Microsoft to share windows source code with indian army

Discussion in 'Indian Army' started by Lions Of Punjab, Feb 4, 2015.

  1. Lions Of Punjab

    Lions Of Punjab Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2013
    Messages:
    639
    Likes Received:
    887
    Location:
    Ahmedabad, India, India
    Microsoft To Share Windows Source Code With Indian Army

    The Indian Army will be using proprietary Windows source code of Microsoft with an aim to develop Secure Operating System.

    “Microsoft has agreed to give the source code. Selection of a secure operating system is on,” an Army officer was quoted as saying by Deccan Herald on February 3.

    Access to the source code will assist the Army to make its software more impregnable to cyber attacks. Indian Army takes every precaution in the book to secure its systems while expanding its digital footprint. At the core of the digital backbone, lies a high bandwidth Army data network that has connected almost 2500 Army units all over the country. Several software and applications are being developed to improve the communications between the ranks.

    But live streaming of the operations is still not on the cards. As a large number of IT hardware is manufactured in China, the defence forces have a screening system in place to check the presence of any hidden malware. Sharing of the Windows source code was a matter of contention as the US firm had refused to part with the code to Indian government agencies in the past.

    With the entry of the Linux in the Indian market more than a decade ago, Microsoft had stated it was willing to discuss source code sharing issues with the Indian government.

    [​IMG]
     
  2.  
  3. Dark Sorrow

    Dark Sorrow Respected Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    1,630
    Likes Received:
    421
    Location:
    Mumbai
    We should go for Linux which is traditionally more secure.
     
    Victor Sierra likes this.
  4. Bangalorean

    Bangalorean Stars and Ambassadors Stars and Ambassadors

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2010
    Messages:
    6,207
    Likes Received:
    6,497
    I don't quite understand how this will work or how this will help.

    Modifying windows source code (even if Microsoft gives over the full thing, which itself is unlikely to begin with) is not a simple task. It requires massive expertise, and the Army does not have that expertise. They will need to outsource the entire thing to a professional IT firm. Even that does not guarantee anything.

    I don't think this is going to work out well.
     
    Free Karma likes this.
  5. Free Karma

    Free Karma Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2013
    Messages:
    2,372
    Likes Received:
    2,576
    Location:
    Chennai
    Last edited: Feb 4, 2015
  6. Dark Sorrow

    Dark Sorrow Respected Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    1,630
    Likes Received:
    421
    Location:
    Mumbai
    Why reinvent the wheel. We can use of the shelf flavor like OpenSUSE, Ubuntu, Fedora, Redhat, etc.
     
  7. Free Karma

    Free Karma Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2013
    Messages:
    2,372
    Likes Received:
    2,576
    Location:
    Chennai
    To customize it for their purposes (what ever that maybe) Dont know a whole lot about Linux, but basically the OS must be owned by some entity in India., to prevent reliance on foreign software, which could be used for spying etc.


    China are doing the same too:
    China Hopes to Have Its Own Operating System Ready by October | WinInfo content from Windows IT Pro
     
  8. Dark Sorrow

    Dark Sorrow Respected Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    1,630
    Likes Received:
    421
    Location:
    Mumbai
    Linux is not an OS but an kernel. It handles process scheduling, memory management, interrupts, inter-process communication, etc. It is bunch of sub-routines written to control any given hardware.

    No single entity owns Linux. It is a community project. Linux kernel source code is available on internet for everyone. All we need is Linux kernel to develop software for any system with soft real time requirement.

    Linux is very much stable and secure than almost all available OS.

    Android framework also use Linux Kernel.
     
    Last edited: Feb 4, 2015
    anupamsurey likes this.
  9. DingDong

    DingDong Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2014
    Messages:
    2,227
    Likes Received:
    3,665
    Location:
    Delhi
    Indian Army does it again. Love for Foreign maal never ends.
     
  10. Free Karma

    Free Karma Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2013
    Messages:
    2,372
    Likes Received:
    2,576
    Location:
    Chennai
    Hmm..I dont think you understand my point about the OS being owned by a company based out of India (or maybe the govt), instead of something off the shelf.

    If IA does use RedHat or something off the shelf, they would still need it to be customized , supported and updated for new threats as and when they show up. For this they would have to have a contract/subscription with RedHat. Thats where the problem is, as RedHat is based in the U.S . Hence the U.S (and buddies) can force these companies to spy on their customers, through a sneaky update or so.

    Or if you meant actually meant building/modifying something on top of the opensource code provided by RedHat etc...that would be fine( and is normally what a lot of orgs do for example see quake engine's evolution to bf/CoD etc)
     
    Last edited: Feb 4, 2015
  11. Free Karma

    Free Karma Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2013
    Messages:
    2,372
    Likes Received:
    2,576
    Location:
    Chennai
    Seems the army has a full fledged Digitization project going on:

    Indian Army aims to become 100 per cent digital, for Cloud storage system - The Economic Times

     
  12. boris

    boris Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2012
    Messages:
    335
    Likes Received:
    193
    Location:
    Somewhere
    Almost close but BSD Unix's like FreeBSD,OpenBSD are even more secure than Linux distro's, OpenBSD is known for its very high level of security.
     
  13. Dark Sorrow

    Dark Sorrow Respected Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    1,630
    Likes Received:
    421
    Location:
    Mumbai
    Security is relative term and often depends on the implementer (both system and application). If Linux is secured by the implementer it is as secure as BSD.
     
  14. Dark Sorrow

    Dark Sorrow Respected Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    1,630
    Likes Received:
    421
    Location:
    Mumbai
    Self Delete.
     
    Last edited: Feb 4, 2015
  15. Dark Sorrow

    Dark Sorrow Respected Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    1,630
    Likes Received:
    421
    Location:
    Mumbai
    The post has been deleted by user
     
    Last edited: Feb 4, 2015
  16. Dark Sorrow

    Dark Sorrow Respected Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    1,630
    Likes Received:
    421
    Location:
    Mumbai
    Sir, developing and testing new OS from scratch is very difficult if not impossible. What is the guarantee that locally developed OS will be secure. At least Linux is time tested mature system.

    In embedded systems (which is main type of computing system used in military), we have Linux Kernel on which application software and middle ware framework are implemented. Its up to the system designer and application program implementer to secure the system.

    You don't need general purpose computer for most military activities as the computation is application specific. Example Radar computer don't need full fledged General Purpose OS (GPOS), having a customized Linux kernel patched for real time operations works.

    Common example for securing/to harden Linux are like turn of communication peripheral that are not needed. In network centric accept communication only from known port, etc.
    Linux Kernel by itself is very secure but it is up to system and application designer to harden it even further.
     
  17. sorcerer

    sorcerer Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2013
    Messages:
    6,203
    Likes Received:
    5,114
    Location:
    India
    @Dark Sorrow
    IMO, this Microsoft thingy would be for the Indian Army offices and administrative purposes and not for platform specific applications. These offices could be using third party windows compatible software for office management and application suit.

    It could be an effort to make the administrative systems safe.
    The autopsy of Windows Soruce code may have to do with that.

    I am a linux user ever but as I understand ; LInux Distros are THE BEST but creates compatibility issues with certain hardware configurations.
    When procuring hardware by different departments across our geography such inconsistencies will creat unchecked holes. These conflicts in compatibility would require dependence on backports. May be this ambuiguity must have given the decision to look into Windows Source Code.

    I agree with you on platform specifics needs ..Linux distros rwak. Its ze Don.. an option we cant refuse. :D
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 10, 2015
  18. Bangalorean

    Bangalorean Stars and Ambassadors Stars and Ambassadors

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2010
    Messages:
    6,207
    Likes Received:
    6,497
    Agree with @Dark Sorrow. There is no need to reinvent the wheel. Creating an OS is not child's play. It will require a $20 million effort to build something up to the mark. And that will also require several iterations to get all bugs and issues ironed out.

    You can use the Linux Kernel to begin with, and build something on top of it. That is the best way to go.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 10, 2015
  19. Dark Sorrow

    Dark Sorrow Respected Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    1,630
    Likes Received:
    421
    Location:
    Mumbai
    Sir can you enlighten us regarding the same.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 10, 2015
  20. Bangalorean

    Bangalorean Stars and Ambassadors Stars and Ambassadors

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2010
    Messages:
    6,207
    Likes Received:
    6,497
    I think he is referring to the everlasting device driver problem on Linux. Most devices just don't work on Linux. Only the most popular printers, sound cards, graphics cards, etc. work well on Linux. Most others simply don't work. The crux of the issue is the GPL. Linux insists that the device drivers should be open source, distributed as part of the Linux source code. That is the spirit of GNU GPL . Some manufacturers agreed, most didn't. So, Linux hackers were left with the unenviable task of trying to reverse engineer the drivers, with mixed success.
     
    Dark Sorrow, sorcerer and Blood+ like this.
  21. Free Karma

    Free Karma Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2013
    Messages:
    2,372
    Likes Received:
    2,576
    Location:
    Chennai
    I Dont think you understood my posts, When did I ever suggest not using/building on top of linux (or something else)?

    I think this is more about general purpose and not really about embedded systems.
     
    Last edited: Feb 5, 2015

Share This Page