India Requests Harpoon II Missiles

Discussion in 'Indian Navy' started by chex3009, Dec 28, 2010.

  1. chex3009

    chex3009 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2010
    Messages:
    915
    Likes Received:
    161
    Location:
    IL
    [​IMG]

    Sometimes, an order request is just an order request. Sometimes, as seen in Singapore, it amounts to more than that. In September 2008, the US DSCA announced India’s official request to buy a package of 24 L-model Harpoon Block II ship-killing missiles, with added GPS guidance and littoral/ land attack capabilities, for up to $170 million.

    India’s rival Pakistan is already arming its P-3 Orions with AGM-84Ls, so regional stability wasn’t an issue, but the exact match for India’s missiles remained a mystery for a while. The order seemed to presage a buy of P-8i Sea Control and Surveillance aircraft, and India did indeed end up choosing Boeing’s 737 derivative. In September 2010, however, reports indicated that the deal was really focused on India’s fleet of Jaguar IM strike aircraft. Now, in 2010, comes a request specifically aimed at India’s forthcoming P-8is…

    Contracts & Key Events

    [​IMG]

    Dec 21/10: The US DSCA announces

    It appears your Web browser is not configured to display PDF files. No worries, just click here to download the PDF file.

     
  2.  
  3. utubekhiladi

    utubekhiladi The Preacher Elite Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2010
    Messages:
    3,021
    Likes Received:
    1,423
    Location:
    TX, USA
    why in the world would india want to buy Harpoon II?
     
  4. LETHALFORCE

    LETHALFORCE Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2009
    Messages:
    20,548
    Likes Received:
    6,551
    these were originally bought for P8-I and Jaguars and it may also give insight into Pakistan's harpoons??
     
  5. Tshering22

    Tshering22 Sikkimese Saber Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2010
    Messages:
    4,404
    Likes Received:
    2,783
    Location:
    Gangtok, Sikkim, India
    Typical excuse for commission to be taken by babus. They know jolly well that BrahMos is a far superior missile in every way and can easily fit the IN's requirements for this role. Despite this, they bought the Harpoon IIs to fill the already rich US coffers and earn some crores at the cost of tax payers' money.

    What's worse is that we civilians don't have a panel or an established body like Anti-Corruption Bureau to demand an account for how the defence money is being spent. Heck even the military doesn't have the right to question these babu slimeballs. :angry_7:
     
  6. sandeepdg

    sandeepdg Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2009
    Messages:
    2,333
    Likes Received:
    216
    Location:
    Gurgaon/Noida
    There's nothing so extraordinary about the Harpoons actually, more than 22 countries already use it and it is similar to the Exocet which is used by another 30 countries, the SSN-25 and the British Sea Eagle. The Brahmos is way ahead of their league.
     
  7. LETHALFORCE

    LETHALFORCE Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2009
    Messages:
    20,548
    Likes Received:
    6,551
    Brahmos is a better missile but why spend 3 million when you can do the same thing cheaper with harpoons, also a salvo of harpoons would be much cheaper than 1 brahmos.
     
  8. sandeepdg

    sandeepdg Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2009
    Messages:
    2,333
    Likes Received:
    216
    Location:
    Gurgaon/Noida
    Yeah, that's true, but then we need it in huge quantities and not just a handful !!
     
  9. LETHALFORCE

    LETHALFORCE Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2009
    Messages:
    20,548
    Likes Received:
    6,551
    we will never know the real quantities ordered
     
  10. Tshering22

    Tshering22 Sikkimese Saber Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2010
    Messages:
    4,404
    Likes Received:
    2,783
    Location:
    Gangtok, Sikkim, India
    Dude, babus will keep giving excuses to reduce indigenous capability and keep buying firangi maal. It is a very common thing. Raptor costs a bomb still USA didn't scrap it for the sake of the multinational JSF or a cheaper spinoff from it for USA's local help. This is what is the meaning of promoting local R&D through inductions and massive purchases. Otherwise all our projects will end up to be cases like Arjun MK1. Token purchases.

    We are Rank 4 in terms of military might and power but we are a Token Purchase Power. The other 3 ranks above us are at least 80% self reliant while we are not even 30% self-reliant with a full margin.
     
  11. LETHALFORCE

    LETHALFORCE Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2009
    Messages:
    20,548
    Likes Received:
    6,551
    This is exactly why I asked what will happen to the LAHAT and HELINA for LCH ??I am almost certain that Hellfires will go on LCH too and these two missiles are history.
     
  12. sandeepdg

    sandeepdg Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2009
    Messages:
    2,333
    Likes Received:
    216
    Location:
    Gurgaon/Noida
    Same old excuses, folks ! Giving local R&D a kick, going in for western hardware, swindling money and making profit by kickbacks and favors, and finally giving lame excuses to the public, same principle followed every time by the government ! Some country we live in, bhai log ! :angry_10:
     
  13. sandeepdg

    sandeepdg Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2009
    Messages:
    2,333
    Likes Received:
    216
    Location:
    Gurgaon/Noida
    Also LF, I would like to add that once mass production picks up, the prices will surely drop, I suppose. And, also there's the difference in technology, since Brahmos is much sophisticated than the Harpoons and Exocets, that means obviously it will be more expensive than the other two. And, even if it doesn't, let's say the price price stays at 3 million USD for a single missile, and suppose the 3 forces combines want to buy around 1000 of these missiles for the time being, that adds up to 3 billion dollars spread over say 5-7 years if the production rate is increased from the current 50, so is 3 billion dollars spread over 5 years too big a price to pay when we are acquiring probably the most advanced missile in the world ? And the string of scams coming out of the closet one after the other, has cost the exchequer anything between 5-40 billion USD !
     
  14. LETHALFORCE

    LETHALFORCE Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2009
    Messages:
    20,548
    Likes Received:
    6,551
    More than the price is the cancellation of indigenous programs that will lead to continuous dependence of foreign weaponry.
     
  15. plugwater

    plugwater Elite Member Elite Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2009
    Messages:
    4,149
    Likes Received:
    1,060
    Knee jerk reactions!!

    Can Jaguar or P-8 fire Brahmos ?

    Both are different class and India is not dropping Brahmos in favor of Harpoon.
     
  16. Daredevil

    Daredevil On Vacation! Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2009
    Messages:
    11,613
    Likes Received:
    5,670
    Guys,

    See the difference in use of Brahmos and Harpoon. Brahmos will be used to take out strategic targets at short distances while Harpoon will be used to take out small tactical targets. It doesn't make sense to use an expensive Brahmos to target small ships when Harpoon can be used. Using Brahmos on small ships is an overkill.

    Also look at the platforms on which Harpoon are going to be used from. Its the fighters which are involved in maritime roles. Brahmos so far can only be used on Su-30MKI air-borne platform which will not be used in maritime role.
     
  17. brain_dead

    brain_dead Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2010
    Messages:
    79
    Likes Received:
    25
    I think it is well known fact that many of the indigenous programs were killed(for eg. trishul) so as to make way for foreign purchases.
    I read one article saying that IAI has paid huge bribes to babus here Barak contract.
     
  18. well i agree with you but trishul programme was cancelled(or put on hold) by drdo itself as it has failed many trials and ther was a serious problem with the seeker and engame avionics.but in the last two years drdo has decided to revive the project by taking the help of mbda in a joint developement project called maitri and the resulting missile will be a highly accurate low level quick reaction missile of range 15km and will be hybrid of trishul and mica though production will be taken up alone by bdl.
     
  19. Crusader53

    Crusader53 Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2010
    Messages:
    772
    Likes Received:
    34
    Location:
    Tampa, Florida
    I think the NSM/JSM would be a far better Weapon than the US Harpoon. Which, like the Exocet is becoming dated........IMO
     
  20. Rahul92

    Rahul92 Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2010
    Messages:
    1,622
    Likes Received:
    748
    Well i agree with ur point but instead of purchasing those harpoon's we can co-ordinate with Russia and produce the lighter version of Bhramos
     

Share This Page