India and Japan: A new alliance in Asia

[desicanuk]

And then China starts giving Assam secessionists and Naxalites big boy weapons...

With your well known reputation you have been probably doing it anyway without success except for your maoist lackeys!!That's why PLA prefers incursions by stealth and "accidental" border crossings.Just wait till jihadists from your ally get involved in East Turkestan.We have lots of patience.

 

[no smoking]

Except by your logic, then India should adopt a default air of skepticism towards investment from most foreign countries

Or maybe that's how it already is (c.f. walmart, enron, bofors, etc)

Relax, please!
This kind of "alliance" just some sweet words when 2 countries leaders meet!
To build up an alliance, both need to offer something which fits the other side. In this case, Japan need an one-way opening market to its product and strong military protection. while India need a one-way economic/techological aid with maximum market protection. They both need soemthing that other side cannot offer: Economically, India won't allow any foreign country to monopoly its market and Japan is always conservative on technology transfer; Militatrily, India need a foreign army to distract Chinese while Japan need a powerful navy to come to its aid.


To Japan, there is only one nation can help it, that is USA!
As I always said: with USA, Japan don't need India; without USA, India's aid is useless to Japan.

To India, it has no abilty and willing to give: if its army doesn't want to pour blood for the rocks on its border, how could you expect its navy to die for others' rocks thousands miles away?

 

[aerokan]

Relax, please!
This kind of "alliance" just some sweet words when 2 countries leaders meet!
To build up an alliance, both need to offer something which fits the other side. In this case, Japan need an one-way opening market to its product and strong military protection. while India need a one-way economic/techological aid with maximum market protection. They both need soemthing that other side cannot offer: Economically, India won't allow any foreign country to monopoly its market and Japan is always conservative on technology transfer; Militatrily, India need a foreign army to distract Chinese while Japan need a powerful navy to come to its aid.


To Japan, there is only one nation can help it, that is USA!
As I always said: with USA, Japan don't need India; without USA, India's aid is useless to Japan.

To India, it has no abilty and willing to give: if its army doesn't want to pour blood for the rocks on its border, how could you expect its navy to die for others' rocks thousands miles away?

The bolded part explains that you have no understanding of India even in the remotest sense. India is not something you can group with the rest of the block. Most of the times, we never make sense to the rest. And that's precisely why China is too paranoid about us despite our best intentions.

 

[Srinivas_K]

That's false - China has plenty, plenty more cards to play in South Asia, if it so desires.

Who do you think has been keeping more radical elements of Rawalpindi on a leash so far? Not America, that's for sure.

Explain those cards?

Tibet and Xinjiang will always be at the boil and the interests of CIA and India will coincide if Chinese do not behave properly.

 

[Ray]

If India decides to cast its lot with Japan, China may formalize its cooperation with Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Nepal.

The informal ties itself is as good as the formal ones.

Therefore, it will really make no difference.

However, if there comes a Govt with less of the dithering seen at present, China would get the suitable rebuff to all its hegemonic adventures, and I am not talking of any armed conflicts, lest you misunderstand.

 

[Ray]

That's false - China has plenty, plenty more cards to play in South Asia, if it so desires.

Who do you think has been keeping more radical elements of Rawalpindi on a leash so far? Not America, that's for sure.

China has already put her cards on the table when asked to 'show'!

Now, it is for the others to put their cards on the table and pull in all the winnings!

 

[no smoking]

The bolded part explains that you have no understanding of India even in the remotest sense. India is not something you can group with the rest of the block. Most of the times, we never make sense to the rest. And that's precisely why China is too paranoid about us despite our best intentions.

Your best intentions? Yes, "what we occupy is ours, what we claim is ours, no negotiation".
There is one thing you are right: you never make sense to others:
You put out your conditions which you know would never be accepted by other side. But you believe that other side will swallow it somehow.
You reject the other side's offer of diplomatic talking. And you still insist you are seeking a peaceful revolution.
You deploy your army behind enemy's line and you think that is not a provocation.
You order your amy to "throw chinese out" and then you blame Chinese started the war.

 

[aerokan]

Your best intentions? Yes, "what we occupy is ours, what we claim is ours, no negotiation".
There is one thing you are right: you never make sense to others:
You put out your conditions which you know would never be accepted by other side. But you believe that other side will swallow it somehow.
You reject the other side's offer of diplomatic talking. And you still insist you are seeking a peaceful revolution.
You deploy your army behind enemy's line and you think that is not a provocation.
You order your amy to "throw chinese out" and then you blame Chinese started the war.

It's not our motto dude.. It's Chinese patented.

"What we can occupy is ours.. What we can't we will nibble.. What is opposed is something because of the other country"

I don't need to explain it but China is the only one stupid enough to claim the entire sea to other countries coast lines just because "Asean Sea" is called "South China Sea" by many.

You put out your ridiculous conditions which the other side won't agree for sure and say that the other country is not coming to negotiations.
We are not the ones who shout to the world abt a 'peaceful rise' and send army and navy into other countries territories. It's China.

We didn't field our army behind enemy lines... It's you who sent your army well inside the disputed LAC far into the Indian territory and still had the guts to claim that we are the ones who are intruding.

Let me ask you one thing first.. Is there a disputed territory between India and China?

If there is a disputed territory, pls go and ask your Chinese govt to say that there is a disputed territory. If you think there is no disputed territory, then why are you negotiating b*tch?

Ans if you want to claim China's innocence, first produce the entire map of China you little piece of sh*t