'Indo-Pak N-exchange possible if Pak continues to back terror'

Discussion in 'Pakistan' started by LETHALFORCE, Mar 30, 2012.

  1. LETHALFORCE

    LETHALFORCE Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2009
    Messages:
    20,550
    Likes Received:
    6,554
    'Indo-Pak N-exchange possible if Pak continues to back terror' - Hindustan Times

    Observing that India and Pakistan have a complex history characterised by "animosity, mistrust, and conflict", a top Pentagon official has warned that there is a potential of a nuclear exchange between them if Islamabad continues to support terror groups against the neighbouring country.


    "Support by elements of Pakistan's military and intelligence services for violent extremist organisations targeting India has the potential to result in military confrontation that could rapidly escalate to a nuclear exchange," James Miller said in written answers submitted to the Senate Armed Services Committee during a confirmation hearing for the post of Undersecretary of Defence for Policy.
    He noted that India and Pakistan have "a long and complex history characterised by animosity, mistrust, and conflict."

    Current efforts at dialogue through a renewed comprehensive dialogue have yielded few concrete results on the core security issues, especially regarding the resolution of territorial disputes, Miller said.

    However, the efforts have increased people-to-people exchanges and trade relations between the two nations, and have provided each side greater insight into the other's positions, he said.

    "Although progress is slow, the trajectory is positive and offers the promise of increased confidence-building measures," Miller said.

    He said India's actions in South and Central Asia generally align with US goals: increasing economic growth and political stability through strengthened democratic institutions, and developmental assistance to help prevent radicalisation.

    Regional stability ultimately depends on cooperation among India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, he asserted.

    "Transparency in the India-Afghanistan and Pakistan-Afghanistan bilateral relationships is critical to reduce misunderstanding and mistrust between India and Pakistan," he told the lawmakers.

    "The ongoing transition of lead responsibility for security in Afghanistan to Afghan forces, and the strategic partnerships Afghanistan has been negotiating with the United States and other international partners are important steps toward demonstrating long-term commitment of the international community, addressing conditions that create uncertainty, and stabilising the region," Miller said.
     
  2.  
  3. W.G.Ewald

    W.G.Ewald Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2 Defence Professionals

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2011
    Messages:
    14,140
    Likes Received:
    8,528
    Location:
    North Carolina, USA
    Who on the committee framed the questions? Did they approve of the answers they got from Miller? What does any of this mean?
     
  4. W.G.Ewald

    W.G.Ewald Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2 Defence Professionals

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2011
    Messages:
    14,140
    Likes Received:
    8,528
    Location:
    North Carolina, USA
    "If you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with bullshit"
     
  5. Yusuf

    Yusuf GUARDIAN Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    24,274
    Likes Received:
    11,283
    Location:
    BANGalore
    :rofl: it's exactly that. South Asia has been a "dangerous" place and likely "nuclear flashpoint" for a couple of decades.

    Only thing India is worried about is terrorists getting their hands on nukes and nothing else. Pakis will not lob nukes at India no matter what.
     
  6. GUNS-N- ROSES

    GUNS-N- ROSES Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2012
    Messages:
    127
    Likes Received:
    56
    this is a fine example of diplomacy. wen u read the para, u r amazed by its briliance but wen u read it carefully u realise it is jus bull s*** draped in flowery words. prime example of all style no substance.
     

Share This Page