- Joined
- Dec 24, 2015
- Messages
- 6,433
- Likes
- 7,047
Fine.Thanks India will achieve what it aims for......Definitely....
Just be aware of one problem : There is a black hole near India.... Time doesn't spent at same speed there....
Fine.Thanks India will achieve what it aims for......Definitely....
Thanks for the warning .... But not to worry we are in Good hands Now.... Modi Rules and our DM Mr Manohar Parrikar is even Better....Fine.
Just be aware of one problem : There is a black hole near India.... Time doesn't spent at same speed there....
He is French Bhai. Don't go by his flagThanks for the warning .... But not to worry we are in Good hands Now.... Modi Rules and our DM Mr Manohar Parrikar is even Better....
How is your BRITEXIT shaping out to be????
Note: We are both going off topic here :biggrin2::bounce: lets get back to the topic .....
Indeed !He is French Bhai. Don't go by his flag
"""""""MUMBAI: Navy chief Admiral Sunil Lanba today said India is indigenously building AIP-enabled submarines.It's possible.
The fact is that the indian AIP program status is not really known.
Today the Tejas is in service with IAF. Now what you are meaning by waiting a little longer is someting i can not understand?If it's like the Tejas story, you will have to wait a while.
Okay,,,, I didnt know that....He is French Bhai. Don't go by his flag
Ahaa French.... cool mate...Indeed !
I really don't know why my fleg is the union Jack (french flag in my personnal profile page)
I live 100km south of Paris.
I was just saying that between the LCA program lauch date and the entry in (limited) service, india spent two to three more times than the others. So I expect it will not be the case for your AIP.Today the Tejas is in service with IAF. Now what you are meaning by waiting a little longer is someting i can not understand?
Bonjour cher ami.Okay,,,, I didnt know that....
Ahaa French.... cool mate...
Bonjour....
No.In case, you are pointing towards ongoing developments wrt MK-1A and MK-2 then i should remind you few facts the Rafale went from F1 to F3, Eurofighter Trance 1-2-3, Gripen A,B,C,D,E, F-16 Block 30/40/52/70, F-18 to F/A-18 SH and why miss Mirage which started at 2000H to 2000-5 to 2000-9.
No Sir thats not true actually.I was just saying that between the LCA program lauch date and the entry in (limited) service, india spent two to three more times than the others. So I expect it will not be the case for your AIP.
@Rahul SinghNo.
I was just speaking about the actual Tejas (as Mirage 2000 H).
And some other members, on this forum and others, say Mk2 will never exists (but Mk1A yes).
You know bon plan people will treat you a lot differently here if they knew you were French that british flag in DP makes people jumpy and we certainly don't like those arrogant righteous Brits lecturing us about anything though I can understand the message in DP I think its a Rafael firing on a Brit??? Or something to that effect?Bonjour cher ami.
C'est un plaisir de vous écrire.
Hi Bro,You know bon plan people will treat you a lot differently here if they knew you were French that british flag in DP makes people jumpy and we certainly don't like those arrogant righteous Brits lecturing us about anything though I can understand the message in DP I think its a Rafael firing on a Brit??? Or something to that effect?
Anyways thanks for your input
It's not false.No Sir thats not true actually.
Lets take a Country which has already manufactured a Fighter aircraft.
USA: USA had a huge aeronautical structure and experience when it started the project of F-35 way back in 1996 and it took about 20 years to develop it...
Where as India which had no aeronautical structure and Experience took a decade more than that say 30 years.... though there are various factors like funds and sanctions but lets still believe it took us 30 years.
So I will say its not that easy to say that India took 2-3 times the time....
In 1980's also India was having a vision of making an aircraft 2020 worthy .... Given all the composite material and technology that went into Tejas,,,,,
The only complaint I would have is we were not able to succeed in terms of Kaveri which was again started because of the sanctions.....
But Now i think we might get our very own engine by the time Tejas Mk1 A (HAL) enters production say 2021....
british praising a french invention or any non english invention that has less chances than that of pigs flying they are very fickle hearted in general and the whole anglo media including the US UK australia and canada and NZ tries to undermine non english inventions or topics there i hardly any detailed discussion or coverage of non english weapon systems in english media for example i was really looking at various canadian blogs and forums for their views on rafale since they too are looking for jets the comments by both canadians and americans left really bad taste in my mouth they were all mocking the indians with typical superiority complex you know poor , toilet , aid blah blah and for french does it have a surrender button, incompetent , not as good as american tech , and they both dont know what they are doing they were all far too pedantic in my opinion i'll post some links and images if possible just didnt wanted to ruin the topic.Hi Bro,
I don't know what's wrong with my flag. Maybe a problem of fire wall or network....
But, for all the others, have you seen a british people with a Rafale as avatar ?
the only reason tejas was stalled and took so long apart from lack of infrastrucutre was because the primary customer was never really interested in buying that if fighter jets are pinnacle of aviation world then destroyers and ACs are of naval world you only have to see and its pragmatic approach towards indigenous programmes to see how IAF has at every block stalled and blocked the tejas now with a firm and pragmatic DM who has put his behind on AVM butt that they are ready to accept it i agree it is not ground breaking but it has evolved far from just a mig -21 replacement because believe it or not after spending billions on jet purchase it still will be the first indian jet with an AESA fire control radar.It's not false.
But F35 is a very amitious plane (too for me), specially because one of the three model is very different from the others (VSTOL F35B).
Tejas has nothing so special (it's just the truth. No offense). And as it is THE iconical Indian aerial program, We expected the efforts to be faster and more visible.
Kaveri was more risky. Specially because it's a variable flow engine, a very high edge tech. It was too ambitious for a first attempt. But I'm sure all is not lost.
an indigenous AESA radar ? or a Israeli's one?it still will be the first indian jet with an AESA fire control radar
it will be israeli modules with indian backend so kinda like JV it will be based on el/m 2052 but with much more T/R modules or better packing the backend developed for this will be finally integrated with UTTAM AESA for different platforms right now we do lack the tech to make high quality T/R module and more with compact packing but we pretty much set on processor / algorithms and back end.an indigenous AESA radar ? or a Israeli's one?
As I said F35 was not the first aircraft they built they had already manufactured F22 which is still treated even better than F35 ....It's not false.
But F35 is a very amitious plane (too for me), specially because one of the three model is very different from the others (VSTOL F35B).
Tejas has nothing so special (it's just the truth. No offense). And as it is THE iconical Indian aerial program, We expected the efforts to be faster and more visible.
Kaveri was more risky. Specially because it's a variable flow engine, a very high edge tech. It was too ambitious for a first attempt. But I'm sure all is not lost.
Actual Tejas, the MK-1 as an IOC version is already in service with IAF. The ongoing developments that you might be referring towards are just weaponisation-- gun, BVRAAM etc. Flight performance envelope is already expanded close to the maximum i.e +8 gs and -3.5g. In fact, if you look at the global standards the Tejas in its pre-FOC state is much more developed than its counterparts from rest of the world. I don't know how many fighter jets entered service with LGBs + LDP in its kitty from day-1?No.
I was just speaking about the actual Tejas (as Mirage 2000 H).
In the absence of clarity people chose to speak what they like to speak. Ask me and i would say i don't know for sure. But if you ask me, if there is a possibility? I would say, yes. Reasons are simple. MK-2 is a design with greater capability just like Mirage- 5 was to Mirage-3. And the naval MK-2 design is what Mirage-2000-9 is to Mirage-3. The difference is huge so are the advantages. Come the time with clarity the obvious will become visible.And some other members, on this forum and others, say Mk2 will never exists (but Mk1A yes).