Pak Army Ethos

Discussion in 'Members Corner' started by Ray, Jan 7, 2012.

  1. Ray

    Ray The Chairman Defence Professionals Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2009
    Messages:
    43,117
    Likes Received:
    23,545
    Location:
    Somewhere
    Received on email

    A glimpse into the ethos of the Pakistani Army
     
  2.  
  3. Nagraj

    Nagraj Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2011
    Messages:
    804
    Likes Received:
    254
    Army not trusting people whom it's supposed to protect and
    population not trusting it's own army both of them are wrong.

    Scary thing is the army has Atom bombs as well.
     
  4. Yusuf

    Yusuf GUARDIAN Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    24,274
    Likes Received:
    11,287
    Location:
    BANGalore
    The title itself is a joke. Pak Army and Ethos. What an oxymoron!!
    We saw in Kargil they didnt claim their own fallen men.
     
  5. Iamanidiot

    Iamanidiot Elite Member Elite Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2009
    Messages:
    5,326
    Likes Received:
    1,493
    Battalion fund...to be raised by battalion itself baap re baap these guys are uniforme thugs.Now I know the reason why these guys cannot fight and as the writer said PA is nothing but a bunch of Muhammad Shah Rangeela's :rofl:.This is no different from the Mughal Mansabdari system atleast the mughals had Rajput sardars and troops on whom they can rely these guys are enunchs
     
  6. Tomcat

    Tomcat Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2010
    Messages:
    493
    Likes Received:
    184
    Location:
    Sharjah United Arab Emirates
    to me the indian and pakistani armies are like two identical twins who had a common upbringing but when they went their seprate ways in their young adult hood one became a Honorful hard working son trying to keep the honor of the family and one became a brat and a rowdy FM cheetwood might be turning in his grave now seeing what the pakistan army has become
     
  7. Iamanidiot

    Iamanidiot Elite Member Elite Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2009
    Messages:
    5,326
    Likes Received:
    1,493
    the IA and PA are two different things culture,ethos and attitude wise.Don't compare IA with these enunuchs
     
    Dovah and Zebra like this.
  8. Tomcat

    Tomcat Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2010
    Messages:
    493
    Likes Received:
    184
    Location:
    Sharjah United Arab Emirates
  9. Bhadra

    Bhadra Defence Professionals Defence Professionals Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2011
    Messages:
    6,687
    Likes Received:
    2,357
    One of the run of the mill article by a frustrated officer filled with half truths and half fascinates.

    Was it Army that devided this country?
    Was it Pakistan Army who was responsible for 1948 incursion into Kashmir? No , it was their civilian leadership.
    Only during 1965, the Army went gungho considering the defeat of India in 1962 and Yahaya being led up the gum by the Americans.
    Bhutto was entirely responsible foe the division of the country in 1971 and whatever happened in Bangladesh.
    Benazir Bhutto is entirely responsible for Taliban phenomenon. ISI was just a tool.


    Under such unreliable history where in the political leadership was responsible for misery to Pakistan than the military itself, it is natural that the military will develop a distaste for their civilian leadership.

    The higher leadership of the Pak Army may have deviated and be corrupt which is every hwere but Pak Army middle ranks continues to be the only national institution supporting the survival of the state. You take it away and Pakistan is gone for ever.

    I feel bad for such micro understanding of this officer of issues Macro. There is enough literature available to say that Pakistan is what Pak Army is. If civilian institutions have lost control over Army in Pakistan it is their crass dishonesty and corruption. Or else why would they listen to the ISI's master, the Army.

    Utter nonsense.
     

Share This Page