Well you better educate yourself about the whole LTTE thing.
Sorry not war crimes human right violations.
http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/INDIA935.PDF
Human rights abuses in Jammu and Kashmir - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You are comparing apples to oranges. If your army do not hang around after wars then they should quit from Kasmir (specially around kargil area) and let the locals handle the business.
As you see in SL war is over but the scars of the war times has not healed. The SLA in Jaffna do not hang around in their camps or bunkers they usually go out and help people.
The people who deserved to treated as such are treated like that. Because their are some LTTE sympathizers living in SL.
With all the humility under my command, I would like to educate you that the Sri Lankan - LTTE issue was a professional input, that encompassed ground realities and not theoretical meanderings of emotional mish mash. My unit was the first to disembark on SL soil in response to the SL Govt's SOS!
Not only is my inputs confined to the Conflict, but also encompassed the causes for the same. I also had to learn of the SL history so that one could take a balanced view.
What most make a mistake is to harbour the idea the military men are only military centric. That is the fallacy. To address any military issue, one has to also understand the history and background when approaching a military mission.
As you are well aware that on many an occasion I have had to educate you about Sri Lankan history especially the ancient part, which you conveniently either overlooked or were unaware of. A case in point is as to who are the real Sri Lankan originals.
While you are gleeful about trotting out Wiki and human rights in Kashmir, you would do well to also indicate how the Indian justice system has punished those guilty of it and proved.
Of course, that would ruin your case and so why should you care to research that?
I don't compare apples and oranges. If I am accused of it, I would prefer the terminology of the original language English - and the term is - chalk and cheese.
However, it is obvious that you are stumped over the example of how India does not harbour imperialistic designs by hanging on in a foreign country once the mission is over. Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Maldives are but such examples. If they hung around, then all these would not be Albatross around the neck, but mere vassalages. But then India cherishes democratic ideals and so they leave.
I presume you are not educated about Kashmir wherein you tort out banal points.
Do spend some time over the subject and do read the UN resolutions.
India is within the legal ambit of the Indian Independence Act of the British Parliament. The Instrument of Accession is a legal and valid document.
Since Pakistan occupies one third, that area is in dispute.
However, magnanimous that our good old Nehru was, he acquiesced to a Plebiscite. The UN has ruled that it will take place when Pakistan removes it military and all Pakistan citizens.
India has no quibble over that.
Let Pakistan do it and then we will know where we stand.
You seem to feel and advocate that India should hand over Kashmir on a platter with a cellophane cover and a ribbon attached. Weird logic.
Are you aware that the as the Kandyan Convention was an agreement in 1815 between the British and the Chiefs of the Kandyan Kingdom, in Sri Lanka show King Sri Vikrama Rajasinha was of Malayali ancestry ?
So, should India demand that SL is a part of India and you hand over SL on a platter with a cellophane cover with a ribbon attached?
Sri Lanka is a religio racist state.
You have systematically not only deprived the Tamils of their rights but also of your own citizens.
Solomon West Ridgeway Dias Bandaranaike was the Prime Minister of Ceylon. He was from a
Sinhalese Anglican Christian family and was
the son of the powerful Sir Solomon Dias Bandaranike the Maha Mudaliyar.
I might add that the book The Tamils in Early Ceylon By C. Sivaratnam traces some of the Mudaliyars in Ceylon to Thaninayaka Mudaliyar (among other), a rich Saiva Vellala who emigrated to Ceylon from Tondaimandalam
Sri Lankan is such a fundamentalist country that
he had to convert to Buddhism in order to join politics.
So racist is Sri Lanka that on the sensitive issue of language, the party originally espoused the use of both Sinhala and Tamil as national languages, but in the mid-1950s it adopted a "Sinhala only" policy
Unlike your country, all religions are equal. That is why we have had Hindus , Muslims, Christians as head of our State, our Govt, our Military and Police and so on.
And you have the temerity to suggest that we hand over Kashmir to Pakistan on religion?
