those are your persons statements.if such documents went into public media its not their fault.its your personal enquiry-it has no value in indian courts except the judge may consider contents of it under his jurisdiction/discretion.
is what I hope.
even though there are many similar vessels to antony what does it confer??
there is only one vessel similar to antony,i.e antony itself at the scene .to support my view its easy as all those ships are given individual identity for any help from authorities,any social welfare programmes by the local govt
poor defence
If I could analyze the radar recordings could demonstrate that the boat approaches the Lexie was not the St. Antony.
One of the elements is that the Italian witnesses according boat approaching from starboard bow, and then always shows the left side of the Enrica Lexie.
The shots on the St. Antony are just on the right side, the opposite side. And there is much more to see.
This is not matter of lawyers or judges, are technical analysis. Even God can say that 2+2 is different to 4.
If the prosecutor in rome let me analyze the radar recordings I can prove that the boat was not the St. Antony, I'm quite sure.
the ballistic reports confirm that guns belong to members of ship.and two members in that ship admitted to shooting.please read again carefully.the confirmation of the report is given by two officers of ship that the guns belong to accused and bullets recovered from dead bodies belong to those two accused.
The ballistic report is kept secret until now. We know what we read in the newspapers, not the ballistic report. The technical analysis of a process must be public, anyone who has to read. And what I read is to be verified.
- There is a probabilistic absurd. A Marine fires, misses the target, and puts a shot on a victim and a shot on the vessel. The other marine shoots, misses the target, and puts a shot on the other victim and a shot on the vessel. If they do it again for a thousand years could not do it again.
- Indian investigators accuse of murder marines Latorre and Girone, but the ballistic report says they fired their guns in each of the Marines Andronico and Voglino. Why?
The Italian marines have supplied each his own weapon, and use that. The guns do not exchange, the Beretta AR 70/90 in tilt and elevation adjustable sight, that every military adapts to himself.
Not there was excitement, because the boat was sighted at 2.8 nm (5km) with the radar, so they had plenty of time to prepare.
There was not intention to kill, because the Beretta AR 70/90 fires 11 rounds per second, and all were made in two seconds of fire. If there was a willingness to kill made a massacre.
the local news agencies always in a hurry to report the news first,released the news without verifying with authorities probably.they are not official statements.not of much value
This is not news agencies, but public statements made by the fishermen to the media, verifiable. All different in time and geographic location, and this never coinciding with the position of Enrica Lexie at the time of the accident.
You say that we have to ask the right version to the police? What, the n. 1, 2, 3 or 4? Or even a new one that tells us the police? I remind you that Mr. Freddy Bosco has confirmed a few weeks ago that he had said at the time of the landing at Neendakara, that he was shot at 9:30 PM (says he does not know why he said it!).
I found, four months ago, the video where he said 9:30 PM on landing.
The witnesses are unreliable, including the police officer of Neendakara, he hears 9:30 PM and writes on report 4:00 PM. Or was deaf?
[If I could analyze the radar recordings could demonstrate that the boat approaches the Lexie was not the St. Antony.
One of the elements is that the Italian witnesses according boat approaching from starboard bow, and then always shows the left side of the Enrica Lexie.
The shots on the St. Antony are just on the right side, the opposite side. And there is much more to see.
This is not matter of lawyers or judges, are technical analysis. Even God can say that 2+2 is different to 4.
If the prosecutor in rome let me analyze the radar recordings I can prove that the boat was not the St. Antony, I'm quite sure.
]
by posting such comments ,you are understating the work done by your agencies.can't they be able to differentiate left to right?you may approach indian courts in person if you wish for defence.
[The ballistic report is kept secret until now. We know what we read in the newspapers, not the ballistic report. The technical analysis of a process must be public, anyone who has to read. And what I read is to be verified.
- There is a probabilistic absurd. A Marine fires, misses the target, and puts a shot on a victim and a shot on the vessel. The other marine shoots, misses the target, and puts a shot on the other victim and a shot on the vessel. If they do it again for a thousand years could not do it again.
- Indian investigators accuse of murder marines Latorre and Girone, but the ballistic report says they fired their guns in each of the Marines Andronico and Voglino. Why? ]
in indian judiciary you are not allowed to make your investigation reports to public,if done so its a crime.
thats why we call the persons accused not murdered.ballistic analysis only speaks about source of bullet,speed,direction,etc not the shooter.ballistic report said,guns and bullets of both italians matched with those found on dead bodies and the vessel.
they confessed the shooting,confirmed by the ship captain.
[The Italian marines have supplied each his own weapon, and use that. The guns do not exchange, the Beretta AR 70/90 in tilt and elevation adjustable sight, that every military adapts to himself.
Not there was excitement, because the boat was sighted at 2.8 nm (5km) with the radar, so they had plenty of time to prepare.
There was not intention to kill, because the Beretta AR 70/90 fires 11 rounds per second, and all were made in two seconds of fire. If there was a willingness to kill made a massacre.
]
by pointing out the boat was identified and sure it identified early,failure of the ship to competent authorities about a possible pirate attack,and start evasive maneuvers the captain is at fault.
when the shooting took place the boat is only hundred metres or so away from the vessel only making it an easy target.
Vice-Admiral K.N. Sushil, Flag Officer Commanding-in-Chief of the Southern Naval Command and Commander-in-Chief (Coastal Defence) of the Southern Zone, opined that the Italian marines erred in judgement :
"If they thought they were being chased by a pirate vessel, they should have carried out evasive manoeuvres to alter the course of the ship, as enunciated by the guidelines. If the skiff was still after them, they would've fired a few warning shots well above the bow of the pirate vessel to deter it. Unfortunately, they do not seem to have done any of this. The Italians are claiming that this was a successful anti-piracy operation, but it is crystal clear that the fishermen were unarmed and were not attempting to come alongside the tanker to board it. As the tanker crew claims to have been fired upon, I sent INS Kabra to ascertain if there were bullet marks on it. It went around the ship to find that there was none. I've also asked my men to verify the tanker's logbook to account for the number of rounds fired by the guards. This is to see if they had fired any warning shot at all. What are you talking about the fishing vessel giving you a chase when the maximum speed it can attain is just about eight knots?"[7]
how ever the ballistics recovered 15 bullet marks from the ship 2 from dead people.
[This is not news agencies, but public statements made by the fishermen to the media, verifiable. All different in time and geographic location, and this never coinciding with the position of Enrica Lexie at the time of the accident.
You say that we have to ask the right version to the police? What, the n. 1, 2, 3 or 4? Or even a new one that tells us the police? I remind you that Mr. Freddy Bosco has confirmed a few weeks ago that he had said at the time of the landing at Neendakara, that he was shot at 9:30 PM (says he does not know why he said it!).
I found, four months ago, the video where he said 9:30 PM on landing.
The witnesses are unreliable, including the police officer of Neendakara, he hears 9:30 PM and writes on report 4:00 PM. Or was deaf?]
very glad to see any links if you have any info that these are public statements given by fishermen in the scene of crime.
let me remind you there are some series of events i would like to add up for you.
had your version of shooting at 9.30pm IST been correct there has been a 3 hour delay in arresting the vessel with crew.taking it to 12.30pm.after which they are handed over to police for fir.Thats the time when FIR is lodged.
so FIR should be filed on next day early hours,not day before.
Just the fir itself is enough to prove it as even the president of india do not have authority to change what is written in a FIR
why you keep on posting comments with out proper sources/links.please post credible sources from next time
.there will only be an official document from court for arrest,at max
