeat whatever those in power want them to repeat.

    If American media were fair, they would present Nemtsov's murder as "democracy," because, the American definition of "democracy," by speech and action, is killing people.
     
    Prometheus and Razor like this.
  7. SREEKAR

    SREEKAR Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2015
    Messages:
    1,072
    Likes Received:
    587
    Location:
    visakhapatnam
    By this mean indian media is better...:clap:
     
  8. Razor

    Razor CIDs from Tamilnadu Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2011
    Messages:
    5,365
    Likes Received:
    4,511
    Location:
    ഭരതം (Bharatham)
    Not just censored, the so called "reporters" know what their bosses want.
    They do not take on stories that might conflict with the agenda of their bosses or that conflicts with the general public opinions and views.
    And people who question the bosses are thrown out (like for eg during the Iraq war some reporters questioned the official amerikan narratives of bogus WMDs and so on, they were simply fired.)
    So the reporters themselves know what to say and what not to say to please and satisfy their bosses.
    And most Western reporters seem to have no moral qualms about doing fake stories and lying through their teeth.
    Hence the term presstitutes= Press (as in media)+ prostitute (their services are available for money.)

    PS: Check my signature.
     
    Prometheus and pmaitra like this.
  9. SREEKAR

    SREEKAR Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2015
    Messages:
    1,072
    Likes Received:
    587
    Location:
    visakhapatnam
    So a news reporter in american media should be pro- American even he/she is native indian???
     
  10. SREEKAR

    SREEKAR Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2015
    Messages:
    1,072
    Likes Received:
    587
    Location:
    visakhapatnam
    Never expected this from U.S
     
  11. Razor

    Razor CIDs from Tamilnadu Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2011
    Messages:
    5,365
    Likes Received:
    4,511
    Location:
    ഭരതം (Bharatham)
    Especially if s\he is native Indian.

    There might be rare exceptions, but what I said before is the norm.
     
  12. Khagesh

    Khagesh Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2015
    Messages:
    928
    Likes Received:
    567
    Location:
    India
    Indian Media is not better. They are better Americans then even the Americans.


    Archived you signature. Had heard it before but never bothered to pick it until you put both of them together. What is applicable to newsmen in US is also applicable to newsmen in India.
     
    Last edited: Mar 8, 2015
  13. Khagesh

    Khagesh Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2015
    Messages:
    928
    Likes Received:
    567
    Location:
    India
    Sheikh Hasina AL had escaped an attempt yesterday.

    Dhaka had seen those Color Revolutions kind of demonstrations sometime back. After the Color Revolutions come the clash with the Islamists and after that comes the US as peace maker. Predictable.

    In our case they would have to organize a clash of riff raff BA pass types, with the Hindutva vaadis. :D
     
    ladder and Virendra like this.
  14. Gabriel92

    Gabriel92 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2013
    Messages:
    808
    Likes Received:
    491
    So,if i understand,all assassinations during his mandate,were west plots ?
    He's a genius. (Or more likely an idiot.)
     
  15. sorcerer

    sorcerer Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2013
    Messages:
    6,203
    Likes Received:
    5,119
    Location:
    India
    @Gabriel92
    The article talks about an assasination by the west....particularly to fuel crisis in Russia and to demonise Putin..
    West is not new to assasination plots.. There are articles about CIA involvement in Bhuto murder.

    The CIA has Attempted to Assassinate 50 Foreign Leaders
    The CIA has Attempted to Assassinate 50 Foreign Leaders Including Chavez | Global Research

    CIA linked to Benazir Bhutto's assassination?
    http://rt.com/usa/cia-linked-to-benazir-bhutto-s-assassination/
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 10, 2015
  16. jouni

    jouni Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2014
    Messages:
    3,898
    Likes Received:
    1,123
    Location:
    finland
    We must remember that Putins comments are 90% aimed to domestic audience. He wants to project the image of Russia as a Great Power, equal to west. In real life Russia vs West is 34:2, which many also here seem to forget.

    West only has to wait, Putin himself is doing all the work for them.
     
  17. pmaitra

    pmaitra Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    31,663
    Likes Received:
    17,162
    Location:
    EST, USA
    What evidence do you have to prove that Putin's comments are aimed at the domestic audience?

    Of course, he speaks in Russian, which could be a proof. Putin even remarked on one occasion that Kasparov spoke to reporters in English and asked why he wasn't speaking in Russian. This is because, his comments are aimed at the international audience.

    Now, let's move on to the next point.

    Why should we remember that Putin's comments are 90% aimed at the domestic audience?

    This also has an answer. Putin is the President of Russia, and he does not pretend to be a world leader. Therefore, it is natural he should address his own country-folks, instead of being an international attention seeker, like the leaders of the west, who like to pretend they are world leaders, but come across as world fools, if we look at the recent global trends.

    Now, let's pose another question.

    Why wasn't Putin's prediction given media coverage in the west?

    The answer is, all the claims about freedom of speech and free press in the west is a sham.
     
    sorcerer likes this.

Share This Page