Pakistan's army calls for India talks

JAISWAL

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2010
Messages
1,527
Likes
1,027
Pakistan's army calls for India talks_ and _Kayani urges less spending on defence

SKARDU, Pakistan — Pakistan's army chief says his country is ready for talks with India over resolving a dispute over a Himalayan glacier.

Gen. Ashfaq Parvez Kayani's comments could signal a softening of the army's position toward a country with which Pakistan has fought three wars.

He says the dispute over the Siachen Glacier "should be resolved" and "how it is resolved the two countries have to talk about."

Kayani was speaking Wednesday in a rare question and answer session with the media after visiting the site of an avalanche near the glacier that has buried more than 125 Pakistani soldiers.


Pakistan's army calls for India talks - CBS News

.
.
. Kayani urges less spending on defence.
.
Source- Kayani urges less spending on defence | DAWN.COM
. .
. .
SKARDU: Pakistan's powerful army chief Wednesday said he would like to see the country spend less on defence, arguing that national security depended on development as much as on protecting borders.
Chief of the Army Staff, General Ashfaq Kayani, said "peaceful coexistence" with arch-rivals India was vital to both countries and the welfare of the people should be a priority.

The nuclear-armed neighbours have fought several wars since independence in 1947 and
both spend heavily on their military while millions
of their people languish in poverty.
"Peaceful coexistence between the two
neighbours is very important so that everybody
can concentrate on the well-being of the people,"
he told reporters.
The general was speaking at Skardu airport in
northern Pakistan after visiting the remote Gayari
army base in disputed Kashmir, which was hit by
a massive avalanche on April 7.
Rescuers are still searching for nearly 140 people
buried by the mass of snow and rock at the
camp, which lies around 4,000 metres (13,000
feet) above sea level.
Pakistan and India invest significant resources in
maintaining a military presence on the Siachen
Glacier — dubbed "the world's highest
battleground" — and the tragedy has sparked
lively debate about the human and financial cost
of defending an uninhabitable patch of snow and rock.
Kayani said soldiers would do their duty come what may, but defending borders should not be the country's sole priority.
"We in the army understand very well that there
should be a very good balance between defence
and development. You cannot be spending on
defence alone and forgetting about development,"
he said.
"Ultimately the security of a country is not only that you secure boundaries and borders but it is
when people that live in the country feel happy,
their needs are being met. Only in that case will a
country be truly safe." He said national security
should be a comprehensive concept.
"And therefore we would like to spend less on
defence, definitely," he said.
"Any country should do the same — more focus should be on the welfare of the people." Pakistan
has spent more than half its history since
independence under military rule and Kayani is widely regarded as the most powerful man in the country.
He said the decades of enmity between India and
Pakistan should be resolved through negotiation
and stressed the urgency of halting the damage
to the environment caused by troop deployment
on the Siachen Glacier.
"Ultimately it's going to affect the River Indus
adversely and we understand water is important
and water management is very important," he said.
Kashmir has been the cause of two wars
between India and Pakistan and the nuclear-
armed rivals fought over Siachen in 1987, though
guns on the glacier have largely fallen silent since
a peace process began in 2004.
 
Last edited:

W.G.Ewald

Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2
Professional
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
14,139
Likes
8,594
Is this due to a public outcry in Pakistan against the loss of life and will that loss be forgotten before long?
 

agentperry

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2010
Messages
3,022
Likes
690
finally pakistan army cheif is realizing that his country is in deep trouble.
economically its rotten
socially its radicalized which is bringing more harm to it than good ( good by turning loyal to army and getting highly anti-Indian)
and in overall manner gilgit balochistan and all its border with afghanistan is troubled badly where army and police are losing many men on weekly basis.

its time to concentrate more on domestic issues and clean the nation of the insurgent groups, men on Indian border will strain army and increase the expenditure.
the army is now thinking on fighting insurgent groups and then getting back to India when its internally stable like in 90s and 80s.

fighting ttp and other insurgent groups require atleast half a decade and to do it efficiently and economically they need to think less of India and deploy lesser men on India border.

the talks and other shit they are talking about, if there is a motive of buying time from pakistani side, will bring only 5 or atmost 10 years of peace, if they be able to finish off internal menace then they will be standing tall with greater economic strength and enhanced confidence and integrity.

India at the moment, should go on increasing economic and political ties but militarily it should maintain its tough stand. 65 years of thirst for blood of eachother and wounds of 4 wars and numerous skirmishes cant be forgotten, atleast in 5-10 years.
the readiness of India should be such that it can go back to hostile situation whenever pakistan changes it mind (shows its true color)
 

Blackwater

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2012
Messages
21,156
Likes
12,211
i dont think so army will make a deal on siachin especially after kargil.

Its the pak army who has problem with men and money.

poor pak army, their begging money is now over. America papa no longer give $$$$$ and chini papa is not known to give $$$


only option left for pakis is to Request India to downsize lolllll
 

SLASH

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2011
Messages
1,156
Likes
459
Time to spend some more. Lets increase the pressure. Spend more on infrastructure on the western border.
 

rock127

Maulana Rockullah
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2009
Messages
10,569
Likes
25,231
Country flag
SKARDU, Pakistan — Pakistan's army chief says his country is ready for talks with India over resolving a dispute over a Himalayan glacier.

Gen. Ashfaq Parvez Kayani's comments could signal a softening of the army's position toward a country with which Pakistan has fought three wars.

He says the dispute over the Siachen Glacier "should be resolved" and "how it is resolved the two countries have to talk about."

Kayani was speaking Wednesday in a rare question and answer session with the media after visiting the site of an avalanche near the glacier that has buried more than 125 Pakistani soldiers.


Pakistan's army calls for India talks - CBS News

.
.
. Kayani urges less spending on defence.
.
Source- Kayani urges less spending on defence | DAWN.COM
. .
. .
SKARDU: Pakistan's powerful army chief Wednesday said he would like to see the country spend less on defence, arguing that national security depended on development as much as on protecting borders.
Chief of the Army Staff, General Ashfaq Kayani, said "peaceful coexistence" with arch-rivals India was vital to both countries and the welfare of the people should be a priority.
The nuclear-armed neighbours have fought several wars since independence in 1947 and both spend heavily on their military while millions of their people languish in poverty. "Peaceful coexistence between the two
neighbours is very important so that everybody can concentrate on the well-being of the people," he told reporters.
The general was speaking at Skardu airport in northern Pakistan after visiting the remote Gayari army base in disputed Kashmir, which was hit by a massive avalanche on April 7. Rescuers are still searching for nearly 140 people buried by the mass of snow and rock at the
camp, which lies around 4,000 metres (13,000 feet) above sea level. Pakistan and India invest significant resources in maintaining a military presence on the Siachen Glacier — dubbed "the world's highest battleground" — and the tragedy has sparked lively debate about the human and financial cost of defending an uninhabitable patch of snow and rock. Kayani said soldiers would do their duty come what may, but defending borders should not be the country's sole priority. "We in the army understand very well that there
should be a very good balance between defence and development. You cannot be spending on defence alone and forgetting about development," he said.
"Ultimately the security of a country is not only that you secure boundaries and borders but it is when people that live in the country feel happy, their needs are being met. Only in that case will a country be truly safe." He said national security should be a comprehensive concept. "And therefore we would like to spend less on defence, definitely," he said. "Any country should do the same — more focus should be on the welfare of the people." Pakistan has spent more than half its history since independence under military rule and Kayani is widely regarded as the most powerful man in the country. He said the decades of enmity between India and Pakistan should be resolved through negotiation and stressed the urgency of halting the damage
to the environment caused by troop deployment
on the Siachen Glacier. "Ultimately it's going to affect the River Indus adversely and we understand water is important and water management is very important," he said. Kashmir has been the cause of two wars between India and Pakistan and the nuclear-
armed rivals fought over Siachen in 1987, though guns on the glacier have largely fallen silent since a peace process began in 2004.
Ok so India should spend less on defense because Pakistan has lost 150 soldiers and running low on money?

How about Pakistan starts spending less on nukes??? Pakistan is spending a reported $2.5 Billion on nukes and has surpassed India in number of nukes which is a matter of concern and alarming for world peace.

Pakistan expanding nuclear arsenal, should India be worried? : Pakistan News - India Today
 

Blackwater

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2012
Messages
21,156
Likes
12,211
latest report says half of paki population is under i.e 9 crore is under poverty line:rofl::rofl::rofl:
 

Blackwater

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2012
Messages
21,156
Likes
12,211
strange Gazi army of pakis, changed their tune after 150 deaths in a day:taunt1::taunt1:


What will happen to GAZWA-A-HIND.

His Holliness has already reached ambala u cant leave him alone in this stage:lol::lol:
 

Mr.Ryu

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2011
Messages
806
Likes
348
Country flag
No chance we should not accept to any thing that beggar say they are full of poison we must not trust them until they hand over those terrorist in puki land to us including dawod & co.

All we have to do is provide top of the line defense and facility to our soldiers in Glacier and high tech life support system and if puki cant afford such items let them die die die who cares :noidea: we must look only to our interest when it comes to puki they cant be trusted lol
 

Blackwater

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2012
Messages
21,156
Likes
12,211


listen to wat hamid gul says
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top