Is India (BECOMING) a colony of China?

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
Today, the war around the world that is most important is not with weapons.

It is a war for economic domination and economic subjugation and that is called 'neo-colonialism'!

It is a word that was very liberally used by the USSR and PRC!
 

pmaitra

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Messages
33,262
Likes
19,594
English is pregnant with words from the Proto-Indo-European languages.

Juggernaut comes from Jagannath of Puri. Ignition comes from Agni. Brother comes form Bhrata.

Therefore, as per cir, England is an Indian colony.
 

satish007

Senior Member
Joined
May 7, 2011
Messages
1,458
Likes
203
If I maybe permitted, this is one of the least educated post I have seen on this thread.

.
sir, cir is makeing his own post, own idea from him which should be welcome, he is making good step.
 

pmaitra

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Messages
33,262
Likes
19,594
sir, cir is makeing his own post, own idea from him which should be welcome, he is making good step.
Cannot disagree with that. Everyone is entitled to his own opinion.

Eventually, if he thinks shunning English is going to serve PRC well, he can petition his government to throw away English from Chinese schools.
 

satish007

Senior Member
Joined
May 7, 2011
Messages
1,458
Likes
203
It is an experience of great fun to hear Indians speaking Hindi which contains so many English sounding words。Good heritage huh?:rofl:
my dear sir, lanuage is whole human's treasure, nothing you can mock, Canton and HK are also using many english words and also speaking many very old Chinese words which northern chinese people have gave up. Lanuage is also a window to understand other contry and culture. cir, don't insult.
but Indian friends would you mind share if you have heritaged UK's polictis and made them really work for India or you guys's indian version is not so effient as UK ones?
 

Folk hero

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
142
Likes
73
We need to stop lying to our selves their are some real problems in our society for instance our politicians waste assembly time by sleeping or fighting that in front of live TV even tho we need high level of efficiency to manage a country as large as ours, then tell me why don't we will not be a colony again.:frusty::frusty:
 

pmaitra

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Messages
33,262
Likes
19,594
my dear sir, lanuage is whole human's treasure, nothing you can mock, Canton and HK are also using many english words and also speaking many very old Chinese words which northern chinese people have gave up. Lanuage is also a window to understand other contry and culture. cir, don't insult.
but Indian friends would you mind share if you have heritaged UK's polictis and made them really work for India or you guys's indian version is not so effient as UK ones?
Going by the endearment the British politicians receive from some of the readers of British news-sites, I don't think the British system is working to the best interests of the Brits.

The Indian Constitution, is based on the Swiss and Irish Constitutions, and not the British Constitution, although the Indian Parliamentary System closely emulates the British Parliamentary System. The Indian Constitution also has lot in common with that of Canada.

It has its drawbacks, which I already mentioned. Politics is roughly inherited from the British System, with caste and religious loyalties thrown in for good measure, and also involves the consideration of 'heritage,' such as, politicians' scions end up being politicians, be it the Gandhi family, Scindia family, or Abdullah family; three examples from many that exist.

[HR][/HR]

References:

It is noteworthy that, while the specific distribution of powers in each federation is the product of its own particular circumstances, not infrequently the drafters are influenced either positively or negatively by preceding examples. In many respects the makers of the 1848 Swiss Constitution took into account the experience of the United States (e.g., the form of the distribution of powers and the Senate) but were determined to avoid concentrating power in the president. Canadians, who were creating a new federation just when the United States was emerging from a horrendous civil war, deliberately tried to avoid what they perceived as a too weak American federal government. On the other hand, the Australians preferred the U.S. model to the Canadian due to the former's decentralized distribution of powers. Later federations have had even more models to consider. For instance, the Constituent Assembly of India included in its deliberations three volumes of constitutional precedents from other countries. But useful as these models have been, ultimately, federations have had to devise solutions to their own particular situations, sometimes coming up with interesting innovations (e.g., the Belgian distribution of powers).
In some cases, however, where territorial social diversity and fragmentation is strong, it has been considered desirable, as in Canada and India initially, and in Spain, to give the federal government sufficiently strong, and even overriding, powers to resist possible tendencies to balkanization.
Note should be taken of three other sets of significant factors. One is the period in which the constitutional distribution of powers was drafted. The eighteenth century and nineteenth century constitutions of the United States, Switzerland, and Canada distributed powers in fairly general terms. By the onset of the twentieth century the Australian constitutional distribution of powers was more detailed and included references to such new subjects as labour arbitration. The newer federal constitutions of the latter half of the twentieth century go even further, including minutely detailed lists of powers and extensive provisions for intergovernmental institutions and processes. An example is the three lists (exclusively federal, concurrent, and state) of powers in the Seventh Schedule of the Indian Constitution, which contain 97, 47, and 66 entries, respectively, or the very finely detailed distribution scheme in the Swiss federal
Constitution of 1999.
http://www.federalism.ch/files/categories/IntensivkursII/comparativeg2.pdf


The concept of Directive Principles of State Policy was borrowed from the Irish Constitution. The makers of the Constitution of India were influenced by the Irish nationalist movement. Hence, the Directive Principles of the Indian constitution have been greatly influenced by the Directive Principles of State Policy.[3] The idea of such policies "can be traced to the Declaration of the Rights of Man proclaimed by Revolutionary France and the Declaration of Independence by the American Colonies."[4] The Indian constitution was also influenced by the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Directive Principles in India - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Last edited:

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
sir, cir is makeing his own post, own idea from him which should be welcome, he is making good step.
Indeed he should give his ideas and opinion.

However, it should be based on some knowledge and facts, or is that asking too much of him?

One should not take flights of fancy on gossamer wings.

If he does, then one should be good enough to show the reality of the universe, if not the world!
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
but Indian friends would you mind share if you have heritaged UK's polictis and made them really work for India or you guys's indian version is not so effient as UK ones?
Our basics are from England.

The reason is simple. It was there during independence and it would be misstep to bring in a new system that had not been tested by time in India.

Obviously, the English system was not the ideal, as no system is ideal. Therefore, other systems were also examined and some ideas incorporated.

Is it working?

That is a hard thing to say.

Systems are good, but then how one implements the system in letter and spirit is another issue.

If one clinically looks at Communism, it is an ideal system. It is so ideal that it cannot be implemented in letter and spirit and so aberrations arise and the intensity of such aberrations depends on those who are interpreting and applying the system.

In religion, which is supposed to be ideal, God made all equal. But is it true? He may have made all equal, but as soon as the child steps into the world, that equality vanishes.

Bo's son studies in the UK. He is an ardent follower of Mao. And yet, there is no equality between his son and a peasant's son as far as quality of education is concerned.

That is life.
 
Last edited:

Predator

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2012
Messages
542
Likes
261
By about the year 2000 Communist China will be a superpower built by American technology and skill. - Antony Sutton in American Secret Establishment, published in year 1984

globalists plan many years ahead, cheap chinese man power was used to increase profit margins of globalist companies, their next plan is to spark off world war three to institute a totalitarian state before reducing human population to around 500 million, they even etched that into stone for all the world to see, google georgia guidestones
 

ice berg

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2011
Messages
2,145
Likes
292
To be frank, India and PRC, are competitors. Nothing wrong with that. The problem is PRC arming Pakistan with nukes and missiles. Ideally, there should be peaceful coexistence, but humans are greedy by nature, right?
China is not the only country selling weapons to Pakistan. Are all those countries you enemy?
 

pmaitra

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Messages
33,262
Likes
19,594
China is not the only country selling weapons to Pakistan. Are all those countries you enemy?
If not now, they were in the past. Patton tank, anyone?

If you are helping our enemy, you are hostile. That's a no brainer.

BTW, when you mention weapons, we are not talking about assault rifles here, rather nuke technology and missiles. There lies the difference.
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
China is not the only country selling weapons to Pakistan. Are all those countries you enemy?
Valid point.

However, other countries selling weapons and weapon platforms are not that hostile to India as China is.

Maybe that is what concerns people.

Hostility + arming a hostile neighbour!
 

ice berg

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2011
Messages
2,145
Likes
292
If not now, they were in the past. Patton tank, anyone?

If you are helping our enemy, you are hostile. That's a no brainer.

BTW, when you mention weapons, we are not talking about assault rifles here, rather nuke technology and missiles. There lies the difference.
In that case, even some of your close allies are hostile to you since they are selling weapons to Pakistan.

I am not aware of China has supplied nuke tech to Pakistan after they signed the NPT..
 

Mad Indian

Proud Bigot
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Messages
12,835
Likes
7,762
Country flag
I am not aware of China has supplied nuke tech to Pakistan after they signed the NPT..
Yeah yeah. The first thing the Chinese govt does is educate the fellow "citizens" on the nuke tech and diplomacy:nod:. I know. Thats their first priority- freedom of information:heh:
 

ice berg

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2011
Messages
2,145
Likes
292
Really. Do provide evidence of how Chinese govt educate their subjects on nuke tech. Or I will take this as another one of your rants. Which occurs once a month.
 

rock127

Maulana Rockullah
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2009
Messages
10,569
Likes
25,231
Country flag
Talking about India being a colony of a country, that country is still the UK, for India has stuck to what the Brits left behinbd, including the parliamentary politics,the governmental structure、the legal system and even the language。

It is an experience of great fun to hear Indians speaking Hindi which contains so many English sounding words。Good heritage huh?:rofl:
In India we don't FORCE a particular clan/group to follow a certain language unlike China where the brutal assimilation and outnumbering culture is followed to supress other ethnic groups.

There is a evergrowing number of Chinese having western names and getting married in western style.... so those Chinese are officially western slaves.More and more Chinese are learning English and are proud to learn an truly international language.More and more Chinese are leaving China to settle in western countries.China has become capitalist society.A LOT of Chinese members on DFI also use English but it's other thing that often they can't comprehend simple things but have to pretend since they need to earn daily 50-cents.

Good heritage? It's an INSULT to Han Chinese heritage. :lol:

Chines boy make sure you see your heritage and culture and see what's going on in your country before opening mouth about others :lol:

The thread title should be "China has become western colony again"
 
Last edited:

s002wjh

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2009
Messages
1,271
Likes
155
Country flag
not sure whats about this copycat stuff . japan copy/import technology alot US stuff after wwii, then korean copy alot japan stuff in the 80s. now china just doing the samething
 

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top