- Joined
- Dec 17, 2009
- Messages
- 13,811
- Likes
- 6,734
IIRC, they all involved uniformed officers.The corruption is not directly by the Army, Navy or Air force. It is because of middlemen involved in the deal.
IIRC, they all involved uniformed officers.The corruption is not directly by the Army, Navy or Air force. It is because of middlemen involved in the deal.
Normally, this never comes out in the media. Matrials-Court perform all their tasks without any media involvement or have any links to the civilian judicial system. Uniformed personnel being caught in the act will be headlines news. If they are sentenced, we will only get to hear the officers name and sentence, the minutes of the courtroom trial will be classified. This is a British era thingy. Even the British have changed their policies, but we still haven't.IIRC, they all involved uniformed officers.
no wonder , the best of NDA enterence goes to navy....
unlike IAF and IA , navy has no problum with 'made in india' tag...
unlike 2000 t-90 , 126 mmrca..., inplace of going on bulk purchages , navy is adding gradually...
1971 , navy aircrafts panitrate deep inside karachi and distroy oil storage tankers.......
why didn't IAF do air excersises with navy , i always has a deep sence that navy pilots are smarter ...
SU-30MKI v/s MIG-29K..
Indian Navy is doing better for simple reason that it is able to retain and enhance her tactical and technical strength, inspite of being low on sanctioned budget. And best of all, she has created an infrastructure which will make sure this capability remains intact in future, sustained strength if you will.Is the INDIAN NAVY acquiring better weapon systems compared to the InA or IAF
I think that rarely happens all over the world. Never heard USAF pilots practice with the USN pilots. Perhaps because of difference in operational doctrine or just ego?
Mate, budgets are always flexible, it mainly depends on the need and requirements and are accordingly given priority ! IA receives the largest share of the budget since it is the biggest arm as per size of personnel is concerned, and IN is the smallest in terms of personnel size. But that doesn't mean that the Navy will be denied funds if it wants to acquire hardware which it feels is critical for its strength ! Look at recently announced P-75I deal worth 50k crores thereby surpassing the IAF's MMRCA deal !!!major chunk of our budget is definitely going to IA and IAF....which will restrict IN to acquire better weapons even if it wants....
It does happen. Just that they never make the news.I think that rarely happens all over the world. Never heard USAF pilots practice with the USN pilots. Perhaps because of difference in operational doctrine or just ego?
F-INSAS is a large scale project. It will take 4 or 5 years before the first few battalions are out. But I do support better equipment at the smallest level.well Indian navy and airforce are doing well.............but the army needs to be developed more by providing them better guns and wireless communication systems............i know there is a F-Insas programme........but it has to be implemented at the earliest
buddy...you are right but given the size of IN our political and neither IA IAF wants to give away more share of the defense budget to IN....[thats my view]Mate, budgets are always flexible, it mainly depends on the need and requirements and are accordingly given priority ! IA receives the largest share of the budget since it is the biggest arm as per size of personnel is concerned, and IN is the smallest in terms of personnel size. But that doesn't mean that the Navy will be denied funds if it wants to acquire hardware which it feels is critical for its strength ! Look at recently announced P-75I deal worth 50k crores thereby surpassing the IAF's MMRCA deal !!!