Muslim marriage is a civil contract, rules Kerala high court

Discussion in 'Politics & Society' started by arnabmit, Jun 9, 2013.

  1. arnabmit

    arnabmit Homo Communis Indus Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2012
    Messages:
    5,894
    Likes Received:
    5,859
    Location:
    Kolkata
    Muslim marriage is a civil contract, rules Kerala high court

    KOCHI: Uncoupling the institution of marriage from sacred or religious connotations conveniently used to deny women their due, the Kerala high court has ruled that Muslim marriage is primarily a civil contract to legalize sexual intercourse. In the same vein, the court held that denying a woman her conjugal rights for an extended period amounts to "cruelty''.

    The ruling by a division bench comprising justices Pius C Kuriakose and PD Rajan was in response to an appeal by Sanjan S of Alappuzha against a family court's decision to grant divorce to his wife on the ground that she was denied sex by him for over three years. The profound implications of the March 21st ruling are only beginning to sink into public consciousness.

    The judgment authored by Justice Rajan says, "The concept of 'marriage' among Muslims from the very beginning itself (is) regarded as a contract. Muslim marriage has been defined as a civil contract for the purpose of legalizing sexual intercourse and procreation of children. It is not a sacrament but a contract, though solemnized generally with the recitation of certain verses from the Quran. Muslim law does not prescribe any religious service essential for solemnization. Justice Krishna Iyer in 'Islamic Law in Modern India' considered the concept of Muslim marriage and stated that "in its legal connotation, Muslim marriage is essentially a contract, though marriage as a social institution is regarded solemn all over the civilized world, including the Muslims."

    Sanjan got married on May 16, 1999 according to Muslim religious rites and his wife delivered a child in August 2004. After February 2004, he avoided sexual contact with his wife, despite her insistence, for more than three years. In 2006 his wife left Sanjan's home and filed for divorce in 2007 in the family court.

    Upholding the family court's decision granting divorce, the high court held, "We are of the opinion that if husband refuses to (have) sex with his wife, when she demands for the same, (it) is a ground for "cruelty". As a wife, she is expecting a healthy sexual relationship with her husband for the persistence of happy and harmonious married life."

    Sanjan's counsel at the high court, K Ramakumar, contended that the alleged cruelty of denying conjugal relations is not pleaded and proved in this case. There is no allegation that the matrimonial relationship was broken irretrievably, he argued. Advocate PK Ibrahim, who appeared for the wife, opposed this, arguing that the totality of the pleading and evidence show that the marriage was irretrievably broken and that the emotional bond between the couple is extinct.

    While deciding the case, the high court cited section 2 of Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act, 1939, which states various grounds for divorce. According to section 2, divorce can be granted if "the husband has failed to perform, without reasonable cause, his marital obligations for a period of three years."
     
    Singh likes this.
  2.  
  3. sayareakd

    sayareakd Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Messages:
    15,624
    Likes Received:
    11,703
    nothing wrong in judgement, Muslim marriage is always consider as contract marriage.
     
  4. Singh

    Singh Phat Cat Administrator

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2009
    Messages:
    20,305
    Likes Received:
    8,270
    Location:
    011
    If Muslim marraige is a "civil contract" essentially legalizing sexual intercourse, why can't a couple dictate the kind of "civil contract" they wish to enter into to either legalize or criminalize "sexual intercourse" ?
    This has the potential to be a landmark judgement, if a progressive group decides to take up the issue.
    In other words, we could head to a new era of marriages being replaced by civil contracts (also possibly legalizing homosexual unions)
     
  5. JBH22

    JBH22 Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2010
    Messages:
    3,620
    Likes Received:
    2,390
    Perhaps she's fugly now to heat up the poor guy.

    High court judgement has destroyed the concept of marriage that we are constantly being bombarded with, its not love but a sexual contract :)
     
  6. Singh

    Singh Phat Cat Administrator

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2009
    Messages:
    20,305
    Likes Received:
    8,270
    Location:
    011
    The concept of marriage as an union of two souls cannot possibly be a civil contract.
     
  7. sayareakd

    sayareakd Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Messages:
    15,624
    Likes Received:
    11,703
    it is like that only, girl was asked for her permission and 'Mehar' for marriage.
     
  8. JBH22

    JBH22 Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2010
    Messages:
    3,620
    Likes Received:
    2,390
    Pretty crude if you ask me, especially reading this "purpose of legalizing sexual intercourse and procreation of children"
     
  9. sayareakd

    sayareakd Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Messages:
    15,624
    Likes Received:
    11,703
    it is always contract between the souls in Muslims in India.
     
  10. Singh

    Singh Phat Cat Administrator

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2009
    Messages:
    20,305
    Likes Received:
    8,270
    Location:
    011
    In the eyes of the law, Marriage is a contract. In the eyes of the Society, Marriage is a sacred religious rite.

    ==
    Why "Civil Contracts" allowed only for Heterosexual Theists, why not for all citizens ?

    This is part of my larger point, why should state dictate and meddle in "civil contracts" ?
    ==
     
  11. sayareakd

    sayareakd Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Messages:
    15,624
    Likes Received:
    11,703
    Singh it is personal law, therefore let them develop it as and when they want it. Overtime they will move with develop it.
     
    Singh likes this.
  12. Singh

    Singh Phat Cat Administrator

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2009
    Messages:
    20,305
    Likes Received:
    8,270
    Location:
    011
    Yep, this is an uncharted territory. Not only in India, even the most liberal nations fall prey to theological/societal dogmas.
     
  13. VIP

    VIP Ultra Nationalist Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2012
    Messages:
    4,684
    Likes Received:
    3,187
    Location:
    Gandhinagar
    You mean to say homosexual marriage or homosexual inter course?? According to judgment of Delhi high court, mutual sexual inter course of 2 individual aged above 18 years is legal. But don't know if marriage is legal.

    Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
     
  14. VIP

    VIP Ultra Nationalist Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2012
    Messages:
    4,684
    Likes Received:
    3,187
    Location:
    Gandhinagar
    Kanun Andha hota hai.... :rofl:
    Jokes apart, Civil Contract is actually not a good word to describe marriage.
    Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
     
    Last edited: Jun 9, 2013
  15. The Messiah

    The Messiah Bow Before Me! Elite Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2010
    Messages:
    10,788
    Likes Received:
    4,552
    *fixed* :D
     

Share This Page