Politics over cow

[Screambowl]

F*** the diagram.

This is not french parliament, where you have people sitting on right are right wing and left siders are leftists.

This is India and we believe in our scriptures. Not left right or libetards or bastards..

It doesn't matter what your culture is. Infringement of property rights is a crime and must be punished by law. You have the right not to eat beef but you cannot infringe on someone elses right to do so with his body.

 

[Project Dharma]

supposed to protect property rights. .

Define property. Islam makes women the property of men. Does that mean muzzy dogs should be allowed to eat their women? Cows are not eaten in Indian culture, muzzies can migrate across the border to a more tolerant and well developed country if they wish.

 

[OrangeFlorian]

Define property. Islam makes women the property of men. Does that mean muzzy dogs should be allowed to eat their women? Cows are not eaten in Indian culture, muzzies can migrate across the border to a more tolerant and well developed country if they wish.

A cow that someone owns is his private property since cows do not have the ability to reason. A women is a human being and her property rights would have to be enforced by the government or private law.

 

[Screambowl]

A cow that someone owns is property. A women is a human being and her property rights would have to be enforced by the government or private law.

what kind of libertarian you are when you dont give liberty to other thoughts lol.. u r nailed.

 

[Project Dharma]

A cow that someone owns is property. A women is a human being and her property rights would have to be enforced by the government or private law.

Yeah but your premise of cows being absolute property isn't true in an Indian context only in a Western one. It's true for instance for Chickens and nobody interferes with anybody slaughtering and eating them any way they want.

 

[OrangeFlorian]

Yeah but your premise of cows being absolute property isn't true in an Indian context only in a Western one. It's true for instance for Chickens and nobody interferes with anybody slaughtering and eating them any way they want.

If they are owned by a person then they are his private property and unless cows develop the ability to reason and select their values than we should not put their property rights on the same level as a humans property rights. The western one pays respect to the rights of the individual over the mob and respects his right to personal responsibility as well as to defend his right to defend himself from aggressors who would violate his property rights in addition the east is more collectivist in philosophical and cultural terms in some ways which hampers capitalism and a free society. If you can eat something than it is food if it is inedible then it is not food in nutritional terms.

 

[OrangeFlorian]

what kind of libertarian you are when you dont give liberty to other thoughts lol.. u r nailed.

You don't have the freedom to threaten to violate property rights or to tell me what I can't say

 

[Project Dharma]

If they are owned by a person then they are his private property and unless cows develop the ability to reason and select their values than we should not put their property rights on the same level as a humans property rights.

They are not on the same level.... Anyway, if you are a true libertarian then the government doesn't have any business interfering in any way and people who murder cows should be able to defend themselves against the ones who want them to stop. If not, they are SOL and should stop whining like bitches

 

[OrangeFlorian]

@Sakal Gharelu Ustad This guy is harassing me and being a troll @Screambowl

 

[OrangeFlorian]

They are not on the same level.... Anyway, if you are a true libertarian then the government doesn't have any business interfering in any way and people who murder cows should be able to defend themselves against the ones who want them to stop. If not, they are SOL and should stop whining like bitches

No a true libertarian doesn't defend someones right to kill other people unless it in defense of himself, his family, or his property. You can a be minarchist and believe that the government should only function as a nightwatchmen state or you can be an anarcho capitalist and believe that the defence should be provided by the private sector instead of the government not the other way
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-aggression_principle

 

[Screambowl]

@Sakal Gharelu Ustad This guy is harassing me and being a troll @Screambowl

You are trying to do intellectual subversion via information warfare on DFI against basic beliefs of Hindus in the name of liberty. You should be considered as threat!

 

[Project Dharma]

No a true libertarian doesn't defend someones right to kill other people unless it in defense of himself, his family, or his property. You can a be minarchist and believe that the government should only function as a nightwatchmen state or you can be an anarcho capitalist and believe that the defence should be provided by the private sector instead of the government not the other way
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-aggression_principle

Sure, but the Indian constitution mandates the government to protect cows specifically Article 48. When the muzzies decided to stay in India over Pakistan, they knew what they were getting into. We've been very hospitable to them and allowed them to setup their places of worship even though their religion considers us Kafirs. The least they can do is respect the constitution and rule of law over Sharia and the culture of India. Our country our rules. If they don't like it then they can GTFO

 

[Project Dharma]

You are trying to do intellectual subversion via information warfare on DFI against basic beliefs of Hindus in the name of liberty. You should be considered as threat!

He's 15 years old dude, we all need to chill lol

 

[OrangeFlorian]

Sure, but the Indian constitution mandates the government to protect cows specifically Article 48. When the muzzies decided to stay in India over Pakistan, they knew what they were getting into. We've been very hospitable to them and allowed them to setup their places of worship even though their religion considers us Kafirs. The least they can do is respect the constitution and rule of law over Sharia and the culture of India. Our country our rules. If they don't like it then they can GTFO

And I agree they can GTFO.

I don't white knight for muslims. I know some muslims.No matter what they say they are Jinnah supporting murderers and subversives at heart I know from experience by the language they use to get peoples attention. But that doesn't entitle me to respect mob mentality or imposed regulation that will prevent india from becoming a free society where ideas that are not inherently dangerous (communism,islam) can be discussed without prejudice.

 

[Screambowl]

He's 15 years old dude, we all need to chill lol

what is he doing here then? Isn't the minimum age to join the forum is 18?

 

[OrangeFlorian]

Why don't you tell that to this guy @Abhinav Dharma

 

[Screambowl]

Why don't you tell that to this guy @Abhinav Dharma

you enjoy your stay here... and learn ... good luck!!

 

[Project Dharma]

Not at the expense of human beings.

They've had fair warning that it is offensive to the majority of people in the country and that it is also against the constitution. If they still want to do it, then its at their own peril and they deserve everything they get.

 

[HariPrasad-1]

I believe Lord Krishna also did something similar?

No Never. You are ill informed.

 

[Abhijat]

"Free" "Society" is oxymoron.

Their can be no absolute freedom in society, as society itself comes in existence when a group of people having common belief try to institutionalise their belief.

So my advice for absolute freedom lovers is , to move out in jungle patch , domesticize animals , scavenge food items...