Massive protests erupts in PoK after Balochistan, locals demand FREEDOM from Pakistan

[OrangeFlorian]

NO! sindh is hind it clearly says so in the nation anthem.

 

[rock127]

Karima Baloch's 'Rakhsha Bandhan' message to India's PM Modi

 

[Screambowl]

1. Pakistanis are violent people and very quick to resort to violence and killing. The hatred between the different ethnic groups in Karachi can be quite murderous. Sindhi nationalists hate Mohajirs and would view an MQM state the same way an Indian nationalist would view Maharashtra or Kashmir leaving the Indian union.

2. Separatist nationalism is weak in Sindh. In Balochistan it is stronger.

In terms of loyalty to the federation of Pakistan it's Punjabis first (as Pakistan is a Punjabi empire basically), then Pashtuns, then Sindhis then Baloch.

3. If Baloch win their war against the murderous Pakistan army then the next day the at least 30 million Sindhis will emulate what the far fewer 6 million Baloch achieved.

The Pakistan army traumatized even today by 1971 and their humiliating defeat would then be traumatized by the loss of Balochistan and not psychologically capable of taking on 30 million Sindhis and would probably concede their secession if they made it clear that's what they wanted and were prepared to use violence.

So Balochistan goes, Sindhi independence is almost guaranteed...leaving Pashtuns and Punjabis in a landlocked union, which both would opt out of as the whole united Pakistan project would have been shown to be a complete failure.

In other words just the separation of Balochistan alone ends Pakistan.

Absolutely correct! Very well put up and explained. Especially point 2) and 3)

 

[rock127]

These anti-nationals like Burqa Dutt and Manishakkar are going to Kashmir to incite rioting again.

These basTURDS don't go to the families of Army who also lost their life fighting for country.

How the hell these anti-national are still roaming free and alive on streets???

 

[mayfair]

Waiting for modi to repeal article 370. This will be the game changer

That requires the J&K state assembly to ratify. Neither NC nor PDP (for that matter nor will The Congress) will allow that to happen and since Kashmir valley holds maximum seats in the assembly, and is their bread and butter, this is extremely unlikey to happen in the short term.

What is needed is patience, perseverance and long term attrition to chip away the Islamo-fascist separatist support, the present protests maybe seen as a very early beginning to a very long term plan.

Modi, Doval and Amit Shah combine (affectionately referred to as MAD) over at BRF, have reallised this all along and we should expect long term consequences.

 

[anoop_mig25]

That HC judgment is wrong , the h'ble SC will quash it anytime, Moreover there is no need to quash it, it's wrong in itself.

For that to happen this order must be questioned in SC . Nobody has challenged it yet in SC

 

[anoop_mig25]

Check a video on YT of SSwamy vs Ram Jethmalani on this issue.

Link please for the video

30oooooooo0000

 

[anoop_mig25]

A 5 judge bench must not decide the political discourse of India. India's parliament represents the will of the people and it's decision is final. Question is whether BJP is willing to walk the talk.

Wasnt NJAC will of people of India ??? i got challenged and got quash in court


Between i donot about will but currently lacks maths and fall of governmrnt in JnK

 

[anoop_mig25]

That requires the J&K state assembly to ratify. Neither NC nor PDP (for that matter nor will The Congress) will allow that to happen and since Kashmir valley holds maximum seats in the assembly, and is their bread and butter, this is extremely unlikey to happen in the short term.

What is needed is patience, perseverance and long term attrition to chip away the Islamo-fascist separatist support, the present protests maybe seen as a very early beginning to a very long term plan.

Modi, Doval and Amit Shah combine (affectionately referred to as MAD) over at BRF, have reallised this all along and we should expect long term consequences.

Can this happen if we have re-captured PoK . Offer its new MLA to support us on scrapping artcile 370 in rteurn we can make POK as separate state then from current J&K

By pok i mean Pok+Gilgit-Baltistan

 

[A chauhan]

For that to happen this order must be questioned in SC . Nobody has challenged it yet in SC

Part 21 and article 370 along with other articles in this part are "Temporary" and it's clearly written there on these provisions. J&K HC has given an opium judgment here. Temporary provisions can not become permanent without a constitutional amendment by the central govt specifically mentioning that effect. State HC's judgment doesn't have binding effect on the h'ble SC, only SC has that power under art 141. So the SC can quash it anytime in the future.

 

[Screambowl]

Can this happen if we have re-captured PoK . Offer its new MLA to support us on scrapping artcile 370 in rteurn we can make POK as separate state then from current J&K

By pok i mean Pok+Gilgit-Baltistan

re capturing POK can only happen if the people there start supporting India or Pakistan does one more Kargil.

 

[aditya10r]

re capturing POK can only happen if the people there start supporting India or Pakistan does one more Kargil.

the former option is much better....
we will have local support as well
porkis ki toh fat jayegi

 

[vayuu1]

I will go one step further?,if pak gets disintegrated, our next target should be China, especially Tibet and xinjiang.

Sent from my SM-N900 using Tapatalk

 

[FRYCRY]

I will go one step further?,if pak gets disintegrated, our next target should be China, especially Tibet and xinjiang.

Sent from my SM-N900 using Tapatalk

I'm sure Modi will be winning next elections as well, hope he is working on some strategy to get rid of pakistan.... what are the chances of another Indo-pak war in next 8-10 years??

 

[aditya10r]

I'm sure Modi will be winning next elections as well, hope he is working on some strategy to get rid of pakistan.... what are the chances of another Indo-pak war in next 8-10 years??

Yes there is some probability of war but a limited war not a full blown war

 

[sachin458377]

Just by covert operations or helping Baloch people , we can not separate Balochnistan from Porkistan. There has to be a complete strategy in which first of all a fast and decisive attack should be made with the help of Israel & US to eliminate the threat of Nuclear weapons. Once these nukes are gone am sure porkistan is almost gone.

 

[spikey360]

Modi, Doval and Amit Shah combine (affectionately referred to as MAD)

I would add Rajnath and make it MARD.

 

[Bornubus]

Rather than speculating for full scale war, govt should end cease fire agreement followed by heavy buildup on Border by 2020. Arty and possibly Air strikes on Paki posts and terrorists hideouts.


Paki can't afford unconventional war with India, make them suffer. All Pakis are tertorist swines so treat them as such.

 

[spikey360]

Just by covert operations or helping Baloch people , we can not separate Balochnistan from Porkistan. There has to be a complete strategy in which first of all a fast and decisive attack should be made with the help of Israel & US to eliminate the threat of Nuclear weapons. Once these nukes are gone am sure porkistan is almost gone.

Agree with you that Pakis' nuclear jewels must be snatched, even if the cost is high.
Also, it must be a joint op by all sworn enemies of Pakistan, to overwhelm the Pakistani establishment and debilitate it in a matter of few hours.
It would require the largest coordinated joint strike, something like Normandy landings on D-Day.
Note: Saudi and even Iran/Afghanistan might come to the aid of Pakistan in their hour of need, so there must be a mechanism to eliminate their chances of success.

 

[anoop_mig25]

Part 21 and article 370 along with other articles in this part are "Temporary" and it's clearly written there on these provisions. J&K HC has given an opium judgment here. Temporary provisions can not become permanent without a constitutional amendment by the central govt specifically mentioning that effect. State HC's judgment doesn't have binding effect on the h'ble SC, only SC has that power under art 141. So the SC can quash it anytime in the future.

SC can only squash when its brought to there notice and nobody has brought it to notice of SC