MRCA news and discussion /feb-june 2009

Which Aircraft should win

  • Dassault Rafale

    Votes: 28 38.9%
  • Eurofighter Typhoon

    Votes: 7 9.7%
  • Mikoyan MiG-35

    Votes: 15 20.8%
  • JAS 39 Gripen

    Votes: 6 8.3%
  • Lockheed Martin F-16 IN

    Votes: 2 2.8%
  • Boeing Hornet E/F Superhornet F-18

    Votes: 14 19.4%

  • Total voters
    72
  • Poll closed .

p2prada

Senior Member
Joined
May 25, 2009
Messages
10,234
Likes
4,015
We will have to pay a lot for the infrastructure and modification of air bases if we go for a non-French or non-Russian fighter.

SH, Viper, Gripen and EF will cost double or triple of what the Rafale or Mig-35 costs.

The Rafale was made with a high degree of commonality of parts with the Mirage-2000. Mig-35 is gonna be the cheapest buy. Probably less than $10billion unless they plan to increase the price to $65mill from the $50mill. It will still be the cheapest buy even after a price escalation.

Also in the weapons category, the Mig-35 may come with Thermobaric bombs.
 
J

John

Guest
We will have to pay a lot for the infrastructure and modification of air bases if we go for a non-French or non-Russian fighter.

SH, Viper, Gripen and EF will cost double or triple of what the Rafale or Mig-35 costs.

The Rafale was made with a high degree of commonality of parts with the Mirage-2000. Mig-35 is gonna be the cheapest buy. Probably less than $10billion unless they plan to increase the price to $65mill from the $50mill. It will still be the cheapest buy even after a price escalation.

Also in the weapons category, the Mig-35 may come with Thermobaric bombs.
yeah right, the cost of going for anything other than Russian or French will triple the cost...haha.. well firstly we wont get the Rafale F-3+ for less than $130 million per unit excluding weapons and service, the Rafale package wont cost anything less than $25 to $30 billion. now the SH package wont cost more than $16-18 billion and it certainly won't cost another 10 billion to upgrade our bases to equip it. Even with all the changes that need to be made to our current infrastructure, SH remains a much much more economical option than the Rafale and EF. I am certain both are virtually out simply because they are too expensive and even after buying we have to integrate a lot of weapons to make the F-3+ any worth. once UAE signs the deal for 60 fighters we'll have a better idea but the F-3 is likely to cost $16 billion including service but excluding weapons. Apparently the Rafale's AESA was rejected as the AESA for the Gripen NG because it simply wasn't good enough for the Gripen NG. Its 150 km detection is not even 1/2 of what the SH can do.

Russia has only one Thermobaric bomb also known as the father of all bombs and it barely fits on Tu-95. US has a whole series in BLU and CBU class bombs.


PARIS AIR SHOW: Gripping Gripen

Saab is reporting an unprecedented level of interest in its flagship Gripen combat aircraft, despite a high-profile and ongoing spat with the Norwegian defence ministry, which last November rejected its next-generation offering in favour of Lockheed Martin's F-35 Joint Strike Fighter.

"We're saturated with opportunities at the moment," says Bob Kemp, senior vice-president sales and marketing for Gripen International. The company fielded five requests for proposals in 2008, plus four requests for information, he says. "As an organisation we're established to handle one RFP and one RFI a year. People were pretty busy."

Last year's Farnborough air show in the UK saw Gripen host 37 government delegations, and while some of these are cited as long-term prospects at best, others are very serious on making acquisitions. Kemp lists 10 countries as potential buyers within the next five years: Brazil, Bulgaria, Croatia, Denmark, Greece, India, the Netherlands, Romania, Slovakia and Switzerland.

NEW OPPORTUNITIES

And new opportunities continue to emerge. Early dialogue has recently been held with Argentina and Malaysia, and the company is also eyeing the needs of Oman, long tipped as a future Eurofighter Typhoon buyer. "It's not a done deal," says Kemp. "The price of oil has come down and the price of Eurofighter has gone up. Maybe the door is still open." Dassault is also touting its Rafale to the nation.

For many of its potential customers, the promise of Saab's next-generation Gripen NG has prompted interest, as it will have longer range, increased payload and a more powerful engine than the current production-standard C/D model.

Saab last year unveiled and flew its two-seat Gripen Demo airframe for the first time, and this has now flown 79 times, de-risking several key technologies destined for the programme's next production phase.

Milestones have included flying at more than Mach 1.6, demonstrating the fighter's "supercruise" performance (the ability to maintain supersonic flight without using afterburner) at more than M1.2, and reaching its maximum angle of attack. It has also flown at its maximum loading, including representative models of MBDA's Meteor beyond visual-range air-to-air missile.

The Demo has received backing from numerous companies. Highlighting General Electric, which has given two F414G engines and engineering support to the project, Kemp says: "There's a belief in industry in Gripen. They believe in the future."

The aircraft has been in the workshop since early April being readied for its second test phase. This will introduce missile approach warners and satellite communications equipment and, from later this year, an active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar: Selex Galileo's Vixen 1000E/ES05 Raven.

Saab rolled out the Demo with an agreement to use an AESA demonstrator provided by Thales, but their relationship quickly crumbled. Thales says it withdrew the technology as it was already under contract for the Rafale, but Kemp gives a different explanation. "The radar wasn't good enough for what we needed to do," he says. "The Selex radar is seriously outstanding. When you brief people on the capabilities they are astonished."

Bob Mason, Selex Galileo's executive vice-president, radar and advanced targeting, says the Vixen 1000E's advantage comes from the use of a swashplate mounting, which enables the active array to be rotated by +/-100°. This beats a fixed AESA during beyond visual-range and off-boresight missile firings, and while acquiring synthetic aperture radar imagery, he says. "We will be delivering a prototype this year for them to fly, and then will upgrade it over the next 18 months."

TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER

Developed in Edinburgh, Scotland, the new system will be demonstrated to India, and Saab says the UK government has already approved it for export. New Delhi is seeking an initial 126 fighters under its $10-12 billion medium multirole combat aircraft (MMRCA) contest, with the Gripen NG up against the Rafale, Typhoon, Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet, Lockheed F-16 and RSK MiG-29.

With the ability to transfer technology and industrial know-how a vital requirement for India and many other potential buyers, Saab points to its experience through selling 26 Gripens to South Africa, and in delivering large offset packages linked to lease deals with the Czech Republic and Hungary. "Handing over source code or transferring technology is natural for Sweden," says Kemp.

Sweden last year closed a deal to sell six Gripens - two Cs and four Ds - to replace some of Thailand's Northrop F-5s. Kemp says dislodging US suppliers from such traditional markets is Gripen's "toughest fight. At one time I thought that was impossible. But we are now seeing things start to change." However, economic constraints have led to Bangkok suspending plans to acquire another six.

Entering into such a market is not viewed as a one-off, and Kemp believes "non-aligned" nations such as Argentina, Brazil, India and Malaysia could follow. "This is a market that I really think we can secure," he says.

Best and final offers for Brazil's initially 36-aircraft FX-2 contest were due for delivery on 8 June, with the Swedish product again battling the Rafale and the Super Hornet. "It's not just about building the aircraft: it's about developing the aircraft," says Kemp. "Brazil can become a partner in our development programme. The competitors have a product to offer; not a programme." And he reveals that Saab has already held discussions with the Brazilian defence ministry about possible future collaboration on the development of a new fifth-generation strike aircraft.

Sensing an opportunity to challenge the dominance of larger European and US manufacturers, Saab could pursue a joint project with Brazil, India and South Africa, he adds.

Kemp believes the outcome of the contests in Brazil and India could have a seismic effect on the global fighter industry, potentially leading to one or two manufacturers withdrawing. "If you secure Brazil or India you're there. If you don't win those two, the question is: where do you find the future markets?"

India's MMRCA contest represents "the last throw of the dice" for Russia's RSK MiG, he claims, but adds that after New Delhi's selection "maybe it will be us, Dassault or Boeing who will opt out of the export market?"

In-country flight tests of the six Indian candidates are expected from late this year or early 2010, having slipped from an original target of April/May this year. Kemp says a contract could still be three or four years away, and that India's planned 2014 in-service date could drift to perhaps 2020. "The 'first six months' took 18," he notes.

EUROPEAN PROSPECTS

Closer to home, Denmark could make a selection around September or October this year, with the Gripen NG, JSF and Super Hornet in the offing. Switzerland should choose in early 2010 between the Gripen, Rafale or Typhoon, with best and final offers for the roughly 30-aircraft deal due in the third quarter of this year. Kemp is optimistic of a Gripen win, noting: "when you've got the right fighter and the right price it's got to be the best solution".

Saab also hopes that it will yet be able to contest the Netherlands' roughly 85-aircraft F-16 replacement, with a decision having been deferred until 2012. The Dutch air force currently favours the F-35, but Kemp questions whether the service's desire to field a "first night of the war" fighter tallies with the country's national defence policy.

The Norwegian defence ministry remains the focus of much discussion by Saab, which is still fiercely defending the Gripen's calibre after the criticism it received from Oslo last November. "We were compliant on over 1,200 requirements, but the air force were in love with the JSF," says Kemp. "It was not a fair competition."

Sweden last year underlined its commitment to keep investing in the Gripen until around 2025, ordering 18 new single-seaters and 13 two-seat trainers. Fresh success on the export stage would help Saab cement its place in the fighter sector, and raise the possibility that it could even develop a manned replacement for the Gripen over the coming decades.

"You need to have a strategic market to propel yourself for developing the next generation of aircraft," says Kemp. "We want to do it, and we have the skills in Saab and the Swedish industry base."

PARIS AIR SHOW: Gripping Gripen
 

hit&run

United States of Hindu Empire
Mod
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
14,104
Likes
63,370
All set for flight evaluation of multirole combat aircraft

Defense Ministry sends letters to six aviation firms it’s for IAF to speedily complete evaluation and indicate its choice
Aircraft to be tested in hot weather and at high altitude

BANGALORE: The Indian Air Force’s bid to acquire 126 medium multirole combat aircraft has got a much-needed push.

The Defence Ministry has issued “the letters of invitation for flight evaluation trials” to six companies that are vying for the $10-$12-billion contract.
They are the European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company, which pitches in with Eurofighter Typhoon, America’s Lockheed Martin (F-16 Falcon) and Boeing Integrated Defence System (F/A-18F Super Hornet), Russia’s Mikoyan (MiG-35), Sweden’s Gripen (JAS-39) and France’s Dassault (Rafale).

The ball is now in the IAF’s court “to speedily complete the flight evaluation and indicate its choice,” say Ministry officials.
Between July and March next, the IAF will have to undertake the trials, initially in India to test the performance of the aircraft under local conditions and then in the countries of their origin. Armament trials will be conducted in the country of origin as bringing weapons to India could be problematic.

For the evaluation trials, the IAF is likely to form two teams composed of test pilots, flight test engineers and maintenance crew, drawn primarily from the Aircraft Systems and Testing Establishment and, to a lesser extent, from fighter squadrons. The teams are also likely to include officials of Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (to look into technology transfer and industrial partnership) and the Centre for Military Airworthiness and Certification.

Besides enabling the IAF test pilots to try out the aircraft, the trials will allow flight and ground test crew to know about the maintenance and overhaul facilities required.

Once the IAF makes its evaluation, some time in 2010, commercial negotiations could begin. The terms indicate that the first aircraft will have to be delayed 48 months after a contract is signed.

Time-consuming, expensive

The time-consuming and expensive process — it could cost each competitor $5 million — will test each aircraft whether it can measure up to the performance indicators set forth in flight manuals in Bangalore, Jaisalmer and Leh (under normal conditions, in hot weather and at a high altitude).

Each competitor is sending two aircraft. Informed sources have indicated that Rafale will be one of the first to be evaluated. It will fly into Bangalore in the first week of September.

Officials of the companies told The Hindu that they had initiated a survey of the locations, where their aircraft would be tested

The Hindu : National : All set for flight evaluation of multirole combat aircraft
 

Sridhar

House keeper
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
3,474
Likes
1,061
Country flag
Lol , Thales Radar is even supported by F35 program chief Brig Gen David Heinz.

F-35 chief endorses competition for engines and radars
By Stephen Trimble

New F-35 programme chief Brig Gen David Heinz strongly defended the case for funding two separate engines and raised the possibility of qualifying Raytheon or Thales as an alterative radar supplier.


For different reasons, Heinz said that in theory he could support selecting Raytheon or Thales to supply an alternative radar for the F-35.

Northrop Grumman currently supplies the APG-81 active electronically scanned array (AESA). But if Northrop's current factory becomes overwhelmed by the production ramp-up, Heinz said, the programme might seek to qualify Raytheon or Thales to supply a compatible alternative.

Raytheon's APG-79 AESA was originally developed for the Boeing X-32, the losing bidder in 2001 for the JSF contract. However, the US Navy selected the APG-79 for the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet and EA-18G Growler, and the radar is now in full-rate production. Meanwhile, Thales is developing the RBE-2 AESA for the Dassault Rafale.
F-35 chief endorses competition for engines and radars
 

Sridhar

House keeper
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
3,474
Likes
1,061
Country flag
X posting

I've just read the Air&cosmos n°2150 (5 december) which deals with AESA radars.

Of course there is an article about the RBE2 AESA.

Some facts from an interview with Gérard Christmann, Thales vice president in charge of Electronic Warfare solutions.

-The searched volume is increased by a factor 3 to 4 against the PESA RBE2
-tracking range is increased by 30% to 50%
-The RBE2 AESA is very similar to the APG-79 in terms of technology and maturity.
-The power processing has been dramatically increased with 4 new calculators.
-Power supply has an average power of 10kW. Which is an increase with previous PESA RBE2.
-The AESA RBE2 will allow sub-metric SAR images.
-The ability to jamm or transmit datas thanks to this new radar is closely considered but not funded for the moment.
-First AESA rafale should be delivered at the very beginning of 2011 (from the current batch). It will also equip the next batch of rafale which is expected to be ordered soon: beginning of 2009 for 60 airframes.
-The Swiss were able to see the gain of performance of this new radar as they could compare to the PESA RBE2. This evaluation of the AESA antenna by the swiss was a success.
-4 radar prototypes are used for trials-1 or 2 will be affected for exports trials. one is tested on the B301 an the other one is tested on the mirage 2000 B501 from the CEV.
-final software validation is expected for the first quarter of year 2010.
-This radar could be licensed in India or Brazil.
-Full ToT is possible.

I forgot : the french government will garanty that a minimum of 11 RBE2 AESA radars will be produced each year for the next batch.

Key Publishing Ltd Aviation Forums - View Single Post - Rafale News V
 
J

John

Guest
haha... RBE-2 similar to the APG-79...hahahhaha...funniest stuff i heard in months...RBE-2 AESA simply doesn't have the max. detection range nor can it perform awacs roles quite like the SH. The SH can track well over 50 targets and target more of them simultaneously. Mr. Gerard seems high or drunk on some serious Bordeaux...moreover even the Swedes rejected it for the Gripen NG. And forget about Thales radars going on board the F-35, Northrop and Raytheon have no competition on AESA for fighters, even if Thales gets a chance to bid for f-35, they will loose.
 
J

John

Guest
Raytheon Miniature Air Launched Decoy Jammer Completes Design Milestone

The U.S. Air Force and Raytheon Company (NYSE: RTN) completed a preliminary design review of the Miniature Air Launched Decoy Jammer. The MALD-J™ adds radar-jamming capability to the basic MALD platform.

"The PDR confirmed our design approach for MALD-J is technologically sound," said Ken Watson, the U.S. Air Force's MALD program manager. "I've cleared the MALD-J team to proceed with final design activities and prepare for a critical design review by early 2010."

MALD is a state-of-the-art, low-cost flight vehicle that is modular, air-launched and programmable. It weighs less than 300 pounds and has a range of approximately 500 nautical miles (about 575 statute miles). MALD-J recently completed captive carry testing.

Raytheon is scheduled to conduct a MALD-J free-flight demonstration by late 2009 and begin engineering manufacturing development in 2010. A milestone C decision - the decision to go into production - is expected in early 2011.

"The modular MALD-J will give the warfighter expendable stand-in jamming capability," said Scott Muse, Raytheon's MALD program director. "MALD-J will reduce or eliminate the need to send aircrews into harm's way to conduct jamming missions."

Raytheon Miniature Air Launched Decoy Jammer Completes Design Milestone - Jun 12, 2009

its not really a cruise missile i think we can get this, it also has a jammer.
 

luckyy

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2009
Messages
568
Likes
3
well firstly we wont get the Rafale F-3+ for less than $130 million per unit excluding weapons and service, the Rafale package wont cost anything less than $25 to $30 billion. now the SH package wont cost more than $16-18 billion and it certainly won't cost another 10 billion to upgrade our bases to equip it.
i thought the allocation given to MMRCA is $10-12bn..

don't it left only Gripen and MIG in the race ?
 

Yusuf

GUARDIAN
Super Mod
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
24,324
Likes
11,757
Country flag
When we talk of infrastructure costs for the MRCA, if my information is correct, then the RFP includes cost for operating,maintaining the aircraft. Any deal today comes with costs included for life cycle cost for the aircraft.
 
J

John

Guest
Yes the aircraft price includes life cycle costs but not weapons. the RFP doesnt include weapons and the deal is estimated to be worth $12 billion but if we choose for Rafale, we'll end up paying more. 60 F-3 Rafales for UAE will cost them $11 billion that puts the price per unit at $183 million, our deal for 126, full-tot, F-3+/4 Rafale would cost around $130 million and would put the deal at $16.4 billion excluding weapons. we order weapons worth $6 billion and the bill hits upto $22 billion. Price bids haven't started and hence we have no idea what the IAF's reservation price is but i expect the Govt.to clear upto $100 per aircraft at a maximum. SH's cost per aircraft including life cycle costs will be around $80 million which puts the deal value at $10.08 billion, with weapons around $16 billion. EF an Rafale are simply way too expensive.
 

p2prada

Senior Member
Joined
May 25, 2009
Messages
10,234
Likes
4,015
Russia has only one Thermobaric bomb also known as the father of all bombs and it barely fits on Tu-95. US has a whole series in BLU and CBU class bombs.
You are a total klutz. Both America and Russia use Thermobaric bombs. The Russians are a step ahead by using it on aircraft. The Americans use it on their hellfire missile, version N. Go read up before opening up.
 
J

John

Guest
haha...GBU or Paveway class LGBs can deploy thermobaric warheads, these LGBs are constantly upgraded, paveway 4 is the newest, thermobaric warheas are also deployed on
CBU class bombs, Hellfires and XM1060 thermobaric grenades in the US inventory. now Russia has them deployed on KAB-500 class bombs and FOAB. please enlighten me on where else Russia uses them. Eitherway i am sure most of the Russian bombs are just free fall bombs without effective guidance.
 

F-14

Global Defence Moderator
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2009
Messages
1,563
Likes
27
the Payway IV is a UK specfic wepon system
 
J

John

Guest
i know the Ruskis have PGMS but the thermobaric versions dont seem to have guidance. moreover Russia PGMS lack the range that US pgms have.
 
J

John

Guest
besides during Kargil even though we used thoudands of tons of Russian PGMs, yet the highlight in the air to ground war was the Paveway LGB bombing runs under 2 meter precision target strikes on Tiger Hill and IAF was very glad to have had that weapon for use.
 

p2prada

Senior Member
Joined
May 25, 2009
Messages
10,234
Likes
4,015
i know the Ruskis have PGMS but the thermobaric versions dont seem to have guidance. moreover Russia PGMS lack the range that US pgms have.
Look at the nose of the picture I provided. It is a TV guided munition.

KAB CONTROLLED AIR BOMBS | Russian Arms, Military Technology, Analysis of Russia's Military Forces

The ones I have posted are all 80s and 90s inventions. The Ruskies don't have the tendency to advertise like the Americans do. The Thermobaric version is the KAB-500 OD.

Anyways, my point was the Americans will not sell it to us. US, Russia, China and India are the only known users of Thermobaric weapons. It goes against the Geneva Conventions. The Americans are also phasing out their CBU-55/72 series. Britain and Israel have come under attack for employing thermobaric weapons too. The only ones being deployed are the Hellfires in the US.
 

p2prada

Senior Member
Joined
May 25, 2009
Messages
10,234
Likes
4,015
besides during Kargil even though we used thoudands of tons of Russian PGMs, yet the highlight in the air to ground war was the Paveway LGB bombing runs under 2 meter precision target strikes on Tiger Hill and IAF was very glad to have had that weapon for use.
The highlight of the war was that only the FRENCH Mirages could deliver PGMs effectively over the Himalayas.
 
J

John

Guest
ahh...no...the thermobaric warheads are still deployed on Paveways and Hellfires. yes the mirages could deliver them coz they are currently the only aircraft in our inventory that can deploy the Paveway. yes the old CBUs are being phased out but the CBU-97SFW, 100, 107 are still active in service in very good numbers too. Yes the KAB-500OD is indeed a good bomb, no denying that but hey it remains a 500kg bomb, now Paveways come in 1000kg and 2000kg bombs as well, bigger bomb, means bigger impact and more damage. moreover LJDAM can also hit high speed moving targets on the ground, a lot of Russian bomb can't hit moving targets.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top