India and the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG)

Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,880
Likes
48,578
Country flag
cross posted

IDN-InDepthNews | Analysis That Matters

India Makes Headway in Indigenous Atomic Power Programme


NEW DELHI (IDN) - The inauguration of India's latest nuclear reprocessing plant by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh on January 7, 2010 emphasizes once again the country's commitment to developing a largely indigenous atomic power programme.

The facility at Tarapur in the West Indian state of Maharashtra will break down highly radioactive used nuclear fuel to extract uranium and plutonium for reuse in fast neutron reactors. It comes as a welcome addition to several reprocessing plants in India -- all operated by the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) -- at Tarapur, Trombay and Kalpakkam.

Small plants at each site were supplemented in 1998 by a new one of 100 tonnes per year at Kalpakkam, and this is now being extended so that it may handle carbide fuel from the Fast Breeder Test Reactor.

The new plant also has a capacity of 100 tonnes per year, and another entirely new facility is under construction at Kalpakkam.

BARC, named after Dr. Homi Bhabha, the country's pioneer in nuclear research, operates under the umbrella of the Government of India's Department of Atomic Energy.

"We have come a long way since the first reprocessing of spent fuel in India in 1964 at Trombay," said Prime Minister Singh at the inaugural ceremony attended by the country's senior nuclear scientists and engineers. "The recycling and optimal utilization of uranium is essential to meet our current and future energy security needs," he added.

Non-India sources confirm that India has a flourishing and largely indigenous nuclear power programme and expects to have 20,000 MWe (megawatt electricity) nuclear capacity on line by 2020 and 63,000 MWe by 2032. It aims to supply 25 percent of electricity from nuclear power by 2050.

"Because India is outside the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty due to its weapons program, it was for 34 years largely excluded from trade in nuclear plant or materials, which has hampered its development of civil nuclear energy until 2009," says the World Nuclear Association (WNA) in its latest dossier on 'nuclear power in India'.

It adds: Due to these trade bans and lack of indigenous uranium, India has uniquely been developing a nuclear fuel cycle to exploit its reserves of thorium. Now, foreign technology and fuel are expected to boost India's nuclear power plans considerably. All plants will have high indigenous engineering content.

In fact, India has a vision of becoming a world leader in nuclear technology due to its expertise in fast reactors and thorium fuel cycle.

The backdrop to the country's ambitious nuclear power programme, says the London-based WNA, is that electricity demand in India is increasing rapidly, and the 830 billion kilowatt hours produced in 2008 was three times the 1990 output, though it still represented only some 700 kWh per capita for the year. With huge transmission losses, this resulted in only 591 billion kWh consumption.

"Coal provides 68% of the electricity at present, but reserves are limited. Gas provides 8%, hydro 14%. The per capita electricity consumption figure is expected to double by 2020, with 6.3% annual growth, and reach 5000-6000 kWh by 2050," the dossier informs.

Atomic power supplied 15.8 billion kWh (2.5%) of India's electricity in 2007 from 3.7 GWe (of 110 GWe total) capacity. After a dip in 2008-2009 this is expected to increase steadily as imported uranium becomes available and new plants come on line.

The forecast for the year ending March 2010 was 22 billion kWh. In 2010-2011 24 billion kWh is expected. For 2011-2012, 32 billion kWh is now forecast.

Nuclear experts say that India had achieved some 300 reactor-years of operation by mid 2009. "India's fuel situation, with shortage of fossil fuels, is driving the nuclear investment for electricity, and 25% nuclear contribution is foreseen by 2050, when 1094 GWe of base-load capacity is expected to be required. Almost as much investment in the grid system as in power plants is necessary," says the WNA.

India committed almost US$ 9 billion in 2006 for power projects, including 9.35 GWe of new generating capacity, taking forward projects to 43.6 GWe and US$ 51 billion. In late 2009 the government said it was confident that 62 GWe of new capacity would be added in the 5-year plan to March 2012, and best efforts were being made to add 12.5 GWe on top of this.

But only 18 GWe had been achieved by the mid point of October 2009, when 152 GWe was on line. The government's five-year-year plan for 2012-2017 was targeting the addition of 100 GWe over the period. Three quarters of this would be coal- or lignite-fired, and only 3.4 GWe nuclear, including two imported 1000 MWe units at one site and two indigenous 700 MWe units at another.

The U.S. audit, tax and advisory services firm KPMG said in a report in 2007 that India needed to spend US$ 120-150 billion on power infrastructure over the next five years, including transmission and distribution (T&D). It said that T&D losses were some 30-40%, amounting to worth more than $6 billion per year.

The target since about 2004 has been for nuclear power to provide 20 GWe by 2020, but in 2007 the Prime Minister referred to this as "modest" and capable of being "doubled with the opening up of international cooperation."

However, the World Nuclear Association says, that even the 20 GWe target will require substantial uranium imports. Late in 2008 NPCIL -- the Nuclear Power Corporation of India, a public sector enterprise under the administrative control of the Department of Atomic Energy -- projected 22 GWe on line by 2015, and the government was talking about having 50 GWe of nuclear power operating by 2050.

Then in June 2009 NPCIL said it aimed for 60 GWe nuclear by 2032, including 40 GWe of PWR capacity and 7 GWe of new PHWR capacity, all fuelled by imported uranium. This target was reiterated late in 2010.

The Atomic Energy Commission however expects some 500 GWe nuclear on line by 2060, and has since speculated that the amount might be higher still: 600-700 GWe by 2050, providing half of all electricity.

NUCLEAR POWER DEVELOPMENT

These projections are grounded in the fact that nuclear power for civil use is well established in India. Civil nuclear strategy has been directed towards complete independence in the nuclear fuel cycle, necessary because it is excluded from the 1970 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty NPT due to it acquiring nuclear weapons capability after 1970.

Those five countries doing so before 1970 were accorded the status of Nuclear Weapons States under the NPT.

As a result, India's nuclear power programme has proceeded largely without fuel or technological assistance from other countries. Its power reactors to the mid 1990s had some of the world's lowest capacity factors, reflecting the technical difficulties of the country's isolation, but rose impressively from 60% in 1995 to 85% in 2001-2002. Then in 2008-10 the load factors dropped due to shortage of uranium fuel.

WNA says: India's nuclear energy self-sufficiency extended from uranium exploration and mining through fuel fabrication, heavy water production, reactor design and construction, to reprocessing and waste management.

The Atomic Energy Establishment was set up at Trombay, near Mumbai, in 1957 and renamed as Bhabha Atomic Research Centre ten years later. Plans for building the first Pressurised Heavy Water Reactor (PHWR) were finalised in 1964, and this prototype - Rajasthan-1, which had Canada's Douglas Point reactor as a reference unit, was built as a collaborative venture between Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd (AECL) and NPCIL. It started up in 1972 and was duplicated Subsequent indigenous PHWR development has been based on these units.
 

sukhish

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2009
Messages
1,321
Likes
312
what can india do since ENR tech restrictions have been put to place ?
 

sanjay

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
459
Likes
186
NSG Removes Nuclear Waiver for India

The Nuclear Suppliers Group has moved to end the special waiver given to India:

The Hindu : Front Page : NSG ends India's ‘clean' waiver


So basically, we've been screwed over. Manmohan has bent over backward for the Americans, and yet given us nothing. It now all looks like a ruse by the Americans just for the duration of their war in Afghanistan. But now that the war is over, it's back to same old discrimination.
 

anooj

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
18
Likes
1
this situation was expected and this vindicate left parties stand
 

pankaj nema

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2009
Messages
10,151
Likes
37,977
Country flag
There is a big misconception that India NEEDS enrichment and reprocessing technology

We have our technology

The only thing that we are looking at is new developments in reprocessing technology because we use reprocessed fuel in a big way

After the Fukushima disaster global Nuclear industry is facing recession

Indian market is very lucrative Nobody wants to loose it

This news about new NSG rule is no big deal .US state department has simultaneouly issued a statement that this new NSG rule will not affect India

US cannot stop India from getting reprocessing technologies from France and Russia

BTW India DOES not need enrichment technology because the fuel that we will buy for our power reactors is in ready to use condition
 
Last edited:

pankaj nema

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2009
Messages
10,151
Likes
37,977
Country flag
Our Nuclear power plants use only 5% enriched uranium which we do ourselves in Nuclear Fuels Complex , A DAE institution

Uranium enrichment technology ie 20 % enriched uranium ; which can be used for N weapon purposes ;is being sought to be denied to the Non NPT states through this new rule

Our N weapons are plutonium based .We dont need any technology for producing plutonium

Simultaneously But separately We have also been producing and storing enriched uranium for the reactors of our Nuclear submarines which we will need in future
 
Last edited:

pmaitra

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Messages
33,262
Likes
19,594
After so much investment, if India cannot generate the required power or enrich its own N-fuel, then it is a great loss. France, US and Russia will impress upon NSG not to cause trouble with N-fuel supplies. They have a lot of money to make out of big ticket deals with India.

If push comes to shove, India should simply say f*** NSG and detonate ten more nuclear devices and declare the tests successful and reactionary to exclusive NSG and discriminatory NPT. In fact, NSG tied down with NPT should be reason enough for India to declare them unfriendly, if not outright hostile. We might as well go ahead with the N-tests. We need to more tests to miniaturise our warheads anyway.

We will definitely have something to gain out of this bad situation.
 

StarShip Enterprise

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2010
Messages
91
Likes
27
this whole drama between USA and India started only because US wanted to thwart India away from doing any business with Iran for India's energy needs. this now leaves us back at square one. Iran is now not at favorable position to deal with right now considering their hawkish, present and immediate danger to Israel - our strategic friend in terms of defense/weapons technology and also considering our stand against Iran in UN resolutions.
we have to use Iran as a leverage against US and EU to get NSG's position back on track.
 

S.A.T.A

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2009
Messages
2,569
Likes
1,560
NSG guidelines don't apply to India since are not a member state of the NSG council.Our relation with members of the NSG, in matters related to civilian nuclear technology,is guided by the nuclear cooperation agreement,similar to the agreement we have with the US,that we have with them.So long as these states adhere to the agreement they have with us,we shouldn't be overtly concerned.
 
Last edited:

LurkerBaba

Super Mod
Joined
Jul 2, 2010
Messages
7,882
Likes
8,125
Country flag
Okay, so we may not get entry into the NSG and get screwed on ENR tech :confused:
 
Last edited:

StarShip Enterprise

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2010
Messages
91
Likes
27
NSG guidelines don't apply to India . true.
but it applies to every other member - with whom we are signing the agreements with - USA, France, Canada
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,880
Likes
48,578
Country flag
domain-b.com : N-deal hype exposed as NSG dumps India's ''clean'' exemption

N-deal hype exposed as NSG dumps India's ''clean'' exemption


New Delhi/Washington: The validity of the terms of the nuclear deal struck by India with the United States and other nations is now in doubt, with the Nuclear Suppliers Group, an international cartel, reneging on the 'clean' waiver provided to Delhi by withdrawing the right of its members to supply enrichment and reprocessing equipment and technology (ENR) to countries, such as India, who are non-signatories of the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty (NPT). Since non-signatories of the NPT are already barred by other provisions of the cartel's guidelines, an amendment adopted by the NSG on Friday effectively targets just India, to which it had earlier provided a ''clean'' waiver from all restrictions for trade in nuclear equipment and material.

The question now arises whether India remains bound by commitments it made to the United States and the international cartel to secure what the UPA's policy makers in Delhi had proudly claimed to be a ''clean'' waiver.

In a decision announced from Noordwijk, the Netherlands, the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG), an international nuclear suppliers cartel, said its member nations ''agreed to strengthen its guidelines on the transfer of sensitive enrichment and reprocessing technologies.'' Though the 46-nation grouping did not release details, the draft text makes it amply evident that the new resolution targets countries which are not signatories to the NPT and do not have full-scope safeguards agreement which allow international inspections of all their nuclear facilities.

Under their old set of guidelines, the NSG had full-scope safeguards for the supply of any nuclear equipment or material through the provisions of paragraph 4. An additional safeguard was ensured through paragraphs 6 and 7 of the guidelines, in which suppliers were asked to be cautious and ensure that no equipment or technology should be supplied that could be used to enrich uranium beyond 20 per cent.

On 6 September 2008, the NSG waived the full-scope safeguards requirement of paragraph 4 for India and expressly allowed ENR exports, subject to paragraphs 6 and 7. In sanctioning a ''clean'' waiver, the NSG said it was acting ''based on the commitments and actions'' on non-proliferation undertaken by India.

But Friday's resolution dumps the ''waiver'' by the simple expedient of adopting a new paragraph 6, which now specifies objective and subjective criteria a customer nation, such as India, must meet before an NSG member can sell ENR equipment to it.

The first requirement, under the amended guidelines, is membership of the NPT.


Since nuclear exports to Israel, Pakistan and North Korea, the other NPT non-signatories, are already prohibited by paragraph 4, the fresh amendments of paragraph 6 are expressly designed to target India, which had earlier received a ''clean'' exemption from these provisions.

As if to rub salt on wounds, the United States said Thursday it fully supported the "clean" NSG exception for India. "Nothing about the new enrichment and reprocessing (ENR) transfer restrictions agreed to by NSG members should be construed as detracting from the unique impact and importance of the US-India agreement or our commitment to full civil nuclear cooperation," said state department spokesperson Victoria Nuland.

The US said while it supports the new NSG guidelines, which have been agreed to unanimously, "The NSG's NPT references, including those in the ENR guidelines, in no way detract from the exception granted to India by NSG members in 2008 and in no way reflect upon India's non-proliferation record."

"These references reinforce the commitment of NSG members to prevent the transfer of items that could be used for weapons purposes, which is the mission of the regime itself and a basic non-proliferation principle shared by India."

The legitimacy of the much-hyped ''strategic partnership'' with the United States will once again come under scrutiny, even as the UPA regime in power at Delhi tries to wriggle out of yet another political log-jam of its own making.

The United States is the prime mover of the amended provisions adopted by the NSG plenary meet on Friday.

For the moment no comments are forthcoming from Delhi, which would be busy figuring out the nature of the spin it would like to impart to the latest fiasco.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top