anupamsurey
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2014
- Messages
- 1,032
- Likes
- 514
looks like Pakis went weeping before PAPA Amrika, I don't doubt that they even begged before Papa, to tell India to show restrain.
May be because Baki assets are blown off in that operation.looks like Pakis went weeping before PAPA Amrika, I don't doubt that they even begged before Papa, to tell India to show restrain.
kunal we all know this anchor and rest of paki media are cheap and fact twister. they can only fool their jahil awam not the world.
I don`t listen them or think much abt them, It just some members is a little off because of it ..
No need for a heavy heart sir.with a heavy heart posting this here...Sad
A fcked paki anchor referred to DFI to defame IA
@DingDong@Bhadra please read my statement again. Nepalese Gurkhas in Indian/British armies and those serving the French Foreign legions are generally thought to be exempted from the International laws and conventions governing the Mercenaries. But like all international conventions, this is open to interpretation. I had just raised a Technical Point, and I had no intention of insulting/demeaning anybody.
Foreigners serving in Indian/UK/French armies are not naturally entitled to citizenship of those respective countries. In fact Gurkhas serving in the British army were not allowed to get British Passport before 2009. Also, like @pmaitra pointed out, a large number of Gorkhas serving in the IA are Indian Citizens.
BTW, My argument was on the topic of use of Napalm during Kargil War. Technically speaking, India had not declared a "war". Use of incendiaries was the most effective way of smoking out those rats who were occupying the bunkers and that s what we did. Those bunkers were built by the IA and could withstand heavy pounding. Pakistan had already disowned those rats as non-regulars, hence nobody was going to fight for their Human Rights or challenge the way through which we made them meet their creator.
Until all the operational details are available Army usually keeps it concise but vague.
Sending any sort of "message" is the job of the political leadership. In our case our Media sent more number of "Messages" than the politicians did through their interpretations and misinterpretations.
What do you mean by that sir??I mean what about Ray sir??Is he alright??Ray sir would have loved these operations!! I'm sure he is at peace and appreciating it!!
He's in Valhalla.What do you mean by that sir??I mean what about Ray sir??Is he alright??
Who are those intelligence officials?HT has published a report today citing intelligence officials telling that in the earlier strike no insurgent of NSCN (K) was killed, giving validity to the statement by the outfit that they had suffered no casualties in the attack.
this is what the report carries. an air of ambiguity surrounds it, but the worse that could happen is the likes of late praful bidwai jumping up and proclaiming "see we told you so! we bet it were the innocent civilians who were murdered."The army’s daring June 9 cross-border Myanmar raid didn’t kill any of the Naga rebels who had ambushed and killed 18 soldiers in Manipur five days earlier, latest intelligence inputs have revealed.
After the rare intervention across the border, the defence ministry in a statement claimed to have inflicted “significant casualties’’ on the insurgents who carried out the worst attack on the army in almost 30 years. Top government officials, however, now say the National Socialist Council of Nagaland (Khaplang) rebels were not among the dead.
“The process of collating intelligence from human sources is a time consuming exercise given the terrain and topography along the border between the Northeast and Myanmar, but it is clear that NSCN (K) insurgents remain unscathed,’’ an intelligence official said.
The army didn’t reveal the number of insurgents killed but during off-the-record briefings the figures varied from 20 to 100.
Wireless intercepts and information gathered on the ground, however, point to the Naga insurgents surviving the overnight raid by the army’s elite paratroopers.
Intercepts also indicate the fact that Niki Sumi, SS Khaplang’s military adviser and self-styled lieutenant general, who is believed to have masterminded the June 4 attack is in touch with his troops.
In a briefing after the operation, the army had said it had “credible and specific intelligence that further attacks were being planned within our own territory’’ by the same group that had struck in Chandel, Manipur.
Soon after the raid, the NSCN (K), which abrogated ceasefire with the Indian government in March, had in a statement questioned the army’s claim of inflicting “significant casualties”, saying the group had not suffered any losses. Intelligence coming in from multiple agencies now seems to support the claim.
When reached for comments, a spokesperson for the ministry of defence said, “The aim was to give the insurgents a clear message that they can’t mess with us.”
Officials familiar with the counterattack said they knocked out a rebel camp and that it was not for them to count the bodies. “Those responsible for killing our soldiers will also get killed sometime soon,’’ an officer said.
The army continues to be on an alert in the northeast. “We are watching the insurgents and their camps along the India-Myanmar border. Retaliatory strikes by the insurgents cannot be ruled out,’’ an official said.
The northeast has a number of rebel groups fighting for separate homelands.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
W | SSS Defence M72 5.56×45mm carbine which is undergoing trials with the Indian Special Forces | Indian Army | 15 | |
Restructuring of Indian Special Forces | Indian Army | 27 | ||
Indian Special Forces | Strategic Forces | 40137 | ||
Indian Armed Forces Special Operations Division (AF-SOD) | Strategic Forces | 105 |