Pakistan’s terror bill: $118 billion spent in last 15 years

Discussion in 'Pakistan' started by sorcerer, Aug 16, 2016.

  1. sorcerer

    sorcerer Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2013
    Messages:
    6,203
    Likes Received:
    5,121
    Location:
    India
    Pakistan’s terror bill: $118 billion spent in last 15 years


    As Prime Minister Narendra Modi criticised Pakistan–without naming the country–for supporting terror groups, 671 infiltration incidents and 738 terrorist attacks were reported in Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) over the last three years, according to a government reply to parliament on July 19, 2016.


    As many as 141 terrorists and 64 civilians were killed across the state between 2013 and July 10, 2016, the reply said.

    As many as 23,061 terrorists, 1,431 civilians and 6,220 security personnel have died in J&K over 28 years to August 7, 2016, according to the South Asia Terrorism Portal.


    [​IMG]

    About 34,000 AK-47 rifles, 5000 grenade launchers, 90 light machine guns, 12,000 revolvers, three anti-tank guns, four anti-aircraft guns, 350 missile launchers and 63,000 kg of explosives, including RDX and more than 100,000 grenades were seized by security forces from terrorists in J&K over the last 25 years, Modi said on August 12, 2016, at an all-party meeting on J&K.


    “During this period, more than 5,000 foreign terrorists were killed, which is almost equal to the strength of 5 Battalions,” said Modi.

    Terrorism has cost Pakistan $118 billion over the last 15 years in direct and indirect costs, according to Pakistan’s Economic Survey 2015-16.


    Pakistan forgets that it bombs its own citizens using fighter planes. The time has come when Pakistan shall have to answer to the world for the atrocities committed by it against people in Baluchistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir,” Modi said on August 12, 2016.

    As many as 351 incidents of violence were reported against minorities in Pakistan between 2012 and 2015, according to the 2016 report State Of Religious Freedom In Pakistan by Jinnah Institute, a public policy advocacy in Pakistan.

    “Sindh and Balochistan, in particular, witnessed persistent targeted killings and bomb attacks against members of the Shia community. In Balochistan, anti-Shia messaging in public spaces and in the press continued with impunity,” the report said.

    People in Balochistan had thanked him for standing by them, according to Modi.

    In 2015, 247 civilians were killed in Balochistan, of which 114 were attributed to militant outfits and 143 were considered the work of the state apparatus and its surrogates, according to South Asia Terrorism Portal.


    Since 2004, till April 17, 2016, at least 922 civilian killings were reported by militant outfits. In addition, 463 people went missing and 157 bodies were found mutilated in Balochistan in 2015.


    http://www.hindustantimes.com/india...st-15-years/story-JZ4SjivBKrcCVmFxgVDZNJ.html
     
    Mikesingh, Kshatriya87 and sydsnyper like this.
  2.  
  3. sorcerer

    sorcerer Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2013
    Messages:
    6,203
    Likes Received:
    5,121
    Location:
    India
    24 Crore Pumped In To Keep Kashmir On The Boil: Government Sources

    New Delhi: As fresh clashes are reported between protesters and security forces in the Kashmir Valley, a top government official told NDTV that about 24 crore rupees have been poured into keeping the unrest seething in the last three weeks.

    The official, among those handling Kashmir affairs at the centre, alleged that much of the money from across the border has been routed to mid and senior-level functionaries of pro-Pakistan separatist groups operating in Kashmir like the Jammat e Islami and the Dukhtranan-e- Millat, headed by Asiya Andrabi.

    The government, sources said, does not expect the unrest to die down soon. "With the kind of money being pumped in it is unlikely that protests will die down. The youth of the valley are being paid to continue with protests and attacking security forces," top government sources said.
    The government says Pakistan has incited and facilitated the violent protests in Kashmir that began on July 8 when Hizbul Mujahideen terrorist Burhan Wani was killed by security forces. The Pakistan government has openly supported the protests, likening them to a "freedom struggle" and lionising Burhan Wani.

    65 people have now died, six of them since last evening, in clashes between protesters and security forces in just over a month. More than 5000 people have been injured, many of them security personnel.

    Protesters have set fire to police stations and attacked security bases. This morning, 300 people reportedly attacked a bus in Budgam carrying Central Reserve Police Force personnel or CRPF personnel, who opened fire. Five people were killed.
    One person was killed last evening when security forces opened fire at protestors during clashes in Srinagar's Batamaloo area.

    Union Home Minister Rajnath Singh, who is holding daily meetings to review the Kashmir situation, told Parliament last week that the security forces have been asked to exercise "maximum restraint" and limit civilian casualties to the extent possible.
    Mr Singh met National Security Adviser Ajit Doval and the Director of Intelligence Bureau today to discuss the fresh outbreak of violence.
    The Kashmir Valley has been under curfew for an unprecedented five weeks.

    Source>>
     
  4. sorcerer

    sorcerer Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2013
    Messages:
    6,203
    Likes Received:
    5,121
    Location:
    India
    Militants routing funds via civilians travelling to Gulf to avoid detection?

    Militants routing funds via civilians travelling to Gulf to avoid detection?
    By Express news service

    http://www.newindianexpress.com/nat...avoid-detection/2016/08/18/article3584673.ece



    NEW DELHI: The NIA on Wednesday said it had found that the terror organisations and their overseas sympathisers were transferring money to civilians’ bank accounts in Jammu and Kashmir to finance activities against the country.


    The agency has started a probe after they found that certain bank accounts in the state had seen huge transaction of funds in the last few months despite the fact that these accounts were in names of persons whose income didn’t warrant such banking transactions.

    NIA Inspector General Sanjeev Kumar Singh said, “Running the risk of getting caught by security and intelligence agencies, militant organisations and their sympathisers have begun jettisoning hawala channels for transferring money and are wooing Kashmiris who travel to Gulf countries for work.”

    The agency has registered a preliminary inquiry and will submit a report to the Ministry of Home Affairs. “One per cent of the money received is left in the bank account of the individual by their ‘handlers’ based abroad as commission,” a source said. The money so deposited in the bank accounts is withdrawn within days. Some people who received such dubious money have no connection with the depositors and the amounts are withdrawn within 48 hours of being transferred.

    In order to avoid detection by the RBI, the funds are transferred in small amounts not exceeding `1 lakh. Banks are mandated to give a suspicious transaction report if they find over `10 lakh has been deposited in any account in one go and also if they notice a regular flow of large amounts into it from the same source. “The money is deposited in various accounts in order to avoid being noticed and named in suspicious transaction report. The same set of people is used after a gap of no less than three to four months,” the scource added. Over-invoicing of goods by some Kashmiri businessmen in the Gulf has also come under the NIA lens.
     
    OneGrimPilgrim likes this.
  5. sorcerer

    sorcerer Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2013
    Messages:
    6,203
    Likes Received:
    5,121
    Location:
    India
    The disruption and terrorism in Bangladesh is created by pakistan with china to stretch the Indian security capability..kinda like opening a credible threat on the eastern border for India.

    The pakis and chinis must be hoping that by doing so they could stall Indian involvement in PoK there by buying an opportunity for china with their CPEC pipeline through PoK.

    I wonder how much of 118 BIllion belongs to china in the investment of terror factories project of pakistan
     
  6. sorcerer

    sorcerer Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2013
    Messages:
    6,203
    Likes Received:
    5,121
    Location:
    India
    Beijing Mind Behind Pak Terrorism
    Dr. Rakesh Datta


    http://www.satp.org/satporgtp/publication/idr/vol_17(2)/rakesh_datta.htm


    [​IMG][​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    According to a recent Pakistan publication named, From a Head, through a Head, to a Head authored by FS Aijazuddin, it was the late Chou-en-lai who suggested to the Pakistani military delegation which called upon him in 1966 that instead of short term wars, Pakistan must prepare for a prolonged conflict with India.


    In order to do this, the late Premier advised the visiting Generals to raise a Pakistan Militia Force to act behind the enemy’s rear, to cut off its logistics and destroy strategic centres and prepare to take over operational control, once the first line of defence broke. On the eve of the 1965 War, General Ayub Khan who felt panicked was advised to resort to a long war with India, keeping in view the latter’s numerical superiority in Armed Forces. When the Pakistani President explained that the flat terrain of Punjab was not suitable for mounting guerrilla attacks on an advancing enemy, he was told to use all available natural obstacles like small rivers and high ground as a cover. Above all, the author says, the late Chou-en-lai reassured Ayub Khan that China would be maintaining pressure all the time. When asked categorically for how long, Chou-en-lai said, "As long as necessary, but Pakistan must keep fighting."

    This concept of warfare involving the citizenry of Pakistan was in fact totally alien to the Pakistani Generals. It was contrary to the military doctrine they had learnt at Quetta. However, the use of unorthodox tactics, the late Premier explained, was considered better suited to nations lacking a military-industrial complex. The Chinese had learnt it from their own long drawn struggle for liberation, the author quoted. It thus became clear to Pakistan leaders that if they wanted Chinese support they had to prepare for a prolonged war with India.

    In fact Pakistan needed Chinese support much more than that of the United States who did not prove to be a friend in deed in their wars against India. It was notwithstanding the fact that Pakistan was their military partner in CENTO, a frontrunner in the US war against communism besides acting later as a bridge between China and America. China on the other hand was believed to be a natural ally with a commonality of interests. While the friendly relations between the two varied initially depending on each country’s estimate of the utility of the other, their mutual marked hostility towards India had remained constant. The strategic linkage between China and Pakistan was forged in 1963.

    For instance, the creation of tension on Sikkim-Tibet border in September 1965 was to immobilise the Indian forces in the eastern sector. During the Bangladesh War, Chinese support to Pakistan was equally vigorous. On the other hand, General Musharraf’s visit to Beijing, more recently, when Pakistan was building defences in Dras, Kargil and Batalik sectors was to take Chinese approval, something that was considered both essential and mandatory.

    Further, as the events have unfolded, India is fighting a low intensity war with Pakistan for over two decades, proving the Chinese contention that it is only through prolonged conflict with India that Pakistan could overcome her military handicaps in the numbers game. This was proved by the expedition in Kargil which was another blow to Pakistan. In any direct war a country must possess 3:1 superiority in military but by undertaking irregular warfare against India, endorsing the Chinese strategy, Pakistan has not only surmounted the conventional superiority of India but has also circumvented the Indian nuclear deterrent.

    According to General VP Malik, former Indian Army Chief, India has lost nearly 35,000 lives fighting the unending war-like situation. This is more than the casualty rate of all the wars put together, that the country has fought both with China and Pakistan. The Union Law Minister has remarked that India is fighting a high intensity war on its borders with Pakistan, in contrast to the operations being dubbed as being of low intensity nature.

    The hidden strategic linkage between China and Pakistan amply proves that everything being done in India in terms of terrorism and cross border infiltration is not Pakistan’s doing alone. The players are different and Pakistan is being used only as a stooge. Imagine a country with a population of sixteen crores, a growth rate of less than 4.6 per cent and a debt of $35billion having let loose a rein of terror in India which is considerably bigger in size, population, resources and capabilities. However, where we draw a blank is on the political front. This factor has even put a question mark on the credibility of our over-a-million army by inanely deploying them on the borders and fatiguing them.

    The recent statistics show that there are nearly 2,500 Madrassas in different parts of Pakistan producing nearly 3 lakh fighters annually; ready to kill and die for Islam. Lashkar-e-Toiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed included, over a dozen organisations supported by ISI are engaged in terrorist activities against India on a permanent basis.

    In this context, military operations conducted by ISI have taken over the control of secessionist movements in Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram and Tripura. Earlier, insurgency elements in all these states drew help from China. In Assam too, the problem with ULFA and BODO tribals, which rose in arms through support by China are now ISI active. In Punjab, the crisis generated by the demand for greater decentralisaton of power, culminated in an armed uprising helped by ISI. Once again the country is faced with a fairly high intensity of terrorism with no sign of it abating.

    Operations of such magnitude, that too on a sustained basis, naturally cost extra money and resources. Keeping in view Pakistan’s socio-economic perspective, the country is hard-pressed in terms of economic growth, high inflation, rising debt, increasing poverty, growing unemployment and low literacy. It is, therefore, hard to accept that Pakistan is managing the confrontationist posture against India exclusively, without getting help from outside.

    On the other hand, the thrust of Chinese policy continues to rest on Mao’s dictum that "Power grows from the barrel of a gun." However, in its bid to prove to the world that China has matured politically, it has refrained from entering into a direct clash with other nations, unlike in the past. But given the geostrategic location of India, China has continued to nibble at India, in order to try and contain it at the level of a sub continental power.

    In this context, going by their policy of indirect approach of using Pakistan to maintain constant pressure on India, China has been giving huge military aid to Karachi. Since September 1965 China has supplied Pakistan complete equipment for two infantry divisions. The ordnance included battle tanks, fighter aircrafts, naval ships and submarines. Later during General Tikka Khan’s visit to Beijing in January 1978, talks were initiated for supply of missiles to Pakistan. According to New York Times, China’s rivalry with India was behind its arming of Pakistan with missiles. The report added, that, if China helped Pakistan secure medium-range missiles they would balance missiles that India, a large and more advanced country, has already developed for itself. Chinese technicians have been seen in Pakistan for the production of missiles including M-11, rocket motors, propellants and guidance system. Pakistan has also been seen testing Shaheen missile which has increased its ability to strike India.

    Again, as a matter of high strategy, the Chinese resolve to further dig into the subcontinent, has helped Pakistan in the construction of Karakoram highway by providing most of the funds and manpower. In the event of Sino-Pak combined thrust on India, this highway will pose a military and political threat to India’s security by making Srinagar-Leh road extremely vulnerable. In this regard Chinese clandestine help in providing logistics to Pakistan Army during latter’s adventures in Kargil could not be ruled out, due to proximity factor.

    Of late Chinese covert assistance to Pakistan’s nuclear weapon programme has completely aborted India’s plan of taking a lead in acquiring effective nuclear deterrence in the region after China; instead it has put India more in a state of quandary vis-à-vis Pakistan. According to US military sources, Chinese nuclear scientists are not only working in Pakistan’s nuclear facilities but have also enabled Islamabad to produce a bomb. China has set up 300 mw Chashma nuclear plant besides helping establish 40 mw Khushab Plutonium producing reactor and facility for extracting weapon grade Plutonium from spent fuel. It was intended to accord Pakistan taking a leap jump over India in nuclear technology and this became quite apparent when Pakistan carried out series of nuclear tests including thermonuclear as a sequel to India’s Shakti-II at Pokhran.

    Both the countries have travelled a long way since 1962. Though there has not been a repeat of any direct conflict between the two, Beijing has persistently maintained the posture of a strategic adversary to India. After all, China continues to occupy 14,600 sq miles of Indian territory annexed during the Sino-Indian War and is certainly in no mood to return it. She is a formidable neighbour and a security risk. Of late, China has started hitting at our domestic industry by flooding Indian markets with Chinese goods. We may dismiss this but cannot ignore it completely.

    So when George Fernandes, the Defence Minister of India speaks out on China being a potential enemy of India - echoing the voice of late Sardar Patel, that India has to reckon with a communist China that has definite ambitions and aims not very friendly disposed towards us - it carries substance, however awkward it may appear in diplomatic jargon.

    At the same time, the present long battle over Kashmir which Pakistan is fighting with India through fomenting terrorist activities by cross border infiltration is the last straw in the series of its devious game plan as suggested by China.

    http://www.satp.org/satporgtp/publication/idr/vol_17(2)/rakesh_datta.htm
     
    Navnit Kundu and Kshatriya87 like this.
  7. sorcerer

    sorcerer Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2013
    Messages:
    6,203
    Likes Received:
    5,121
    Location:
    India
    IDN TAKE: Is Pakistan Kashmir Policy Responsible For Its Faltering Economy?
    Pakistan’s foreign debt and liabilities touched the highest ever figure of over Rs 74 trillion in the first month of the current financial year, the country’s central bank informed on 30th Aug 2016. This is the record high debt in the history of Pakistan, What is the reason for this? , if I throw this question to the audience I am damn sure most will give the answer “Terrorism sponsored by Pakistan”.

    Why will any company invest in a country which is unstable, Corrupt and one of the prime sponsors of terrorism in entire World? The result of this fear is deterioration of the economy of Pakistan, another most important reason for poor economic condition of Pakistan is “Kashmir” issue, and time and again Pakistan has tried to internationalize the Kashmir issue and had fought 3 wars with India on Kashmir nevertheless Pakistan lost all the 3 wars leading to further deterioration of its economy.

    Pakistan’s Obsession with Kashmir started from 1947 when India and Pakistan were partitioned at the time of partition Kashmir was independent princely state under the rule of Maharaja Hari Singh. Maharaja wanted to keep Kashmir as an independent state by neither joining India and nor Pakistan, but on 22nd October 1947 Pakistan launched an attack on Kashmir by sending tribal militia, Maharaja Hari Singh sought the help from India to stop the advance of militia but before that had to sign the instrument of accession to India thus becoming one of the state of India after 1947 war India governed 43% part of Kashmir and Pakistan administers roughly 37% part of Kashmir.

    From 1947 the Kashmir is bone of contention between India and Pakistan relations and as analyzed by some experts is also a nuclear flash point between both South Asian neighbors.

    Pakistan considers India as its arch rival and considers Kashmir as its jugular vein thus its defense spending are directed towards India, Pakistan spends roughly 2.5% of its GDP on defense but this number looks sham as entire world knows that it is the Pakistani Army which calls the shot in Pakistan internal politics and Pakistan’s democratic government is just a puppet in hands of Pakistani Army Chief, large parts of Pakistan economy and its GDP are under the control of Pakistan military and there is a direct interference of Pakistani military in Pakistan economic policies and the proof of this interference is that till now Pakistan has not given most favored nation(MFN) status to India however India granted Pakistan MFN status way back in 1996. This military interference in economy has cost Pakistan dearly and has made Pakistan totally dependent on foreign aid, according to statistics US alone has granted Pakistan $67 billion till 2011 in addition to aid provided by other world agencies like IMF, World Bank and ADB.

    Presently, large part of US aid to Pakistan is being slashed because of failure of Pakistan in cracking down the Haqqani network in addition to this the secret links between Pakistani Government and terrorists organizations like Lashkar-e-Taiba, Taliban etc through its Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) agency has been busted, noting this US frustration Pakistan has found new donor inform of China and now Pakistan is attracting $46 billion Chinese aid in form of CPEC (China Pakistan Economic Corridor). This policy of Pakistan of depending on foreign aid is going to fail in long run because any country which itself is not able to sustain its economy faces a constant danger of going bankrupt if foreign aid stops, also that country has to follow the orders of the country which is providing it economic aid.


    In conclusion, rivalry with India on Kashmir issue has greatly cost Pakistan its economy also the constant support to terrorists groups has undermine Pakistan position to become an investment destination for other countries with exception of China. If Pakistan doesn’t mends its ways and do not stop in competing with India on defense spending than the day is not far when Pakistan’s economy will get bankrupt. Moreover Pakistan with its current economic and foreign policies will never be able to compete with India on economic terms as Indian GDP ($2 Trillion) is 8 times that of Pakistan ($250 Billion) .At last India can only say this to Pakistan “Get Well Soon”.

    http://www.indiandefensenews.in/2016/09/idn-take-is-pakistan-kashmir-policy.html
     
  8. Kshatriya87

    Kshatriya87 Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2014
    Messages:
    4,742
    Likes Received:
    3,185
    Location:
    Mumbai
    We should open a part of the border. Booby trap the terrorists. Send them to jahannum. Take their weapons and send them back to pakistan via balochistan of course.

    Even if the weapons are seized, they will be paki made.
     
  9. sorcerer

    sorcerer Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2013
    Messages:
    6,203
    Likes Received:
    5,121
    Location:
    India
    India to nail Pakistan's lie on LeT funding at international meet
    Highlights
    • India will look to corner Pakistan at a weeklong discussion on financing of terrorism in Paris
    • Free run given to banned outfits like Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jamaat-ud-Dawa in Pakistan will be brought up

    NEW DELHI: When delegates from 190 countries, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), United Nations and multilateral agencies sit together from Sunday in Paris for a weeklong discussion on financing of terrorism, the Indian representatives will turn the spotlight on the free run given to banned outfits like Lashkar-e-Taiba and its UN co-listed entities Jamaat-ud-Dawa (JuD) and Falah-i-Insaniyat Foundation (FIF) for raising funds for terrorism in the name of charity in Pakistan. :clap2:

    India will also highlight the recent collection of funds in the name of Hizbul commander Burhan Wani.

    According to the latest Asia Pacific Group report on action taken by Pakistan against terror financing in line with FATF recommendations, exclusively accessed by TOI, Islamabad claimed to have taken several measures under international pressure against these UN listed groups. The action included taking over the management of these UNSCR 1267 designated organisations — LeT and its charitable arms — FIF and JuD, and appointing an administrator from Punjab (Pakistan) government to oversee their operations. Pakistan also said it has frozen 33 bank accounts related to individuals and entities associated with LeT, JuD and FIF. In order to stem the fundraising activities of these outfits, the Nawaz Sharif government claimed to have put a ban on advertisements seeking funds in the name of charity, holding public rallies and has blocked websites and telephone services for raising of funds.

    However, the report which Indian officials are likely to raise in Paris says that the Markaz is still running under the name of JuD, which indicates that asset freezing and prohibitions on collecting funds are not comprehensively implemented. Indian officials say that Jamaat-ud Dawa and its branches still openly hold public rallies and collect funds while Pakistan is lying to the international community on such action.

    "It's all eyewash. Pakistan doesn't want to take action against UN listed organisations and individuals and doesn't comply with the recommendations of world body on terrorism financing — FATF," said a government functionary.



    The Indian delegation, which includes officials from MHA, MEA and other agencies, will also share steps taken by the Narendra Modi-led government in curbing terror funding through banking and non-banking channels, confiscating terrorists' assets, action on money laundering and amending unlawful activities (prevention) act to criminalize terror financing.

    In its last report to FATF in 2015, India had informed that Pakistan-based terror outfit Hizb-ul-Mujahideen was receiving funds originating from Pakistan through different channels.

    http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...t-international-meet/articleshow/54874631.cms
     
  10. Kshatriya87

    Kshatriya87 Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2014
    Messages:
    4,742
    Likes Received:
    3,185
    Location:
    Mumbai
    Modi just called Pakistan "the mothership of terrorism" at BRICS. Looks like independence day is in store.
     
    Mikesingh likes this.
  11. Navnit Kundu

    Navnit Kundu Pika Hu Akbarrr!! Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2016
    Messages:
    1,385
    Likes Received:
    2,935
    Baluchistan was an independent country on 13th August 1947, two days before India and one day before Pakistan. Jinnha's jihadis merely occupied the territory after their failed attempt to occupy Kashmir.
     
  12. Kshatriya87

    Kshatriya87 Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2014
    Messages:
    4,742
    Likes Received:
    3,185
    Location:
    Mumbai
    They still need independence from pigs don't they?
     
    Navnit Kundu likes this.
  13. Mikesingh

    Mikesingh Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2015
    Messages:
    1,089
    Likes Received:
    1,359
    That should read, 'At last India can only say this to Pakistan “Get fuked Soon”.
     
    sorcerer likes this.
  14. Mikesingh

    Mikesingh Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2015
    Messages:
    1,089
    Likes Received:
    1,359
    For those who aren't aware of the true story of Balochistan, do read this......


    How Balochistan became a part of Pakistan – a historical perspective

    http://nation.com.pk/blogs/05-Dec-2...e-a-part-of-pakistan-a-historical-perspective

    The last paragraph:

    The true history of Balochistan is never shared or talked about among the general public of Pakistan. Our textbooks and other publications narrate a rhetoric which is far from the truth, and which has made the general public believe in a lie. It is the responsibility of the intellectuals, the teachers and the professors to learn and reveal the real facts according to non-tempered historical documents.
     
  15. Mikesingh

    Mikesingh Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2015
    Messages:
    1,089
    Likes Received:
    1,359
    Really? What a fukin joke! Who are these Porks trying to fool? Check this out....

    Jamaat-ud-Dawa (JuD), the parent body of banned terror group Lashkar-e-Taiba has been allocated over Rs. 61 million in the budget for Pakistan's Punjab province government headed by Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif's party PML-N.

    Besides a grant-in-aid of over Rs. 61 million in its budget for fiscal 2013-14 for 'Markaz-e-Taiba', the largest centre of the JuD, the provincial government has allocated Rs. 350 million for setting up a "Knowledge Park" at the centre and other development initiatives.
     
  16. Navnit Kundu

    Navnit Kundu Pika Hu Akbarrr!! Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2016
    Messages:
    1,385
    Likes Received:
    2,935
    Don't know about them, but we sure do need them to be independent of Pakistan, that is the current situation. The back story is really interesting, if you are interested. Jinnah was actually the lawyer hired by the Khan Of Kalat who was the monarch of Baluchistan during British rule in India. In the name of lawyer's fees Jinnah asked the Khan to give gold equal to the weight of Jinnah and in exchange Jinnah would argue the case for the independence of Baluchistan from Pakistan. This was obviously a ploy. Jinnah took the gold, stalled the case until his army could prepare for a full invasion of Baluchistan and once they were ready, they invaded, kidnapped the family of the monarch, made him sign instrument of accession and Jinnah kept all the gold which he had taken as lawyer's fees, like a true Muslim. Jinnah was a very highly educated member of British India, I think he had foreign degrees too.

    Moral of the story is, doesn't matter how highly educated a Muslim is, be it doctor, engineer, barrister, prime minister, a Muslim never ceases to be a Muslim due to education, he remains a Muslim, first and always. Musharraf also has a similar story, he was actually an Indian from an elite Indian Muslim family who migrated to Pakistan very late after the creation. So all those who say that Indian Muslims are a different breed than Pakistani Muslims and their loyalty must not be challenged, here is a great counter example called Musharraf.

    As long as the nation of Pakistan exists as an alternative for Indian Muslims to look up to, as an ideological model for a functional Islamic state (which serves as living counter-narrative to India's nationhood of a secular democratic republic) and as a flagship of Muslims of the subcontinent and as a functional place of refuge for all anti-India elements to hide in, after committing crime in India, India will always face an existential threat from Pakistan. This makes Pakistan more dangerous than China, even with all their military might. Pakistan shall always provide the mental comfort of being the "Plan B" for any Muslim in the sub-continent who wants to start over afresh after committing a crime in India. In essence, India must always strive to undermine this nation to show that the idea of an Islamic riwayat within the Indian subcontinent was an inherently flawed concept, it will have more credibility now that it has been tried and failed once already during 1971, and once again, when Baluchistan splits apart.

    As long as people know that there is another rat hole to run to, after messing things up in India, they will always give step motherly treatment to their motherland. It is our responsibility to dismantle Pakistan to send a message to the 170M + 180M + 120M Muslims of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh that you cannot have a safe haven in South Asia. There can be no parallel Islamic model operating in the Indian subcontinent. We will break you until you are nothing more than vassal states of a Hindu India.

    Especially to the Muslims of India, it will send an unwritten message that there is no "Plan B" to migrate to, anymore, so if you were thinking of dodging taxes, planting bombs, burning saints alive in Godhra, throwing non-veg in temples, thinking that you could escape to Pakistan, that hotel-cum-lodge has shut down now. You will be brought to book, not by Indian army or RAW, but a simple hawaldar of Mumbai police and brought back in a second hand police van to face trial in not the supreme court as an international celebrity terrorist, but a chillar chindi chor arrested from the neighboring vassal state of Baluchistan, Sindh, Bangladesh, just like we do for jihadis hiding in Nepal currently.

    There will be no more Dawoods produced in India as there will be no more Pakistan to hide in. This is how we need to approach the problem.
     
    Last edited: Oct 17, 2016
    Kshatriya87 likes this.
  17. Mikesingh

    Mikesingh Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2015
    Messages:
    1,089
    Likes Received:
    1,359
    No more Pakistan by 2020. Here's the map....

    [​IMG]
     
    Kshatriya87 and sorcerer like this.

Share This Page