Pak Stoked J&K Terror. Time for New Ties

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
Imran Khan calls for new ties with India, says he's not anti-west either

WASHINGTON: Implicitly conceding that Pakistan erred in using terrorism to foment unrest in Jammu and Kashmir, Imran Khan, the country's former cricket hero-turned-rising political star called for a ''completely new relationship'' between the two countries in keeping with the times.

Khan, virtually unknown in the US despite his near mythic cricketing status in the subcontinent, used a skype conversation with Washington DC's think-tank community on Friday to present himself as a moderate, progressive, idealist peacenik who has the silver bullet to Pakistan's problem.

"Opposing the US war on terror does not mean I am anti-western," Khan told several veteran Pakistan watchers who turned up at the Atlantic Council to hear the new political star from the beleaguered country, maintaining that he had lived in the west more than any other Pakistani leader and understood it better. ''I'm not anti-American; I'm anti American war-on-terror,'' he clarified, countering the broad perception here that he has Taliban sympathies and a poor understanding of western concern about Pakistan's radicalization.

Khan was vague about who the ''real terrorists,'' as he termed them, are, variously referring to Al Qaeda and the Punjabi Taliban. But he was clear that Pakistan stood more radicalized after 9/11 and the U.S war on terror. The only way to normalize the situation was to win the hearts of the people from whose midst terrorists were emerging, he said, adding that the U.S strategy of ''fight and talk'' would not work.

But it was his candid and implicit acknowledgement of Pakistan's mistakes on the Kashmir front that pricked the ears of regional specialists, although it was marked by some caveats. Pakistan, he conceded, had encouraged militants, which (he said) it called ''assets,'' following the ''rigged'' state elections in 1989, in hopes of fomenting an uprising. The policy failed and Pakistan had to suffer the blowback. ''Whatever the reason, we should move on,'' he said. ''The time has come to develop a completely new relationship with India. Pakistan should resolve all issues with India through political dialogue.''

This, Khan cautioned, does not mean putting the Kashmir issue on the backburner; if you do that there will be another Mumbai 26/11 kind of attack and things will be back to square one. He offered no specific solution or roadmap to resolve the issue other than constant dialogue.

Khan was blunt in criticizing Washington over its Pakistan policy, saying it did not involve the people of Pakistan. He wanted it to be like the U.S relationship with India, where no matter which political party came to power, U.S relationship with Indian democracy continued to thrive.

There were several other statements from Khan that reflected raw and pristine idealism that did not address the country's fundamental malaise, including its domineering military and its toxic ideological DNA that has put religion at the center of nation-building. In fact, Khan deftly deflected suggestions that he was backed by the country's powerful military saying like in the country, there was support for his party in the army too.

He also presented broad vision of his economic philosophy (still being formulated, he acknowledged) which he said was inspired by Scandinavian welfare states. "If you ask me today what is closest to that ideal, I would say the Scandinavian countries," he said, praising them for their "humane society, where there is rule of law, a society that looks after its weak, its handicapped."

While he was broadly critical of Pakistan's current political dispensation, Khan was at his harshest when it came to former military ruler Pervez Musharraf, who once called Khan ''Taliban without a beard.'' Khan scoffed at Musharraf's proposed return to Pakistan to enter the political arena, saying the former general faced a range of threats to his life, from Baloch freedom fighters, whose leader he allegedly murdered, to families of victims of the Lal Masjid military raid.

"He's going to have a terrible time,'' Khan sneered. ''No longer being the president and having the protection which he has, I would not be the insurance company to give him life insurance.''

Imran Khan calls for new ties with India, says he’s not anti-west either - The Times of India
Imaran Khan the new PM as is popularly believed has conceded that Pakistan stoked the J&K terror.

At the same time, he speaks of new ties. But he was quick to suggest that unless Kashmir is resolved, the Mumbai type of attacks could continue. In other words, he has said nothing new.

He has tried to present himself as a moderate, progressive, idealist peacenik who has the silver bullet to Pakistan's problem.

He has claimed that he was not against the US, but against the US War on Terror, and yet at the same time, has remained vague as to who are the terrorists. He has conceded that Pakistan is a radicalised country that requires the US to change its policy to address the situation in Pakistan.

If he should come to power, will it make any change to the India Pakistan relationship or the US Pakistan relationship?

Is he capable of achieving a balanced and progressive Pakistan?
 

SATISH

DFI Technocrat
Ambassador
Joined
Mar 7, 2009
Messages
2,038
Likes
303
Country flag
Same thing Zardari told when he was campaigning for his elections. But even after he came to power nothing changed....or it wasn't allowed to change.
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
True, but Zardari did not know or understand India as Imran does.

Imran has a better knowledge of India.

Would that help him to address the issue with greater passion than the others who have tried their hand at solving the issues?
 

SATISH

DFI Technocrat
Ambassador
Joined
Mar 7, 2009
Messages
2,038
Likes
303
Country flag
True, but Zardari did not know or understand India as Imran does.

Imran has a better knowledge of India.

Would that help him to address the issue with greater passion than the others who have tried their hand at solving the issues?
But sir, Will the army let him do it?

I don't think so. The army and the ISI will not let him take his decisions.
 

KS

Bye bye DFI
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Messages
8,005
Likes
5,758
Blah blah blah.....vote catching tantrums.

The foreign policy of Pak , especially relating to India is made in Rawalpindi and not in Isloo.
 

SpArK

SORCERER
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2010
Messages
2,093
Likes
1,112
He is the alternative the army will present to run its own agenda.
 

Dovah

Untermensch
Senior Member
Joined
May 23, 2011
Messages
5,614
Likes
6,793
Country flag
Hope the next Pakistani leader runs that country further into the ground.
 

thakur_ritesh

Ambassador
Joined
Feb 19, 2009
Messages
4,435
Likes
1,733
it seems after musharraf, IK is all set to toe the indian line, be it on kashmir or trade but then that could well mean the 4 point agenda discussed between MMS and mush possibly being put to work.

the best part is, IK has now repeatedly termed the pakistan sponsored terror in J&K as terrorism and no one in pakistani media is raising a voice, and there remains extremely limited coverage of this within pak media, which definitely shows that for now the pak army is not interested in rocking his boat, what is further note worthy is that a big chunk of people who were ministers during mush's dictatorship era are joining his party and it is possible that they could get to be the ministers in his government as and when it is formed, if so, every likely hood of continuation of mush dictatorship era's policies.

if khurshid kasuri gets to be the foreign minister, then there should be no doubt in anyone's mind that the much talked about 4 point agenda with the full backing of pak army will be implemented, the indian side as such has said there is no looking back on the issue, and the further movement on kashmir will be only be picked up from where it was left or there will be CBMs, and india has stuck to the line all throughout since the exit of musharraf.

why do i sense pakistanis are going to really hate and curse IK once he gets to be the PM of that country!
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
IK is a novice,

The hurly burly and machinations of Pakistan politics, the rampant interference of the Pak Army and the Mullah menace, apart from the Taliban will force him to adopt a new avatar - anti Indian to start with and then the usual - against the whole world less the Islamic countries!
 

Virendra

Ambassador
Joined
Oct 16, 2010
Messages
4,697
Likes
3,041
Country flag
If its Imran's turn, he will be taking over the throne of a nation in turbulent times, among immense expectations and powerful hostile entities such as PA.
It will be tough and he will be cursed. What matters in the end is, how much repair and rediscovery he could do for Pakistan.

Regards,
Virendra
 

Yusuf

GUARDIAN
Super Mod
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
24,324
Likes
11,757
Country flag
I would not want the mushy agenda back. Settlement on Kashmir under present boundary without the resolution of Gilgit Baltistan in India's favor is just not acceptable. Better to wait for the next war and decisively win it all on our terms.

No Indian should accept any unilateral treaty or border agreement that does not resolve Indian strategic interests. I am sorry, I am one of those who thinks there can be no peace with Pak even if kashmir is given to them on a platter. I would prefer them as enemies than friends. What we need is leadership with some balls. That will be all.
 

Tshering22

Sikkimese Saber
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2010
Messages
7,869
Likes
23,236
Country flag
जब जान निकल रही है तो सारी शराफत सूझ रही है इनें । We should adopt an even more aggressive stance once this UPA government is kicked out in 2014.
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
Yusuf,

Your contention is not what the Indian Govt subscribes to!
 

Yusuf

GUARDIAN
Super Mod
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
24,324
Likes
11,757
Country flag
Sir, I cannot expect it either with a legacy seeking PM.
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
Yusuf,

The PM can leave no legacy.

He is hamstrung by his own party and its head honcho as also the Opposition.

He is hedged around by friends and foe and both have the same aim - disgrace the PM!

He deserves pity!

A good man on the whole!
 

Yusuf

GUARDIAN
Super Mod
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
24,324
Likes
11,757
Country flag
I am a hawk when it comes to Pakistan, plus Indian vital strategic interest in GB means I will never advocate peace with Pakistan.

Unfortunately even ABV tried to run after legacy. So I don't know if there is anyone who comes to the "chair" and not try to be a "hero" in all the wrong sense as far as Indian interests go.

Cold start as I have understood is a perfect doctrine. Gives us land from the enemy and makes it talk on our terms. We better have govt with balls when it comes to pass that negotiates GB and not give away land captured and their soldiers as well.
They'd do well to call me when negotiations are done!!
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
Yusuf,

Hard line or soft line.

The only answer if Peace, even though not at all costs,

Try Peace!

One can do many things without going to war!
 

Virendra

Ambassador
Joined
Oct 16, 2010
Messages
4,697
Likes
3,041
Country flag
I am a hawk when it comes to Pakistan, plus Indian vital strategic interest in GB means I will never advocate peace with Pakistan.
Even if GB remains independent/autonomous, we still need it friendly or neutral for our long term strategic reasons. Not the one sprawling with terrorist camps.
 

Yusuf

GUARDIAN
Super Mod
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
24,324
Likes
11,757
Country flag
Yusuf,

Hard line or soft line.

The only answer if Peace, even though not at all costs,

Try Peace!

One can do many things without going to war!
Knowing Pakistan, I will not take the risk.
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
Yusuf,

Think Balochistan.

Think Balwaristan.

Think Sindhu Desh.

Think Seraiki!

Think Shia!

Think Ahmediya!

Think Black Omani in Gwadar!

Think Iran!
 
Last edited:

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top