India to acquire 'x-band' radars

SHASH2K2

New Member
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
5,711
Likes
730
NNIIRT 52E6MU Struna-1MU / Barrier E Bistatic Radar1



Struna 1MU antenna package and tethered mast on display at MAKS2007 (Author).

The 52E6MU low altitude early warning radar system was one of the most obscure, but also most interesting exhibits at the MAKS 2007 aerospace exhibition. This system was developed by NNIIRT, based at Nizhniy Novgorod, now a division of the Almaz-Antey Joint Stock Company based in Moscow. The 52E6MU is in series production for the armed forces of the Russian Federation.

The purpose of this system is to provide border protection of a geographical area, such as a national geographical border, an urban area, a specific restricted area, a mountain pass, a coastal bay or estuary, against low flying low Radar Cross Section targets, including cruise missiles, low observable aircraft, light aircraft, ultralight aircraft, powered parawings, parachute deployed special forces, balloons and other low flying targets.

The 52E6MU is essentially a new style of radar system, based on bistatic radar technology.

Due to the inverse square law constrained forward scattering effect seen in bistatic systems, the volume of space between the transmitter and receiver has sufficient electrical field strength to permit the reliable detection of targets otherwise difficult to detect using conventional monostatic radars, which are constrained by the physics of the inverse fourth power law. Russian sources claim that the effective bistatic radar signature of targets in this regime is 2 to 3 times greater than the monostatic signature of the same target. They have also stated that this is largely independent of surface coating performance, permitting detection of low observable targets2.

A unique feature of the 52E6MU design is that its transmit power source is a radio communications relay channel operating in a conventional point-to-point transmission regime, carrying regular digital and communications traffic. Radiated power is extremely low, which also permits the deployment of system components in close proximity to urban or other inhabited areas3.

Work on the first variant of the system, labeled the 52E6 Struna 1, and performed by NNIIRT, was completed in 1999; NNIIRT researchers are continuing development to further improve its operational and performance parameters.

The system operates at a frequency of 450 MHz, although other sources claim a frequency range between 390 to 430 MHz.

Target detection probability is cited at 0.8 to 0.9, at a False Alarm Rate of 1 spurious detection over a 72 hour interval.

The first variant has a cited operational life of 40,000 hrs between overhauls.

The area coverage footprint for the first variant of the system was cited at 50 to 400 km, subject to the number of stations chained at separations of up to 50 km.

The current variant, which is in serial production for the armed forces of the Russian Federation, is designated with the 52E6MU industrial code, and believed to be named the Struna-1MU.

The principal difference between the initial variant and the series production variant is the use of newer basic technology, which permits smaller containers and lower power consumption for deployment and operation of the system.

Current variants of this unique radar system, offered to potential foreign customers under the Barrier-E export designation, can create a coverage footprint of up to 400 km in length, where all information is received, processed and displayed on a single workstation.

This design is essentially a bistatic radar system, which permits operation across multiple spans. The processing software can determine target altitude and flight direction, and also performs non-cooperative identification and classification into target categories. The length of a single span between two stations is up to 50 km.

The width of the single span coverage footprint is between 1.5 and 8 km, subject to the target type and distance from the transmit antenna. Altitude coverage is between 30 m and 7 km.



The receive antenna is a planar dipole array, mounted on standoffs over a 5 x 2.5 metre base. The antenna is located on a tethered lattice frame tower structure, with a total height of approximately 25 m, including the frame mounting the antenna and 10 to 11 structural frames. The antenna base mounts the array of 32 dipoles, in 4 rows of 8 dipoles each. Receiver hardware is installed in a box shaped housing mounted on the rear face of the antenna.

A typical high density coverage barrier is formed by emplacing transmit/receive station spans in two parallel chains, separated by 10 to 11 km, with stations in each span separated by 40 to 50 km distance, the latter determined by local terrain elevation along the span.

A transmit/receive station, termed a PPP (Priyomno-Peredayushchiy Post), is located with each antenna/mast subsystem. Each PPP module has a power consumption of 0.8 kiloWatts.

A complete system requires only one operator station, termed an RMO (Rabocheye Mesto Operatora). Receiver outputs collected by all stations in the system are relayed via embedded communications channels to the RMO data processing system, which performs tracking and displays outputs for the operator. Each RMO module has a power consumption of 0.3 kiloWatts.

Total radiated RF power for the 52E6MU system is 1 to 10 Watts (0 - 10 dBW).

The processing software can identify and classify four categories of targets - light aircraft, heavy aircraft, helicopters, and cruise missiles; other sources claim five categories, where heavy aircraft are sorted into fighters and bombers.

The 52E6MU Struna 1MU system generates target track outputs at 1 second intervals.

Accuracy of target tracks is 80 – 200 m normal to the boresight line of a span. Other sources claim that the system determines air target coordinates and kinematic parameters with an accuracy of 2,100 m along the span boresight, 170 m normal to the span boresight, 1° in azimuth and 5.8 m/s in velocity. The claimed target detection probability is 0.89. Five targets can be individually tracked within each span. The manufacturer claims a single false alarm per 72 hour interval. A BIT i.e. self test system can isolate faults down to two modules. The service interval in continuous operation is 2,500 hours. Personnel requirements are a single operator per RMO container, and one technician per PPP container.

Notes:

1 First published as Miroslav Gyűrösi, Radarový systém 52E6MU Struna-1MU, ATM journal, May, 2008, URL: http://www.atmonline.cz/archiv/5-2008.htm; translated and posted with permission.

2 This claim is based on the fact that surface and edge treatments used in low observable designs are typically optimised to minimise surface currents and backscatter from specific aspects, such as the forward hemisphere.

3 This idiosyncrasy of the design technically qualifies it as Passive Coherent Location (PCL) system, using similar technology to the US LM Silent Sentry design, refer: Lockheed-Martin, Silent Sentry, Product Webpage, available at http://www.lockheedmartin.com/products/silent-sentry/index.html.



Above: a PPP transmit/receive station and RMO operator station container; below: interior equipment in PPP container (Author).





Operator console in the RMO container (Author).



Barrier E operator display with digital map and track data (NNIIRT via RusArmy.com).

Basic Characteristics / Основные характеристики
Диапазон волн, МГц

390-430 (10 рабочих точек)

Operating Band, MHz
390-430 (10 operating frequencies)
Зона обнаружения:

многозвенная (максимальное количество звеньев 10 )

Coverage Zone:
Variable (up to 10 bistatic links)
длина одного звена, км
distance between stations, km


До 50
up to 50

поперечный размер барьерной зоны, км
width of mainlobe, km

1,5-12 ( в зависимости от типа цели)
1.5 - 12 (depends on type of target)

высота барьерной зоны, км
coverage altitude, km

от 0,03 до 3-7
from 0.03 metres to 3 - 7

Точность определения координат и параметров движения воздушных объектов (усредненная по трассе):
Target tracking accuracy (average per track)



вдоль барьера, м
along mainlobe, m

2100

поперек барьера, м
normal to mainlobe, m

170

азимута, град.
azimuth, degrees of arc

1

скорости, м/с
velocity, m/sec

5,8
5.8

Разрешающая способность поперек барьера, м
Resolution within mainlobe, m

не более 300
not exceeding 300

Средний период ложных тревог, ч
False alarm rate, he

не менее 72
at least 72

Количество классов распознаваемых целей

Identifiable target categories

5 (крылатая ракета, истребитель, бомбардировщик, вертолет, легкомоторный самолет)
5 (cruise missile, fighter, bomber, helicopter, ultralight)

Вероятность распознавания
Probability of detection

0,89
0.89

Вид выходной информации
Output format

трассы
tracks

Количество одновременно сопровождаемых целей
Number of tracked targets

5 ( в зоне обзора одного звена)
5 (within each mainlobe)

Темп выдачи информации, с
Data output rate, sec





http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-52E6MU-Struna.html
 

plugwater

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2009
Messages
4,154
Likes
1,081
Don-2NP Pill Box radar

In September 1967, Yu.V. Votintsev was appointed chairman of an inter-departmental commission for examining new ABM system and equipment designs. The commission rejected the designs by A.L. Mints for the Don-2N multifunctional radar, since it did not resolve the main problems of antiballistic-missile defense with the required effectiveness -- the discrimination of ballistic missile warheads in the presence of countermeasures.

By June 1975 it possible to define the purpose and time periods of development and creation of the new Moscow ABM system. The Mints Radiotechnical Institute (RTI) was assigned the task of developing and constructing facilities for the upgraded Moscow ABM defense system, and V.K. Sloka was the chief designer. The Don-2NP multifunctional radar [known in the West as PILL BOX] is located not far from Pushkino (Moscow region).

The multifunctional Don radar had a shape of a truncated pyramid with equal length and width (100 meters), and height of 45 meters. Phased arrays with diameter of 16 meters each were mounted on four sides of the pyramid. Along with the digital processing of incoming signals and information, this radar features an antimissile missile control channel and a wide range of probing signals, making its operation possible in various modes. The resolution characteristics of the radar are excellent, and it can see space objects a few centimeters in size.

Building of the radar began in 1978, and it reached full operational capability around 1989. The modified Don 2NP large multifunction phased-array radar at Pushkino is an integral part of the A-135 Moscow ABM system. The radar, which has 360-degree coverage, provides support for GAZELLE and GORGON interceptor systems.

Zaloga reports that this facility is located at Krasnoarmeisk, but provides coordinates that are substantially different from those provided by NIMA [Krasnoarmeisk, aka Krasnoarmeysk, PPLX 48°31'48"N 44°37'59"E].

A map that appeared in Soviet Military Power incorrectly labeled the radar site as a [non-existent] Moscow ABM launcher complex under construction, and placed the radar location several kilometers to the east of the actual location.

According to one published Russian report, the main radar station and computer complex are "in the region of the town of Fryazino" near Moscow. Fryazino is small scientific town, located in the north-east area of Moscow region, 25 km from Moscow [Fryazino PPL 55°38'00"N 38°30'00"E, and Fryazino PPL 55°57'38"N 38°02'44"E]. Fryazino is located on Metshersk lowland on the river Luboseevka running into the river Vorya (the left inflow of the river Klyaz'ma). It had a population of 54,000 as of 1992. Large enterprises at the location of the modern city appeared in the middle of the 19th century (factory Kondrashovykh-Kaptchovykh). In 1900 a factory for mechanical engines was built, and about 450 persons worked in the factory by 1916. In 1934 a mechanical plant was built, and at the end of 1930s a branch-line from Ivanteyevka (located on the railway line Moscow - Yaroslavl) to Fryazino was constructed. Since 1938 it is a worker's settlement Fryazino, and since 1951 it became a city. Later the city developed as a center of microelectronics.

The Fryazino part of the Institute of Radio Engineering and Electronics of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FIRE RAS) together with Special Design Bureau was founded in 1955. The total staff of the FIRE RAS is about 1000. About 700 researchers and engineers, including 58 doctors and 230 candidates of sciences work in 60 laboratoriesof the FIRE RAS. The laboratories of the FIRE RAS are located in 6 separate buildings and take the area of 13000 square metres. The total area of the FIRE RAS territory is 68 hectares. Work at the institute includes fundamental researches in radio engineering, radio physics, electronics and informatics, as well as applied researches, development of high technologies and design of new scientific instruments.

Other scientific institutions and organizations include Research-and-production enterprise "Cyclone - Test", Production enterprise "Electron-device" and State research-and-production enterprise "Istok".

ISTOK is the State Research and Production Corporation (SRPC) of the former USSR, and one of the largest producers of microwave components inthe world. Founded in 1943, ISTOK's capabilities encompass almost every equivalent of US and European technology. ISTOK is the leading microwave tube company in Russia and has research,development, and manufacturing facilities located in the Moscow area. Founded in 1943, ISTOK designs and manufactures klystrons, TWTs, BWOs, IOTs, CFAs, magnetrons, solid state devices, and complete microwave and millimeter subsystems. ISTOK had a broad product line of rugged magnetron and klystron powertubes at 5800, 2450, 915, and 460 MHz with CW power levels from 100 W to 100 kW for industrial processing. ISTOK has an extraordinary array of industrial products. ISTOK magnetrons are manufactured in Russia in the Fryazino Region of Moscow. The strict manufacturing and quality control procedures for Russian military products are enforced throughout the Fryazino plant for all products. ISTOK's plant, with 8,500 employees and 270,000 square meters of space, has manufactured thousands of high quality microwave and millimeter tubes for military and industrial applications.

Although the general location of the PILL BOX radar is well established, evidently the exact location is a matter of some confusion. In fact the radar site is 48 kilometers North of Moscow, about 2 kilometers from the town of Balabanovo [which is located at 56°11'00"N 037°44'00"E - 56.183°N 37.733°"E]. This is established through SPOT imagery, which reveals a large circular exclusion zone around the radar complex, centered at 56°10'30"N 37°45'54"E. Previous analysis of LANDSAT imagery which provided coordinates at 56°12'24"N 37°45'35"E would appear to have been in error.






http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/russia/pill_box.htm
 

sayareakd

Mod
Joined
Feb 17, 2009
Messages
17,734
Likes
18,952
Country flag
we need three of these, one in the notheast, another in Himachal and another in Gujrat. that will take care of Pakistan and china.
 

SHASH2K2

New Member
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
5,711
Likes
730
we need three of these, one in the notheast, another in Himachal and another in Gujrat. that will take care of Pakistan and china.
If we get access to these then we may not have to beg USA for Xband Radars . Russians are more willing to sell these to us.
 

sayareakd

Mod
Joined
Feb 17, 2009
Messages
17,734
Likes
18,952
Country flag
we need three of these, one in the notheast, another in Himachal and another in Gujrat. that will take care of Pakistan and china.
correction with that range only two would be enough that too in the middle of India not on the border. 6000 km is great great range.
 

SHASH2K2

New Member
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
5,711
Likes
730
correction with that range only two would be enough that too in the middle of India not on the border. 6000 km is great great range.
For best possible result we need 3 radars. one at southern India. in on north east and one in north west . India is secured from all sides.
 

nrj

Ambassador
Joined
Nov 16, 2009
Messages
9,658
Likes
3,911
Country flag
I dont feel 6000km range x-band radar is anywhere near. L-band radar should be adopted with that range. Honestly X-band radars with around 800Km range on border installations will do enough job. They will pickup any potential movement minutely & will be linked to the BMD to do the needful.

Favorable locations for installations apart from border would be Major Missile Launching sites, Critical Silo bases & naval station IMO.
 
Last edited:

SHASH2K2

New Member
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
5,711
Likes
730
I dont feel 6000km range x-band radar is anywhere near. L-band radar should be adopted with that range. Honestly X-band radars with around 800Km range on border installations will do enough job. They will pickup any potential movement minutely & will be linked to the BMD to do the needful.

Favorable locations for installations apart from border would be Major Missile Launching sites, Critical Silo bases & naval station IMO.
If our Radar stations are too close to the border they may become target of Radiation missiles.Do we have any countermeasure for them?
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,876
Likes
48,556
Country flag
These radars don't need to be close to the border a few 100 kilometers away is ok.
 

nrj

Ambassador
Joined
Nov 16, 2009
Messages
9,658
Likes
3,911
Country flag
If our Radar stations are too close to the border they may become target of Radiation missiles.Do we have any countermeasure for them?
Such high value radar stations are generally guarded by fighter patrol or other complementary SAMs. We have very good SAMs in inventory now, so that shouldn't be a problem. Plus it won't be that easy for enemy to locate these radar sites.
 

SHASH2K2

New Member
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
5,711
Likes
730
In this case Our Swordfish should be good enough for current need.
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,876
Likes
48,556
Country flag
Such high value radar stations are generally guarded by fighter patrol or other complementary SAMs. We have very good SAMs in inventory now, so that shouldn't be a problem. Plus it won't be that easy for enemy to locate these radar sites.
we also have AWAC's foreign and soon indigenous.
 

SHASH2K2

New Member
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
5,711
Likes
730
Forward-Based X-Band Radar-Transportable
Alternate Name: FBX-T
Country: USA
Basing: Land; Mobile
Details

The Missile Defense Agency's Forward-Based X-Band Radar-Transportable (FBX-T) system is a high-resolution, X-band class, phased array radar based upon and designed to be integrated with the hardware and software programs built for such missile interceptors as the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD).



The FBX-T is a highly mobile, land-based, radar system that would be placed in strategic areas overseas in order to provide additional advance warning of potential ballistic threats from locations near the location of a missile's launch. The FBX-T can be transported to its destination by air, sea or rail. As the first sensor to pick up a threat at launch, the Forward-Based radar would acquire, track, classify, and estimate the trajectory of a missile and then transmit that information to the "adjunct" radar system for more detailed analysis, with eventual transmission to the rest of the multi-layered U.S. Ballistic Missile Defense System.



By providing early and accurate target-tracing and signature data the FBX-T would enlarge the effective "battle space" of U.S. interceptors, thereby increasing the threat detection and defense capabilities of the BMDS. Closer proximity to the launch site allows for earlier detection, which decreases the time needed for launch detection as well as supplement tracking and therefore provide greater accuracy for targeting. For example, a missile launched from North Korea or China could be more quickly detected, tracked, and targeted if forward based radars were deployed in such places as South Korea or Japan.



The first FBX-T radar unit is scheduled to be ready for deployment by the end of 2005, with operational tracking capability scheduled for early 2006. Three more FBX-T's are set to be produced in the coming years, with a final deadline of 2010.



http://www.missilethreat.com/missiledefensesystems/id.19/system_detail.asp
 

Yatharth Singh

Knowledge is power.
Regular Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2010
Messages
744
Likes
176
Country flag
Regarding Pakistan getting F-16 free- NO, They are not getting these for free..in fact they had paid for them long back and US didnot deliver these to them. Ironically they have even charged Pakistan the parking fee..Bottom line DONOT TRUST US COMPLETELY

China wiil be more powerful- compared to..? they already are No.3 militarily and No. 2 overall..they will remain so for atleast 5 more decades..

do you think India would be provided with the best of what the superpowers have- Yes i do believe that we will be offered the best ..even though we will have to pay dearly for these..(by best i mean something like F-35..not F-22..US does not offer any thing if they already are not having its superior version )


As our armed forces are not so cheap that for the low price they will compromise with their standards.Never- hahaha..sadly its not our forces which make the last call..however things are changing for good these days..Armed forces are having more say in the mattres..but we should not forget A-400 deal..
India has only been offered F-35 and take it from me that US will not offer F-22 to us because F-22 are the best.Actually they are above all. Secondly live in present with the current situation all around. Yes China is powerful than India in military might but I doubt that it can be a threat for the whole world that the current superpowers will provide India with all modern weaponries. And if India is provided with them, then also India doesnt have enough money to spent on all that destroyers,fighters,tanks, etc. Many many reasons behind it. India is currently working on numerous defence projects and most of the money from its defence budget is spent into it.

Dont become overexcited. These situations would not be coming for next 2 decades. As Russia`s military dominance over the Asia and Africa seems to be over and US and other rich nations are not in that situation to sell their products to India at a lower price just to show that they are still they are above the the Asian and African powers. If you are talking about future then you will see after two decades that what you are saying today, things will be the just opposite of that.
 

p2prada

Senior Member
Joined
May 25, 2009
Messages
10,234
Likes
4,015
I still believe this is a hoax. US does not sell its X band to anybody.

It is possible we are looking for a less capable radar from Israel or Europe.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top