"My target is 100 children", says father of 35

Discussion in 'Pakistan' started by Indx TechStyle, Apr 10, 2016.

  1. Indx TechStyle

    Indx TechStyle Perfaarmance Naarmal Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2015
    Messages:
    7,089
    Likes Received:
    7,619
    Location:
    21°N 78°E / 21°N 78°E
    Yet I had shared this news before on IM thread, I guess people got not informed (most).
    So, decided to put a thread.
    I could not do it before because of a temporary occur.
    Anyway, enjoy.
    @Superdefender @Gessler @Illusive @Sakal Gharelu Ustad @Navnit Kundu
    "My target is 100 children", says father of 35
    QUETTA: Jan Muhammad, 43, is now father to 35 children after the recent births of two more children. Jan Muhammad has three wives who have given him 21 daughters and 14 sons.

    "My target is 100 children," he tells Dawn.com.

    The family of 39 lives in a mud-brick house located in a poor neighbourhood of Quetta.

    By profession, Jan Muhammad is a doctor and trader. "Thank God, I am able to manage the growing expenditures of my family," he said. "I spend about Rs100,000 a month on family expenditures," he said.

    Two of his wives gave birth to two daughters last week. The middle-class family celebrated the arrival of the newborns.

    "We, the girls have outnumbered the boys," Shagufta Nasreen, the elder daughter of Jan Muhammad tells Dawn.com, smiling.

    She said the population of women in Pakistan was already very high and her family was contributing to the increase in the number of girls.

    The ages of children range from one-week-old to almost 16-years-old.

    Jan Muhammad's family lives happily despite its increasing size. He challenges the established perception that "less family members lead to a happy life".

    "My aim is to educate my kids as well," he said.

    Audiences were first introduced to Jan Muhammad's family on DawnNews.

    A video of his family was watched by over 3.3 million people on Facebook, who shared it over 175,000 times and commented on it 4,000 times.
    [​IMG]
     
  2.  
  3. Indx TechStyle

    Indx TechStyle Perfaarmance Naarmal Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2015
    Messages:
    7,089
    Likes Received:
    7,619
    Location:
    21°N 78°E / 21°N 78°E
  4. Indx TechStyle

    Indx TechStyle Perfaarmance Naarmal Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2015
    Messages:
    7,089
    Likes Received:
    7,619
    Location:
    21°N 78°E / 21°N 78°E
  5. porky_kicker

    porky_kicker Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2016
    Messages:
    305
    Likes Received:
    464
    lol :pound: :pound: add another 100 of accidental and unwanted children's due to cases of mistaken identity at night and nothing to say of their religious weirdness regarding u know what..........:facepalm:
     
    raja696 and Indx TechStyle like this.
  6. LETHALFORCE

    LETHALFORCE Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2009
    Messages:
    20,550
    Likes Received:
    6,552
    Many people in India have the same goal. This is why the demographics of India has always had increasing minority population. Even with fake government numbers.
     
  7. Indx TechStyle

    Indx TechStyle Perfaarmance Naarmal Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2015
    Messages:
    7,089
    Likes Received:
    7,619
    Location:
    21°N 78°E / 21°N 78°E
    Whatever. But with time more and more population will secularize.
    Through united nations fertility variant, India's population will be 1.74 billion in 2060 and will start decline.
    It will be declined to 1.70 billion in 2070 and even 1.65 billion in 2100.
    Meanwhile, paki population would only increase for next 150 years (observed from speed).
    I was worried about economic edge but lost when came to know that our GDP per capita would be 10.2 times higher in nominal and 5-6 times in PPP. :D
     
  8. anoop_mig25

    anoop_mig25 Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    5,195
    Likes Received:
    2,223
    looks fake to me .how it is possible to have children aged between 1 week to 16 total begin 35 among 3 wifes
     
  9. Indx TechStyle

    Indx TechStyle Perfaarmance Naarmal Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2015
    Messages:
    7,089
    Likes Received:
    7,619
    Location:
    21°N 78°E / 21°N 78°E
    It's possible if that thing is done in early teen. :peace:
    :drool:.→ :love:

    :kiss: = :baby:

    Sada sukhi raho, aabad raho.
    :biggrin2::biggrin2::biggrin2::biggrin2::biggrin2:
     
    porky_kicker likes this.
  10. roma

    roma NRI in Europe Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2009
    Messages:
    3,248
    Likes Received:
    1,863
    I salute the giuy for putting his thesis into actual practice , he insists that a smaller family does not bring hapiness but rather a larger one ( something akin to that ) .....and from what i understand he is not doing it via govt expenses but rather on his own ?

    it that's the case then i think the people and govt in india should consider his model of family relations
    @angeldude13@[email protected] Indian @anupamsurey@aliyah @Alien@angeldude13 @Abhijat@Ancient [email protected] @aliyah @Alien @Aravind Sanjeev @A chauhan @asingh10
    @aditya g @asianobserve @Bahamut @BATTLE FIELD@bose @Bornubus @brational @blueblood @Blackwater@Blood+ @bhai-117 @Bangalorean @bengalraider @Bengal_Tiger @biswas_k11 @cobra commando @Chirag @Chris Jude @Chinmoy @Cadian@DingDong @dhananjay1
    @ersakthivel @FRYCRY @Gessler @garg_bharat @guru-dutt@Hari [email protected]&run @HeinzGud @indiandefencefan@I_PLAY_BAD @Indian Devil @Indibomber @Jangaruda @jackprince @Kunal@Kshatriya87 [email protected]@laughingbuddha @mhk99 @MetsaMan @Mark Antony @manutdfan @maomao@Navneet Kundu @Neil @Nicky G @OneGrimPilgrim@pmaitra @parijataka @PaliwalWarrior @Pulkit @Rowdy@[email protected] @[email protected] @shade @sasum @smestarz @Sakal Gharelu Ustad @Srinivas_K @sunnyv @sgarg@sabari @Sameet2 @saik @sorcerer @Superdefender @sydsnyper @Sridevi @SREEKAR @Screambowl @Sylex21 @Tactical Frog @TejasMK3@The enlightened @tejas warrior @tharun @thethinker @tsunami @VIP @VaghaDeva @Vishwarupa @Vishal Guts @Yusuf@Yumdoot @Zebra

    i had a different set of numbers fro a french study group ....china has already peaked and is already declining , india to peak at 2 billion round about end of century , Peskystan to peak at 500 million

    http://www.newgeography.com/content/002940-pakistan-where-population-bomb-exploding
    in this reference , it is interesting that india's growth rate is HIGHER than Bdedsh's

    http://www.theguardian.com/global-d...-the-2015-revision-9-7-billion-2050-fertility

    in this article the graph shows pakstan as having a gradual growth rate along with a whole hos of others .....the same graph shows india's growth rate as slightly higher than that group and nigerias as being v much higher

    nigeria is the one to watch , they may peak at well above 2 billion ?

    and while peskystan is shown as being in the group with the others, perhaps , the figures may have been manipulated by their govt so as not to cause alarm ?
    @porky_kicker
    @angeldude13@[email protected] Indian @anupamsurey@aliyah @Alien@angeldude13 @Abhijat@Ancient [email protected] @aliyah @Alien @Aravind Sanjeev @A chauhan @asingh10
    @aditya g @asianobserve @Bahamut @BATTLE FIELD@bose @Bornubus @brational @blueblood @Blackwater@Blood+ @bhai-117 @Bangalorean @bengalraider @Bengal_Tiger @biswas_k11
    @cobra commando @Chirag @Chris Jude @Chinmoy @Cadian@DingDong @dhananjay1
    @ersakthivel @FRYCRY @Gessler @garg_bharat @guru-dutt@Hari [email protected]&run @HeinzGud @indiandefencefan@I_PLAY_BAD @Indian Devil @Indibomber @Jangaruda @jackprince @Kunal@Kshatriya87 [email protected]@laughingbuddha @mhk99
    @MetsaMan @Mark Antony @manutdfan
    @maomao@Navneet Kundu @Neil @Nicky G @OneGrimPilgrim@pmaitra @parijataka @PaliwalWarrior @Pulkit @Rowdy@[email protected] @[email protected] @shade @sasum @smestarz
    @Sakal Gharelu Ustad @Srinivas_K @sunnyv @sgarg@sabari @Sameet2 @saik @sorcerer
    @Superdefender @sydsnyper @Sridevi @SREEKAR @Screambowl @Sylex21
    @Tactical Frog @TejasMK3@The enlightened @tejas warrior @tharun @thethinker @tsunami @VIP @VaghaDeva @Vishwarupa @Vishal Guts @Yusuf@Yumdoot @Zebra
     
  11. HeinzGud

    HeinzGud Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2011
    Messages:
    1,961
    Likes Received:
    382
    Location:
    Colombo, Sri Lanka
    I don't know about Hindu's but Muslims definitely do this. This is a growing crisis in Sri Lanka
     
    LETHALFORCE and Bahamut like this.
  12. Razor

    Razor CIDs from Tamilnadu Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2011
    Messages:
    5,357
    Likes Received:
    4,502
    Location:
    ഭരതം (Bharatham)
    Will never get to 100 with 3 wives.
    He's got to bat with a few more for that century.
     
    Last edited: Apr 10, 2016
    sasum, Bahamut and parijataka like this.
  13. aliyah

    aliyah Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2015
    Messages:
    418
    Likes Received:
    302
    poor wives..... working hard for dumb hubbys target.100000/month with 35kids. so with 100?? what really he do?? rahil Sharif's accountant :)
     
  14. Superdefender

    Superdefender Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2016
    Messages:
    977
    Likes Received:
    655
    There is a simillar kind of man in India too who want to score a century. He also has like 3-4 wives; hmm I can't quite remember. Watched the news about 2-3 yrs ago. This Pak guy seems to increase girl's numbers in Pak by contributing small from his family. He is well rich too to support them. Contrast to him, his Indian counterpart is very very poor and he wants to make kids just for fun... That is sheer madness!!! One thing I will admit, this is sure a dumb way to increase girl population. Does not matter if you are rich enough.
     
  15. Bahamut

    Bahamut Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2015
    Messages:
    1,826
    Likes Received:
    1,337
    Location:
    somewhere in space time
    Look at the hard work he is doing,keeping his 3 wife's busy
     
  16. VaghaDeva

    VaghaDeva The Wise Wolf

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2016
    Messages:
    381
    Likes Received:
    143
    Location:
    Mangaluru
    Why do we need to have just more children? Why not better children from more people with good genes?
     
    Bahamut likes this.
  17. Indx TechStyle

    Indx TechStyle Perfaarmance Naarmal Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2015
    Messages:
    7,089
    Likes Received:
    7,619
    Location:
    21°N 78°E / 21°N 78°E
    Well, I guess you may not be knowing a rule.
    Long tag lists are useless because only five members (sometimes 6th) will get notification of their tag.
    That's why I have tagged members in batches of 5-5. :)

    Anyway, for population declination, here in India, effects are observable.
    People do not marry even at age of 30-35(my big bro is example).
    And who marry, they have only one and sometimes no children.

    Though in terms of development, GDP per capita or HDI etc., we and our neighbors would be like US vs Mexico in next 20-30 years. Yet we would take at least 50 years to catch up with west.
    Most near among richies is France. Even China will overtake them. :D
     
    Last edited: Apr 10, 2016
  18. OneGrimPilgrim

    OneGrimPilgrim Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2015
    Messages:
    3,349
    Likes Received:
    3,422
    Location:
    whr invaders hv been eulogised, heroes binned!!
    that chicha is from Bhopal IIRC, & probably already crossed a century. he'd be titled 'ghazi' when he dies.
     
    Superdefender likes this.
  19. Navnit Kundu

    Navnit Kundu Pika Hu Akbarrr!! Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2016
    Messages:
    1,384
    Likes Received:
    2,928
    Does anyone here have any doubts about the prediction that these kids will grow up dirt poor with no education and then cite Hindu discrimination and Sachhar committee report, even 20 years later, as an excuse to why the muslim community is backward? It's all an evil yindoo baniya plan to keep muslims poor, you see.
     
  20. PaliwalWarrior

    PaliwalWarrior Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2014
    Messages:
    844
    Likes Received:
    306
    Location:
    Shunyavkash
    Well as per govt stats analysis there were only some 20 districts in India with high population growth nos

    For the rest the population growth nos are already coming down and approaching the replacement ratio which I think is 2.1

    Which means the parents (2 nos) have 2.1 children - the 2 children will replace the 2 parents and the .1 will take care of child births, child death during childhood etc etc

    Coming back to the topic at hand

    Well what can you say
    There will always be done crackpot like him on different issues

    But for the general population at large economics dictate the size of the family - which is a reality

    For the very poor - more children means more income earners - more hands to work

    For the middle class the cost of living brings in a realisation that lower no of children is better

    And on a different note the population predictions for China - a genuine question when were they published

    Before the China's one child policy reversal ? - if yes those needs to be revisited
     
    Navnit Kundu likes this.
  21. Navnit Kundu

    Navnit Kundu Pika Hu Akbarrr!! Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2016
    Messages:
    1,384
    Likes Received:
    2,928
    The government also bears a lot of responsibility in the social engineering that has gone into segment. If socialist doles and schemes continue to incentivize manual labor and people see that their decision to bear more children does indeed yield dividends, then they have a vested interest in continuing the status quo of having more children and this results in a vicious cycle of overpopulation, hunger games, and politics of 'socialist' vote banks. In that sense the government is to blame for incentivizing the status quo.

    The government should have a long term plan to slowly wean people away from the dole by increasing the cost of living gradually so that people find that it's costly to have more kids. If they keep decreasing the cost of living by giving subsidies and free doles, then the population will never decrease. Incidentally, successive governments have deliberately kept these doles active so that they could create a large population which is dependent on the government in power for their survival. The Congress had cleverly intertwined the survival of poor people with the survival of their party, by schemes like NREGA.
     
    prateikf and Superdefender like this.

Share This Page