This has created an interesting situation. The Delhi High Court ruling has decriminalised homosexuality. And at the same time Kapil Sibal is at it, along with the Delhi High Court, to ban 'obscene' sites and wage war against obscenity. Therefore, Haji Saheb, the social activist, rightly or wrongly, feels homosexuality is obscene and so he has acted according to his sensibility, which may find a chord with many an Indian. If Kapil Sibal is correct, then can we hold the Haji to be wrong? A moral and legal quandary?