One-third of CIA budget goes to ISI

Discussion in 'China' started by Daredevil, Nov 17, 2009.

  1. Daredevil

    Daredevil On Vacation! Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2009
    Messages:
    11,613
    Likes Received:
    5,670
    One-third of CIA budget goes to ISI

    November 16, 2009 11:41 IST

    Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence collected tens of millions of dollars through a classified CIA programme that pays for the capture or killing of wanted terrorists, since the 9/11 attacks, accounting for as much as one-third of US spy agency's annual budget, according to a leading US daily.

    The Los Angeles Times quoted officials as saying that the payments have triggered intense debate within the US government, because of 'long-standing suspicions that the ISI continues to help Taliban [ Images ] who undermine American efforts in Afghanistan and provide sanctuary to Al Qaeda [ Images ] members in Pakistan'.

    But US officials have continued the funding because the ISI's assistance is considered crucial. 'Almost every major terrorist plot this decade has originated in Pakistan's tribal belt, where ISI informant networks are a primary source of intelligence,' the paper reports.

    The White House National Security Council has 'this debate every year', said a former high-ranking US intelligence official involved in the discussions.

    Despite deep misgivings about the ISI, the official said 'there was no other game in town'. The payments to Pakistan are authorised under a covert programme initially approved by former President George Bush [ Images ] and continued under President Barack Obama.

    'The CIA payments are a hidden stream in a much broader financial flow… the US has given Pakistan more than $15 billion over the last eight years in military and civilian aid,' said the Los Angeles Times.

    'The ISI has used the covert CIA money for a variety of purposes, including the construction of a new headquarters in Islamabad [ Images ] -- that project pleased CIA officials because it replaced a structure considered vulnerable to attack. It also eased fears that the US money would end up in the private bank accounts of ISI officials,' it said.

    Given the size of overt military and civilian aid to Pakistan, CIA officials argue that their own disbursements -- particularly the bounties for suspected terrorists -- should be considered a bargain, the Daily Times reports.

    'They gave us 600 to 700 people captured or dead,' said one former senior CIA official, who worked with the Pakistanis. 'Getting these guys off the street was a good thing, and it was a big savings to (US) taxpayers.'
     
  2.  
  3. Daredevil

    Daredevil On Vacation! Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2009
    Messages:
    11,613
    Likes Received:
    5,670
    The original article in LAtimes.

     
  4. Pintu

    Pintu New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2009
    Messages:
    12,076
    Likes Received:
    327
    It seems uncanny to me, that they are still draining the money to ISI for sake of abatement of terrorism , while the latter is itself shaken by the terror attack and credibility taken to downhill with practically no or little control left on terror networks by the said organisation.

    This is my personal opinion , It will be great if any respected member please air his or her thoughtful view in this very interesting topic posted by dd.

    regards
     

Share This Page