Novator awacs-killer

J

John

Guest
the MKI will have no trouble detecting an awacs at over 300 km, its radar has max. range of 350km for 5m2 target, the missile has a range of around 300 km when launched from very high alt. and super sonic speeds, the missile has a top speed of around mach 6 which allows for short flying time and since its a first shot, the mki can hold on to the target for another 150 km for mid-course updates without having to face any trouble at all, the missile kills the awacs. This missile has been designed for large targets like awacs and transport aircraft.
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,880
Likes
48,578
Country flag
Zvezda Kh-31 (AS-17 Krypton)

Zvezda Kh-31 (AS-17 Krypton)

New air defense weapon systems of the American Patriot kind have raised the requirements which antiradar missiles must meet. These include first of all higher speed and longer range, then also high interference immunity and radar turn-off when attacked.

For the special purpose of meeting these requirements, the "Zvezda" group under the direction of V. Bu***skiy began in 1977 working on the Kh-31 missile (Article) 77P). The first launchings of this missile took place in 1982.

The most interesting component of the Kh-31P is its dual propulsion system designed by the "Soyuz" Design Bureau in Turayevo near Moscow (note: there are several "Soyuz" engineering groups in Russia). First the missile is accelerated by its solid-fuel rocket engine to a speed of Mach 1.8, then the engine is discarded and the interior of the missile is converted into the combustion chamber of the missile's jet engine.The latter accelerates the missile to a speed of almost Mach 4.5, while four air intake holes on the sides of the missile body open up. On the basis of the Kh-31P antiradar missile were developed the Kh-31A missile (Article 77A) with an active-radar guidance head and also an M-31 flying target for air defense training exercises. The Kh-31 was for the first time publicly displayed in November 1991, in Dubai (United Arab Emirates).

The State Scientific Production Center Zvezda-Strela has upgraded the air-to-surface supersonic ASM Kh-31A NATO: AS-17 Krypton). Recently a variant of the air-to-air class based on the Kh-31 was made available, equipped with a hybrid active-passive guidance head for use against nonmaneuvering airborne targets such as AWACS (passive guidance) from far distances. The range of this missile is 200 km. The unofficial designation of this missile is 'mini-Moskit'. The Kh-31A missile has been developed from the technologies of the 1970-80s.
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,880
Likes
48,578
Country flag
Kh-31P / AS-17 Krypton, YJ-91


Description: The Kh-31, AS-17 Krypton NATO-codename, is an advanced, long range, highly supersonic missile designed to withstand countermeasures effects. The Kh-31 propulsion system consists of a solid-fuel rocket engine which accelerates the missile to Mach 1.8 airspeed. Then this engine is dropped and a jet engine ignites using the missile's within space as a combustion chamber. The missile accelerates to Mach 3+ thanks to the jet engine.

The Kh-31P has been designed to be a high performance anti-radiation missile against the most sophisticated air defense systems developed by NATO countries. It features high kill probability against radar systems that have been turned-off when attacked.
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,880
Likes
48,578
Country flag
KH-31 India

Kh-31PMK could deliver even more lethal SEAD

ROBERT HEWSON Editor, Jane's Air-Launched Weapons
London

* Russian sources claim the Kh-31PMK outclasses all comparable systems in the suppression of enemy defences role

* A new improved wideband seeker is believed to be fitted to the Kh-31PMK

Russia is testing a new version of the Kh-31P (AS-17 'Krypton') high-speed anti-radiation missile that is larger, longer-ranged and more capable than any existing variant of the weapon.

The Kh-31PMK is an export-dedicated missile that Russian sources describe as "a step beyond previously described upgrades".

The Kh-31PMK is undergoing operational clearance trials at Russia's weapons test centre in Akhtubinsk. When it enters service the missile will outclass all comparable systems in the suppression of enemy defences (SEAD) role, the sources claimed.

The Kh-31 was developed during the 1980s by Zvezda-Strela. The key to its unique performance is a liquid-fuelled ramjet propulsion system, produced by Soyuz TMKB. Both Zvezda-Strela and Soyuz have now been incorporated in Russia's Tactical Missiles Corporation. Two basic Kh-31 versions were built: the active radar-homing Kh-31A anti-ship missile and the passive anti-radiation Kh-31P.


The original Kh-31P was fielded with three interchangeable seeker heads, each covering a different frequency band for use against specific NATO radar/ missile systems. Seeker manufacturer Avtomatika CKBA has been developing an improved wideband seeker (the L-130) that covers all the required frequencies in a single unit. This new seeker is believed to be fitted to the Kh-31PMK.

The Kh-31PMK is longer than the Kh-31P, with an extended main body. Russian sources note that the improved missile has an increased range of approximately 200 km. While there are several methods of improving ramjet performance the longer missile points to the straightforward incorporation of additional fuel. The missile software has also been improved, to use more efficient trajectories that further extend the weapon's reach.

Zvezda-Strela officials have referred to an upgraded Kh-31PM (M, modernizirovannaya - modernised) for several years. The emergence of the Kh-31PMK programme is a new twist, and a significant one. Jane's sources say that the PMK missile is not the same as the PM, leaving open the question as to whether a separate Russian Kh-31PM programme also exists.

The K designation stands for Kommercheskaya (commercial), ie for export. In practice, the K also stands for Kitai (China). Only China and India are known to have acquired the Kh-31 and Russian sources note that China has a sizeable requirement for longer-range SEAD weapons. The Kh-31PMK is on test at Akhtubinsk as part of (but not exclusive to) the Su-27SM/SKM multirole upgrade programme for the single-seat 'Flanker' - another Chinese link to the weapon.

In a separate development Jane's has confirmed that the baseline Kh-31P weapon is in service with the Indian Air Force (IAF). India was previously believed to be a Kh-31 user, with the missile equipping its Su-30MKI strike fighters. Now Jane's can confirm that the Poona-based Su-30MKI force has acquired the Kh-31, with one pictured here on an aircraft of the recently established No 20 Sqn (the IAF's second Su-30MKI unit).

The IAF already possessed an defence suppression capability using MBDA Anti-Radiation MATra (ARMAT) missiles with its Mirage 2000 and Jaguars. However, the Kh-31P is a generational shift in SEAD for the IAF, due to its high speed and long range.
 

Rage

DFI TEAM
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
5,419
Likes
1,001
Excellent set of posts Lethalforce.


While the Ks-172RVV-L is sure to make mortiferous the MKI, I've also read that a shorter range version without the booster, as proposed for the R-172 in 2005, might be employed on smaller aircraft.

The airframe is apparently derived from the Buk missile system, which was designed to also engage cruise missiles.

Here are the specifics on the design apropos of an Indian magazine in 2004:

"....a core 6.01m long and 40 cm in diameter with a wingspan of 61 cm, with a booster of 1.4m, and 748 kg total weight."
A solild-fuel tandem rocket booster making it capable of speeds up to 4,000 kmph and an adaptive HE fragmentation warhead with 12g maneuvering makes this one potent baby.

My question to the military experts: what is the degree of "off-boresight" capability of the Ks-172RVV-L? If this missile is anything like the R-73 or R-73M (incidentally, which the HAL plans to use on its Tejas), with its infrared-guided, cryogenically-cooled seeker and gas-dynamic control, then it will be capable of being both retrolaunched (launched with its stern forward to defend the parent's aircraft rear) and better or equate its target kill capability of maneuvering targets at accelerations of up to 12 g at altitudes of 0.02 to 30 km.
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,880
Likes
48,578
Country flag
The tale of the missile

The tale of the missile



In 1997, the Clinton administration quietly announced that the Russian Zvezda-Strela Kh-31 missile would be the Navy's next generation super-sonic target drone without issuing an open contract (RFP). The reason given for the extra-ordinary Russian weapons purchase was that the Navy had run out of U.S. made super-sonic target missiles called the "Vandal."

On Oct. 13, 1998, two House Democrats, Tim Romer and Robert Cramer, joined with Republican House Representative Van Hilleary and wrote the Navy. According to their letter, the Clinton administration informed Congress the purchase of the Russian Kh-31 missile was necessary because "there are insufficient Vandal assets remaining for conversion."

According to the Navy, something had to be done to address the so-called Navy "missile gap" -- thus the Russian missile was selected.

Yet, according to the House letter, there is no Navy "missile gap." The three congressmen wrote Defense Assistant Secretary for Research, Development and Acquisition Dr. H. Lee Buchanan: "Should the Navy procure the last 30 EER Vandal targets remaining as planned, it is our understanding they would have enough targets to meet the test requirements through 2003."

Captain J. R. Trowbridge replied on Oct. 23, 1998. "We are gathering information necessary to provide you with a substantive response and will reply further upon completion of our investigation into this matter," wrote Captain Trowbridge. "You can expect a final response by 10 November, 1998."

The sudden retirement of the Navy officer charged with the Russian missile project, Admiral George Huchting, has left the project in disarray. Department of Defense official Michael Walsh indicated the Congressional questions will not be answered until Nov. 27, 1998. Huchting left the Navy immediately after this author broke the Kh-31 story.

The obviously false claim by the Clinton administration that there were no more U.S.-made missiles left is compounded by the public announcement of inflated test results by Boeing from the Russian missile test program.

In 1998, Boeing claimed to Aviation Week & Space Technology that the Russian Kh-31 flew over 50 miles during live fire tests. The claim is clearly false. This author obtained the actual test results compiled by Boeing which showed the Kh-31 flew a mere 16 miles under the best of conditions.

The Russian missile falls far short of U.S. Navy requirements for a target missile with a minimum low altitude range of 50 miles. As a result of the poor performance, Boeing has acquired additional Navy funding to increase the short range for the Russian missile, using air launched cruise missile technology developed during the Cold War (ALCM).

House Democrats and Republicans are asking a series of hard questions about the Russian Kh-31 project. Congress is seeking information on how the Navy intends to spend the "$72.7 million in FY99 funds" for a super-sonic target missile.

The Navy's inability to explain the decision to select a Russian missile over a U.S. made system also involves national security concerns. Navy officials met with congressional representatives and assured them that Boeing and McDonnell Douglas would restrict Russian access to advanced U.S. technology.

However, there are allegations that U.S technology has already been given away. The short-range Kh-31 is so dangerous that Boeing and the Navy would not risk a pilot. The problem forced Boeing/Douglas to use a radio controlled F-4 Phantom to carry the missile close enough for firings against Navy ships. Boeing and Russian engineers shared enough data to fit the Kh-31 to a U.S. built fighter in order to fire the missile safely.

The same jet, the F-4 Phantom, is the number one strike-fighter for the Iranian Air Force -- a radical state that has shown interest in purchasing the Kh-31. In fact, the F-4 is the ONLY Iranian jet capable of carrying the Kh-31. Iran flies a large number of U.S. built F-4 Phantoms bought by the Shah - the same plane picked by Boeing and Zvezda to carry the Kh-31 drone.

Iranian F-4s normally fly anti-ship missions against U.S. Navy aircraft carriers. The Iranian F-4s fired Chinese-made cruise missiles at simulated U.S. Navy targets, during the "Road To Jerusalem" wargames in late 1997. Zvezda-Strela has already courted Iranian sales, showing the Kh-31 at a number of Moscow and Middle East air shows. The missile is certainly more appealing to Iran now that their strike-fighter can shoot one.

Boeing/McDonnell Douglas assured congressional representatives that they take the utmost care in guarding U.S. military secrets. Yet, in 1998 Boeing paid a multi-million dollar fine to the U.S. government for an illegal transfer of advanced missile technology to Russia through their joint SEA-LAUNCH project.

McDonnell Douglas is also charged with the illegal transfer of advanced aircraft manufacturing equipment to China. The technology, a giant stretch press for aircraft manufacture, was sold in 1994 to CATIC, a Chinese-state owned corporation, controlled by generals of the People's Liberation Army.

The Clinton administration approved the sale to CATIC through the Commerce Department then under Ron Brown. The approval came just before Mr. Brown left on his whirlwind tour of China in August 1994. Federal investigators charged McDonnell Douglas knew the Chinese company never had any intention of purchasing the equipment for civilian use because the facility constructed to house the giant machine was put at the Nanchang military aircraft plant.

The equipment sent to China is currently manufacturing fighters based on the Russian Su-27 Flanker. Recent photos taken at a Russian airshow displayed a variant of the Su-27 armed with two Kh-31 missiles. China has expressed an interest in the Kh-31 to arm its own jet fighters but acknowledged the short range missile needed improvement.

The Clinton administration is funding a project designed to improve the Kh-31 for Russian customers such as Libya, Syria, India and China. Clinton wants to buy a Russian missile over a U.S. missile. The Russians promised Clinton they would not sell the Kh-31 even as Zvezda weapons merchants were meeting with Asian and Middle Eastern clients.

Vice President Al Gore is alleged to have supported the purchase of the Kh-31 by the Navy. The Russian maker Zvezda-Strela is reportedly backed by Clinton/Gore supporter Cassidy Associates, a firm of lobby lawyers located inside the Beltway. Cassidy Associates made hundreds of thousands of dollars in political donations to the Clinton/Gore campaign. In fact, Cassidy Associates made a total of over 2,500 political contributions between 1991 and 1998, nearly one donation every two days.

Cassidy Associates also traveled with Ron Brown on trade missions. Cassidy Associates sent Maely Tom, a DNC donor, to the Far East on a Ron Brown trade mission. The same mission included DNC donors Charlie Trie, Pauline Kanchanalak and Nora Lum.

The process was driven by political donations and big power lobby groups -- not national security needs. Clinton intends to spend $172 million on North Korean food aid but cannot account for the meager $72 million squandered on a U.S. Navy super-sonic target.

The Kh-31 was not much of a missile. Its limited range and inability to be dropped by a wide variety of western aircraft were major drawbacks to Russian marketing efforts. Bill Clinton addressed the Kh-31 short-comings using U.S. taxpayer dollars and American technology. Zvezda no longer has to fear going out of business.

U.S. taxpayer financing of Russian weapons to improve their capability to kill Americans or U.S. allies is pure insanity. Clinton's actions have resulted in a new weapon, a dagger for radical states to aim at the critical life blood flow of oil. Nations armed with the improved Kh-31 missile could wage a sea war in the Gulf that would sink Western economies into a new dark age.

The Clinton administration elected not to purchase the last 30 U.S. built Vandal supersonic missiles on purpose. The Clinton administration intentionally exercised the option not to buy the remaining U.S. missiles in order to select the Russian Kh-31. The administration lied to cover the switch.

The Clinton administration continues to lie and put U.S. aerospace engineers out of work so that Russian weapons dealers
can make big bucks. It is time to stop the insane policy and demand our national security be restored. The Kh-31 project must be killed before it is too late.
 

bhramos

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2009
Messages
25,625
Likes
37,233
Country flag
K-100 Novator - Indian AWACS Killer.

K-100 Novator Indian AWACAS Killer.

The Novator K-100 is a Indian/Russian air-to-air missile designed as an "AWACS killer"[4] at ranges up to 300–400 km (160-210 mi). The missile has had various names during its troubled history, including Izdeliye 172 ('Article 172'), AAM-L (RVV-L), KS–172, KS-1, 172S-1 and R-172. The airframe appears to have been derived from the 9K37 Buk surface-to-air missile (SAM) but development stalled in the mid-1990s for lack of funds.[4] It appears to have restarted in 2004 after a deal with India, who wants to produce the missile in India for their Su-30MKI fighters.

Novator K-100 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

this is more advanvced development to KS-172.
 

indian_blues

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2009
Messages
496
Likes
1,277
Country flag
I think it's a dead horse. can brahmos (su-30MKI version) take out air targets?
 

Singh

Phat Cat
Super Mod
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
20,311
Likes
8,403
Country flag
Brahmos is not an AAM. Its a cruise missile. And stop flogging a dead horse.
 

AJSINGH

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2009
Messages
1,237
Likes
77
i beg to differ , Novator K -100 is excellent weapon ,if funding was through in russian time ,we would have seen that weapon in active service ,good paln of india to revive that weaposn ,consdering china has awacs capability as well as pakistan ,that weapon will be usefull
 

bhramos

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2009
Messages
25,625
Likes
37,233
Country flag
Its Indian funded Russian product, even Russia will become Customer for it if every thing goes right,
This will be one of the best products of Indo-Russian Defence Co-operation afther Brahmos Supersonic Cruise Missile Program.
 

bhramos

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2009
Messages
25,625
Likes
37,233
Country flag
Its Indian funded Russian product, even Russia will become Customer for it if every thing goes right,
This will be one of the best products of Indo-Russian Defence Co-operation afther Brahmos Supersonic Cruise Missile Program.
 

bhramos

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2009
Messages
25,625
Likes
37,233
Country flag
U r right ppgj, but this is purely for IAF missile. that KS-172 is Russian Missile, both are different in programs.
 

ppgj

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
2,029
Likes
168
U r right ppgj, but this is purely for IAF missile. that KS-172 is Russian Missile, both are different in programs.
it has different names and A2A missile.

Novator K-100 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Novator K-100 is a Indian/Russian air-to-air missile designed as an "AWACS killer"[4] at ranges up to 300–400 km (160-210 mi). The missile has had various names during its troubled history, including Izdeliye 172 ('Article 172'), AAM-L (RVV-L), KS–172, KS-1, 172S-1 and R-172. The airframe appears to have been derived from the 9K37 Buk surface-to-air missile (SAM) but development stalled in the mid-1990s for lack of funds.[4] It appears to have restarted in 2004 after a deal with India, who wants to produce the missile in India for their Su-30MKI fighters.
 

bhramos

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2009
Messages
25,625
Likes
37,233
Country flag
KS-172 is old Name and K-100 Novator is New Name.
this missile is ''For Indians, By Russians and To Indians.''
 

bhramos

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2009
Messages
25,625
Likes
37,233
Country flag
KS-172 is old Name and K-100 Novator is New Name.
this missile is ''For Indians, By Russians and To Indians.''
 

Vladimir79

Professional
Joined
Jul 1, 2009
Messages
1,404
Likes
82
Its Indian funded Russian product, even Russia will become Customer for it if every thing goes right,
This will be one of the best products of Indo-Russian Defence Co-operation afther Brahmos Supersonic Cruise Missile Program.
Why would Russia need it? We already have an AWACs killer.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top