McKinsey: Chinese firms still lack global status

Discussion in 'China' started by Daredevil, Jul 20, 2012.

  1. Daredevil

    Daredevil On Vacation! Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2009
    Messages:
    11,613
    Likes Received:
    5,670
    McKinsey: Chinese firms still lack global status

    Chinese companies still have relatively low profitability and lack global status despite a record presence in the latest Fortune 500 list, McKinsey & Company said on Thursday.

    As economic structural reform advances and cost advantages fade away, investment-driven growth must give way to higher productivity, said the US-based consultancy firm.

    The average profit margin of China's 42 central State-owned enterprises on Fortune Magazine's latest annual ranking of the world's 500 largest companies by revenue was only 2.2 percent, compared with an average of 4.8 percent for non-financial companies outside the Chinese mainland.

    Sinopec Group, the largest company in China by revenue, which ranked fifth globally, reported a profit margin of 2.8 percent in 2011. In comparison, Exxon Mobil, which came third on the list, had a profit margin of 8.6 percent.

    The mainland had a total of 70 companies on the list, overtaking Japan for the first time as the second-largest base for the world's top 500 companies.

    However, Xu Haoxun, a director with McKinsey China, said that less than 10 of these companies can really be regarded as "world-class enterprises".

    "The growth of China's SOEs is mostly a result of their competitive edge in the domestic market, but these Chinese 'giants' face a lot more challenges when they enter the global market," Xu said.

    Apart from its monopolized sectors, the Chinese market has the most severe competition in the world, which has resulted in the lowest profit margins, Xu said, adding that the investment-driven growth of previous years is no longer sustainable.

    Meanwhile, rising costs in the domestic market mean that managers need to pay more attention toward both human and capital costs.

    "The best form of defense is offence, thus taking a slice of the global market is key to the survival of Chinese enterprises," he added.

    To build world-class enterprises, Chinese companies need to make more efforts to improve their profitability and sustainability, and improve the efficiency of their management systems and their ability to allocate resources globally, he said.

    "In the next five to 10 years, China will need at least 100 CEOs with the ability to run Fortune 500 companies, 100,000 talented and experienced managers, and millions of skilled workers who can operate advanced equipments," Xu said.

    The State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission recently launched a program to improve internal controls in SOEs, and Xu said that McKinsey is working with the national assets watchdog to help build these companies into "world-class enterprises".

    Xu said that as this process continues, more SOEs will pull out from non-core businesses, offering more opportunities to private business.

    "Sometimes it's not that the SOEs don't want to reform, they do face a lot of resistance," said Xu Baoli, a researcher with the research center affiliated to SASAC.

    The researcher said despite the SOE reform in 1998, there are still some non-performing assets, and the problem has been hidden by the rapid growth since 2003.

    But SOEs may now face a period of contraction. At a recent meeting, Shao Ning, a vice-chairman of SASAC, called on the companies to prepare for a "winter period".

    "Coping with contraction will be a tougher mission than expansion for the management of SOEs," SASAC's Xu said.

    "World-class enterprises in the West evolved in an environment of complete competition, but China's SOEs have to deal with more social responsibilities, thus there isn't a universal standard," he added.
     
  2.  
  3. Daredevil

    Daredevil On Vacation! Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2009
    Messages:
    11,613
    Likes Received:
    5,670
    I think these companies are mainly in Forbes 500 list is due to the fact that being a SOE (State owned Enterprise) they have monopoly with no or little competition from private players. If one looks at the profit margins one can understand how inefficiently these enterprises are being run.
     
  4. Predator

    Predator Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2012
    Messages:
    542
    Likes Received:
    260
    >>Chinese companies still have relatively low profitability and lack global status despite a record presence in the latest Fortune 500 list, McKinsey & Company said on Thursday.

    >>McKinsey is working with the national assets watchdog to help build these companies into "world-class enterprises".

    You give me money, I will make you world class. classic way to create a problem then offer a solution and earn money from it.
     
  5. satish007

    satish007 Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,458
    Likes Received:
    202
    Location:
    China
    Chinese firms still lack global status? Most Chinese hate them and almost want to destroy them, but them are needed to counter Indian, Indian have many Top 500, Chinese can not be loser.
     
  6. amoy

    amoy Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Messages:
    5,523
    Likes Received:
    1,547
    SOE monopoly mostly happens at home in sectors of such as energy, water supply. However, when it comes global competition, SOEs draw strength from state backing that private enterprises lack. Moreover most of those SOEs went public being listed in bourse

    Countless examples -
    State Grid Corporation of China Successfully Acquires a 25% Stake in REN, Portugal
    China's State Grid to buy Brazil assets from Spain's ACS_cableabc.net
    ICBC and Standard Bank Group Agreed on the Sales and Purchase of Standard Bank Argentina-ICBC NEWS-ICBC China


    The power of 'state capitalism'
     
  7. nimo_cn

    nimo_cn Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2009
    Messages:
    3,491
    Likes Received:
    592
    The best example to illustrate the power of 'state capitalism' would be Samsung of South Korea, I only hope Indian posters understand what I am talking about.
     
  8. no smoking

    no smoking Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2009
    Messages:
    3,172
    Likes Received:
    422
    I believe that indians understand what you talk about. Actually indian giants such as Tata are almost the same as Samsung: get everything and cover everything.
     

Share This Page