Numerical strength and Operational status of Tanks in Europe

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
Ukraine: The military balance of power

On paper, at least, the Ukrainian military looks credible, though it is numerically inferior to the Russian armed forces - Moscow having about four times as many active troops and twice as many tanks as Kiev.

On the face of things, if Russia were to move into eastern Ukraine, then the Ukrainian forces should be able to put up a better performance than tiny Georgia's armed forces did when the Russians moved onto the offensive in 2008.

But in reality, Ukraine's military is dispersed; it lacks readiness, and much of its equipment is in storage.

Given the divisions inside the country, there must also be question marks about the loyalty of elements of the Ukrainian military to the new interim political authorities in Kiev.



Elite forces
Russia, in contrast, has been exercising some 150,000 troops in military districts bordering eastern Ukraine.

It can also draw upon specialised, capable units like the 7th Guards Airborne Division based at Novorossisk; a variety of special forces formations; and potentially it could deploy elite Interior Ministry forces whose training and equipment might be ideally suited to this kind of mission.

The Ukrainian military inherited a significant quantity of former Soviet equipment at independence.

It is thus in many ways a smaller mirror image of the Russian forces, similarly equipped but having had very little money to modernise over the course of subsequent decades.

It has had some limited, small-scale experience in Nato operations. Its force structure has been modernised to a certain extent. But it is far from cutting edge, with much of its equipment moth-balled or poorly maintained.

Ukraine is also on its own. It is certainly a partner country of Nato but it has none of the security guarantees that membership of the Atlantic Alliance would bring. There is simply no question of Nato becoming militarily involved in this crisis.

Russia was from the outset in the driving seat in the Crimea. Its deployments there dwarf Ukraine's limited forces in the region.

Russian reinforcements

While the Black Sea Fleet itself is now rather out-dated and in any case one of Russia's smaller naval forces, its military bases there gave it more than sufficient manpower to take over key installations and blockade Ukrainian units inside their bases.



Over the past few days, Russian reinforcements have been arriving but Moscow retains the option of sending in many more units if any actual fighting breaks out.

So far, Russia's military operation has been largely bloodless. Its forces have met with only some passive resistance from Ukrainian units, who can do very little.

Perhaps the initial military phase of this crisis is largely at an end. However, if Russian troops were to move into eastern Ukraine it could take this drama to a whole new level.

It is not so much that there would be full-scale mechanised warfare - though clearly some Ukrainian units might fight.

The greater danger is that such a move could prompt a bitter civil struggle with pro- and anti-Russian groups mobilising against each other

BBC News - Ukraine: The military balance of power
 

militarysta

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2011
Messages
2,110
Likes
789
Both numbers given above are wrong.


Rusia has not 2500 tanks but on duty circa 1500 + 1000 whit unkown condition (I have some assumptions here).
Ukriana has not 1100 tanks but mucht less, it was posted here page erlyier:
Ukraine: 106 T-64BM Bulat + 224 T-64BW + 320 other T-64BW whit unkown operational status

So sucht newspaper articles are ussaly rubbish ;-)
 

W.G.Ewald

Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2
Professional
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
14,139
Likes
8,594
What does Numerical strength and Operational status of Tanks in Europe to be the index of victory in battle?

They are mere statistics.
Sir, as we know strength and readiness are indicators. A better indicator would be the level of training of the armored forces in joint operations.
More than 50 U.S. Army M1A2 Abrams Main Battle Tanks and M2A3/M3A3 Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicles rolled into the Grafenwoehr Training Area this week as the final shipment of the European Activity Set.

The arrival of the vehicles marks the return of U.S. Army heavy armor to the European continent. The last heavy armor left Europe in 2013 with the inactivation of the 172nd Infantry Brigade Combat Team.

The EAS is a combined-arms battalion-size set of vehicles and equipment that will be pre-positioned at the U.S. Army's Grafenwoehr Training Area to support units deployed to Europe as part of the Army's Regionally Aligned Forces program.

"Pre-positioning the EAS here allows the Army to save time and money on transportation," said Col. Thomas Matsel, Chief of Operations for the 7th Army Joint Multinational Training Command. "It also expands the training experiences we can offer to both U.S. and partner-nation forces here in Europe."
http://www.army.mil/article/119213/Heavy_armor_returns_to_Europe_to_support_rotational_forces/
 
Last edited:

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
Training , terrain , weather and Intelligence Battle field Preparation holds the key
 
Last edited:

W.G.Ewald

Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2
Professional
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
14,139
Likes
8,594
[PDF]http://www.fas.org/irp/doddir/army/fm34-130.pdf[/PDF]
 

militarysta

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2011
Messages
2,110
Likes
789
Update 2014 :)

Poland:



Germany:

PzBat. :
- Pz.Bat.93 (Munster)
- Pz.Bat.203 (Augustdorf)
- Pz.Bat.104 (Pfreimd)
- Pz.Bat.392 (Bad Frankenhaisen)

4x 44 = 176 Leopard-2A6

Pzh.Lehr units:

- Augustdorf
- Pfreimd
- Bad Frankenhaisen

eacht one: 4 x Leo-2A5 = 12x Leo-2A5

+
Mixed Panzer Lehr in Munster: (5x Leo-2A6 i 8x Leo-2A5) = 13 (14?)

+ reserve PzBatl in OA-blt Munster:
(44x Leopard-2A6)

Tottal:
176x Leopard-2A6 in 4 Pz.Bat. + 12 Leopard-2A5 in 3 trening units + 13 Leopard-2A5 in Munster in Pz/Lehr + 44 reserve Leopard-2A6 in Munster (OA-blt Munster) = 245 Leopard-2A6/A5 tottal, 176 in "active" service, whit option to very fast "reactivation" this "trening" units and OA-blt from Munster.

GB:
in 2020 will be 4 Tank Regiments:

GB:
1) Royal Tank Regiment (Tidworth)
2) King's Royal Hussars (-//-)
3) Queen's Royal Hussars (-//-)
4) Royal Wessex Yeomanry (AR) (Bovington)

4x 56 = 224x Challenger-2 + 20 trening vehicles


France
4x regiments, eacht 60 tanks = 240 leclerc
but:
La poursuite de l'effort de numérisation et une préparation opérationnelle
appropriée garantiront la cohérence entre ces trois composantes et leur capacité
à se renforcer mutuellement. Ces forces disposeront notamment d'environ
200 chars lourds, 250 chars médians, 2700 véhicules blindés multirôles et de
combat, 140 hélicoptères de reconnaissance et d'attaque, 115 hélicoptères

Russia 2014
~225 T-90A
~130 T-90
~300-400 T-80U (some part in reserve)
280-300 T-72B3 in two version
810-850 T-72BA
~ 500-800 T-80BV
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top