Indian Economy: News and Discussion

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
Mod
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,287
Likes
56,238
Country flag
By International Monetary Fund (IMF)

Women workers at an air conditioner plant in Gurgaon, India. Reforms that support more women working can strengthen India's ongoing recovery (photo: Ramesh Pathania/Mint/Getty Images)
For India, Strong Growth Persists Despite New Challenges
February 22, 2017
  • India remains one of the fastest growing emerging market economies
  • Due to recent cash shortages, growth is projected to slow temporarily this fiscal year
  • Maintaining the reform momentum is key to stronger growth

India’s overall outlook remains positive, although growth will slow temporarily as a result of disruptions to consumption and business activity from the recent withdrawal of high-denomination banknotes from circulation.

But the nation's expansion will pick up again as economic reforms kick in, said the IMF in its latest assessment. Growth is expected at 6.6 percent in this fiscal year and at 7.2 percent in the following year.

Speaking to IMF News, IMF mission chief for India Paul Cashin discusses these and other challenges, and also highlights the opportunities for this vibrant economy moving forward.

Related Links
IMF News: The IMF just completed its annual assessment of the Indian economy. How is the economy doing?

The Indian economy is growing strongly and remains a bright spot in the global landscape. The halving of global oil prices that began in late 2014 boosted economic activity in India, further improved the external current account and fiscal positions, and helped lower inflation. In addition, continued fiscal consolidation, by reducing government deficits and debt accumulation, and an anti-inflationary monetary policy stance have helped cement macroeconomic stability.

The government has made significant progress on important economic reforms, which will support strong and sustainable growth going forward. In particular, the upcoming implementation of the goods and services tax, which has been in the making for over a decade, will help raise India’s medium-term growth to above 8 percent, as it will enhance the efficiency of production and movement of goods and services across Indian states.

Challenges remain, however, and there is little scope for complacency. A key concern for us is the health of the banking system, which is still dealing with a large amount of bad loans, and also heightened corporate vulnerabilities in several key sectors of the economy.

And, over the past few months, the economy has been hit by cash shortages, and accordingly we reduced our growth forecasts to 6.6 percent for fiscal year 2016/17 and to 7.2 percent in 2017/18.

IMF News: How is this recent “demonetization” initiative affecting the economy, and what are some of the long-term ramifications?

The initiative affected notes with a total value of about 15 trillion rupees, which amounted to 86 percent of all cash in circulation. Because payment transactions in India are primarily cash-based and electronic payments infrastructure is limited, the shortage of cash has disrupted economic activity, with smaller businesses and rural regions being particularly badly affected.

Fortunately, these effects are expected to gradually dissipate by March 2017 as cash shortages ease. It also appears that measures taken to alleviate payment disruptions, such as temporarily allowing use of old banknotes for purchases of fuel and agricultural inputs, have helped mitigate the negative impact. So we expect the slowdown to be limited and relatively short-lived and the financial system to come through unscathed. Of course, potential loan repayment risks should be monitored carefully, particularly given an already elevated level of non-performing loans.

The demonetization initiative presents an opportunity to increase the size of the formal economy and broaden financial intermediation in the longer term. It can also support a widening of the tax base, help reduce the fiscal deficit, enhance bank liquidity, and give a fillip to the government’s efforts to promote greater financial inclusion.

IMF News: How can India ensure that the fruits of its growth are shared by all?


India has made appreciable progress on several fronts. It achieved its Millennium Development Goals of halving poverty, infant and child mortality, and maternal mortality rates. Students are now staying in school longer, as evidenced by an increase in secondary school completion rates. Moreover, significant progress has been made in enhancing financial inclusion, leveraging technology to bring more of the population into the financial system.

However, progress on improving health, nutrition, and sanitation has been less encouraging, income inequality has risen, and employment growth has been sluggish. For instance, a very large share of Indian workers—more than 90 percent—remain employed in low-productivity informal sector jobs. Women’s participation in the labor force is also low at around 25 percent—the lowest among emerging markets. Further labor market reforms, at both the center and state levels, are needed to encourage better quality job creation and raise female labor force participation.

While there has been important progress, we see scope to pursue better targeting and greater efficiency of subsidy and social spending programs through greater use of the trio of Aadhaar unique beneficiary identification, direct benefit transfers, and information technology. Finally, more needs to be done to raise agricultural productivity and enhance market efficiency. This would help increase supply of high-value foods, enhance returns to farmers, and dampen food inflation pressures.


IMF News:As India’s economy becomes increasingly sophisticated, how does the government keep pace with its capacity to craft sound economic policy?

Sound economic policymaking underpinned by strong institutions is critical for sustainable growth. A recent example of a positive change in India is the implementation of flexible inflation targeting and creation of the Monetary Policy Committee, which have strengthened the credibility of monetary policy and helped maintain price stability in an increasingly complex economy.

In addition to providing policy advice, the Fund is committed to working with the Indian authorities to help build capacity for policymaking. The recently inaugurated South Asia Regional Training and Technical Assistance Center (SARTTAC) headquartered in New Delhi—which will serve Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, and Sri Lanka—is the first IMF-supported center to combine both technical assistance and training.

The center will provide training to government and public sector employees, enhance their skills and improve the quality of their policy inputs, and will also provide technical assistance to governments and public institutions. SARTTAC is expected to become the focal point for planning, coordinating, and implementing the IMF’s capacity development activities in the region on a wide range of areas, including macroeconomic and fiscal management, monetary operations, financial sector regulation and supervision, and macroeconomic statistics.


http://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles...strong-growth-persists-despite-new-challenges
 

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
Mod
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,287
Likes
56,238
Country flag
Latest Wikipedia update:

GDP of India (PPP. 2017 End Estimates) - $9.59 Trillion
GDP 2017
Nominal: $2.46 trillions
PPP: $9.6 trillions

Per capita
Nominal: $1852
PPP: $7224

These were new accurate numbers, our nominal GDP per capita could cross $2,000 this year but currency de appreciation didn't let it happen. We will do it next year.
http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2016/02/weodata/weorept.aspx?pr.x=45&pr.y=1&sy=2015&ey=2020&scsm=1&ssd=1&sort=country&ds=.&br=1&c=534&s=NGDPD,NGDPDPC,PPPGDP,PPPPC&grp=0&a=
Again pretty good growth, per capita too has been saved by controlled population growth rate.
But even better could be done. Did anyone gap between GDPs in PPP and nominal is enlarging? Means there's some inflationary potential left to boost nominal GDP.

If anyone noticed,

Indian GDP 2011,
₹83.88 Lakh crores ($1.8 trillions)
GDP 2016
₹156 lakh crores ($2.3 trillions)
Way faster than China did in 80s & 90s, :biggrin2:
India has literally been doubling economy in every 5 years.
If currency deappreciation & deficit wasn't there, Indian Nominal GDP growth rate would have been recorded in double digits today!:rolleyes:
Earlier, IMF projected India to be $2.6 trillions, but we reached $2.46 trillions,
On the other hand,
India has outperformed PwC estimates for $2.1 trillions! :peace:

So, as I told before, on this thread,
http://defenceforumindia.com/forum/...conomy-by-2050-pwc-report.78422/#post-1266116

IMF gives most optimistic & PwC gives most pessimistic estimates of Indian Economy,
We underperform in ending against IMF estimate but always outshine PwC projections!:)
Relevant thread for Indian Development discussions anyway!
http://defenceforumindia.com/forum/...ast-and-become-rich.76673/page-8#post-1273061
 

Superdefender

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2016
Messages
1,207
Likes
1,085
Launch of the 2017 Economic Survey of India
Remarks by Angel Gurría,
Secretary-General, OECD
New Delhi, India, 28 February 2017
(As prepared for delivery)
Mr Das, Ladies and Gentlemen,
I am delighted to be in Delhi to present the 4th OECD Economic Survey of India . I’d like to thank the Ministry of Finance for their excellent collaboration on the Survey and in the preparation for this launch.
We all recognise that India has been a star performer in gloomy times for the world economy. We launch about 25 OECD Economic Surveys every year, and it is not often that I get to announce growth figures of 7%.This is more than double the current global growth figure, and four times the OECD average. At the same time, inflation, the current account deficit, and the central government deficit have all been brought down in the past few years.
The acceleration of reforms has brought a new growth impetus
India’s strong performance is in part thanks to reforms introduced since 2014. It is now easier to do business in India: administrative requirements have been simplified, bankruptcy laws have been modernised, FDI regulations have been eased, and the Indian states have been given more powers to reform.
India has taken important steps to fight against illegal economic activity and promote tax compliance, including through demonetisation. Demonetisation has inflicted some short-term pain on the economy. However, it’s early days. The long-term effects will surely include important gains.
This is not a moment for resting on one’s laurels, however. Our main message today is that the reform momentum must be maintained so India can benefit from more inclusive growth. Progress is needed on many fronts, including making labour laws more flexible, bank recapitalisation, pricing of water and energy, easing stringent product market regulations and continuing to improve access to education, to mention just a few. Let me take a moment to highlight some of the core challenges discussed in the Survey, and share with you some of the recommendations that we make to meet those challenges.
Increasing tax revenues to expand access to quality public services
Firstly, India needs to finance access to quality public services for all, to reduce poverty and promote inclusive growth. Despite progress, too many Indians still lack access to reliable energy, health care and sanitation facilities. For example, almost 20% of the Indian population has no access to electricity.
Increasing tax revenues will help expand access to services. India raises only about 15% of GDP in tax revenue, around half the ratio in Brazil and roughly a third of the levels in advanced European countries. The implementation of the Goods and Services Tax will spur greater competitivenessand investment. Corporate income tax rates have been reduced for small companies and implementing the "base broadening-rate reducing" reform for all companies will help promote investment and job creation.
However, more revenue could be raised from property and personal income taxes, which are paid by too few people. Less than 6% of the population pay personal income tax. These taxes could also be fairer, with fewer exemptions and more progressive rates. Statutory rates are relatively low and kick in at high income levels. Specific tax reliefs, such as for housing investment, benefit primarily the well-off. Employing more skilled tax officers will be vital to strengthen tax administration and make the system fairer and more effective.
Strengthening macroeconomic resilience and growth
But it’s not just about raising revenues, it’s about spending. Spending needs on physical and social infrastructure are not being fully met, which is holding back private investment, contributing to sluggish job creation in the organised sector and undermining well-being.
While ensuring that the debt to GDP ratio returns to a declining path, India would benefit from investment in education and vocational training, particularly to get more women and youths into the workforce. Over 30% of youths aged 15-29 in India are not in employment, education or training (NEETs), which is more than double the OECD average and almost three times the rate in China.
In the area of physical infrastructure, spending to upgrade electricity and water infrastructure would improve well-being and catalyse corporate investment. India would also gain from setting energy and water prices high enough to cover economic costs for investors, while replacing blanket subsidies by better targeted household financial support.
Achieving strong and balanced regional development
In addition to raising revenues and improving spending, India also needs to promote regional development to reduce inequalities. Regional disparities are a problem almost everywhere, but in India they are particularly pronounced. GDP per capita in Bihar is about five times lower than in Haryana.
India has made progress tackling these disparities. The creation of NITI Aayog; the change from tied to untied central government grants to the states; and the new system ranking ‘ease of doing business’ in the Indian states' have all had positive effects.
However, in many states, rural poverty remains high. To raise productivity and living standards, India needs to promote farm consolidation. Many land holdings are too small to be economically viable. More than two-thirds of Indian farmers operate on a plot of less than one hectare. Improving the land registry and faster digitisation of land rights would help. But action on the rural front has to be complemented by effective policies for urban areas.
In the coming decades India will urbanise more than any other country. Well-managed urbanisation can improve well-being and support economic growth. However, urban citizens in India often suffer from high air pollution and lagging urban infrastructure. To overcome these challenges municipalities need more and clearer spending and taxing powers, so they can raise real estate taxes; rely more on road pricing and invest in public transport and other services.
Ladies and Gentlemen,
The Nobel Prize winning Indian physicist, C.V. Raman said "The true wealth of a nation consists not in the stored-up gold but in the intellectual and physical strength of its people."
India has lifted millions out of poverty and has carried out an impressive reform effort, but it has to keep up the momentum to confront the great challenges which lie ahead. It has to continue investing in its people, in their health and well-being, in their skills and opportunities. Because in India, as in the rest of the world, it is inclusive, people-centred growth that represents “the true wealth of a nation”. Count on the OECD to continue to support India in the design, implementation and delivery of better policies for better lives.
Thank you.

Source: http://www.oecd.org/india/launch-of-the-2017-economic-survey-of-india.htm
 

Akshay_Fenix

Member
Senior Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2016
Messages
2,226
Likes
7,024
India GDP Growth Beats Expectations in Q4

The Indian economy advanced 7 percent year-on-year in the last three months of 2016, slowing from an upwardly revised 7.4 percent rise in the previous quarter but beating expectations of a 6.4 percent growth. The GDP is expected to grow 7.1 percent in the fiscal year ending in March 2017.

Private spending rose 10.1 percent, faster than a 5.1 percent increase in the previous quarter. Government spending went up 19.9 percent, higher than 15.2 percent in the previous quarter. Gross fixed capital formation expanded 3.5 percent, recovering from a 5.3 percent contraction in the previous period. Exports advanced 3.4 percent, rebounding from a 0.9 percent drop in the previous quarter. Imports rose 4.5 percent, following a 7.4 percent fall in the previous period.

On the production side, the gross value added for public administration, defence and other services expanded the most (11.9 percent compared to 11 percent in Q3), followed by manufacturing (8.3 percent compared to 6.9 percent in Q3); mining and quarrying (7.5 percent compared to -1.3 percent in Q3); trade, hotels, transport, communication and services related to broadcasting (7.2 percent compared to 6.9 percent in Q3); utilities (6.8 percent compared to 3.8 percent in Q3); financial, insurance, real estate and professional services (3.1 percent compared to 7.6 percent) and construction (2.7 percent compared to 3.4 percent in Q3).

http://www.tradingeconomics.com/india/gdp-growth-annual
 

lcafanboy

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2013
Messages
5,811
Likes
37,279
Country flag
India retains fastest-growing major economy tag despite cash crackdownBusinessFeb 28, 2017, 07.15PM

GDP figures for the third quarter show that demonetisation did not have negative impact on the economy.
HIGHLIGHTS
  1. Gross domestic product registered 7 per cent growth in October-December quarter
  2. India's growth was higher than China's 6.8 per cent for the last three months of 2016
NEW DELHI: India's economydefied expectations on Tuesday to retain the title of the world's fastest-growing major economy, despite the disruption caused by Prime Minister Narendra Modi's demonetisation decision.

Gross domestic product (GDP) registered 7 per cent growth in October-December quarter, down from 7.4 per cent in the previous quarter.
India's growth was higher than China's 6.8 per cent for the last three months of 2016.

The federal statistics office retained its growth forecast for the fiscal year ending in March 2017 at 7.1 per cent.

The figures surprised economists, who had expected the economy to take a bigger hit from government's decision last November to demonetise old 500 rupee and 1,000 rupee banknotes, taking out 86 per cent of the currency in circulation virtually overnight.
"Perhaps this data is not capturing the impact of demonetization," said Aneesh Srivastava, chief investment officer, IDBI Federal Life Insurance Co.

"I am totally surprised and stunned to see this number ... I believe that, with a lag, we will see an impact on GDP numbers."

The data also backs the central bank's assessment, which all along maintained the economic disruption caused by Modi's shock monetary therapy as a transitory phenomenon.
http://m.timesofindia.com/business/...spite-cash-crackdown/articleshow/57394858.cms
 

ezsasa

Designated Cynic
Mod
Joined
Jul 12, 2014
Messages
31,927
Likes
148,108
Country flag
India retains fastest-growing major economy tag despite cash crackdownBusinessFeb 28, 2017, 07.15PM

GDP figures for the third quarter show that demonetisation did not have negative impact on the economy.
HIGHLIGHTS
  1. Gross domestic product registered 7 per cent growth in October-December quarter
  2. India's growth was higher than China's 6.8 per cent for the last three months of 2016
NEW DELHI: India's economydefied expectations on Tuesday to retain the title of the world's fastest-growing major economy, despite the disruption caused by Prime Minister Narendra Modi's demonetisation decision.

Gross domestic product (GDP) registered 7 per cent growth in October-December quarter, down from 7.4 per cent in the previous quarter.
India's growth was higher than China's 6.8 per cent for the last three months of 2016.

The federal statistics office retained its growth forecast for the fiscal year ending in March 2017 at 7.1 per cent.

The figures surprised economists, who had expected the economy to take a bigger hit from government's decision last November to demonetise old 500 rupee and 1,000 rupee banknotes, taking out 86 per cent of the currency in circulation virtually overnight.
"Perhaps this data is not capturing the impact of demonetization," said Aneesh Srivastava, chief investment officer, IDBI Federal Life Insurance Co.

"I am totally surprised and stunned to see this number ... I believe that, with a lag, we will see an impact on GDP numbers."

The data also backs the central bank's assessment, which all along maintained the economic disruption caused by Modi's shock monetary therapy as a transitory phenomenon.
http://m.timesofindia.com/business/...spite-cash-crackdown/articleshow/57394858.cms
Time is India chaps would have written this article with a heavy heart. TOI was one of the organisations who said demo is bad, they had atleast one article on this everyday in economic times.
 

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
Mod
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,287
Likes
56,238
Country flag
3 musketeers: Agriculture, manufacturing, mining behind FY17 GDP surprise, beating demonetisation
CSO data surprised everyone, projecting India’s full fiscal year growth at 7.1% in its revised advance estimates for the current financial year 2016-17, helping the country retain the tag of the fastest growing major economy. (Image: PTI)
A growth spurt in agriculture, manufacturing and mining helped India ward off the impact of demonetisation with the government estimating fiscal third quarter GDP expansion at a healthy 7%, contrary to the predictions of reputed economists and analysts, most of whom had expected that the country’s economy would be badly hit in October-December due to the surprise move to ban high-value currency notes, which sucked out 86% of cash in circulation.
The CSO (Central Statistics Office) on Tuesday pegged fiscal third quarter agriculture sector growth at 6%, quickening from 3.8% in the previous quarter. It further said that the mining sector output grew at an impressive 7.5% in October-December, against a 1.3% fall in the preceding quarter. Similarly, manufacturing sector output also grew faster during the quarter at 8.3% in comparison to 6.9% a quarter ago.
CSO data surprised everyone, projecting India’s full fiscal year growth at 7.1% in its revised advance estimates for the current financial year 2016-17, helping the country retain the tag of the fastest growing major economy, ahead of China. The FY17 growth forecast still marks a slump against the 7.9% growth in the last financial year 2015-16.
Economic Affairs Secretary Shaktikanta Das sought vindication in the numbers, saying that the figures negate all the speculation about impact of demonetisation. Agriculture, manufacturing and mining, which are the substantive sectors in any economy, have shown a healthy and satisfying growth, he said.
Further, this year’s growth figures are on a high base of last fiscal and numbers do not show much negative impact of demonetisation, Das said, adding that the process of remonetisation has progressed well.
However, some predict that the impact of demonetisation could show in the economy with a lag – a concern that even the government’s chief statistician TCA Anant did not explicitly alleviate while releasing the encouraging figures. There will certainly be more numbers coming in the future and the government would revise its estimate further in January next year, he said.
Earlier on January 6, the CSO had released its first advance estimate of India’s GDP for the current fiscal at 7.1%, but had not taken into account the slowdown seen in November citing high volatility in the figures.
A number of think-tanks and experts have cut their projections for 2016-17 to even below 7.1% estimated by CSO in January, but most have predicted a healthy recovery in the next two financial years.
The Reserve Bank of India cut its GDP growth forecast for this fiscal to 6.9%, but at the same time, projected a rebound in the next fiscal at 7.4%. Earlier this month, the International Monetary Fund in its annual report on India had forecast that the GDP growth will slow to 6.6% in 2016-17 due to “temporary disruptions” caused by demonetisation, but also said it will bounce back to its expected growth of more than 8% in the next few years.
However, amid all the optimism, there might be a slight cause for concern. Earlier last month, Chief Economic Adviser Arvind Subramanian said the official GDP figures may not fully reflect the “real and significant hardships” experienced by the informal sector, which employs about nine out of 10 workers in India.
 

abu bakr

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2017
Messages
55
Likes
76
http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1035781.shtml

China should pay more attention to India’s increasing manufacturing competitiveness
By Hu Weijia Source:Global Times Published: 2017/3/3 0:03:39


There has been a lot of discussion about whether India's higher-than-expected economic growth of 7 percent from October to December 2016 is authentic and reliable. Meanwhile less attention is being paid to bright points in the country's economy. What cannot be overlooked is the increasing competitiveness of the manufacturing sector in India.

Although Narendra Modi's demonetization move put a dent in India's economic momentum, the country's manufacturing sector still grew 8.3 percent in the third quarter of the country's fiscal year. This is a great achievement for India, even if the growth figure may be exaggerated as some analysts suggest.

The rapid growth in India's manufacturing sector is likely to continue. The Nikkei India Manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index grew to 50.7 in February from 50.4 in January, suggesting an expansion of activity in the sector.

Although India is still in its initial stage of developing export-oriented manufacturing industries, the country has great potential to emerge as a regional hub for labor-intensive industries. One recent analysis showed China's manufacturing hourly wage in 2016 was roughly five times that in India.

Although it is too early to say that India will replace China as a manufacturing giant, as it is not easy to form a complete industry chain from screw to commercial airliner in a short time, increased competitiveness from Indian-made products should be closely watched. Official data showing India's January exports to China soared 42 percent year-on-year was overlooked by most Chinese analysts, but it will be a very dangerous venture if China adopts an arrogant attitude toward India's increasing competitiveness. Scholars should make a careful analysis about the soaring growth to find out whether this is merely a flash in the pan or a result of subtle changes in competition in the manufacturing sector.

On the whole, rapid economic expansion in India is a good thing for China as China's consumer market matures, but Chinese manufacturers will inevitably face increased competition from Indian firms at the same time. As labor costs climb in China, Vietnam has become an emerging manufacturing nation, but China doesn't need to panic. However, manufacturing development in a large country like India means more pressure on China. The increasing competitiveness from India's manufacturing sector is a issue of strategic importance and deserves more attention.
 

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
Mod
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,287
Likes
56,238
Country flag
By FE
Unemployment rate falls on Narendra Modi govt’s rural infrastructure drive
After the very optimistic GDP numbers released on February 28, there is another good news that unemployment rates have fallen as Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) has perked up rural infrastructure. The report by the Economic Research Department of State Bank of India points out that contrary to market perception, India’s unemployment rate declined sharply and consistently from 9.5% in Aug’16 to 4.8% in Feb’17. The states that witnessed major decline in unemployment include Uttar Pradesh (17.1% to 2.9%), Madhya Pradesh (10.0% to 2.7%), Jharkhand (9.5% to 3.1%), Odisha (10.2% to 2.9%) and Bihar (13.0% to 3.7%).

According to the report, this decline is primarily due to government’s effort in providing new employment opportunities in the rural areas. This decline is also explained by household allocated work under MGNREGA, which increased from 83 lakh households in Oct’16 to 167 lakh households in Feb’17. Hence, on the one hand, the unemployment rate has almost halved, on the other hand, the demand for work has almost doubled. Further, the report points out that the number of work completed under the scheme has also increased by a whopping 40% to 50.5 lakh in fy 17 compared to 36.0 lakh in fy 16.

The most creditworthy increase was seen in Anganwadi work at 166%, drought proofing 158%, rural drinking water at 698% and water conservation and harvesting at 142%. This is a welcome trend and will contribute greatly for developing rural infrastructure as a sine qua non for sustained agriculture growth.

In Union Budget speech, MGNREGA scheme has been allocated a budgetary resource of Rs 48,000 crore. During fy 18, another 5 lakh farm ponds will be taken up, compared to expected 10 lakh farm ponds during fy 17. This single measure will contribute greatly to drought proofing of gram panchayats.

The report that was released on Friday has been authored by Dr. Soumya Kanti Ghosh, Chief Economic Adviser, Economic Research Department, SBI.

@ezsasa
 

Neo

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2009
Messages
4,514
Likes
964
Is India Lying About Its World Beating Economy?

American Enterprise Institute’s Derek Scissors says India’s desire to report faster growth trumped accuracy.


By Derek Scissors

India just announced its October-December GDP figures, supposedly showing it is still the fastest-growing major economy. You should not believe it. Every quarter there are questions about India’s GDP, with this one no exception. But there is a bigger problem: India refuses to publish the full GDP series, so that the world may not be able to trust the Indian government’s claims at all.

Economic growth should be measured by personal or household income. Instead it is measured by GDP, an accounting tool far more relevant for top-down planners than ordinary people. This is hardly India’s fault, but India has done a small bit to make the problem worse.

In January 2015 India revised recent GDP growth figures higher, among other things raising the fiscal year 2013-4 gain from 5% all the way to 6.9%. It is at this point the fastest-growing economy boasts began. Questions about the revision were raised immediately, including by current Indian government officials, because purportedly faster GDP did not fit with many other indicators. (It still does not.)

Since then, however, the new series has become widely used. While the Indian government argues that it better matches global practices, it manifestly fails to do so in an indispensable respect. The back series – the necessary base for calculations of ongoing GDP growth – has not been published more than 2 years later. Technically, we do not know India’s GDP in 2010, or anytime earlier.

The back series was first to be published December 2015, then mid-2016, and now has no apparent due date and will not be complete. The “globally accepted” new approach therefore makes it impossible to assess India’s GDP trajectory, potentially important information for a country aspiring to rapid development.

The best way to proceed in this case was to start from the beginning, applying the new method to a base year as far in the past as possible and generating new data forward from there. The obvious question is how India determined growth when earlier years could not serve as a base? The answer is unfortunately political: the government’s desire to report faster growth trumped accuracy.

It all may sound familiar. India seemingly always has an eye on China. If China pulled a stunt like this, its “world-beating” claims would be roundly ridiculed. India initially had the benefit of the doubt because it is a multi-party democracy with a competitive press. Those are very good reasons, but not good enough. One benefit of an open society is transparency, and the Indian government is being opaque in self-interested fashion.

India had a poor reputation for statistics quality before the GDP revision. It just revised a GDP growth figure from 7.2% all the way down to 6.5% for Q415.There are other, crucial statistics practices, for example concerning rural electrification, that are clearly biased in the government’s favor. In this context, hiding past GDP looks like a continuation of previous behavior.

The central government is willing to offer such detail as revisions to the initial advanced estimates for future GDP growth. We obviously do not have measurements for the future yet, yet the government can generate a figure. What it cannot do is generate GDP for the past, when all measurements have been completed.

The GDP revision is a complex matter and the government has sound responses to some criticisms. But this part is simple: if you cannot even apply your own methodology to the past, why should anyone believe you can apply it properly to the present and future? The government is annoyed with ratings agencies for failing to see India’s progress. It should look in the mirror and properly document a basic element of that progress.

Most people from pluralist open societies want to see pluralist, open India do well. For now, however, India has the same level of economic credibility as a country like Vietnam (which publishes GDP results even before the year ends). World-beating growth? Maybe. Or maybe poorly founded quasi-propaganda.

Derek Scissors is a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), where he studies Asian economic issues and trends. In particular, he focuses on the Chinese and Indian economies and US economic relations with China and India. He is author of the China Global Investment Tracker and the Chinese Investment in the US Dataset.


https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017/03/07/inus-m07.html
 

F-14B

#iamPUROHIT
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2016
Messages
2,076
Likes
4,006
Country flag
World socialist website what a fucking joke
@Neo yarr please you are giving me a laughing fit dear i hearby appoint you the jester in chife of the fourm
 

Adioz

शक्तिः दुर्दम्येच्छाशक्त्याः आगच्छति
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2015
Messages
1,419
Likes
2,819
Is India Lying About Its World Beating Economy?

American Enterprise Institute’s Derek Scissors says India’s desire to report faster growth trumped accuracy.


By Derek Scissors

India just announced its October-December GDP figures, supposedly showing it is still the fastest-growing major economy. You should not believe it. Every quarter there are questions about India’s GDP, with this one no exception. But there is a bigger problem: India refuses to publish the full GDP series, so that the world may not be able to trust the Indian government’s claims at all.

Economic growth should be measured by personal or household income. Instead it is measured by GDP, an accounting tool far more relevant for top-down planners than ordinary people. This is hardly India’s fault, but India has done a small bit to make the problem worse.

In January 2015 India revised recent GDP growth figures higher, among other things raising the fiscal year 2013-4 gain from 5% all the way to 6.9%. It is at this point the fastest-growing economy boasts began. Questions about the revision were raised immediately, including by current Indian government officials, because purportedly faster GDP did not fit with many other indicators. (It still does not.)

Since then, however, the new series has become widely used. While the Indian government argues that it better matches global practices, it manifestly fails to do so in an indispensable respect. The back series – the necessary base for calculations of ongoing GDP growth – has not been published more than 2 years later. Technically, we do not know India’s GDP in 2010, or anytime earlier.

The back series was first to be published December 2015, then mid-2016, and now has no apparent due date and will not be complete. The “globally accepted” new approach therefore makes it impossible to assess India’s GDP trajectory, potentially important information for a country aspiring to rapid development.

The best way to proceed in this case was to start from the beginning, applying the new method to a base year as far in the past as possible and generating new data forward from there. The obvious question is how India determined growth when earlier years could not serve as a base? The answer is unfortunately political: the government’s desire to report faster growth trumped accuracy.

It all may sound familiar. India seemingly always has an eye on China. If China pulled a stunt like this, its “world-beating” claims would be roundly ridiculed. India initially had the benefit of the doubt because it is a multi-party democracy with a competitive press. Those are very good reasons, but not good enough. One benefit of an open society is transparency, and the Indian government is being opaque in self-interested fashion.

India had a poor reputation for statistics quality before the GDP revision. It just revised a GDP growth figure from 7.2% all the way down to 6.5% for Q415.There are other, crucial statistics practices, for example concerning rural electrification, that are clearly biased in the government’s favor. In this context, hiding past GDP looks like a continuation of previous behavior.

The central government is willing to offer such detail as revisions to the initial advanced estimates for future GDP growth. We obviously do not have measurements for the future yet, yet the government can generate a figure. What it cannot do is generate GDP for the past, when all measurements have been completed.

The GDP revision is a complex matter and the government has sound responses to some criticisms. But this part is simple: if you cannot even apply your own methodology to the past, why should anyone believe you can apply it properly to the present and future? The government is annoyed with ratings agencies for failing to see India’s progress. It should look in the mirror and properly document a basic element of that progress.

Most people from pluralist open societies want to see pluralist, open India do well. For now, however, India has the same level of economic credibility as a country like Vietnam (which publishes GDP results even before the year ends). World-beating growth? Maybe. Or maybe poorly founded quasi-propaganda.

Derek Scissors is a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), where he studies Asian economic issues and trends. In particular, he focuses on the Chinese and Indian economies and US economic relations with China and India. He is author of the China Global Investment Tracker and the Chinese Investment in the US Dataset.


https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017/03/07/inus-m07.html
I will humour you a little @Neo.
There are two major changes in the way that GDP is calculated in India:-
  1. Revision of base year: The base-year has been revised from 2005 to 2012. The last such revision took place in 2010, where base year was shifted from 1994 to 2005. The only problem economists have with this is that the base-year for IIP data (Index of Industrial Production) has not yet been revised to 2012.
  2. Shift of calculation from calculation at Factor prices to Market prices: The GDP was earlier calculated at factor prices (the way it is done in most developing countries). Now, it is being calculated at market prices (the way it is done in most developed countries). Uniformity of taxes is the major deciding factor here that allows developed nations to calculate their GDP at market prices without significant aberrations. In India's case, this move has to do with the impending implementation of GST, which will make taxation in India very uniform. However, for statistical purposes, the CSO (Central Statistics Office) releases both data viz. GDP at factor price and GDP at market price. This has been the case since long before this government revised the methodology of calculation.
Now as for the back-year data, its needed simply from the point of view of statistics. The data before 2010 is not being withheld for now, IMHO it has to do with the fact that base-year was revised in 2010 itself. However, these numbers will eventually be released. Maybe after they are able to revise IIP data. The only reason the article sites that the government is deliberately "hiding" back-year data is that these numbers are 3 months due and the government has not declared a due date. (So the writer of article assumes that the numbers will never be published just because of a slight delay by the CSO. )

The government is not running a scam, trying to fudge up these numbers without adequate grounds. For example, it is still calculating GDP at constant prices and not current prices (like the developed world does) because inflation is still a lot more than in developed countries.

The "expert" whose article you quoted here is definitely an expert at convincing fools into his anti-India propaganda. How is he a propaganda mouthpiece? This little thing he said here gave him away:-
Economic growth should be measured by personal or household income. Instead it is measured by GDP, an accounting tool far more relevant for top-down planners than ordinary people.
So this "expert" apparently suggests using GDP per capita at PPP as the primary indicator for growth rather than GDP. Tell him that those numbers are also available with the CSO. This is an academic debate in which most economists support the GDP number as the prime indicator, and with good reason. And this is how we measure economic progress of countries today. But this guy absolutely had to bring up an academic debate specifically in the case of India because he has no solid points to base his article upon and is simply pulling assumptions and arguments out of his a** to make false accusations against the government. Well, here is what most investors and economists in the world think:
FDI inflows into India jump 18% to a record $46.4 bn in 2016 despite global fall
And this is in the year next to the one in which the revisions in GDP calculation methods were made. Clearly the world disagrees with your article's opinion, and while they may have their doubts, even they know that these doubts will be resolved once GST is implemented and more back-year data is published. Back-year data was published in december 2015 and again in june 2016. It will be published again because our system does not allow that to not happen.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top