New divorce law in China

Discussion in 'China' started by Mad Indian, Dec 27, 2015.

  1. Mad Indian

    Mad Indian Proud Bigot Veteran Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2012
    Messages:
    12,830
    Likes Received:
    7,524
    Location:
    Podigai Hills.
    While Chinese law makers may be stupid for writing such laws, here is a news where they prove they have more brains and balls that Indian law makers:

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...d-Law-that-makes-men-laugh-and-women-cry.html

    Basically the law is a fuck you to all the gold digging whores and bitches . And we are heading in the opposite direction. Damn , the chinese are very pragmatic when dealing with these affairs.
     
  2.  
  3. Mad Indian

    Mad Indian Proud Bigot Veteran Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2012
    Messages:
    12,830
    Likes Received:
    7,524
    Location:
    Podigai Hills.


    Here is the video on whu such a move by Chinese govt, which had made so many feminized men crying for gold diggers in the west
     
  4. Bangalorean

    Bangalorean Stars and Ambassadors Stars and Ambassadors

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2010
    Messages:
    6,207
    Likes Received:
    6,497
    This will definitely stop the gold diggers but don't you think it disincentivizes children and procreation greatly? I think it will lead to more DINK couples. Because the woman needs to be career-focused now, and she would not want to give up precious years of her career, which will eventually lead to her losing out in the corporate race. Kids would be a lower priority for her now.

    While this disincentivizes gold diggers, it also disincentivizes kids and child upbringing. Two sides of the coin, so to speak.
     
  5. Mad Indian

    Mad Indian Proud Bigot Veteran Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2012
    Messages:
    12,830
    Likes Received:
    7,524
    Location:
    Podigai Hills.
    ^^Not really. Women need children to take care of them in their future. So they are going to get children no mater what. Also, its not like the women are not going to have tens or huindreds of babies anyway. At max, they will have 2 kids. So career is no big deal. All this law does is make the women pay for their choice of divorce. and in all fairness it is correct even from a moral pov. Its not like women are taking care of some other woman's child. Its actually shameful that the feminist * want to give gold medals for the women for taking care of their children which is their fucking job. All the women in home does for the family is give sex for the husband and take care of the home. Husband pays for the sex and the food they eat. By this logic alone , women have no right to claim anything from what the husband earned.

    But, lets look at the way the things were looking previously.by making the laws skewered against men, the previous laws were actually disincentivising men from participating less and less in family and their desire to have childrten. After all, what good is marriage if the only end goals of marriage- sex and kids are fgoing to be taken away from you? This is wjhy so many men are not marrying in the west and are even going MGTOW there/


    BTW, the difference between the two paras is because of the difference in biology. A man can and will produce kids when he is in his 50s, women cant. Men can work on te very day he becomes a father, women cant. We cant make two things which are unequal to be equal just for the sake of it. Will you guys punish a fast sprinter in a race among two unequal competitors, for the sake of achieving e2uality?

    And since women have a bilogical clock in them, which means they are useless as reproducing members of the society by 40+ and men dont, this actually forces women to enter marriage early. stay with the children and the families to a large extend. This has an added benefit that their off spring does not become criminals of the society. Fatherless children become the worst criminals of the society. Just look at the crime data of USA. blacks there are criminals compared to whites because black women have more out of wedlock children/have higher single mom % .


    The only thing which 9is negative about this law is that it acknowledges the inherent differences men and women have and their different roles they play in the society
     
    asingh10 and Sakal Gharelu Ustad like this.
  6. Sakal Gharelu Ustad

    Sakal Gharelu Ustad Detests Jholawalas Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2012
    Messages:
    6,687
    Likes Received:
    6,666
    They have their bunch of stupid laws. But Chinese know what they are doing rather than suck up to fake liberalism!
     
    asingh10 likes this.
  7. Razor

    Razor CIDs from Tamilnadu Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2011
    Messages:
    5,365
    Likes Received:
    4,511
    Location:
    ഭരതം (Bharatham)
    This is common sense.
    I do not understand why the rest of the world has those BS laws.

    @Sakal Gharelu Ustad : Please move posts 10, 11, 12, 13, 15 AND this one to a new thread (maybe China's Divorce law or something else.) Thanks.
     
  8. Razor

    Razor CIDs from Tamilnadu Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2011
    Messages:
    5,365
    Likes Received:
    4,511
    Location:
    ഭരതം (Bharatham)
    1. This ,might be the reason for low birth rates in Europe?

    2. Negative, how?
     
  9. salute

    salute Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2015
    Messages:
    1,587
    Likes Received:
    787
    Location:
    india
    is it simply 'talaq,talaq,talaq' or something new. :laugh:
     
  10. Indx TechStyle

    Indx TechStyle Perfaarmance Naarmal Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2015
    Messages:
    7,172
    Likes Received:
    7,724
    Location:
    21°N 78°E / 21°N 78°E
    URL isn't working. Can anybody tell me what's new fever of these Chinkies? :lol:
     
  11. Mad Indian

    Mad Indian Proud Bigot Veteran Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2012
    Messages:
    12,830
    Likes Received:
    7,524
    Location:
    Podigai Hills.
    @Razor

    1. There are lots of reasons for low tfr, in west - 1. Feminism and loss of family values, 2. Socialist welfare state making children unimportant as a security in old age, 3. Relentless propaganda in media on why staying married and staying home and having children is uncool for women as opposed to career for instance etc.


    2. I know . I was being facetious :p
     
    Razor and asingh10 like this.
  12. dhananjay1

    dhananjay1 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2013
    Messages:
    972
    Likes Received:
    912
    Location:
    india
    Indian jolawallas should go there to start chin ki beti bachao andolan, it's not like we would miss them here.
     
  13. asingh10

    asingh10 Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2015
    Messages:
    1,717
    Likes Received:
    3,160
    They also reversed the one child policy recently.

    Xi has come out in support of native traditions + Buddhism to uphold family values and curb Xtian growth.

    And now this, these Hans are truly blessed with a clarity of mind.
     
    Last edited: Dec 29, 2015
  14. Kshatriya87

    Kshatriya87 Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2014
    Messages:
    4,736
    Likes Received:
    3,177
    Location:
    Mumbai
    Not able to open the link. What's the new law again?
     

Share This Page