more details are available in the mentioned site I will come up with more details soon.How about providing us more details ?
You obviously lag any such taste you tamalian, in what way does this look bad to you?The design sux big time.
I always like the classic style of a Pulsar 180..Even 220 was good.
But this..boooooooo
And yeah, for long distance trips your ass is done .
The classic's handling was like a skateboard and 220 was not proportionate in design, you re getting oldThe design sux big time.
I always like the classic style of a Pulsar 180..Even 220 was good.
But this..boooooooo
And yeah, for long distance trips your ass is done .
Dude if you mean the round-domed one...the 2003 model I agree. Not quite a great handler.The classic's handling was like a skateboard and 220 was not proportionate in design, you re getting old
I second you.The design sux big time.
I always like the classic style of a Pulsar 180..Even 220 was good.
But this..boooooooo
And yeah, for long distance trips your ass is done .
to cater to people like karthic ?This bike really is crazy cool.. It is also liquid cooled engine? Then the price must be high...
When Bajaj can design such great bikes, why do they do this?
My dear fellow Tamilian, this design looks too wannabe.You obviously lag any such taste you tamalian, in what way does this look bad to you?
Back in Bangalore I had two bikes Pulsar 220 and a relic Rx 100, for the congested roads and parking of Bangalore rx-100 rocks big time, not that for P220 though but in Highway P220 was an excellent performer though Karizma was better in comfort P220 had excellent ride quality again not that for Rx-100 though.Dude if you mean the round-domed one...the 2003 model I agree. Not quite a great handler.
But the later ones..especially with the distinct wolf-eyes (2007 model) was excellent...Atleast for me and mind you i am writing about my experience on Mumbai's concrete roads which offer less traction than the tar roads back home. Even the 220 was good.