ISHRAT JAHAN FAKE ENCOUNTER THEORY FALLING LIKE NINEPINS

Discussion in 'Politics & Society' started by Lions Of Punjab, Jun 17, 2015.

  1. Lions Of Punjab

    Lions Of Punjab Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2013
    Messages:
    640
    Likes Received:
    888
    Location:
    Ahmedabad, India, India
    [​IMG]
    New Delhi: The Ishrat Jahan fake encounter theory is collapsing like ninepins. Today the Ministry of Home Ministry refused to sanction prosecution against former Intelligence Bureau officer, Rajinder Kumar on the ground that there was no evidence. The Central Bureau of Investigation which was directed to probe into the case by the UPA find itself in a difficult position today. Senior Gujarat police officer Vanzara was granted bail in February 2015 while N K Amin another police official was ordered to be released on bail.

    Theory falling like ninepins
    Ishrat Jahan and three of her accomplices were killed in an encounter at Gujarat in the year 2004. It was based on intelligence bureau reports that the action was taken by the Gujarat police. As per the report it was stated that she and three others had arrived in Gujarat with an intention of carrying out terror strikes and also targeting Narendra Modi who was the Chief Minister of Gujarat then.

    However when the UPA came to power at the centre, it was decided to rake up this case once again and the CBI was brought into the picture. The CBI made several startling claims quoting its own investigation. Among the main claim was that the operation was fake. All through the probe they insisted that Ishrat Jahan was innocent.

    The Maharashtra police also came into the picture and proclaimed that there were no pending cases against Ishrat. What the police from Ishrat's home state Maharashtra missed was that terrorists could also have first timers.

    While the entire probe became centric around Ishrat, none of the investigtors once said that her associates, Pranesh Pillai (alias Javed Gulam Sheikh), Amjad Ali Rana and Zeeshan Johar were innocent. While admitting three of her accomplices were not innocent, the CBI was also not able to tell clearly what Ishrat was doing with them if at all she was innocent.
    CBI-IB War

    The Ishrat Jahan case brought out some of the worst days in the history of India's national security set up. The CBI and the IB were at logger heads. The IB being targeted in the form of Rajinder Kumar was never a good sign as the job of an IB official is to share information.

    Whether the information is actionable or not is the duty of the police. However when Kumar was questioned by the CBI, the IB took it very badly and the coordination between each other came to a standstill. Many in the IB were even upset with the government of India and the information sharing almost came to a stand still.
    When Ajit Doval was appointed the National Security Advisor, his primary job was to bridge this gap. It was never a good sign when two of the country's most premier agencies are at war with each other. Thankfully today the normalcy has been restored.

    When proof from Lashkar-e-Tayiba and Headley was not good enough

    When the incident first took place in the year 2004, the Ghazwa Times a Lahore based mouth piece of the Lashkar-e-Tayiba claimed that Ishrat Jahan was their operative. They even commended her sacrifice. However when the finger was pointed towards Pakistan, the Lashkar's financer and political wing, Jamaat-ud-Dawa clarified that it was a journalistic error.


    When a team of the National Investigating Agency visited the United States of America to probe David Headley, the 26/11 attack accused, he spoke about Ishrat Jahan. He said during his questioning that he was aware of this person and she was very much part of the Lashkar.

    However the NIA never went into that aspect. Sources tell OneIndia that they were under pressure not to probe this link. However for the sake of the public it was said that there was not enough proof in what Headley was saying and hence the angle was never probed.

    The NIA had even produced a letter in the Gujarat High Court in May 2011 stating that the aversion made regarding David Colman Headley making statement on Ishrat Jahan is purely in the nature of hearsay, it does not have any evidentiary value."

    Twists, turns and the truth:
    This case has seen several twists and turns. With one side accusing the police of faking this encounter, the Gujarat government however stood its ground and backed their officers.

    The People's Union for Civil Liberties, a human rights' body had said that the Gujarat police did not follow normal procedures in their investigations. No FIR was lodged with the local area police station where the encounter occurred; no chargesheet was filed.

    Before the case was handed over to the CBI, a judicial inquiry headed by Metropolitan Magistrate S P Tamang was constituted. The report stated that four persons were killed in police custody. Further, it was stated that some top officers were assured promotions for such fake encounters.

    The Gujarat government challenged the report before the high court on the ground that the accused were not accorded an opportunity to present their side of the case. The court stated that the encounter case was of national importance and ordered the police witnesses to be placed where they would not be working as subordinates to officials accused in the case.

    A Special Investigating Team was set up and this team told the HC in 2011 that the encounter was fake. The HC ordered that a complaint under Indian Penal Code Section 302 (murder) has to be filed against those involved in the fake encounter.

    Following this the CBI came into the picture. The agency arrested several officers and even brought IB officer Rajinder Kumar under the radar. The CBI accused the IB officer of providing the weapons which was planted at the encounter spot to make the operation look genuine.

    Today the Home Ministry has found that there was no evidence to proceed against Rajinder Kumar and refused to accord sanction to prosecute him.


    http://www.oneindia.com/india/ishrat-jahan-fake-encounter-theory-falling-like-ninepins-1771098.html
     
    OneGrimPilgrim, Vishwarupa and VIP like this.
  2.  
  3. Hari Sud

    Hari Sud Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2012
    Messages:
    1,054
    Likes Received:
    863
    Location:
    Ontario
    Can we prosecute any of the CBI officer for putting together a fake case?
     
  4. VIP

    VIP Ultra Nationalist Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2012
    Messages:
    4,689
    Likes Received:
    3,198
    Location:
    Gandhinagar
    Case is not fake. Encounter was fake for sure & it was based up on IB information. Problem was CBI was heading on the orders of UPA, despite knowing that they shouldn't pursue IB.
     
  5. Screambowl

    Screambowl Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    4,645
    Likes Received:
    3,268
    Location:
    N/A
    Sonia gandhi tried to bring rift between IB and CBI.
     
    Abhijat likes this.
  6. sob

    sob Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    6,359
    Likes Received:
    3,665
    Location:
    New Delhi
    Staged encounters are not new in India. We have seen plenty of it in Punjab and also in Mumbai. The difference was that the opposition was solidly behind the government and inderstood that they were in the national interest. These encounters were never used to settle political scores.

    All this changed when UPA came to power and they had a petty and vengeful leader at the helm. This case was used purely to settle political scores and with a view to tie down the Gujarat CM. CBI and NGOs with chequered history were used and we have all seen the results.

    Now it is time the case against Colonel Purohit is dismissed immediately and he is reinstated to his post with seniority intact and adequate compensation paid to his family.
     
    OneGrimPilgrim and jackprince like this.
  7. Rowdy

    Rowdy Co ja kurwa czytam! Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    3,256
    Likes Received:
    2,959
    Location:
    Milky Bar
    Sacrifice Hindus to please Islamists....not surprised.:india2:mera bharath mahan
     
  8. anupamsurey

    anupamsurey Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2014
    Messages:
    987
    Likes Received:
    396
    Location:
    karnataka
    the INC made a political tool out of a national security horror scenario, Ishrat Jahan was a terrorist there were no doubts about it, but they willingly overlooked the facts and tried to implicate CM of Gujrat and Police of Gujrat.
    After all, killing of a Muslim women under the orders of an already presumed slaughterer of Muslims came as music to the ears of so called seculars. they forgot to mention that every terrorist caught or killed in police action in our country is either a muslim or a communist.
     
    OneGrimPilgrim likes this.
  9. blueblood

    blueblood Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    1,871
    Likes Received:
    1,429
    [​IMG]

    Ishrat ke papa, sunte ho ki nahi.....:pound:
     
    Lions Of Punjab likes this.

Share This Page