Odisha police may boycott anti-Naxal ops if Maoists released

Discussion in 'Internal Security' started by Mad Indian, Apr 9, 2012.

  1. Mad Indian

    Mad Indian Proud Bigot Veteran Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2012
    Messages:
    12,830
    Likes Received:
    7,524
    Location:
    Podigai Hills.
    Odisha police to govt: We will boycott anti-Naxal ops if Maoists are released - The Times of India

    The Govt seems to lack the balls which even the Police have:doh:
     
  2.  
  3. utubekhiladi

    utubekhiladi The Preacher Elite Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2010
    Messages:
    3,021
    Likes Received:
    1,423
    Location:
    TX, USA
    what happened to do not negotiate with terrorist policy?
     
  4. Mad Indian

    Mad Indian Proud Bigot Veteran Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2012
    Messages:
    12,830
    Likes Received:
    7,524
    Location:
    Podigai Hills.
    Since when did the govt follow the policies:troll::heh:
     
  5. lupgain

    lupgain Offence is best defense

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2009
    Messages:
    366
    Likes Received:
    440
    Location:
    India
    I think Odisha govt should adopt no negotiation policy
     
  6. ejazr

    ejazr Stars and Ambassadors Stars and Ambassadors

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    4,518
    Likes Received:
    1,378
    Location:
    Hyderabad and Sydney
    I can totally understand the pov of the Orissa police.

    We don't seem to have any crisis managers and proper hostage negotiaters. These maoists should know that release of rebels is not an option. And in this case, there is only 1 MLA who is a hostage.

    This seems a repeat of the J&K situation in 1989 when rebels there had kidnapped the Home ministers's daughter and wanted ultras released in exchange for her. The Orissa govt. should not fall for this tactic and up the ante by saying that if the MLA and other hostages are harmed or killed; that those areas would be notified under DDA and AFSPA will be applied to that region with the full force of the state going after them
     
    KS, aerokan and devgupt like this.
  7. ejazr

    ejazr Stars and Ambassadors Stars and Ambassadors

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    4,518
    Likes Received:
    1,378
    Location:
    Hyderabad and Sydney
    Why the Indian soft state is losing the war to the Maoists | Firstpost

    For days now, Maoists in Odisha have been keeping the state government on tenterhooks with their demands for the release of their comrades in return for the two hostages they hold. And just when the Naveen Patnaik government appeared to have completely capitulated to the ‘ransom’ demand, the Maoists have gone ahead and raised the stakes, with demands for yet more releases.

    Unless the Maoists are cussed about it, the crisis will likely resolve itself at the right equilibrium of prisoners released to secure the release of the hostages. Thirty prisoners for an MLA may seem like a lopsided swap, but to a government that is negotiating at gunpoint, in an environment of policy opacity in such matters at the national level, no price is too high to secure the release of hostages. Particularly when there isn’t a political price to be paid for such surrender.

    On virtually every occasion (barring one notable exception, about which more below) that the Indian state has found itself in hostage situations, it has buckled under pressure, and shown itself up to be a soft state.

    That’s not to say that a government in such a situation doesn’t face a dilemma, one that involves making decisions on which lives hinge. It’s borderline disingenuous to thunder and demand that governments adopt a policy of never negotiating with terrorists; that’s easier said from the sidelines.

    Yet, what compromises the Indian state’s ability to negotiate from a position of reasonable strength in such situations — and skews the equation overwhelmingly in favour of the terrorists — is that it lacks the sting to signal any hard power at all.

    There are instances when even the most relentlessly uncompromising governments yield ground in hostage situations. Last year, the Israeli government, which for many represents the ‘gold standard’ in dealing ruthlessly with terrorists, negotiated the release of one of its soldiers who had been held hostage by Palestinian militants for five years. In return it released over 1,000 Palestinian prisoners, many of whom were involved in vile terrorist attacks on Israel. That swap left Israelis wondering if they’d perhaps paid too high a price.

    But what such terrorists-per-hostage calculations overlook is that Israel relentlessly goes after the released prisoners and in most cases recaptures them. In every other way too, Israeli power projection conveys a very strong signal that acts as a shield against further attacks or abductions.

    In India, however, governments at both the Central and state levels have failed abysmally to project that hard power that puts the fear of retribution in those who wage war on the state. If they were able to credibly summon up that power, hostage negotiations would be rendered somewhat more advantageous for governments because the back-channel intermediaries would be able to convey the message on behalf of a determined state that it will come after the terrorists – even after the swap has been carried out.

    Only once did the Indian state signal its uncompromising stand in the face of a hostage situation, but since that episode ended in a tragedy, political leaders have derived the wrong message from it.

    That notable exception happened in 1984, when Kashmiri separatists in Birmingham abducted Ravindra Mhatre, an Indian diplomat in the UK, and sought the release of their leader Maqbool Butt, who was awaiting execution in Delhi. The then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi refused to negotiate with the terrorists; Mhatre was killed, upon which Butt was promptly hanged. And although India, and the diplomat’s family paid a high price in that instance, it at least established something of a policy that the Indian state stood for. (More here.)

    Contrast that with the feckless surrender of the VP Singh government in 1989, which within days of coming to power was confronted by the embarrassing abduction of Union Home Minister PM Sayeed’s daughter Rubaiya Sayeed in Kashmir. Again, it capitulated by releasing jailed terrorists; it marked a defining moment, when the majesty of the Indian state stood crushed by the terrorists, and provided a big boost to the morale of the separatist movement – and claimed many thousands more innocent lives over the decades.

    The low point for the Indian state in hostage situations came in 1999, when Jaswant Singh, a minister in the NDA government, accompanied three dreaded terrorists to Kandahar and released them in return for the release of the passengers on board Indian Airlines IC 814, which had been hijacked by the Pakistan-based Harkat-ul-Mujahideen. That episode highlighted the price we paid in the absence of a crisis management strategy: the Indian security establishment lost out on the opportunity to immobilise the aircraft when it landed in Amritsar for refuelling.

    Since then, no government has had the spine to stand up to terrorists and Maoist abductors, although the attacks and abductions have only escalated in intensity. But what compounds that cowardice in dealing with the Maoist threat is the lack of clarity within the government on what their objectives are.

    Long after Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, in an unusual expression of candour, flagged the Maoist threat as perhaps the country’s biggest security challenge, leaders like Digvijaya Singh were sniping at Home Minister P Chidambaram’s counter-insurgency strategy. And more extreme commentators like Arundhati Roy have gone so far as to justify violence by Maoists, whom she referred to, without any sense of irony, as “Gandhians with guns”.

    Schizophrenia in policy making is downright dangerous when you are dealing with those who are waging war on the state, and who dream of unfurling the red flag at the Red Fort. It renders the Indian state softer than it already is, and accounts for why it is losing ground to the Maoists.

    What the leaders — at both the Central and state levels — need is a Gitopadesha, a sermon, like the one that Krishna gave Arjuna. ‘War’ is of course unpleasant, particularly when it is waged on one’s own people. But there are some situations — such as this — in which it is the duty of a leader to wage war, however unpleasant it may be.
     
  8. sob

    sob Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    6,359
    Likes Received:
    3,665
    Location:
    New Delhi
    Good steps taken by the cops. The Orissa CM is ready to buckle under pressure from the Maoists and all those cops who have lost their lives battling against these Maoists.
    In fact Naveen Patnaik should trade places with the Italian hostage and we can then close the chapter.
     
    KS likes this.
  9. KS

    KS Bye bye DFI Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2010
    Messages:
    8,008
    Likes Received:
    5,718
    Location:
    irrelevant
    Good move @ Orissa police.

    Hope they stand tough in their stance.
     
  10. nitesh

    nitesh Mob Control Manager Stars and Ambassadors

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2009
    Messages:
    7,541
    Likes Received:
    1,260
    Location:
    Bangalore
    Good time, our people in uniform capture these terrorists by putting there life in danger. It seems there life has no value at all.
     
  11. sob

    sob Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    6,359
    Likes Received:
    3,665
    Location:
    New Delhi
    The local Govt. has come out as a soft target to the Naxals and they will continue to increase the pressure and keep on changing their demands. We need another SS ray to finish off this problem.
     
  12. lcatejas

    lcatejas Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2010
    Messages:
    710
    Likes Received:
    255
    Location:
    Bharat
    Good job from Police .. take a lesson for next time ... No arrest only encounter.....:thumb:
     
  13. ALBY

    ALBY Elite Member Elite Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,990
    Likes Received:
    1,490
    Location:
    KOTTAYAM,KERALA
    Maoist leader’s wife freed, Odisha hostage crisis continues

    Bhubaneswar: An Italian and an Odisha legislator continued to be in the custody of Maoists Tuesday even as a top rebel's wife - whose release from jail had been demanded as one of the conditions to set free the hostages - was acquitted by a court. While the Maoist deadline for the government to meet their demands neared Tuesday evening, Subhashree Das, the wife of rebel leader Sabyasachi Panda, was released by a fast court in Gunpur in Rayagada district, about 250 km from here.

    She was acquitted in a 2003 shootout case for lack of evidence, officials said. Subhashree was accused of involvement in the exchange of fire between Maoists and police in Kutingaguda area of the district in 2003.

    Her release was sought by the rebels in exchange for Italian Bosusco Paolo who has been held captive by the Maoists since last month. Her husband was behind last month's abduction of Bosusco and another Italian, who was later released.

    After her release, however, Subhashree said the government did not have any role in her release. "I was saying from the beginning that I am innocent. Now it has been proved," she told reporters in Gunpur.

    Praising her husband for serving the poor and peasants, she said Sabyasachi was a friend, guide and philosopher for her even though he had to stay away from her. Subhashree was also apprehensive that police may arrest her again in 'false cases'.

    Subhashree, also known as Mili, is one of several prisoners whose freedom was sought by the Maoists group led by her husband in exchange for the release of Paolo.

    There was no official word on whether the state government facilitated her release. Sabyasachi is also yet to respond on his wife's release.

    Although some believe the release of Subhashree may pave way for the release of the Italian, the fate of Biju Janata Dal legislator Jhina Hikaka who has been kept hostage by another group of rebels since March 24 continued to remain in the dark.

    While Paolo was abducted by the Odisha unit of the Communist Party of India-Maoist (CPI-Maoist) from Kandhamal district, Hikaka was kidnapped by the Andhra-Odisha border special zonal committee from Koraput district.

    Both the groups were more or less making the same demands, which include a ban on tourism in tribal areas, a halt on the state's operations against Maoists, and the release of several prisoners.

    The state government a few days ago announced it would facilitate the release of 23 prisoners, including eight Maoists, to secure the release of Hikaka, and four other prisoners in exchange for the release of the Italian.

    But the kidnappers of the legislator and the Italian insisted that the government release five and three prisoners respectively, in addition to what the government has announced.

    Manorama Online | Maoist leader's wife freed, Odisha hostage crisis continues
     

Share This Page