Apparently, they don't care about the natives and the people. They would choose a treaty signed by a dynasty of genocidal tyrants over the voice and rights to self-determination of the people. Just ignore it, they can keep pretending Gilgit Baltistan is a part of India and GBians are Indians - it does not affect us.
You mean what you are doing in baluchistan
Going by your logic then baluchistan should be declared a independent state because Mir Ahmad Yar Khan provided generous funding to the Muslim League, both at the local and All-India levels, and acquired the services of
Muhammad Ali Jinnah as the Legal Adviser to the Kalat state. With Jinnah's advocacy, it was agreed on 4 August 1947 that the 'Kalat State will be independent on 5 August 1947, enjoying the same status as it originally held in 1838, having friendly relations with its neighbours'. On the same day, an agreement was also signed with Dominion of Pakistan. According to the Article I, 'The Government of Pakistan agrees that Kalat is an independent State, being quite different in status from other States of India'. However, the Article IV stated:
a
standstill agreement will be made between Pakistan and Kalat by which Pakistan shall stand committed to all the responsibilities agreements signed by Kalat and the British Government from 1839 to 1947 and by this, Pakistan shall be the legal, constitutional and political successor of the British
Muhammad Ali Jinnah pressured Yar Khan to accept Pakistani rule but the Khan stalled for time. Out of patience, on 27 March 1948, Pakistan formally annexed Kalat.
[54] In April, the military invaded, conquering the territory in a months
So why did pakistan conquer baluchistan????
