What option do they have?Killing Mongols, Tajiks and Kazaks?
If they are with the occupying Hans, then what option do you think they should adopt?
They have indeed a right to stay there since they have lived for ages.What option do they have?
How about accepting these Mongols, Tajiks and Kazaks have the same right living in this area?
How about admitting this land is not the home for Uighur alone?
How about accepting these Mongols, Tajiks and Kazaks have the right of not choosing the side?
No, Ray, these Mongols, Tajiks and Kazaks were not with Hans from the beginning, they kept being neutral until Uighurs put them into target list.
That is very lovely answer! You just justify any CCP activity you condemned:They have indeed a right to stay there since they have lived for ages.
But if they connive, then the situation is different or so it appears.
cuz western media said so.Probably OT here, but why is Ramadam/Ramzan banned in China?
BBC didn't tell you this Imam was killed at the end of Ramadan.The original article from BBC states that Ramzam was banned n China, so there must be reason to the same. Maybe I can be pointed to a neutral source that idicules this opinion.
BBC didn't tell you this Imam was killed at the end of Ramadan.
You can trust BBC if you want...Please read the original article or let someone else answer my question
"But activists disputed this account and said that local Uighurs were protesting against a Chinese crackdown on the observance of Ramadan, which ended on Monday."
Source: BBC News - Imam of China's largest mosque killed in Xinjiang
That is where you Chinese Mainlanders go wrong in your logic and assessment because you are so enamoured in self.That is very lovely answer! You just justify any CCP activity you condemned:
These Uighur have indeed a right to enjoy their autonomy there. But if they decide to pursuit this autonomy by killing everyone else, then don't complain of being killed by everyone else.
When Uighur decide turning to violence, what option do others have?
Well, the land was belong to Oirat Mongols before The Zunghar genocide.That is where you Chinese Mainlanders go wrong in your logic and assessment because you are so enamoured in self.
Human Rights means everyone has the right to stay where one's family has inhabited for ages. Therefore, Tajiks etc cannot be ousted.
But if these people work negatively with what is seen to be an 'occupier' (Han) by those whose homeland it is, then these people who are collaborators if lessoned cannot be taken to be a violation of human rights, since the human rights of the majority, who are being swamped, are being violated.
The Yuezhi or Rouzhi (Chinese: 月æ°; pinyin: YuèzhÄ«) were an ancient Indo-European people were the settlers often identified with the Tókharoi (ΤοχάÏιοι) of Classical sources. They were originally settled in the arid grasslands of the eastern Tarim Basin area, in what is today Xinjiang and western Gansu, in China, before they migrated to Transoxiana, Bactria and then northern South Asia, where one branch of the Yuezhi founded the Kushan Empire.Well, the land was belong to Oirat Mongols before The Zunghar genocide.
Zunghar genocide - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Zunghar genocide was the mass extermination of the Zunghar people by the Qing dynasty of China. The Qing Manchu Qianlong Emperor ordered the extermination to punish the Zunghar leader Amursana's rebellion against Qing rule after the Qing first conquered the Zunghar Khanate with Amursana's support before he rebelled in 1755. The genocide was carried out mainly by Manchu Bannermen and Khalkha, who were part of the Qing force sent to crush the Zunghars. Uyghurs from Turfan like Emin Khoja who were vassals and allies of the Qing, helped supply Qing forces during their war against the Zunghars. After wiping out the native Zunghar population of Dzungaria, the Qing then resettled Han Chinese, Hui, Uyghur, and Xibe on state farms in Dzungaria along with Manchu Bannermen to repopulate the area.
The Oirats converted to Tibetan Buddhism around 1615. The Zunghars were a confederation of several Oirat tribes that emerged suddenly in the early 17th century. The Zunghar Khanate was the last great nomadic empire in Asia. In the 18th century, the Dzungars were annihilated by Qianlong Emperor in several campaigns. About 80% of the Zunghar population, or around 500,000 to 800,000 people, were killed during or after the Manchu conquest in 1755–1757.[2] Some scholars estimate that about 80% of the Zunghars population (600,000 or more) were destroyed by a combination of warfare and disease during the Qing conquest of Zunghar Khanate in 1755–1757.[3]
Yuezhi is ~1500 years too early ...The Yuezhi or Rouzhi (Chinese: 月æ°; pinyin: YuèzhÄ«) were an ancient Indo-European people were the settlers often identified with the Tókharoi (ΤοχάÏιοι) of Classical sources. They were originally settled in the arid grasslands of the eastern Tarim Basin area, in what is today Xinjiang and western Gansu, in China, before they migrated to Transoxiana, Bactria and then northern South Asia, where one branch of the Yuezhi founded the Kushan Empire.
The first known references to the Yuezhi are contained in the Yizhoushu, Guanzi and Tale of King Mu, Son of Heaven. The dates of the most common version of this book are disputed, however, and it may date to as late as the 1st century BCE. Unlike the neighbouring Xiongnu dynasty, who were also nomadic, the Yuezhi did not engage in conflict with the nearby Chinese states. Rather, the book described the Yuzhi 禺æ°, or Niuzhi 牛æ°, as a people from the northwest who supplied jade to the Chinese.
Yuezhi - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You can trust BBC if you want...
It has all the answers for you.
Your parents don't teach you manners?Yeah! I do, its better than chi-bots
We are talking of history.Yuezhi is ~1500 years too early ...
It belongs to the early history of XinJiang.
Then, they can claim for the whole Central Asia now(by your logic).The Uyghurs historically formed the largest population group in the Central Asian region.