Pentagon's failed Syria program cost $2 million per trainee

Discussion in 'Americas' started by Kshatriya87, Nov 9, 2015.

  1. Kshatriya87

    Kshatriya87 Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2014
    Messages:
    4,727
    Likes Received:
    3,166
    Location:
    Mumbai
    http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2015/11/05/pentagon-isil-syria-train-and-equip/75227774/

    WASHINGTON — When the Pentagon pulled the plug last month on its plan to train and field a force of moderate Syrians to combat the Islamic State, it had spent $384 million, or $2 million per fighter, for a program that produced dismal results, according to interviews and spending figures obtained by USA TODAY.

    The Pentagon had tabbed $500 million in 2015 for the effort and promised to graduate 3,000 trained and equipped New Syrian Forces fighters this year, and 5,000 annually thereafter to combat the Islamic State, also known as ISIL.

    The program was suspended after $384 million had been spent. Of the 180 Syrians vetted, trained and equipped, 145 fighters remain in the program. Of those, 95 are in Syria today. Two of the four training camps the Pentagon designated for the program in the Middle East never hosted a recruit.

    The Pentagon disputes the $2 million figure per trainee, saying the actual cost is far lower, $30,000 per trainee. The "vast majority" of the funds paid for weapons, equipment and ammunition, some of which the U.S.-led coalition still has in storage, Navy Cdr. Elissa Smith, a spokeswoman, said in an email. In addition, some of those trained fighters have been calling in air strikes, and ammunition designated for the trainees has been given instead to other forces fighting ISIL, Smith said.

    "Our investment in the Syria train and equip program should not be viewed purely in fiscal terms," Smith said.

    Separately, in Iraq, the Pentagon has spent nearly $1 billion training and equipping security forces to counter ISIL, according to Mark Wright, a spokesman. Despite that, ISIL still holds Mosul, Iraq's second-largest city behind Baghdad, and Ramadi, a major city in the west.

    The Syria train-and-equip program had been a centerpiece of the White House and Pentagon strategy to confront the Islamic State, after its stunning success at capturing cities and territory across Iraq and Syria. The Pentagon announced that it planned to recruit, vet, train and equip thousands of Syrian "moderates" to protect their villages from ISIL's onslaught.

    The spending figures for the failed train-and-equip program, broken down into nine categories, show that the Pentagon earmarked tens of millions of dollars to build training camps that were rarely if ever used and for flights to ferry the trainees from their homes to training sites and battlefields. Another $47 million was designated under the heading "services."

    In the end, the program fielded fewer than 200 fighters. In September, one group of trainees surrendered one quarter of their U.S.-supplied weapons, ammunition and vehicles for safe passage through territory held by another rebel group. Last month, the Pentagon shelved the training effort, noting its poor results. Attention has shifted to groups already fighting ISIL in Syria, and 50 U.S. commandos will be deployed there to help coordinate their efforts.

    "It's clear to everyone now that this initial program was a failure," said Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., a member of the Armed Services Committee. "My hope is that Pentagon leaders have taken the lessons of this failure to heart as they pursue a different approach in Syria."

    Armed Services Committee member Rep. Jackie Speier, D-Calif., blasted the Pentagon for not ending the program sooner.

    "As we've discovered, the Syria train and equip process was ill-thought-out and spectacularly wasteful," Speier said. "Congress should demand periodic reports by the military when it becomes clear it is not meeting its goals. It borders on malfeasance that so much money was spent before the plug was pulled."

    While the training has stopped, the United States will still give equipment and weapons to the leaders of vetted groups of rebels who are already fighting ISIL "so that over time they continue to re-claim territory," Smith said.

    Restrictions placed on Syrians eligible for training doomed it to failure, said Jennifer Cafarella, a Syria analyst at the Institute for the Study of War in Washington. The fighters had to pledge to fight ISIL, not the regime of Bashar Assad, and they had to be free of links to one of his main opponents, the Al Nusra Group, an al-Qaeda affiliate. That pool was exceptionally small, she said.

    "We eliminated a large portion of the rebels with the requirements imposed on trainees," Cafarella said.
     
  2.  
  3. Kshatriya87

    Kshatriya87 Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2014
    Messages:
    4,727
    Likes Received:
    3,166
    Location:
    Mumbai
    nGNPoua.jpg

    30 freaking characters
     
  4. pmaitra

    pmaitra Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    31,663
    Likes Received:
    17,159
    Location:
    EST, USA
    This is what they are saying. A large part of Pentagon's budget (I think 40%, but I could be wrong on the number) is outside of Congressional audit. Nobody can tell for sure whether this is a smokescreen for the money spent in arming the ISIS. Like Sergei Lavrov said, "Don't listen to the Pentagon."
     
    Kshatriya87 likes this.
  5. pmaitra

    pmaitra Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    31,663
    Likes Received:
    17,159
    Location:
    EST, USA
    Giant Pentagon Budget Is Unauditable Year After Year
     
  6. Kshatriya87

    Kshatriya87 Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2014
    Messages:
    4,727
    Likes Received:
    3,166
    Location:
    Mumbai
    "the U.S. defense budget for 2013 is estimated to be around $716 billion (not counting defense expenses in other civilian departments.) To strike a comparison,China, the next biggest military spender, has a budget of $106 billion as reported by their government. Remarkably, you can add the military budgets of the next ten largest spending countries and still not match the U.S.'s astronomical military budget"

    That's a HUGE figure. Just 1 billion could have been spent on their veterans rehabilitation and the whole country would have been grateful to the government.
     
    jackprince likes this.

Share This Page