Obama wins Nobel Peace Prize

johnee

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2009
Messages
3,473
Likes
499
Is life is all about failures? awards are not all for winners. I'm not supporting Obama but what I feel is we need to give some more time for him, after all you can't change the world in 9 months.
Agreed that the man needs more time. But how does that justify the award? Do people get awards based on what they could do in future? Is it some kind of gamble?

Why Mahatma Gandhi need an Nobel prize for his recognition? Nobel doesn't deserve it. Martin Luther King, Nelson Mandela, Dalai Lama, Therasa and Obama who got inspired from Gandhi probably deserve it. That speaks volumes about Gandhi.
Another spin!!!

It is not about whether MKG deserves Nobel or Nobel deserves MKG, it is the question of a suitable candidate not getting it and a completely irrelevant choice bagging the award. That will only take out all credibility from such awards and they look orchrestated to please certain people rather than the neutral judging of people's excellence in certain fields.
 

Martian

Respected Member
Senior Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2009
Messages
1,624
Likes
423
"they look orchrestated to please certain people rather than the neutral judging of people's excellence in certain fields."

This captures the heart of the matter. The Nobel Peace Prize selection looks rigged. Just like a rigged boxing match, the winner of the Nobel Peace Prize was already pre-determined. No one believes that the Nobel Peace Prize committee fairly judged a group of candidates based on each individual's contribution to peace.
 

indian_blues

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2009
Messages
495
Likes
1,277
Country flag
Agreed that the man needs more time. But how does that justify the award? Do people get awards based on what they could do in future? Is it some kind of gamble?
I don't have any respect for Nobel Prize because of the political pressure, but immense on Obama as an individual, after all he is the only person we can really hope to, as he said he doesn't deserve it but probably when he vacates white house we can certainly beleive that he had done something that everyone can be proud of him. :icon_salut:
 

johnee

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2009
Messages
3,473
Likes
499
I don't have any respect for Nobel Prize because of the political pressure, but immense on Obama as an individual, after all he is the only person we can really hope to, as he said he doesn't deserve it but probably when he vacates white house we can certainly beleive that he had done something that everyone can be proud of him. :icon_salut:
I disagree, I have no hope from Obama. He has already shown that he is hostile to India. As an Indian, I have greater respect for Bush. He really helped India and under him, for the first time, US was sympathising with India. Obama just reversed that Bush policy.
 

1.44

Member of The Month SEPTEMBER 2009
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2009
Messages
4,359
Likes
52
Obama has yet to live up to his promises he made in his campaign.If he had/might managed to successfully end the Iraq war or stabilize Afghanistan he might have been a excellent candidate for the peace prize.
Maybe the nobel guys have a crystal ball or something.
 

xebex

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2009
Messages
536
Likes
70
Oh man this was totally premature decision from Nobel committee. Could've waited for few more years. Even Obama was like wtf.

One thing for sure, it will be a tough task for Obama to keep his Nobel medal clean and shiny for the rest of his life.
 

Antimony

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2009
Messages
487
Likes
14
Guys,

I heard on NPR that he himself was surpised when he heard this
 

Daredevil

On Vacation!
Super Mod
Joined
Apr 5, 2009
Messages
11,615
Likes
5,772
Some facts about this Nobel prize to Obama

Deadline for peace prize Nomination - February 1

Obama became president on January 20

So, somebody nominated him for his work of 10 days as a president :p, otherwise there is no great body of work done by him before he became president.

The Nobel peace prize committee members are left-leaning members and so Obama being a leftist got the votes from them.

So, what exactly he did that is worth giving Nobel peace prize apart from his hot air speeches. He has done nothing worthwhile in his own country forget about the world.

Sorry Obama, you don't deserve this prize or this prize is just a farce.
 

qsaark

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2009
Messages
177
Likes
2
Nobel peace prize has always been political. Is this only a coincidence that all the US presidents awarded with the Nobel peace prize were Democrats? The selection procedure for Peace prize will remain like this because the committee has to choose someone from the available lot. At any rate, by discussing this, are we not giving it importance that it surely does not deserve?
 

BLACK_COBRA

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2009
Messages
73
Likes
0
Anti-nuke Obama won't allow India to expand weapons programme

WASHINGTON: Just hours before the Nobel Committee announced the Peace award for Barack Obama citing his work in nuclear weapons elimination, the
American President transmitted to the US Congress a letter which in effect promised that his administration was working with other countries not to support enhancement of India’s nuclear weapons programme. :clever66:

Such a Presidential letter, or ''certification'' is required every six months under section 204 of the US-India Civilian Nuclear Cooperation Act, but Obama’s punctilious reporting to the Congress of the US meeting its obligation is among the factors that mark him out to be a staunch anti-nuclear weapons advocate.

Section 204 (a) of what the Obama White House formally calls the ''US-India Nuclear Cooperation Approval and Nonproliferation Enhancement Act'' requires the U.S President to certify to Congress that ''it is the policy of the U.S to work with members of the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG), individually and collectively, to agree to further restrict the transfers of equipment and technology related to the enrichment of uranium and reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel'' to India.

(Section B of the act says the President ''shall seek to achieve, by the earliest possible date, either within the NSG or with relevant NSG Participating Governments, the adoption of principles, reporting, and exchanges of information as may be appropriate to assure peaceful use and accounting of by-product material.'')

Distilled from the legalese is the commitment that the US — and the NSG — will not allow India to in any way enhance its weapons-making capability riding on the civilian nuclear deal.

While some Indian critics expect Obama to be a thorn in the prospects of a muscularly nuclear India, the fact is as a senator Obama voted for the US-India nuclear deal — which implicitly recognizes India as a nuclear weapons power. Since then, as President, he has not questioned India’s status as a nuclear weapons power.

But working toward abolishing nuclear weapons seems to be an article of faith with him, although he concedes that it may not be accomplished in his lifetime.

''We cannot tolerate a world in which nuclear weapons spread to more nations and in which the terror of a nuclear holocaust endangers more people. And that's why we've begun to take concrete steps to pursue a world without nuclear weapons, because all nations have the right to pursue peaceful nuclear power, but all nations have the responsibility to demonstrate their peaceful intentions,'' Obama said after the Nobel award, echoing remarks he has made frequently in the past, starting with his landmark address in Prague last year.

That speech appears to have impressed the Nobel grandees. In its statement, the Nobel committee said it ''attached special importance to Obama's vision of and work for a world without nuclear weapons.''

Obama though is conscious of his limitations in carrying through his vision both in the face of geo-political complexities and a hard-line, militaristic, entrenched domestic constituency that believes ardently in a tough nuclear posture.

''Some of the work confronting us will not be completed during my presidency. Some, like the elimination of nuclear weapons, may not be completed in my lifetime,'' Obama said post-award. ''But I know these challenges can be met so long as it's recognized that they will not be met by one person or one nation alone.''

Anti-nuke Obama won't allow India to expand weapons programme - US - World - The Times of India
 

dead-already

New Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2009
Messages
4
Likes
0
may be noble comittee thought..
He'll {Obama} think twice before invading/waging war on small countries{poking nose in other countries matters } :tank:
 

Pintu

New Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2009
Messages
12,082
Likes
348
I think he would opt for the policy 'Charity begins at home' and do justice to the Honour gifted to him.

Regards
 

tarunraju

Sanathan Pepe
Mod
Joined
Sep 18, 2009
Messages
9,080
Likes
40,077
Country flag
Planned to watch a movie this weekend and nothing worked out? You may give this very plausible conspiracy theory movie a try (2 hours long, watch it on GV for a bigger video frame): The Obama Deception
 

p2prada

Senior Member
Joined
May 25, 2009
Messages
10,234
Likes
4,015
This guy gets a Nobel prize for what? Talking out of your a** and being the President of the United States gets you Nobel Prizes. What has he done till date? Nothing but talk, talk, talk.

Tomorrow Obama will declare war on Iran.

Planned to watch a movie this weekend and nothing worked out? You may give this very plausible conspiracy theory movie a try (2 hours long, watch it on GV for a bigger video frame):
I have the DVD Rip. :D
 

Pintu

New Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2009
Messages
12,082
Likes
348
The Associated Press: Russians praise, GOP mocks, Obama's peace prize

Russians praise, GOP mocks, Obama's peace prize

(AP) – 54 minutes ago

WASHINGTON — While Russia's president congratulated President Barack Obama for winning the Nobel Peace Prize, Republicans see the award as so outrageous that they're using it to raise campaign money.

Obama won the prize "for awesomeness," says the mocking GOP fundraising letter. Obama's honor shows "how meaningless a once honorable and respected award has become," says the letter, signed by Michael S. Steele, chairman of the Republican National Committee.

Russian President Dmitry Medvedev had a different view. He said the award will encourage further U.S.-Russian cooperation.

"I hope this decision would serve as an additional incentive for our common work to form a new climate in world politics and promote initiatives which are fundamentally important for global security," Medvedev said in a letter to Obama.

Steele said Obama hasn't accomplished enough to deserve the prize. Numerous Democrats and independents have expressed similar views, although generally in less bombastic terms.

Asking for contributions to the RNC of $25 to $1,000, Steele wrote that "the Democrats and their international leftist allies want America made subservient to the agenda of global redistribution and control. And truly patriotic Americans like you and our Republican Party are the only thing standing in their way."

Former Cuban leader Fidel Castro called the Nobel award a "positive step," although he said it was more a repudiation of former President George W. Bush than a recognition of anything concrete Obama has done.

South Africa's president, Jacob Zuma, cited a Zulu term — "Ubuntu," which refers to the importance of community" — in saying Obama's "leadership reflects the true spirit of Ubuntu because your approach celebrates our common humanity."
 

Flint

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Messages
1,622
Likes
163
Planned to watch a movie this weekend and nothing worked out? You may give this very plausible conspiracy theory movie a try (2 hours long, watch it on GV for a bigger video frame): The Obama Deception
Don't bother with this stuff. Its a mixture of internet myths, speculation, and facts that are presented to push the agenda.
 

ajay_ijn

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2009
Messages
422
Likes
28
Country flag
may be Obama can start disarmament process by giving up US nuclear weapons. Then he would really deserve a nobel. Instead of attacking countries which did not sign NPT, how about starting the process at home.

atleast US can stop deploying nukes in other countries. This is continuing even after cold war.
 

Sridhar

House keeper
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
3,474
Likes
1,061
Country flag
Many in US media skeptical of Obama's Nobel Prize
(AFP) – 2 days ago
WASHINGTON — US President Barack Obama's Nobel Peace Prize win has been met with skepticism by many US media organizations, including those who endorsed him as a candidate during the 2008 election campaign.
"Excessive praise can be unwelcome and embarrassing," noted The Los Angeles Times. "We endorsed him for the job, and we greatly prefer him to his predecessor. But it's difficult to see why he deserves the peace prize so soon after taking office. The Nobel committee didn't just embarrass Obama, it diminished the credibility of the prize itself."
The Washington Post, another newspaper that had endorsed Obama for president, was equally skeptical.
"It's an odd Nobel Peace Prize that almost makes you embarrassed for the honoree," said the Post editorial. "In blessing President Obama, the Nobel Committee intended to boost what it called his 'extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples.'
The Wall Street Journal, a conservative newspaper, said in an editorial that its reaction was "bemusement" at the Nobel Committee, which the paper said was "anticipating the heroic concessions that it believes Mr. Obama will make to secure treaties that will produce a new era of global serenity."
"We all have at least three more years to learn if Mr. Obama will fulfill the audacity of hope that the Nobel Committee has put on him to bow to the values of the world's 'majority,'" the paper opined.
But Thomas Carothers, vice president for studies at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in Washington, said the prize reflects just how strongly many Europeans felt that "a conflictive rift" opened up between the United States and the rest of the world during the Bush years.
"In their view, Mr. Obama?s election and his determination to reengage globally already have done much to heal this rift and thus merit reward," Carothers noted in The New York Times.
Presidential scholar Stephen Hess of the Brookings Institution is quoted by USA Today as saying the judges may have been investing in Obama, rather than rewarding him for what he has done so far.
"It shows the Nobel committee's audacity of hope," Hess told the paper, borrowing from one of Obama's book titles, "Hope for future achievement."
But The Boston Globe saw in the Nobel committee decision a silver lining.
"Whether or not the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to Obama prematurely, global awareness of the award can translate into a valuable American asset," The Globe said in an editorial.
"Hard-headed leaders in Tehran, Moscow, or Pyongyang will not suddenly do Obama?s bidding simply because he has been praised by a committee of dignitaries in Oslo. But this Peace Prize carries a message for those leaders and their publics."


AFP: Many in US media skeptical of Obama's Nobel Prize
 

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top