Justice and ‘a Ray of Hope’ After 2002 India Riots

Discussion in 'Politics & Society' started by Oracle, Jul 3, 2012.

  1. Oracle

    Oracle New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    8,120
    Likes Received:
    1,541
    Location:
    Bangalore, India
    AHMEDABAD, India — The police stood by as Hindu mobs slaughtered nearly 1,000 people, mostly Muslims, in massacres that evidence suggests were an election-year ploy by state officials to garner votes. Mothers were skewered, children set afire and fathers hacked to pieces.

    That was 10 years ago. A decade later, the riots in Gujarat State may be remembered less for the horrors they unleashed, however, than that such sectarian carnage, which once struck India as often as a heavy monsoon, has not been repeated since. There are many reasons for this astonishing quiescence, but technology has played a crucial role. The killers made cellphone calls, and records of those calls became evidence.

    After years of dithering, India’s creaky justice system lurched into action. Hundreds of rioters have been convicted, and more cases are pending. On Saturday, a judge trying 61 defendants — including a former state education minister — delayed issuing verdicts until Aug. 29 in a case that involves about 94 deaths. A total of 327 people testified, but the crucial evidence, again, was the phone records contradicting claims by some of the accused that they were nowhere near the scene of the crimes.

    Indeed, those same records continue to be examined for any role played in the riots by the office of the state’s top official, Narendra Modi, who is among India’s most prominent politicians. But even if Mr. Modi is never charged, the political calculus behind stoking sectarian clashes — long a staple for winning elections here — has fundamentally changed, political analysts say.

    “We reached a tipping point,” said M. J. Akbar, author of “Riot After Riot” and editorial director of India Today, one of India’s leading news organizations. “This is the first time that India’s judicial system has actually worked to hold people accountable for rioting. In the past, the guilty never got punished.”

    India was once the world’s wellspring of religiously inspired massacres. As such violence rages across the Middle East, the bougainvillea sprouting from Gujarat’s charred buildings offers hope that even societies steeped in blood can curb the self-perpetuating logic behind such clashes.

    Shakeel Ahmad, chairman of the Islamic Relief Committee in Gujarat, said he was optimistic. About 150,000 people were displaced by the rioting in 2002. Witnesses and other evidence suggest that the violence was encouraged by state officials, who deny the charge. Dr. Ahmad’s son was imprisoned for nearly seven years, accused of plotting against the life of a state official who is now on trial himself.

    During a lengthy interview in his office at the edge of a Muslim neighborhood, Dr. Ahmad could not suppress a triumphant smile.

    “There is a ray of hope,” he said in his office here, his white hair and beard swirled in cigarette smoke. “For the first time in Gujarat, we have seen demands for justice.”

    To be sure, India’s politics are still vicious and violent, its society riven by religious, cultural and caste divisions that feed continuing discrimination and sporadically erupt in fury. Assassinations are frequent, corruption endemic and the courts largely feckless. Gujarat’s Muslims have never entirely recovered from the riots, and the state’s population is more religiously segregated than ever. No one can promise that large-scale riots will never return, but there are signs of hope.

    The riots began on Feb. 27, 2002, when a train filled with Hindu pilgrims who had just visited a disputed shrine rolled into Godhra, a small city in eastern Gujarat, and was attacked by a Muslim mob. A fire started, and at least 58 Hindu pilgrims burned to death. Their charred bodies were brought to Ahmedabad, Gujarat’s largest city, and laid out in public, an act that all but guaranteed more violence. Huge mobs gathered to view the bodies.

    At the time of the riots, Gujarat’s chief minister was Mr. Modi, a newly appointed functionary from the Bharatiya Janata Party, which advocates Hindu supremacy but faced sinking popularity in the state. Mr. Modi and his party endorsed a widespread strike.

    Massacres began immediately. About 20,000 Muslim homes and businesses and 360 places of worship were burned. Later that year, Mr. Modi’s party was overwhelmingly re-elected. Mayors in the United States are thrown out when too much snow clogs streets; Mr. Modi let his streets be choked with blood and won election overwhelmingly.

    Mr. Modi was following a familiar script. In 1984, Sikh bodyguards assassinated Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, and Hindu mobs in Delhi killed thousands of Sikhs in retaliation. The Congress Party, whose members encouraged the rioting, was rewarded later that year with a huge majority in Parliament. Commissions were formed to investigate, but there were few arrests and fewer convictions. After the 1992 Hindu-Muslim riots in Mumbai, in which 900 people were killed, commission recommendations were again ignored.

    Commissions were impaneled after the Gujarat riots as well. A top state official told one panel that Mr. Modi ordered officials to take no action against rioters. That official was murdered. Thousands of cases against rioters were dismissed by the police for lack of evidence despite eyewitness accounts.

    But in 2004, the Supreme Court intervened, acting on petitions from human rights groups. The court ordered that more than 2,000 dismissed cases be reopened, a special police team be created and some trials be transferred out of Gujarat. The wheels of justice began to turn, leading more victims to press claims.

    That year, a lawyer representing victims was cross-examining a top police official when the official laid a CD on the table in front of him.

    “What’s that?” asked the lawyer, Dr. Mukul Sinha.

    “Evidence,” answered the officer, Rahul Sharma.

    The CD contained records of every cellphone call made in Ahmedabad during the worst of the rioting. The records allowed advocates to construct precise timelines of the movements of many rioters, timelines that often dovetailed with the accounts of riot victims but contradicted those of the accused.

    Dr. Sinha is still mining the records for evidence, but Mr. Modi’s government is vigorously trying to suppress the investigation, charging the officer who provided the records with violating the Official Secrets Act.

    The cellphone records have proved invaluable to prosecutors. While no government agency or court seems to have a scorecard of how many people have been convicted, state and court records show that they number in the hundreds, with scores more due for judgments.

    Gujarat state officials and representatives for Mr. Modi did not respond to multiple interview requests or to a list of e-mailed questions.

    Mr. Modi’s role in the rioting continues to plague him and his party. Two years after the riots, his alliance lost its hold over the national government. Important members of the group have warned against Mr. Modi’s selection as the alliance’s candidate for prime minister in the 2014 elections. Yet Mr. Modi remains popular in Gujarat, where he has recast himself as an economic problem-solver.

    Steven I. Wilkinson, a professor of political science at Yale University who has studied India’s riots, said that India’s national elections had become so competitive that no political party could afford to alienate Muslims, who represent 13 percent of the electorate, about the same share that blacks represent in the United States.

    “Riots are now a stain on your reputation forever in a way they never were before,” he said.

    On a recent morning, Shareefa Bibi sat outside her reconstructed house in the Muslim neighborhood of Naroda Patiya. She recalled fleeing a mob with her husband and five children to a nearby police camp, where officers refused to protect them.

    “They said, ‘No, you have to die today,’ ” she recalled bitterly. The family ran to another neighborhood and hid, but in the confusion her 18-year-old son, Sharif, was caught by rioters, gutted and set on fire. Cowering just a few feet away with her other children, Ms. Bibi watched him die.

    She testified against her son’s killers, whose judgments have been delayed until Aug. 29.

    “I will never get my son back,” Ms. Bibi said. “But our hope is that we will get justice.”

    NYT
     
  2.  
  3. KS

    KS Bye bye DFI Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2010
    Messages:
    8,008
    Likes Received:
    5,718
    Location:
    irrelevant
    :facepalm:
     
    afako, A chauhan and Mad Indian like this.
  4. VIP

    VIP Ultra Nationalist Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2012
    Messages:
    4,684
    Likes Received:
    3,187
    Location:
    Gandhinagar
    


M.J.Akbar and his lame stories. :lol:
     
    maomao likes this.
  5. Virendra

    Virendra Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2010
    Messages:
    4,674
    Likes Received:
    2,923
    Location:
    Delhi, India, India
    I see O is posting again :)
     
    Oracle likes this.
  6. vikaskumar11233

    vikaskumar11233 Tihar Jail Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2011
    Messages:
    116
    Likes Received:
    14
    Location:
    Jaipur
    According to me the cases related to a specific religion and religion communities needs in depth knowledge and circumstantial evidences to give a perfect decision.This case result can cause riots in whole India.So,decision should be of the type which is not partial to any community.
     
    Mad Indian and parijataka like this.
  7. Oracle

    Oracle New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    8,120
    Likes Received:
    1,541
    Location:
    Bangalore, India
    And I've seen you after sometime mate! :)
     
  8. Sunder singh

    Sunder singh Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2012
    Messages:
    535
    Likes Received:
    143
    Location:
    FROM NAINITAL NOW IN CHENNAI
    Fighting in the name of religion is bad idea
     
    Ankit Purohit likes this.
  9. A chauhan

    A chauhan "अहिंसा परमो धर्मः धर्म हिंसा तथैव च: l" Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2009
    Messages:
    4,927
    Likes Received:
    4,561
    Location:
    Raipur
    Biased article! A small number of policemen can not deal with a mob with overwhelming numbers in a riot, how difficult it is to understand?

    After SIT report all these fake communal charges doesn't make any sense!
     
    Mad Indian and Raj30 like this.
  10. Zebra

    Zebra Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2011
    Messages:
    6,007
    Likes Received:
    2,250
  11. If you'll read the article carefully

    ^
    is all that's attributed to MJ Akbar ...

    what's so lame and storylike abt that ?
     
  12. rock127

    rock127 Maulana Rockullah Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2009
    Messages:
    8,936
    Likes Received:
    10,289
    Location:
    India
  13. parijataka

    parijataka Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2011
    Messages:
    4,893
    Likes Received:
    3,688
    Location:
    Bengaluru
    Sikhs have forgiven Congress since Manmohan Singh became PM [and many top bureucrats and army chief]...:p
     
  14. SHURIDH

    SHURIDH Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2011
    Messages:
    1,484
    Likes Received:
    293
    Location:
    Murshidabad,Paschim banga,India.
    what is partial?
    The judge will verdict according to law.
    The judge won' t spare anyone.
    Every rioter who kills deserve death penalty the judge should not reduce their penalty anyway.
    The mother who lost her son.
    Has every right to see killer of her son to be hanged.
    The killer of her son should not get any special previllage from court.
    Just because he belongs to a community.
    This is a question of justice.
    There should not any comporise in question of justice.
    And by the way mr. Modi can't afford another riot.
    If another riot happen in gujrat .
    Than there will be end mr.modi in national politics
     
  15. SHURIDH

    SHURIDH Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2011
    Messages:
    1,484
    Likes Received:
    293
    Location:
    Murshidabad,Paschim banga,India.
    Leave him bro.
    People like him always want to try to give some kinds of justification of killing riot.
    They don't want to see the killer of riot be punished and want to end the case without punishing guilty.
     
  16. Mad Indian

    Mad Indian Proud Bigot Veteran Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2012
    Messages:
    12,830
    Likes Received:
    7,522
    Location:
    Podigai Hills.
    What a Non sense pile of Crap :frusty:

    Modi cant afford a riot huh? What the hell is that supposed to mean?

    Oh btw if we go to history, there are several histories we can take a look at for the past few decades alone, let alone few centuries ;)


    And people like you will cling to non-sense even after getting spanked so many times by "your" self appointed protectors aka secularists. There is a reason, BJP does not get Muslim votes is a stereotype you know
     
    Last edited: Jul 3, 2012
    Raj30 and A chauhan like this.
  17. VIP

    VIP Ultra Nationalist Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2012
    Messages:
    4,684
    Likes Received:
    3,187
    Location:
    Gandhinagar
    


I was talking about his articles, not this article.
     
  18. A chauhan

    A chauhan "अहिंसा परमो धर्मः धर्म हिंसा तथैव च: l" Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2009
    Messages:
    4,927
    Likes Received:
    4,561
    Location:
    Raipur
    You misunderstood my post, a criminal must be punished whether he is a Hindu or a Muslim. What I objected is dragging Modi in all this while SIT has already given him clean-chit. You can understand it very easily, just imagine if 1000 rioters are rioting, and there is a police force of 100 men, what option remains to those policemen ? Simple! Policemen are also human beings, they too live,they also have wives and children, so the only option remains with them is to watch it quietly or get assaulted and killed. And the police did the same although it can be criticized on legal and moral grounds, but I really don't get it when some Idiots blame Modi for it. I appreciate Indian courts and legal system who have punished the criminals irrespective of religions.

    :facepalm:
    Your stereotypical prejudice in the matter of Gujrat 2002 riots has forced you to think to this extent !!

    Which killer you are talking about?

    I say if any Hindu is convicted then he should be punished severely and I demand same for Muslim accused, where I am wrong?

    Stop using harsh words against members here.

    Edit:
    PS: what I objected was the way of reporting, I can clearly see the writer is not appreciating the legal system but actually falsely criticizing Modi, that is why I posted here.
     
    Last edited: Jul 3, 2012
    Raj30 and Mad Indian like this.
  19. VIP

    VIP Ultra Nationalist Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2012
    Messages:
    4,684
    Likes Received:
    3,187
    Location:
    Gandhinagar
    


This article shows you the reason to believe in Indian Judicial System, than you should think twice.There's nothing wrong to believe in judiciary system but on the basis of this article, than it's laughable. This article presents those people who are wellknown for having some political ambitions and a lot of bias plus connection with opposition party.Even the bold part of article can make you believe how biased this article is.
     
    Last edited: Jul 3, 2012
  20. SHURIDH

    SHURIDH Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2011
    Messages:
    1,484
    Likes Received:
    293
    Location:
    Murshidabad,Paschim banga,India.
    simple if another riot happen in modi regime.
    Modi will be doomed.
    Nobody can save his political leadership in center.
    Modi can't affort another riot.
    The sarvadarma hunger strike drama he did in last year.
    All will be lost.
    Gujrat bjp claimed to get 30% muslim vote. So i think you agree with me state bjp is a liar.
     

Share This Page