India Offers To Spend $12B To Break Monopoly

Discussion in 'Indian Air Force' started by AVERAGE INDIAN, Nov 5, 2014.

  1. AVERAGE INDIAN

    AVERAGE INDIAN EXORCIST Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2012
    Messages:
    2,762
    Likes Received:
    2,718
    Location:
    Detroit MI
    NEW DELHI — The Indian government, acting on Air Force demands, has offered to spend $12 billion to encourage private firms to establish an aircraft manufacturing facility — a move that would break Hindustan Aeronautics Limited’s monopoly on aircraft manufacturing after years of delays on several projects.

    Specifically, the Indian government has offered an advance order for the homemade light combat aircraft (LCA) Mark-2, a Defence Ministry source said.

    The offer was conveyed to senior private sector executives during several meetings with MoD officials in the last month, the source said. India’s private defense majors, Tata Group, Mahindra & Mahindra and Larsen and Toubro, are the most capable of setting up an additional military aircraft plant, either independently or in partnership with overseas firms.

    None of the executives who participated in the meeting would comment on whether they would consider building such a facility.

    Madhukar Vinayak Kotwal, president, Heavy Engineering of Larsen & Toubro, said, “Since this [building of an additional facility] is a matter currently under discussion at various levels in the government as well as in industry associations, we would like to refrain from giving any comments at this stage.”

    The LCA, developed by Bangalore-based Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA), a laboratory of the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), is nearly 20 years behind schedule. The first order for 40 of the Mark-1 version of the aircraft has been given to state-owned Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. (HAL). The final operational clearance is expected to be granted in 2015, after which the aircraft can go into production.

    The Indian Air Force has a future requirement for only the next-generation LCA Mark-2, which would be powered by the higher thrust General Electric GE-414 engine. But the aircraft is still in the development stage and is not expected to be ready for production before 2017-18. The Air Force has a requirement for 250 LCA Mark-2s, which the government estimates would be covered by the $12 billion advance order.

    The Air Force has demanded establishment of an additional aircraft facility to break the monopoly of HAL, India’s sole military aircraft manufacturer, and has complained of delays in delivery of aircraft.

    HAL, with annual sales of $2.3 billion for the year that ended March 31, has produced more than 50 types of aircraft and helicopters, and has been designated as the production agency for the $12 billion Medium Multi-Role Combat Aircraft program, in which Dassault’s Rafale has been short-listed as the favored aircraft.

    “It is absolutely essential to set up an additional military aircraft facility here, as HAL is overloaded for the next 10 years and has become too unwieldy,” defense acquisition expert Miral Suman said.

    Vivek Rae, former director general (acquisition) in the MoD, said, “India sorely needs aircraft manufacturing capability in the private sector. We cannot afford to put all eggs in the HAL basket.”

    Subhash Bhojwani, retired Air Force air marshal, agreed an additional manufacturing facility is needed, but said HAL should be made more commercial.

    “HAL is into the design and contemporary manufacture of fighters, transports, trainers and helicopters, as well as avionics and engines,” he said. “It is possibly the only company in the world to be so diversified. However, while this may sound good in a book of world records, it isn’t good as a commercial model.”

    Defense analyst Amit Cowshish, a retired Defence Ministry bureaucrat, said the objective should be “not to create an entity that could compete with HAL but to have additional capability in India to manufacture aircraft so that the requirement, both of the military and civil sectors, could be met in a more cost-effective manner and in shorter time frames. Of course, competition would help in improving HAL’s efficiency.”


    Sujith Haridas, deputy director general of India’s industry lobbying agency, the Confederation of Indian Industry, said, “It is very much desired to have an additional manufacturing facility, but one should not ignore that it takes several decades of consistent investment and efforts to create a mammoth system integrator like HAL.”
    Would It Build Fighters?

    Analysts disagree about whether the new facility should be used to build fighter aircraft

    India’s private sector is able to set up such a facility, and could acquire the capability to build the LCA Mark-2 over time, but it could be a challenge, Cowshish said.

    “LCA is a program in the pipeline for more than three decades. HAL and DRDO have worked hard on it, and the final operational clearance is expected sometime later this year,” he said. “To bring in a new manufacturing agency at this stage may not be a very good idea. Though it is possible to pass on the technology to the private industry for manufacturing the aircraft, selecting such an agency may turn out to be a [technically] tricky affair.”

    Defense analyst Rahul Bhonsle said, “Setting up a new military aircraft facility is no doubt a Herculean task. But the new facility will be looking primarily at system integration.”

    But Muthumanikam Matheswaran, retired air marshal and adviser (for strategy) to the chairman of HAL, said no private-sector aircraft facility could build the LCA.

    “There appears to be a misconception that if ADA wishes, the LCA can be produced by the private sector. Nothing can be further from truth. The LCA cannot be produced by anybody without the major involvement of HAL.” ■

    Email: [email protected].

    India Offers To Spend $12B To Break Monopoly | Defense News | defensenews.com
     
    LalTopi and Srinivas_K like this.
  2.  
  3. Kyubi

    Kyubi Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2013
    Messages:
    331
    Likes Received:
    247
    Location:
    Bangalore
    It is indeed a welcome move by GOI but the author claims that LCA is 20 yes behind schedule is factually incorrect I presume @Kunal Biswas and @ersakthivel would like to corroborate on this...
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 10, 2015
  4. Kunal Biswas

    Kunal Biswas Member of the Year 2011 Moderator

    Joined:
    May 26, 2010
    Messages:
    27,577
    Likes Received:
    28,349
    Location:
    BHARAT, INDIA, HINDUSTHAN
    That is normal time for any +4 gen modern fighter development let be it any, Tejas would have been faster if their were no sanctions, also to put this the prototype only flew 10 years back in that case, Project in practice is 10 years old only ..

     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 10, 2015
  5. sgarg

    sgarg Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2014
    Messages:
    3,479
    Likes Received:
    961
    HAL's competence lies in license manufacturing.

    A grounds up fighter like Tejas has been outside HAL's comfort zone for obvious reasons.

    HAL has too many programs today. HAL suffers from a serious shortage of management bandwidth. The fact that HAL is struggling with IJT proves all is not right at HAL.

    It is a serious mistake to burden HAL with even more work when it has difficulty pulling what is has already.

    The Dhruv helicopter and its variants and LUH now give HAL almost a $1 billion per year sales opportunity. HAL also has FGFA and MTA in the pipeline.
    Add to this current Su-30 production, assembly and maintenance of various aircrafts etc. and you can see the situation at HAL.

    No other country takes this one company approach like India does. India has made a serious mistake in concentrating its aviation in a single company.
     
    AVERAGE INDIAN likes this.
  6. Kyubi

    Kyubi Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2013
    Messages:
    331
    Likes Received:
    247
    Location:
    Bangalore
    Indeed Kunal Bhai what you say is true but the authors claim about Tejas timeline I think is absurd he does not consider the several hurdles it had to face... Just have a look at the ADA website and see What all has gone in to developing the infrastructure.. A journalist might not understand but an engineer sure does
     
  7. Kunal Biswas

    Kunal Biswas Member of the Year 2011 Moderator

    Joined:
    May 26, 2010
    Messages:
    27,577
    Likes Received:
    28,349
    Location:
    BHARAT, INDIA, HINDUSTHAN
    Concerning fact is also this that in our Country, People are not educated much about defense, Their understanding limited to weapon ' specs ' and politics around arm bazaar ..

    Their are no or very less ' Professional ' Defense Journalist in India, Majority of them are ' Bikaou ' and lobbies take full advantage of both factors ..

     
    AVERAGE INDIAN, ersakthivel and Kyubi like this.
  8. Kyubi

    Kyubi Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2013
    Messages:
    331
    Likes Received:
    247
    Location:
    Bangalore
    Yes, HAL monopoly is evident, I personally think GOI should consider AVIC (Aviation Industry Corporation Of China) Model.. It has several subsidiaries like Chengdu aircraft industry group, shanghai aviation industrial company ,, and many more each have a different role to play ... For the fifth gen aircraft I believe both Chengdu and shanghai had participated for the contract.... I think this is how HAL can become competetive and also position itself in the global market.
     
    AVERAGE INDIAN likes this.

Share This Page