Pakistani Village Attacked By Afghan Militants

Agnostic Muslim

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2009
Messages
517
Likes
144
Ohhh really :lol: Now they suddenly became "civilians" because they were Paki civilians???

So easy for Pakis to ask sympathy when they never show any at first.
Why do you believe that the Pakistani villagers who were attacked, and whose livestock was killed and stolen, were not 'civilians'?
 

techmaniac

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2010
Messages
34
Likes
18
when pakistan do shelling in afghanistan in the name of killing ttp handlers thats an official ,overjoyed incident of bravery for pakistani army . i hope to see few human rights activists here from pakistan to raise their voice that time too. ( or are they afraid ?)
 

Jim Street

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2012
Messages
279
Likes
126
Country flag
Didnot you Pakistanis were over joyed with the 26/11 attack on Mumbai ? I saw it then from the comentary from many pakistani peoples.
So does that mean you also do the same. Being victim of terrorism, atleast have some sympathy for innocent.I agree people of Pakistan hate us and are happy when something bad happen in India.....but you can't say this for rural people.

How many villagers in our country know about ISI and terrorism.? In my village i think Pakistan has never been discussed, may be when there was a cricket match between us....
 

Agnostic Muslim

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2009
Messages
517
Likes
144
when pakistan do shelling in afghanistan in the name of killing ttp handlers thats an official ,overjoyed incident of bravery for pakistani army . i hope to see few human rights activists here from pakistan to raise their voice that time too. ( or are they afraid ?)
Has the ANA or GoIRA issued any statements indicating that these goat thieves were in fact ANA soldiers who mistook the villagers and goats for Taliban militants?

If not, there really is no comparison between the two events you are trying to connect.
 

rock127

Maulana Rockullah
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2009
Messages
10,569
Likes
25,230
Country flag
There is a difference between them and us. Maintain the difference.

Hum dushmani main bhi sharafat rakhte hain.....

BTW what is the proof those villagers were terrorists ?

Do you think ANA and other people of Afghanistan didn't work with Taliban and were part of terrorism against India. Just because now they are on our side, should we think these Afghanistan never harm us.....
Don't bore me with Amitabh Bacchan dialogue in LoC.Be practical and not emotional, it looks good in films.

We are keeping enough difference but Pakis are going down and down and down but STILL asking for sympathy because their own bred terrorists are attacking them.

What proof do you have that those civilians didn't support Jihadi groups? Why would 300 gunmen go inside Pakistan and kill only "civilians". Why so much risk to kill "civilians" when they could be ambushed by Pak Army?

Seems like now Pakis want to say all their terrorist or supporters are "civilians" so that they cry of human rights while they run their terrorist breeding sanctuaries as usual.
 

blank_quest

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2012
Messages
2,119
Likes
925
Country flag
So does that mean you also do the same. Being victim of terrorism, atleast have some sympathy for innocent.I agree people of Pakistan hate us and are happy when something bad happen in India.....but you can't say this for rural people.

How many villagers in our country know about ISI and terrorism.? In my village i think Pakistan has never been discussed, may be when there was a cricket match between us....
+1 .. but only one thing boss! Pakistan is not Human.. it may have humans... Pakistan is a flawed ideology ... and I laugh at that :pound:
 

techmaniac

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2010
Messages
34
Likes
18
Has the ANA or GoIRA issued any statements indicating that these goat thieves were in fact ANA soldiers who mistook the villagers and goats for Taliban militants?

If not, there really is no comparison between the two events you are trying to connect.
comparison is for the killing of innocent civilians and the way it is percieved in both countries. i donot support any. but if it happens both from sides their isnt much to cry for ,from any side.
 

Agnostic Muslim

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2009
Messages
517
Likes
144
comparison is for the killing of innocent civilians and the way it is percieved in both countries. i donot support any. but if it happens both from sides their isnt much to cry for ,from any side.
There is a significant difference in civilians being targeted deliberately, as was apparently done by these ANA Goat Thieves, and civilians being injured in the course of military operations attempting to target terrorists across the border.
 

techmaniac

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2010
Messages
34
Likes
18
There is a significant difference in civilians being targeted deliberately, as was apparently done by these ANA Goat Thieves, and civilians being injured in the course of military operations attempting to target terrorists across the border.
the thing being u believe they are civilians is the same rehotic the world knows about terrorist organizations like jud, jei and let percieved as ngo . when u dont believe in interfering a international border with shelling a deliberate act of aggretion that makes the state of pakistan hypocrytical. wat are your opininons if india do shelling in pok to destroy all terrorist camps ?
 

Agnostic Muslim

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2009
Messages
517
Likes
144
the thing being u believe they are civilians is the same rehotic the world knows about terrorist organizations like jud, jei and let percieved as ngo . when u dont believe in interfering a international border with shelling a deliberate act of aggretion that makes the state of pakistan hypocrytical. wat are your opininons if india do shelling in pok to destroy all terrorist camps ?
First, India does not shell Pakistani territory because it would be paid back in kind.

Second, until the GoIRA officially gives up its claims on Pakistani territory and recognizes the Durand Line as the international border, as it is recognized by the UN and essentially the rest of the world, it is in fact Afghanistan that is taking a position of 'deliberate aggression and hostility towards Pakistan'. Pakistan responded to attacks by hundreds of terrorists on its villages and checkposts by shelling the retreating terrorists - some of those shells may have gone astray ...
 

techmaniac

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2010
Messages
34
Likes
18
First, India does not shell Pakistani territory because it would be paid back in kind.
exactly my point when u feel it should be responded in a kind , one can expect an afghani reaction to be similar in the lines of pakistani shelling in afghanistan.

Second, until the GoIRA officially gives up its claims on Pakistani territory and recognizes the Durand Line as the international border, as it is recognized by the UN and essentially the rest of the world, it is in fact Afghanistan that is taking a position of 'deliberate aggression and hostility towards Pakistan'. Pakistan responded to attacks by hundreds of terrorists on its villages and checkposts by shelling the retreating terrorists - some of those shells may have gone astray ...
The same can be said otherwise afghanistan responded to the afghan taliban numerous attack which is well escorted as an strategical asset by pakistan which cause a existential threat to democracy and peace in afghanistan.
 

ajtr

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
12,038
Likes
723
Don't bore me with Amitabh Bacchan dialogue in LoC.Be practical and not emotional, it looks good in films.
that dialogue is from lakshya not from LOC.

We are keeping enough difference but Pakis are going down and down and down but STILL asking for sympathy because their own bred terrorists are attacking them.
you try too escape pakistan but you cant escape.yo are just like its shadow.

What proof do you have that those civilians didn't support Jihadi groups? Why would 300 gunmen go inside Pakistan and kill only "civilians". Why so much risk to kill "civilians" when they could be ambushed by Pak Army?
and what proof you ve that those were terrorists.

Seems like now Pakis want to say all their terrorist or supporters are "civilians" so that they cry of human rights while they run their terrorist breeding sanctuaries as usual.
another bla blah bla.....................................................
 

ajtr

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
12,038
Likes
723
+1 .. but only one thing boss! Pakistan is not Human.. it may have humans... Pakistan is a flawed ideology ... and I laugh at that :pound:
Pakistan's TNT ideology is as much flawed as india's secularism...sorry what you indians call it as pseudo-secularism.....:p
 

Daredevil

On Vacation!
Super Mod
Joined
Apr 5, 2009
Messages
11,615
Likes
5,772
Heavily Armed Afghanistan Militants Attack Pakistan Village - World Of Defense

Is Pakistan now at war with tribes inside Afghanistan. If this is true then Pak army will be hard pressed to maintain its presence on our border:becky:
First of all it is a joke to call the militants as Afghanistan militants. These militants are raised by ISI/PA to serve as a proxy in Afghanistan and now they are reaping the harvest now since they have turned against PA for supporting US.
 

techmaniac

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2010
Messages
34
Likes
18
Pakistan's TNT ideology is as much flawed as india's secularism...sorry what you indians call it as pseudo-secularism.....:p
atleast we dont have a geographical proof unlike pakistan (bangladesh).
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top